Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 13, 2008, 11:58 AM   #1
Gemba
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
MBA 1.6GHz with SSD - who's gone this route??

Hi,

I'm looking at getting a 1.6GHz MBA with the SSD drive.

Despite all the price vs performance issues I am sold on the SSD (I want a drive that will not fail when travelling), so that is not up for debate on this post at least.

Really interested in any reasons for why I should / should not pony up the extra bucks for the 1.8GHz or whether 1.6 will be fine. Laptop will be used primarily for Office apps (I have to use Microsoft, and so far Office 2008 is slow on everything I've run it on), Mail, general Safari and Firefox browsing and an occasional bit of image processing.

Seems to me that the 1.6 will perform admirably. Anyone gone the 1.6 SSD route that have any words of wisdom?

Many thanks.
Gemba is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2008, 12:27 PM   #2
shahidhaque
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Helena, MT
I suppose this might give you added battery life because of the reduced power of the 1.6 processor + the SSD HD. Any thoughts?

Anyone tested this yet?
shahidhaque is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2008, 12:38 PM   #3
dal20402
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
I/o

I haven't seen or used a 1.6/SSD MBA, but I'd expect one to work great. In fact, I think that's probably the best-value MBA configuration.

Most computer users today (including you, judging by the apps you say you want to use) have more processor performance than they can ever use. When they experience slowdowns, the bottleneck is almost always the disk or the network. Getting the fastest disk available has always made a bigger difference to my subjective experience than getting a faster processor.

(That's why I have an original Core Duo MBP with a hot-rod 160GB 7200rpm disk... )

This is especially true with a machine with limited RAM, where there is always the possibility of swapping to disk. The MBA's 2GB is already limited for some users and will become inadequate for many more users in the next couple of years as running multiple OSes at once through virtualization becomes ever more common.
dal20402 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2008, 01:27 PM   #4
jjchando
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
It's probably the best possible way to go on this machine. The difference between the 1.6 and the 1.8 with a SSD is going to be so minimal that you wouldn't be able to tell def not worth the $300.
I returned mine because I just didn't need a new laptop right now, so I can't give you a very detailed analysis. Still kind of wished I kept it because it's so darn cool haha.
__________________
MacBook Pro 17" Unibody 2.93 GHz Core 2 Duo, 300GB 7200 rpm HD, Anti-Glare Screen
iPhone 3G White 16GB

www.justinchando.com
jjchando is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2008, 02:41 PM   #5
sirozha
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
I guess those who elected to pay $999 extra for an SSD don't mind a few hundred bucks for a faster CPU. If you are trying to save some money, go with the 1.8 MHz CPU and HDD. You will be able to upgrade to a bigger SSD within a year for much les than $999. I believe you will be able to get a 120 GB SSD for around $200 by the end of this year. If you choose a slower CPU, you won't be able to upgrade to a faster one so easily.
sirozha is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2008, 12:37 AM   #6
kkrull
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Disagree

I have no regrets about getting the 1.6 with the SSD

I never notice any CPU delays. I never hear a hard drive spin. And I get really fast random access times. My machine is cool and the battery lasts a really long time.

Plus I have destroyed a hard drive every other year for ten years. I bet this drive lasts until Apple Care is up and by then I will buy a SATA SSD. No way am I upgrading anything in this machine except the battery.
kkrull is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2008, 03:25 AM   #7
CaptainCaveMann
macrumors 68000
 
CaptainCaveMann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirozha View Post
I guess those who elected to pay $999 extra for an SSD don't mind a few hundred bucks for a faster CPU. If you are trying to save some money, go with the 1.8 MHz CPU and HDD. You will be able to upgrade to a bigger SSD within a year for much les than $999. I believe you will be able to get a 120 GB SSD for around $200 by the end of this year. If you choose a slower CPU, you won't be able to upgrade to a faster one so easily.
Man that would be awesome. But antech posted an article about swapping the hd's from hdd to ssd and they said the connectors are different, suggesting Apple is using custom connectors for the hdds. So beware. Upgrading my not prove to be so easy.

http://anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=3226&p=13
__________________
I give up caring. Apple disappoints me every Tuesday. Looks like I'm going to Alienware. At least their computers can glow red. -TantalizedMind
CaptainCaveMann is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2008, 03:28 AM   #8
phungy
macrumors 68020
 
phungy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FL/NY/TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by shahidhaque View Post
I suppose this might give you added battery life because of the reduced power of the 1.6 processor + the SSD HD. Any thoughts?

Anyone tested this yet?
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardw...d-review.ars/1

Makes no difference. Battery life is horrible @ 2.5 hours.
__________________
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ .
phungy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2008, 03:37 AM   #9
netdog
macrumors 603
 
netdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by phungy View Post
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardw...d-review.ars/1

Makes no difference. Battery life is horrible @ 2.5 hours.
These test are ridiculous. I am getting about 5 hours. 1.6/80.
__________________
We don't see the world as it is. We see it as we are. -Anais Nin
Classical Homeopath and Naturopathic Doctor in London
netdog is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2008, 03:39 AM   #10
netdog
macrumors 603
 
netdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by dal20402 View Post
Most computer users today (including you, judging by the apps you say you want to use) have more processor performance than they can ever use. When they experience slowdowns, the bottleneck is almost always the disk or the network. Getting the fastest disk available has always made a bigger difference to my subjective experience than getting a faster processor.
This isn't the case with the Air. The SSD very seldomly enhances any subjective experience of speed. I spent 30 minutes at least on each, playing with them and doing things that should have benefitted the SSD if anything. Sadly, there was little between them subjectively.
__________________
We don't see the world as it is. We see it as we are. -Anais Nin
Classical Homeopath and Naturopathic Doctor in London
netdog is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2008, 08:36 AM   #11
kkrull
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by netdog View Post
The SSD very seldomly enhances any subjective experience of speed...I spent 30 minutes at least on each, playing with them and doing things that should have benefitted the SSD if anything. Sadly, there was little between them subjectively.
I have spent several days now on the SSD and my experience is the opposite. Because I do a lot of multitasking and keep my drives mostly full the MBA is a lot faster than even my MBP - so much so that I am wiping my MBP and starting over after having it a year.
kkrull is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2008, 09:05 AM   #12
Cybergypsy
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Central Florida!
Quote:
Originally Posted by netdog View Post
These test are ridiculous. I am getting about 5 hours. 1.6/80.
3.5 to 4.5 here HHd
Cybergypsy is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MP/ MBP/ MBA speed comparisons with SSDs barmann Mac Pro 5 Dec 5, 2010 08:03 PM
Is purchasing this MBA 1.6GHz 2GB/120GB a good deal? eljay MacBook Air 3 Jun 27, 2009 09:09 PM
MBA rev: A 64gb SSD faster than MBA:rev:B 1,6ghz with 120gb HD King t. MacBook Air 13 Apr 25, 2009 07:22 PM
worth trading unibody MB 2,4 ghz for MBA rev:B 1,6ghz with 128gb SSD? King t. MacBook 6 Mar 30, 2009 01:05 PM
Intel 128GB SSD - who's gonna put one in their MBA? macanudo MacBook Air 10 Mar 11, 2008 09:00 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC