|Oct 26, 2003, 10:04 PM||#4|
this seems really strange. everyone with old macs has said panther is much better.
The system is 10.2.6 I wonder if that makes a difference.
Does anyone else have any results? I will after tomorrow
|Oct 26, 2003, 10:30 PM||#5|
I will bet a lot of this has to do with "only" 384MB RAM. XBench is very erratic with systems that have less than 512MB RAM. I think a lot of this has to do with how the swap file is used...
|Oct 27, 2003, 04:58 PM||#6|
Wow, such varying results...
I hoped more consistent...
There is a little Steve in all of us!
-->Folding is Fighting Against Disease and help MacRumors. Join Today!<--
Props to --> Shadowfax For Making My Avatar!
IM Me On AIM Already!
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Need Help Upgrading From 10.2.3 To 10.3||lostangelent||Mac Pro||2||Jul 28, 2009 05:33 AM|
|Upgrade from 10.2.1 to 10.3||ria||Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther) Discussion||2||Mar 7, 2005 09:13 AM|
|OS X 10.2.8 vs 10.3 ?||absurdio||Mac Applications and Mac App Store||9||Feb 10, 2004 10:20 PM|
|I've gone back to Mac OS X 10.2.6 from 10.2.8 - has anyone else done this and why?||wrldwzrd89||Mac Applications and Mac App Store||18||Oct 5, 2003 11:17 PM|
|XBench of OS X 10.2.6 vs. Panther 7B21 on a 600MHz iMac.||MacBytes||MacBytes.com News Discussion||5||Aug 1, 2003 04:04 PM|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.