Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:43 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Intel Nehalem Processor Details Leaked



DailyTech provides screenshots from Intel slides detailing their upcoming Dunnington and Nehalem architectures.

First, the slides detail Dunnington, a 45nm six-core (three dual-cores) Xeon processor and successor to Tigerton. The Tigerton procesors were launched in September of 2007 and are aimed at very high end servers. Apple has not yet adopted these processors in either its Mac Pro or Xserve line.

More interesting are details of Intel's Nehalem processors which will be the successor to Penryn. While Nehalem is also a 45nm, SSE4, quad-core chip, it will introduce a number of other new technologies. In Nehalem, Intel will replace the front-side bus model with "QuickPath Interconnect" (similar to Hypertransport), add on-die memory controllers, and tri-channel DDR3. All these changes will reportedly increase the available bandwidth to the processor, allowing it to interact with the computer at faster speeds.



Longer is faster, X5482 is Harpertown processor found in Mac Pro

Based on early estimates, the Nehalem processor is expected to benchmark 144-203% faster than existing Harpertown Xeon processors (X5482).
Quote:
The Nehalem processor more than doubles the floating point performance of its current Penryn-family processors. Ou adds, "We’ll most likely know by the end of this year what the actual scores are, but I doubt they will be more than 5% to 10% off from these estimated projections."
The first Nehalem processors are not expected to be launched until Q4 2008.

Article Link
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:45 PM   #2
powermac_daddy
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Philadelphia & Northern California
I love this
powermac_daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:46 PM   #3
7even
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Wow. Maybe I'll actually upgrade my desktop when those come out.
7even is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:47 PM   #4
macintel4me
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Wow! That's first the first MAJOR performance gain and not just performance/watt gain have seen from Intel in awhile. Cheers!!
__________________
My iPhone 3.0 games:Mancala: FS5, Tic-Tac-Touch
macintel4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:49 PM   #5
MacsRgr8
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Wow.... gr8!

Interesting thing about Intel and its roadmap.... far more "educated guessing" about future Macs.

OTOH...
Boring thing about Intel and its roadmap.... far more "educated guessing" about future Macs than rumors and speculation.
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:51 PM   #6
killmoms
macrumors 68040
 
killmoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Send a message via AIM to killmoms Send a message via Yahoo to killmoms
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacsRgr8 View Post
Wow.... gr8!

Interesting thing about Intel and its roadmap.... far more "educated guessing" about future Macs.

OTOH...
Boring thing about Intel and its roadmap.... far more "educated guessing" about future Macs than rumors and speculation.
To be fair, it means a lot less "Motorola/IBM processor divination" threads (will we ever get a faster chip?!) and a lot more "When the hell are we getting the new Intel chips in updated Macs OMGOMGOMG?!" threads.

You decide which is better.
__________________
killmoms.com - Well, don't really.
Goodbye Velocity and Yaseko, say hello to...
Henrietta: 15" MacBook Pro, 2.33GHz C2D, 2GB RAM
Kyoko: 8GB iPhone
killmoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:51 PM   #7
MacsRgr8
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
The first Nehalem processors are not expected to be launched until Q4 2008.
WWDC '09....
Intro of these babies in the Mac Pro, if it also gets a facelift.
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:52 PM   #8
zapp
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Caribou,ME
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacsRgr8 View Post
WWDC '09....
Intro of these babies in the Mac Pro, if it also gets a facelift.
And I just bought my first desktop a mac pro 2.8 octo
__________________
Mac Pro 2.8 GHz Octo, 10 GB RAM, 2.3 TB storage: iPhone 3G 16GB
zapp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:52 PM   #9
JonasLondon
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London
Oh well, still getting my Mac Pro in a few weeks :-)

8-cores w 8 GB RAM and 512 MB Graphics card just got to be fast enough for a while dammit. :-)
JonasLondon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:53 PM   #10
MacsRgr8
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by killmoms View Post
To be fair, it means a lot less "Motorola/IBM processor divination" threads (will we ever get a faster chip?!) and a lot more "When the hell are we getting the new Intel chips in updated Macs OMGOMGOMG?!" threads.

You decide which is better.
Yep. Or will we ever get the G* {censored} in a PowerBook...? (sorry)

Less fun, but far better. It is much easier this way to plan ahead.
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:53 PM   #11
Cromulent
macrumors 68040
 
Cromulent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The British Empire
I'll be looking forward to these coming out that is for sure .
__________________
Neural Advance - Mac OS X, UNIX and Windows Development
Extreme Metal Reviews
MP 4x 2.66Ghz Xeons / 2GB RAM / 250GB + 500GB + 750GB + 1TB HDDs / Nvidia 8800GT 512MB
Cromulent is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:54 PM   #12
JonasLondon
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapp View Post
And I just bought my first desktop a mac pro 2.8 octo
Congratulations, you'll have a lot of fun with it until this new beast becomes available and you can always switch just when the new one comes out.

I've got the same machine on order. It will be a blazing machine compared to my Dual 1.8 GHz PowerMac, that's a safe bet!
JonasLondon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:55 PM   #13
MacsRgr8
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapp View Post
And I just bought my first desktop a mac pro 2.8 octo
I just upgraded my Quad G5 to the Octo 2.8 with GeForce 8800 GT.
Don't worry, this Mac will stay the fastest Mac for at least 12 months (maybe even to summer '09), judging past upgrades...
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:55 PM   #14
TMay
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Carson City, NV
Not explicitly stated, but am I to assume that both Dunningham and Nethalem support multiprocessor configurations?
TMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:57 PM   #15
Cromulent
macrumors 68040
 
Cromulent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The British Empire
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMay View Post
Not explicitly stated, but am I to assume that both Dunningham and Nethalem support multiprocessor configurations?
Yes. It was explicitly stated as they said they were the successor to already existing multiprocessor CPUs.
__________________
Neural Advance - Mac OS X, UNIX and Windows Development
Extreme Metal Reviews
MP 4x 2.66Ghz Xeons / 2GB RAM / 250GB + 500GB + 750GB + 1TB HDDs / Nvidia 8800GT 512MB
Cromulent is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:58 PM   #16
twoodcc
macrumors 603
 
twoodcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Right side of wrong
Send a message via AIM to twoodcc Send a message via MSN to twoodcc
wow. now that's something to look forward to!
__________________
tville pump
Smarter than the average bear
twoodcc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 03:58 PM   #17
zdobson
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapp View Post
And I just bought my first desktop a mac pro 2.8 octo
I wouldn't worry too much. Seems like they won't be available until mid '09.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but won't it take some time for software to be available to make full use of the new architecture's capabilities? I mean, quad core chips have been around about a year (?) and not all pro software (i.e. Photoshop) makes use of all cores yet.
zdobson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 04:02 PM   #18
MacsRgr8
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by zdobson View Post
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but won't it take some time for software to be available to make full use of the new architecture's capabilities? I mean, quad core chips have been around about a year (?) and not all pro software (i.e. Photoshop) makes use of all cores yet.
I depends how you use your computer.
Sometimes you use batches of multiple Photoshop actions which can use a couple of Cores at a time.

Simple (non-PS) example:
Take one QuickTime movie. Convert it to iPhone format: you will notice 2 Cores in use.
Now start a second QuickTime movie and do the same thing at the same time: Two Cores are used twice, i.e. 4 Cores used at once... and so on.

Or you can have one app use 4 Cores, while another app uses 2 Cores, and you still can iChat too.

EDIT:

Example of CPU time and CPU monitor when converting 2 QuickTime movies:
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Picture 1.png
Views:	370
Size:	52.6 KB
ID:	104918  
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.

Last edited by MacsRgr8 : Feb 25, 2008 at 04:12 PM.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 04:03 PM   #19
ksz
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapp View Post
And I just bought my first desktop a mac pro 2.8 octo
Me too, and I'm more than happy with it. Definitely not enlisting in the Wait for Eternity, er, oops, I mean Nehalem camp.
ksz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 04:07 PM   #20
sblasl
macrumors 6502a
 
sblasl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Heber Springs, AR
Glad I sat out the most recent "speed bump" upgrade to the Mac Pro. This Nehalem upgrade will be worthy of the wait. It will also have a significant negative impact on the resale value on the current Mac Pros when the Nehalem Mac Pros are released.
__________________
Pardon Multimedia - please give MM another chance!
sblasl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 04:10 PM   #21
Macmaniac
macrumors 68040
 
Macmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: A tiny spec in the "Garden State", 1 square mile in area, somewhere on the outskirts of town by the railroad tracks
Que the I am waiting for the Nehalem processor threads..... oh wait... we already have one...
__________________
The customer is NOT always right
Macmaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 04:12 PM   #22
RHD
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Wow!
That's amazing!
I love technology!
__________________
TiBook G4 15" 1 GHz and 17", 2.6 ghz MBP with State Of The Art Last Year but now stone dead nVidea card. Otherwise now known as the Drinks Tray. RIP MacBook Pro and may Nvidia go broke.
RHD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 04:19 PM   #23
abiyng87
macrumors Demi-Goddess
 
abiyng87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Send a message via AIM to abiyng87
As a dorky tech student with a dorky tech student fiance, we are both giddy as school girls over Nehalem.
__________________
Abbie
Twitter Facebook MRoogle
Don't go messing up my view of the world with your facts.
abiyng87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 04:22 PM   #24
cohibadad
macrumors 6502a
 
cohibadad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
Based on early estimates, the Nehalem processor is expected to benchmark 144-203% faster than existing Harpertown Xeon processors (X5482).
I think this should read 44-103% faster or benchmark at 144-203% of X5482. The chart does not show 144-203% faster.
cohibadad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2008, 04:23 PM   #25
kornyboy
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN (USA)
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/4A93 Safari/419.3)

This will make for a nice Mac Pro!
__________________
Stuff
kornyboy is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC