Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:23 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
MacBook and MacBook Pro: Penryn, Battery Life, Updates Sooner than Later?



Apple released new MacBooks and MacBook Pros today which carry the new 45nm Penryn processors, upgrading the laptops from the older 65nm Merom processors. The jump from Merom to Penryn is not a dramatic one as previous benchmarks demonstrate.

Penryn Advantages

Overall, the high end Penryn's may have marginal improvements in performance due to higher L2 cache, though the low-end Penryns (2.1GHz and 2.4GHz) actually have less (3MB vs 4MB) of L2 cache vs their Merom counterparts. Whether this results in any real world difference is unclear. Early benchmarks of the new Penryn 2.4GHz MacBook Pro reveals a comparable GeekBench score (3086) to the older Merom 2.4GHz MacBook Pro (3094).

One new feature all Penryn processors share is the SSE4 instruction set. Similar to the PowerPC's Altivec instruction set, SSE4 can provide dramatic speed increases (40% faster) for applications specifically written for them.

Battery Life

There's been some discussion about the fact that Apple's battery ratings for the new MacBooks and MacBook Pros are significantly less than previously published ratings. The new ratings are listed below with old ratings in parenthesis:

MacBook: 4.5hrs (6hrs)
15" MacBook Pro: 5hrs (5hrs)
17" MacBook Pro 4.5hrs (5.75hrs)

Apple PR clarified today, however, that this is simply due to a difference in reporting the numbers, and the new Penryn-based MacBooks and MacBook Pros' battery life has actually improved -- which would be expected with the more power efficient processors:
Quote:
Anuj went on to explain that Apple has always done three separate battery tests when coming up with this metric—a DVD playback test, a wireless productivity test, and a "highway test," which got the best battery life and Apple used to advertise. However, the highway test is "hard to reproduce, and people got confused" he said, which is why Apple ditched it and started going with wireless productivity instead. "The wireless productivity test is the closest to normal usage, right in the middle of the road with WiFi, text editing, sending e-mail, etc." Anuj said.
Other Notes

- The new MacBook Pros have a Multitouch trackpad, but the MacBook does not.
- The Apple Remote control is no longer included, and must be purchased separately ($19).
- Teardown photos of the new MacBook Pro.
- BestBuy's inventory system incorrectly reported the MacBook part numbers as MacBook Pros, leading to some confusion about the planned updates. For future reference, BestBuy may be fed part numbers ahead of time, but has no actual knowledge of specs or price points, and clearly used placeholder information in this case.

Why Now?

The biggest question is why Apple bothered speed bumping the MacBooks which were not yet due for revision. According to our sources, Apple was forced by Intel into upgrading the MacBooks at this time. Intel is aggressively phasing out the older generation 65nm Merom chips over the coming months. As a result, Apple needed to upgrade the MacBooks in the interim to maintain a proper supply. One could speculate that, consequently, the next MacBook refreshes may occur mid-year, ahead of their expected product cycle.



Article Link

Last edited by arn : Feb 27, 2008 at 12:46 AM.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:24 PM   #2
kavika411
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alabama
Good analysis.
kavika411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:28 PM   #3
shadowfax
macrumors Demi-God
 
shadowfax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Send a message via AIM to shadowfax
Most exciting news: Intel is lighting a fire under Apple's butt to keep their darn product line up to date. Love it!
__________________
iMac 3.06 GHz | 4GB RAM | 500 GB ::: Unibody MacBook 2.4 GHz | 4GB RAM| 250GB
80 GB Video iPod ::: 16 GB iPhone 3G
shadowfax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:29 PM   #4
cohibadad
macrumors 6502a
 
cohibadad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Big news day. Now we need SSE4 utilization!
cohibadad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:29 PM   #5
shoulin333
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: California
wonder if this means the MBA will be upgraded soon also... i hope not bah
__________________
15" uMBP
shoulin333 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 09:51 PM   #6
LostPacket
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada, eh
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoulin333 View Post
wonder if this means the MBA will be upgraded soon also... i hope not bah
Probably not. It's using the new die that Intel is just starting to market to other manufacturers. That chip is just starting it's life cycle.

The biggest news I can see is the lack of new multi touch in the MBs. It really differentiates it from the MBPs. With the MBP controller, new gestures are just a software update away. Not so with the MBs. Maybe they did this to make up for the jump in MB processor power?
LostPacket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:29 PM   #7
theddie
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
I thought all the mbps had the multi-touch?
__________________
For those about to rock! Buy a mac!
PowerBook G4 15", 1.67 GHz
8 gig iPhone
30 gig 5th gen iPod, black
with a new MBP!
theddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:30 PM   #8
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
Quote:
Originally Posted by theddie View Post
I thought all the mbps had the multi-touch?
yep. that was a mistype. All MacBook Pros have multitouch. MacBooks do not. I corrected the article

arn
arn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 09:00 PM   #9
ZorPrime
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Behold to those who Doubt...

Arn was right... It is Tuesday, he said there would be, and there have been MB & MBP updates.
__________________
*17" 1.67GHz PPC real old PowerBook w/ 2gig DDR2 SDRAM, DL DVD, 100 7200rpm HDD* Time to upgrade to 17" MBP.
"Dubito ergo cogito"
ZorPrime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:31 PM   #10
skwoytek
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post

One could speculate that, consequently, the next MacBook refreshes may occur mid-year, ahead of their expected product cycle.
I'm more worried about the next refresh of MBPs.

My ADC discount expires in September. So do I buy the latest MBP fresh on release, today? Or, do I hold out until September for one more refresh, with the possibility of time running out and then using my discount to buy a six-month old MBP.
skwoytek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 10:28 PM   #11
akadmon
macrumors 65816
 
akadmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Quote:
Originally Posted by skwoytek View Post
I'm more worried about the next refresh of MBPs.

My ADC discount expires in September. So do I buy the latest MBP fresh on release, today? Or, do I hold out until September for one more refresh, with the possibility of time running out and then using my discount to buy a six-month old MBP.
Buy now. Apple is going to milk this release for all it's worth, that is to say they'll wait until most kids wanting to buy a MBP will crack under pressure in September. You'll see the update no sooner than October, after the iPod deal is over.
__________________
Mac Pro Quad 2.66Ghz Xeon w/ ATI 4870 (Apple)+Nvidia 7300GT, 12G RAM, 4 TB int./2 TB ext., Dell 2407WFP, 16 GB IPhone 3G
akadmon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 10:34 PM   #12
dante@sisna.com
macrumors 6502a
 
dante@sisna.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Send a message via Skype™ to dante@sisna.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by akadmon View Post
Buy now. Apple is going to milk this release for all it's worth, that is to say they'll wait until most kids wanting to buy a MBP will crack under pressure in September. You'll see the update no sooner than October, after the iPod deal is over.
Agree -- I have come to know you as one of the wise ones who hang out here.
dante@sisna.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 11:03 PM   #13
akadmon
macrumors 65816
 
akadmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Quote:
Originally Posted by dante@sisna.com View Post
Agree -- I have come to know you as one of the wise ones who hang out here.
Thanks. I'm just applying the rules of common sense and using what I've learned from recent history. I predict I will be wrong one of these days
__________________
Mac Pro Quad 2.66Ghz Xeon w/ ATI 4870 (Apple)+Nvidia 7300GT, 12G RAM, 4 TB int./2 TB ext., Dell 2407WFP, 16 GB IPhone 3G
akadmon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2008, 07:59 AM   #14
JCT
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by akadmon View Post
Buy now. Apple is going to milk this release for all it's worth, that is to say they'll wait until most kids wanting to buy a MBP will crack under pressure in September. You'll see the update no sooner than October, after the iPod deal is over.
Strongly agree-- the other issue is waiting and then going for a Rev A.

I currently have a Rev A MBP (2.16 GHz/CD/7200 HDD/2 GB RAM) -- it is probably my best computer purchase in my 20 years of buying machines, but those first few months were a bit rough (logic board replaced, etc). The machine runs flawlessly, but I'm using more PS3 and Aperture of late and more RAM would really help.

I could certainly hold out a bit more, but I think that any major redesign is not going to be as soon as people think and may represent a Rev A -- not sure I want to go down that road again so soon. It's actually the reason I held off on a MBA for work. Not to mention the fact that I may not *like* the redesign .

So I think I will try to sell my current one and either buy the 2.5 GHz or a late refurb (the prices are great) --- I still like the current design, this is a late rev machine and should be stable as a rock AND with 4 GB of RAM it should be a real improvement over my current one.

I do hate the effort of selling laptops though....

JT
JCT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2008, 01:14 AM   #15
himansk
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by skwoytek View Post
I'm more worried about the next refresh of MBPs.

My ADC discount expires in September. So do I buy the latest MBP fresh on release, today? Or, do I hold out until September for one more refresh, with the possibility of time running out and then using my discount to buy a six-month old MBP.
I am on a similar boat, my subscription ends in oct, I plan to wait though, montevina is due mid 2008 so I hope apple will get the updated mbp soon after since its around time of back to school promos. Thats my educated guess...
__________________
MacbookPro Unibody 2.53GHz, 4GB DDR3 1067MHz, 9600M 512MB, 320GB 7200RPM
Time Capsule 500GB,WD MyBook 1TB,Lacie 1TB
iPhone3G 16GB
MacbookC2D Black
himansk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:31 PM   #16
WHM
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South
Send a message via Yahoo to WHM
Battery

After charging mine for less than an hour it is showing 4:30 battery life. My 3 year old PowerBook G4 never got beyond 3 hours so far I AM A HAPPY CAMPER.
__________________
15" 2.6GHz 4G@7200 HH
23" Cinema HD Display
iMac 2 Ghz Core 2 Duo 2 gb Ram
iPhone 16 3G
30 gb iPod Classic

Last edited by arn : Feb 26, 2008 at 08:34 PM. Reason: removed large quote
WHM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:36 PM   #17
TheSpecialist
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Netherlands, Europe
Send a message via MSN to TheSpecialist
Interesting that Apple is changing so much, even more appealing to me is that they did at least 1 thing every tuesday...!!!

Also, the new MBP doesn't have the Apple logo on the command key anymore, it now says command or cmd.
TheSpecialist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 09:33 PM   #18
mrcrapperson
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSpecialist View Post
Interesting that Apple is changing so much, even more appealing to me is that they did at least 1 thing every tuesday...!!!

Also, the new MBP doesn't have the Apple logo on the command key anymore, it now says command or cmd.
hm.. about time

I'll miss the old apple key, but it was kind of a pain to have to describe it when doing phone support.
mrcrapperson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 10:24 PM   #19
tirerim
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrcrapperson View Post
hm.. about time

I'll miss the old apple key, but it was kind of a pain to have to describe it when doing phone support.
Huh? It's the key with the apple symbol on it; doesn't seem that hard to describe to me. It's only hard if you call it "command" rather than "apple". I may be betraying my childhood spent on Apple ][e's, though. I'll miss the old three-fingered salute being control-apple-reset... not that I've had to use it much lately. :-)
tirerim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2008, 08:54 AM   #20
jbh001
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by tirerim View Post
Huh? It's the key with the apple symbol on it; doesn't seem that hard to describe to me.
You've obviously never worked in customer service.

My brother finally got over it when he pictured that every person on the other end of the call was really Homer Simpson. Then he was finally explain things to them (or at least not get as frustrated).
jbh001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2008, 12:29 AM   #21
ShiggyMiyamoto
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Just outside Boston, MA.
Send a message via AIM to ShiggyMiyamoto Send a message via MSN to ShiggyMiyamoto Send a message via Skype™ to ShiggyMiyamoto
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSpecialist View Post
Interesting that Apple is changing so much, even more appealing to me is that they did at least 1 thing every tuesday...!!!

Also, the new MBP doesn't have the Apple logo on the command key anymore, it now says command or cmd.
I have a Santa Rosa (late Merom) MacBook, and I don't have the symbol either. I'm a Mac veteran so I don't need it, but I can see how come people have grown to rely on it...
__________________
MacBook "Santa Rosa" 2.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
4 GB RAM | 500 GB HDD | Intel GMA X3100
Mac OS X 10.6.2 | No Secondary OS Installed ATM...
ShiggyMiyamoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2008, 07:59 AM   #22
j26
macrumors 65816
 
j26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paddyland
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSpecialist View Post
Interesting that Apple is changing so much, even more appealing to me is that they did at least 1 thing every tuesday...!!!

Also, the new MBP doesn't have the Apple logo on the command key anymore, it now says command or cmd.
That's a deal breaker for my daughter (aged 2 1/2). Sometimes she sits beside me when I'm studying and says "Press de Apple one, Daddy"
__________________
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
j26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:38 PM   #23
d_and_n5000
macrumors 6502a
 
d_and_n5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Land of the Peppers
The only thing I have to say is I hope that Apple makes it very well known that they are using a new formula for their battery tests. I'd imagine that Joe Consumer who did a decent amount of research will take one look at the new MacBook battery test, say "WTF! Battery life dropped an hour and a half! What's Apple doing? They need to beef it up, I'm not getting this for that that much less battery life!" Lost sale. Not good.
__________________
34 days until I get my license.
d_and_n5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 09:16 PM   #24
diamond.g
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Quote:
Originally Posted by d_and_n5000 View Post
The only thing I have to say is I hope that Apple makes it very well known that they are using a new formula for their battery tests. I'd imagine that Joe Consumer who did a decent amount of research will take one look at the new MacBook battery test, say "WTF! Battery life dropped an hour and a half! What's Apple doing? They need to beef it up, I'm not getting this for that that much less battery life!" Lost sale. Not good.
They have Wireless Productivity under the numbers. Just like they do for the Macbook Air. Shouldn't be too difficult to figure out.
__________________
The whole earth should be like Hawaii (weather wise)
diamond.g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2008, 08:44 PM   #25
Darkroom
macrumors 68000
 
Darkroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montréal, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post

Why Now?

The biggest question is why Apple bothered speed bumping the MacBooks which were not yet due for revision. According to our sources, Apple was forced by Intel into upgrading the MacBooks at this time. Intel is aggressively phasing out the older generation 65nm Merom chips over the coming months. As a result, Apple needed to upgrade the MacBooks in the interim to maintain a proper supply. One could speculate that, consequently, the next MacBook refreshes may occur mid-year, ahead of their expected product cycle.
Article Link
could one also speculate that, consequently, the new iMac revision is next week?
__________________
iPhone OS Apps: Film Light, SizeMe.
Darkroom is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC