|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
DDR2 800 in penryn Macbook Pros?
I was just wondering if the new macbook pro's will take DDR800 ram? Or does it max out at 667 still?
|
|
|
|
| wolfattack |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by wolfattack |
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
|
The chipset is limited to DDR2-667. DDR2-800 RAM should work, but it won't run faster.
__________________
MBP | 15" matte | 2.5GHz Penryn/Crestline | 2GB | 200GB 7200 | OS X 10.5.8 | XP Pro SP3 | Win7 x64 RC iPod | 4G Monochrome | 40GB
Last edited by valvehead : Mar 3, 2008 at 11:01 PM. Reason: mistake |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Thread Starter
macrumors member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
cool, thanks for the help
|
|
|
|
| wolfattack |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by wolfattack |
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln, NE
|
DDR2 800 worked in previous revision MBPs just fine. So, that's what I bought for my Penryn. For whatever reason, it does NOT work in Penryn MBP. Be warned!!! (it's not just bad ram, others have had this issue)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
It didn't work for me either. Returning my PC2 6400 sticks tomorrow
|
|
|
|
| physicistjedi |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by physicistjedi |
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
|
Mods, we really need a MacBook Pro RAM sticky or something.
EDIT: Yeah, nevermind, I see it at the top.
__________________
The Un-Funny Truth About Scientology (Warning: Graphic images) MacBook Pro 15.4"/2.5 GHz/250GB/4GB RAM iMac G4 17"/800 Mhz/80GB/512GB RAM |
|
|
|
| Stridder44 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Stridder44 |
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Some of the info on this thread is incorrect.
Fact: DDR2 800mhz RAM WILL work in a DDR2 667mhz slot JUST FINE. They are pin compatible. The only difference is that the DDR2 800 RAM is tested and rated for a higher speed. The RAM speed in a computer is determined by the motherboard chipset though, not the RAM. So running it at 667mhz is perfectly fine. (i.e. driving a car rated for 70mph at 60mph is fine. But if your car is only tested to go 70mph, best not run it at 80!) More Important Fact: There are many different RAM settings such as CAS latency, timing delays, etc that are also tested and spec'd, but most retailers don't advertise that stuff unless you look closely and dig for it. And even if you find it, Apple doesn't really publicly state what memory specs are needed for their laptops in this regard as they'd rather just sell you the memory themselves. Most Important Fact: Apple computers are historically very finicky about which memory they like and which they don't. If you go to an online store with a good reputation in the mac community, you might pay a bit more than if you went to the cheapest place on pricewatch/pricegrabber/ebay, but you usually get some kind of guarantee. This is the best way, imho, to protect yourself and get good memory. Hope that advice is useful for some out there! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Plenty of people have DDR2-800 memory working fine. Anytime you add memory I would highly recommend running a real memory diagnostic. Something like memtest86 which is included on the Ultimate Boot CD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: On the Left Coast - Victoria BC Canada
|
The problem is that there is no advantage at all to installing DDR2-800, AND if the SPDs are not written correctly on the RAM, it won't downshift to 667 properly, so there will be problems. We are getting reports that 800s that work in the SR MBP do not work in the Penryn. The SPD setings control the RAM module's identity, and what speeds, voltages and latencies it will work at.
In the past, the problem has come up because a new model (or new firmware rev) enforces the standards more strictly, and RAM that is slightly off-standard gets gonged.
__________________
Expert
Ex = former, no longer. Spurt = a leak, esp. when caused by water pressure. Expert = a has-been drip under pressure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln, NE
|
Quote:
![]() Sadly, both physicistjedi and I have tried our pc2-6400 RAM and it does not work. I'm willing to believe CanadaRAM's explanation of why, as I have never dived that deeply into RAM firmware. The TESTED FACTS are: PC2-6400 WORKED in Merom SR MBPs PC2-6400 DOES NOT WORK in Penryn SR MBPs. I understand that you are advising people to buy RAM guaranteed to work with their Mac, and I agree. Just wanted to state that in this case, 667 and 800 are not compatible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
|
yup - that's why just pay like 5 to 10 percent more and grab some RAM from a place that has good results in the mac community. I've been burned by trying to save a few bucks by getting cheap RAM elsewhere and I def regretted that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Can people please post the actual specs of the memory that doesn't work in terms of latency (e.g 2-2-2-6 or 3-3-3-8 or 4-4-4-12). The problem is likely from a mismatched pair than from anything else. I don't have a Penryn MBP yet, but if I did I would run memtest86 and post the memory specs it reports for the stock memory here.
Apple has possibly begun using a slightly different spec'd memory (hopefully higher than lower ) in the Penryn models. It has already been proven that a mismatched memory pair can affect performance, and a certain amount of mismatched-ness apparently now causes real problems.So again please post actual specs of the memory that comes with Penryn systems, and the specs of memory that does not work alongside the stock module. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln, NE
|
It's not an issue of running the new ram along side a stock module - the people I've seen with pc2-6400 bought matched pairs. For further info, the ones I had that did not work were 5-5-5-15, which is pretty much the standard currently.
All of their timing and latency specs matched up - I believe it's the inability of the logic board to downclock it that is causing problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln, NE
|
Then explain why the ram works just fine in a pre-penryn mbp and not in a penryn mbp? It's clearly some change in the laptop itself, not the RAM.
Edit: I went to the mfg's site before school and viewed the data sheets on the RAM. the voltage, cas timing, etc, all identical. I'll try to post links. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
What is the latency of the stock Apple memory that comes with Penryns?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|