Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Mac Scene

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 1, 2003, 07:56 PM   #1
jihad the movie
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Smugtown, NY
Send a message via AIM to jihad the movie
Mhz Myth in a PC magazine

I believe the magazine is called PC UPGRADE... it has an Athlon 64 bit machine on the front cover and mentioned something about 64 bit gaming. Anyways, it said something about how the 2.2 ghz Athlon spanks the 3.4 ghz Pentium four, and gets into clock cycles, pipelines, and what not. I thought this was great, because, we have been saying this all along as a macintosh community, and here a PC magazine goes on carrying our torch. Has anybody else seen this?
__________________
Dual 1.8 G5, Rev A. 3GB ram
12" PowerBook 1.5ghz 1.25GB ram
jihad the movie is offline   0
Old Nov 8, 2003, 09:31 AM   #2
jefhatfield
Retired
 
jefhatfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
not specifically that one

the dynamics of "fastness" goes really deep as i am finding out working on my phd in computer engineering

as a general rule, for now, the slower clock speed athlon is faster than a pentium 4, mhz for mhz/ghz for ghz

but both are faster than a mac...i hope apple can get some speed going but the PC world makes bigger leaps in technology in chip design and os design...windows 2000 to windows XP was a huge improvement while os x slogs along and becomes too bloated and recently, more buggy

panther sucks right now...avoid it at all costs

it's pretty sad, really
jefhatfield is offline   0
Old Nov 8, 2003, 09:47 AM   #3
howard
macrumors 68020
 
howard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
you say panther sucks?? i've heard so many good things about it! what problems have you been having?
howard is offline   0
Old Nov 8, 2003, 09:55 AM   #4
jefhatfield
Retired
 
jefhatfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by howard
you say panther sucks?? i've heard so many good things about it! what problems have you been having?
i personally do not have panther

i am a former apple warranty tech (as i have stated a gazillion times...he he), phd computer student, and i have computer repair business for PCs and macs, and i keep in contact with many techs or the PC and mac side...panther is terrible with most of their client's printers and scanners...networking is a nightmare with the PC side and my wife's work cancelled huge order for panther...panther does not mesh well with the 64 bit environment and the dual G5...the only good thing about panther is that is has given me the most mac work i have ever seen and maybe i can go on a long expensive vacation...i used to rely on windows to make me the money, but now, i hate to say it, panther will give me more work

if i had the time, i would find all the problems around panther and write a troubleshooting book...with the window of time right now, that would be a best seller

wait for the next update...i am going to get jaguar for my dual G4
jefhatfield is offline   0
Old Nov 8, 2003, 10:57 AM   #5
caveman_uk
Guest
 
caveman_uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hitchin, Herts, UK
Quote:
Originally posted by jefhatfield

wait for the next update...i am going to get jaguar for my dual G4
Wow that is conservative! In the Linux world you'd be a 'Debian stable' kind of guy

I've got Panther and I've had no problems- then again I only network macs to macs and everything is stock. No upgrades other than RAM. I've had no problems though. Normally I'd wait for .1 or SP1 (depending on your OS choice) though....
caveman_uk is offline   0
Old Nov 8, 2003, 11:02 AM   #6
jefhatfield
Retired
 
jefhatfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Quote:
Originally posted by caveman_uk
Wow that is conservative! In the Linux world you'd be a 'Debian stable' kind of guy

I've got Panther and I've had no problems- then again I only network macs to macs and everything is stock. No upgrades other than RAM. I've had no problems though. Normally I'd wait for .1 or SP1 (depending on your OS choice) though....
i always hear, "get the .1 update and never buy a virgin product" and when i have gone against this advice, i would almost always get burned

i have heard too many times that people crash panther a lot...many have never crashed jaguar

perhaps apple rushed panther...i hope apple inc is not becoming the microsoft of old and putting profit way way before product reliability
jefhatfield is offline   0
Old Nov 25, 2003, 09:53 AM   #7
krimson
macrumors 65816
 
krimson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Kalifornia
Send a message via AIM to krimson
Quote:
Originally posted by caveman_uk
Normally I'd wait for .1 or SP1 (depending on your OS choice) though....
As an ex-net admin, I completely agree, I've almost never bought the GM release. Usually the first major update is the best time to go.. usually all the major kinks have been worked out.



__________________
"Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind".
Basically, it's made up of two separate words - "mank" and "ind". What do these words mean ? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind."
-Jack Handy

Join MacRumors.com - Team Folding, and be a part of the Mac Folding team!
krimson is offline   0
Old Nov 25, 2003, 10:14 AM   #8
jxyama
macrumors 68040
 
jxyama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
jefhatfield -

given your considerable experience and network, it's a bit disheartening to hear of your less than stellar take on panther...

i upgraded my PB. so far, i haven't had too many problems but i hardly do anything too complicated. fus and expose being stable is far from certifying panther as bug free...

i also can't shake the feeling that panther was a bit of a rush job. jaguar was rock solid, but i'm a bit biased because it was at 10.2.3 by the time i got my PB...

Last edited by jxyama; Nov 25, 2003 at 10:20 AM.
jxyama is offline   0
Old Nov 25, 2003, 10:19 AM   #9
etoiles
macrumors 6502a
 
etoiles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Where the air is crisp
...so did 10.3.1 fix most of these problems ?
Personally, I am really glad I upgraded, connecting to my PC seems to work better, the finder is faster, I am using expose all the time etc. But then I don't really have external drives, network printers or any other 'fancy' stuff.
etoiles is offline   0
Old Nov 25, 2003, 10:28 AM   #10
Catfish_Man
macrumors 68030
 
Catfish_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Send a message via AIM to Catfish_Man
I have to say that 10.3 has kicked ass for me (XCode, on the other hand....).
Catfish_Man is offline   0
Old Nov 25, 2003, 11:06 AM   #11
kettle
macrumors 65816
 
kettle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: England, Great Britain (Airstrip One)
Send a message via AIM to kettle
concerned reader

Quote:
Originally posted by jefhatfield
panther sucks right now...avoid it at all costs

it's pretty sad, really
Which parts in particular need to be avoided?
Are the bits that "suck" features that didn't "suck" under Jaguar?
If we buy a new mac should we also buy Jaguar and downgrade to 10.2.8?
When you say "avoid it at all costs" is there a limit to how far you would go to avoid it, or is this just a general warning to those whose attention skills do not function unless things are dumbed down or super sensationalised?
__________________
Well gentlemen, a great deal of money has been invested in this project...
...and we can't allow it to fail.
File Under - METAL
kettle is offline   0
Old Nov 25, 2003, 11:27 AM   #12
ExoticFish
macrumors 6502a
 
ExoticFish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The inner depths of madness, aka Kent, OH
Send a message via AIM to ExoticFish Send a message via Skype™ to ExoticFish
no one i know has anything bad to say about Panther. in my experience it is faster, easier to use (thank you Expose!), and networking has been a heck of a lot faster (until i started messing around with getting active directory working that is, now's it's slow)

just my $.02
__________________
20" Intel iMac 2.16GHz C2D, OS X.5
ASUS M51Sn laptop running Ubuntu/Vista
play Dofus on your Mac? try Dofex
ExoticFish is offline   0
Old Nov 25, 2003, 11:32 AM   #13
1macker1
Banned
 
1macker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: A Higher Level
There seems to be plenty of problems with Panther, that's why i'm still running Jag. Check out this thread for Panther problems.

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthre...threadid=48838
1macker1 is offline   0
Old Nov 25, 2003, 11:34 AM   #14
jxyama
macrumors 68040
 
jxyama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
gents,

read what jefhatfield wrote at the beginning. he make a living fixing computers and OSes. while his warning to avoid panther "at all costs" may have been a bit strong, i believe he is in a far superior position than singular desktop users (i.e most of us) to comment on the general bugginess of panther.

"panther works fine for me, what's your problem?" is not a very meaningful nor substantial testament to panther's quality. only by taking a look and dealing with problems in many different hardware/use/config/software settings can the true quality of panther be evaluated. i think jef is in a better position to do so than many of us.

being easier to use or faster to respond say nothing about the robustness and underlying quality of panther.
jxyama is offline   0
Old Nov 25, 2003, 10:53 PM   #15
etoiles
macrumors 6502a
 
etoiles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Where the air is crisp
I am not questioning jefhatfield's knowledge and experience, but I am just very surprised at what he said, especially regarding the 'leaps in PC os design' vs.OS X.

I don't think win2K to XP was a huge step (at least not in the right direction), I actually don't know of anybody in the 3D industry for example who uses XP...most artists/studios stick to win2K because it is 'said' to be more stable and efficient (at least for 3D stuff). I am not a tech person but that is what every sys admin guy told me so far.

I know there have been a few major bugs in Panther, but I have not encountered any myself (again, I don't have an external hd and I don't run it on an extensive network). However, I run into windows bugs all the time. Hell, one of the last 'critical updates' for windows was corrupting our 3DSmax files at work...so they had to release a fix for the fix. I guess we just live in a world of pain. Apple is not perfect but I don't think they are falling behind at the moment.

OS X is getting faster with every release so I am not sure I understand the 'slogs along' comment. Compare 10.1 to 10.3 to see how far we have come. Hope you will enjoy 10.3.2 as much as I enjoyed 10.3...

Life is good !
etoiles is offline   0
Old Nov 27, 2003, 03:23 AM   #16
Rower_CPU
Moderator emeritus
 
Rower_CPU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
jef-
What's the extent of your hands-on experience with Panther?

I'm a tech, too, and I've seen no issues whatsoever on the handful of machines it's gone on. We're going to update our eMac lab and staff machines (approx. 40 machines) over winter break and I foresee no problems.
__________________
Join MacRumors.com - Team Folding!
Rower_CPU is offline   0
Old Nov 27, 2003, 05:13 AM   #17
johnnyjibbs
macrumors 68030
 
johnnyjibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London, UK
Send a message via AIM to johnnyjibbs Send a message via MSN to johnnyjibbs
And I thought this was a thread about the MHz myth...
johnnyjibbs is offline   0
Old Nov 27, 2003, 06:13 AM   #18
Les Kern
macrumors 68030
 
Les Kern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alabama
Quote:
Originally posted by johnnyjibbs
And I thought this was a thread about the MHz myth...
I'm writing a book on combining chaos theory, fractals and group dynamics. I'm using Macrumors as a source!
Les Kern is offline   0
Old Nov 27, 2003, 06:40 AM   #19
mj_1903
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Hmmm, don't know what the issue is. My personal home network of Mac's and PC's has had no issues. My compile farm of old Mac's also has had no issues.

I just finished an install of 20 iMac's and G5's into a school network based on Window 2K all centering around Active Directory, and again had no issues. In fact, it went better than I thought, which knowing my trust of technology these days is a big statement.
mj_1903 is offline   0
Old Nov 27, 2003, 07:14 AM   #20
edesignuk
Moderator emeritus
 
edesignuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London, England
Quote:
Things Not to Do
1) Off-topic posts in the non-Community discussion areas. Keep it free of off topic posts. Off-topic posts will be deleted/edited. If you keep doing it see #4.
Nice to see we're all being good and sticking to the rules

...anyway...

There does seem to have been many more posts about problems with Panther than I remember there being with Jaguar.
I have only had one problem with Panther, but it was IMO a very big problem. Samba stopped working! I use Samba all the time to access my Mac's drive from my PC's, and when I didn't work after installing Panther I was none to pleased. Eventually I got it working by over writing my smb.conf with another MR members own edited working version and all was fine. But this should not have been something that I had to fix!
But, other than that, I've had no problems at all....so far!
__________________
edesignuk is offline   0
Old Nov 29, 2003, 03:16 AM   #21
Nik_Doof
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Widnes, UK
Send a message via MSN to Nik_Doof Send a message via Skype™ to Nik_Doof
Quote:
Originally posted by caveman_uk
Wow that is conservative! In the Linux world you'd be a 'Debian stable' kind of guy
And whats wrong with that?

*Nik slowly pushes his debian stable server back into the rack*
__________________
Andrew D. Williams (Nik_Doof)
tensixtyone.com
12" Powerbook 1ghz // 13" Macbook Pro Retina 8GB/256GB (Late-2013)
I Switched To Mac On: 15th October 2003
Nik_Doof is offline   0
Old Nov 29, 2003, 04:54 AM   #22
ryme4reson
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cupertino CA
Send a message via AIM to ryme4reson
Quote:
I am not questioning jefhatfield's knowledge and experience, but I am just very surprised at what he said, especially regarding the 'leaps in PC os design' vs.OS X.
I would like to question your knowlege. Where are you going to school Mr. Hatfield? As a Phd candidate its interesting you would take out of your ass (sorry I hope your feelings dont get hurt). like that. Havent you learned anything? Making bold statements based on pure speculation is not a wise action to get used to.

Quote:
i personally do not have panther
Well I would like to know what experience you have with Panther. First hand, not I heard that it....
__________________
2 Ghz MBP!!!
ryme4reson is offline   0
Old Nov 29, 2003, 06:40 AM   #23
Phillip
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
the mac is slower than the pc but not its not with the mhz myth... i have an 700mhz imac and i runs faster than an 700 mhz pc it is imo a 1.2 - 1.3ghz pc... but in photoshop my pc (amd 1800+) is faster (maybe because i have DDR ram and a better graphics card on it)...

another thing is i find the finder very slow compared to explorer in windows... i compared it to my pc (300 mhz) running xp and explorer ran faster than browsing in the finder... can someone explain why...
Phillip is offline   0
Old Nov 29, 2003, 06:57 AM   #24
Char
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Quote:
Originally posted by Phillip
the mac is slower than the pc but not its not with the mhz myth... i have an 700mhz imac and i runs faster than an 700 mhz pc it is imo a 1.2 - 1.3ghz pc... but in photoshop my pc (amd 1800+) is faster (maybe because i have DDR ram and a better graphics card on it)...

another thing is i find the finder very slow compared to explorer in windows... i compared it to my pc (300 mhz) running xp and explorer ran faster than browsing in the finder... can someone explain why...
One thing to always remember.. is if the application isn't optimized for the CPU it will run slower then it can potentially. A good hand full of Mac Applications are built just for Mac, thats why they seems to be able to run at better speeds then a Wintel at the same clock speed. But then you get these apps that are cross platform that really are just horrible coding and cant do anything right. Thats why you can't really benchmark a Mac vs a PC. Can't find a app to do it right.
Char is offline   0
Old Dec 16, 2003, 09:56 AM   #25
Bengt77
macrumors 68000
 
Bengt77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Europe
Quote:
Originally posted by Les Kern
I'm writing a book on combining chaos theory, fractals and group dynamics. I'm using Macrumors as a source!
Hehe...

That's really funny. You might be on to something, though.
__________________
Computer: MacBook CE unibody 2,4GHz
iDevices: iPod nano 4G 8GB, iPhone 3GS 16GB
Headphones: ATH-A900Ti, ATH-AD900, SE530 & SE210
Use
MRoogle!
Bengt77 is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Mac Scene

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OS-neutral: Myth 2 successor ElderBrE Mac and PC Games 1 Dec 30, 2013 01:30 PM
1600 MHz RAM running at 1333 MHz mapleleafer Mac mini 2 Dec 17, 2012 12:56 PM
Fitness and Fashion iPad Magazine by GlamFit Magazine Chlo3 iPad Apps 0 Nov 30, 2012 05:16 PM
48 GB RAM 1333 MHz in flashed Mac Pro 5,1 working as 1066 MHz Spacedust Mac Pro 27 Oct 14, 2012 02:30 PM
Memory upgrade necessary on 2012 MBP 15 Base? 8GB or 16GB? 1333 MHz or 1600 MHz? cherishzm MacBook Pro 9 Jun 26, 2012 04:52 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC