|
|
#1 |
|
MBP 2.16GHz X1600 vs. 2.2GHz 8600M
The refurbished store is offering the first model in my title for an astounding $1299USD, which is a deal I almost can't resist. But the latter model is only $150 more, and the only differences are the processer, the GPU, RAM, and Supredrive speed. This may seem like a lot, but the processer difference is minimal, the GPU I don't know much about, I'm going to upgrade the RAM anyway, most likely, which leaves the the Superdrive speed. Any input on which model I should buy? I don't really NEED a laptop now, and I could possibly wait till June for Montevina, but is it worth it? Input much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
iMac 27" i5 2.8GHz; Dell P4 3.8Ghz Windows 2000 (My main squeeze); Samsung Galaxy SII X; ATV2 JB |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
the 8600M is in the 3rd gen MBP (aka SR MBP) which will allow for more max RAM, and has a LED backlit screen, which will last longer. For the extra $150, I'd spring for the SR MBP.
Having said that, I have the MBP with the x1600 in it, and I couldn't be happier
__________________
MacBook Air • 17" MacBook Pro • iPod Nano • Apple TVCustom Windows 7 Desktop • Surface RT • WP7 experience comes from bad judgment." - Mulla Nasrudin |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The latter model will be marginally faster due to the fsb, not just the clock speed of the processor, however still a small input. The superdrive speed will make a noticeable difference to burning DVDs if you burn at full speed. The biggest difference will be the GPU however, if you play games, do video editing or use an external monitor - I'm pretty sure it has the advantage of higher clock speed and more video memory, according to manufacturers specs...
What are you planning to do with your laptop? EDIT: And the maximum amount of ram which i forgot about! Last edited by JG271; Mar 14, 2008 at 05:31 PM. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I would do it for the screen which is much brighter
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I agree with everyone else,
The regular backlit screens cannot compare with the LED. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 |
|
why are LED's so much better than regular backlights?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
If you're concerned about the graphics card at all, the 8600 will blow the X1600 out of the water.
More power efficient, "greener", more even backlighting (I think...).
__________________
21.5" iMac, 15.4" MBP, 13.3" MBA, Apple TV 2nd Gen, iPhone 4 + 4S, iPad 2 + 3 |
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MBP 2.0 ghz vs 2.2 will i see a difference? | coolant113 | MacBook Pro | 7 | Jul 15, 2011 12:40 PM |
| From 2007 MBP 2.16GHz to 11" MBA (advice)? | koobcamuk | MacBook Air | 6 | Nov 5, 2010 07:56 AM |
| Feeler: MBP 2.16ghz, 2gb/MB 2.0ghz 1gb SD/MM 1.66ghz CD SD 512mb | rmhop81 | Marketplace Archive 2 | 7 | Jun 25, 2007 11:27 PM |
| MBP 2.16 C2D vs. 2.33 C2D???? | jayeskreezy | Buying Tips and Advice | 12 | Apr 26, 2007 07:16 PM |
| 2.16ghz MBP vs. 2.33 | ljova.com | Buying Tips and Advice | 12 | Oct 30, 2006 05:35 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.








MacBook Air • 17" MacBook Pro • iPod Nano • Apple TV
Linear Mode

