|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Apple With Specific Plans for P.A. Semi
![]() EETimes provides a little background to the recent acquisition of P.A. Semi by Apple. According to their source, Apple had already been an investor of the company and had previously been in negotiations with it for low-power PowerPC chips. Apple's switch to Intel, of course, ended these talks and eliminated a potentially large revenue stream from the company. More recently, Apple is said to have had a new chip design in mind and wanted the P.A. Semi team involved. According to EETimes, P.A. Semi had essentially run out of funding and "the only way to get the project funded was for Apple to pay off the other investors and bring P.A. Semi in-house." As a result, the $280 million acquisition was to bring their talent in for this new project rather than any specific technologies P.A. Semi had already developed. This explanation is consistent with early statements from P.A. Semi to their existing customers that the company was bought for "intellectual property and engineering talent". Article Link Last edited by arn : May 7, 2008 at 01:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: U.S.
|
Sounds awesome! What ever they come up with will be amazing!
__________________
MacBook Pro 15" 2.4Ghz 2GB :: Lightroom :: Sony Alpha |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Switzerland
|
Good to know that we'll be staying with intel for a while
Shame that we miss out on the PowerBook G5 tho..
__________________
//MacBook C2D-2 GHz-2GB Ram-120 gig HD/20" Cinema Display/750GB's of HDD/iPod Shuffle 2G/iPod touch/iPhone/JBL Creatures//
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
Quote:
![]() So not to derail the PA Semi discussion too much with wild-*ss speculation, but let's connect a few dots. 1. PA Semi has experience making PPC chips. 2. Apple believes PA Semi has talent to do something great with the PPC (presumably). 3. Apple has signaled an interest in games lately. 4. XBox 360 and Wii are both powered by PPC processors. Hmm....
__________________
• • Setting the virus record straight: the market share myth debunked • • |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida Resident
|
A-Box 360 from Apple. Hey Microsoft, how do you like being copied?
|
|
|
|
| BornAgainMac |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BornAgainMac |
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Surrey/Kent UK
|
Good to see that apple are making their own chips!
Although PA semi have usually made small, power efficient chips though - less need for them in a gaming machine - however - apple cover most of the tech gadgets spectrum, apart from gaming... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
macrumors god
|
Quote:
I took a look through their patents but it was a bit technical, so I was unable to get anything out of it. arn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
macrumors regular
|
Quote:
If Intel can't design the same type of chip, I'd suspect that PA Semi will design the chip and Intel will produce it (as someone stated before). This all probably revolves around battery life..... |
|
|
|
|
| CaptainScarlet |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by CaptainScarlet |
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
I agree. Nearly anything that can be done on a custom chip can be done in software on a general purpose chip, so if they are doing a custom chip it must be for efficiency reasons, whether that be battery life or pure performance I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jul 2003
|
Quote:
PA Semi might have patents (issued or pending) on low-power design technologies that could cover what Apple wants to do with portable devices in the future (as well as Apple's competitors!). If those patents cover something Intel needs on its future roadmap, that would put Apple in an even better position when time comes to negotiate pricing the next few rounds. Portions of PA Semi's team have already designed an ARM processor, and with higher performance than ARM Inc. could at the time. And Safari on the iPod is still a bit sluggish. But the XCode toolpath doesn't seem to care what CPU architecture is under the hood. PA Semi's current technology includes something like an integrated security processor, the kind that might make jailbreaking an iPad many orders of magnitude more difficult. Might be one reason the defense industry is buying PA Semi's current products, as well as performance/power ratio. Lastly, buying PA Semi might have been cheaper than the cost of a potential lawsuit for backing away from some sort of letter of intent. ^^ (but all the above are just some random characters due to my cat walking across the keyboard... ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Perhaps the interest in low-power chips + the interest in games = handheld gaming device? We all know how miserably the Nokia N-Gage failed but...could Apple pull it off?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
|
Quote:
Will be interesting to see what Apple has in mind, and where they intend to apply the P.A. Semi chip stuff... I'm guessing its not going to be in one specific area, but a number of areas.
__________________
I should really get around to putting iTunes on my Valve Radio Computer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Denver, CO
|
Quote:
Tell me more.
|
|
|
|
|
| lazyrighteye |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by lazyrighteye |
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors 603
|
well i hope they are a good help to Apple. i wonder what this new chip will be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Sep 2002
|
Hmmm. Apple gets PA Semi to design a chip that is sort of a PPC/x86 hybrid. Intel then runs with the design for their new Core 4.
Runs all the current stuff today - OS X, WinXP/Vista/9x, Linux, etc. However, due to the extra stuff, Apple gets a bit of the revenue from the chips IF used by other companies (HP, Dell, Alienware, etc.), otherwise, Apple pays for the chips since Intel still has to create them. Cool. Yes. I just made that up. May Fools == me.
__________________
15" (Glossy) MacBook Pro/2.33GHz C2D/2GB RAM/160GB 5400RPM/6x DL SuperDrive
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ERIE, PA
|
Quote:
For them to invest $250 million plus IM sure Apple plans on reaping mucho profits from this chip production down the road. Guess only time will tell!
__________________
iMAC 20 " CORE DUO-Black MacBook 2.2 Ghz-Ipod Touch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
|
The bad news: Your company has been acquired
The good news: You still have a job The bad news: You now have the pickiest, crankiest boss on the planet |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors 68030
|
The other bad news, the good news depends on how said boss feels that particular morning.
__________________
When did Think Different become Conform Always? |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
|
Quote:
If you want angry, lifeless, morons just work in the Seattle Area. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
|
|
|
|
| gnasher729 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by gnasher729 |
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
The not-so-excellent news: those products will always have essential features missing for no good reason beyond your new boss thinking them unnecessary or inelegant.
__________________
• • Setting the virus record straight: the market share myth debunked • • |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
Wordmunger, as tempting as it seems to put the worst possible spin on this acquisition, this is not a buyout to get rid of a competitor, this is not a buyout to gain "synergy", this is a strategical purchase with the goal of getting and keeping these developers. And Steve Jobs is light years away from being the pickiest, crankiest boss on the planet. You are confusing absolute devotion to quality with begin "picky" and "cranky". People who are picky and cranky don't turn $10bn companies into $100bn companies. |
|
|
|
|
| gnasher729 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by gnasher729 |
|
|
#23 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Madrid, Spain
|
Quote:
) You could also think of his Steveness as been the most future looking boss in the world, capable of producing products that not only impact UI, design, but even pop culture. His might not be the courtliest person on the planet, but heck you could learn alot from the man IMHO. JM
__________________
MPro 2.66/ MBP 2.33 / 2x23"ACD![]() Leopard 10.5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Yes please!
Gimme back the PPC feeling. Honestly, those Intel iMacs (Core Duo first iteration) really feel bad. The lasting appeal deteriorated so much. For the first time in my Mac life I experience regular system freezes with leaving Safari open for more than 24 hrs. My PB G4 feels so good in contrast. I fear upgrading to an Intel machine, as at least those iMacs I have behave a bit...let me say...strange! PPC was a glorious time, so here is to hoping that Universal binaries will stay! Granted Parallels and Boot Camp are awesome and wouldn't run on PPC.
__________________
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: .. London ..
|
Quote:
It does need lots of RAM - my MB C2D was **terrible** on 1GB, but flies on 4GB. Fortunately RAM is dirt cheap at the moment so go for it. Moving to a new architecture is full of pitfalls, and at the same time as a new OSX Leopard is just asking for trouble. I fully expected the first few Intel revs to be buggy as **** and avoided them for this reason. And I avoided the first few 10.5.x releases too. I only bought my MB once it moved to C2D, GMA X3100, and 10.5.1 (or.2), meaning that every component was on at least its second revision. The new MBs coming out soon, along with 10.5.3 are finally becoming a mature product. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|