Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 14, 2008, 03:19 PM   #26
WhySoSerious
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Send a message via AIM to WhySoSerious Send a message via Yahoo to WhySoSerious
why the hell would anyone want a tablet? i mean, it's probably too big for pockets (or if you squeeze it in, it'll be uncomfortable) and it'll be just like all the other crappy mini-laptops out there.

think of it this way, it'll be about the size of a portable dvd player. what's the point in that? if you need a PC that bad when you're on the go......get a full blown laptop (MBA or MB or MBP). If you don't need a PC that bad, but just wanna surf the net, watch movies, play games.....an iphone should suffice and it fits in your pocket.

this is a bad idea and the only market that exist for a tablet is for HARDCORE fanboys, not 99% of the other population.

this will be a huge dud. the only purpose the tablet will serve is to TEST technology so they can use it in future MacBooks and iMacs.....nothing more, nothing less.
__________________
It's all part of the plan...
MacBook Pro 17" HighRes Glossy | Snow Leopard
2.4 GHz Intel C2D | 4GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM
WhySoSerious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:19 PM   #27
Zeegler
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlaceofDis View Post
hmmm might have to wait on my considering of an eee then. this might work, but i guess we'll see, won't we?

the odd thing is that apple, and steve jobs, hates it when companies do this. so i'm surprised anything was said and it makes you wonder just how furious he is over this now.
yeah...UNLESS it was a planned move by 's marketing dept
__________________
128 GB 4G iPhone Black
13" iTablet, 3.2 GHz, 16 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, WiMax
Apple ][+, 1 MHz, 48K RAM, dual 5.25" floppy drives
Zeegler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:20 PM   #28
QCassidy352
Contributor
 
QCassidy352's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Boston, MA
I will withhold judgment until I see what this device is all about, but from the limited description in this article, I can't really see the point.
__________________
"If Jesus Himself came back to earth and turned water to wine, half of MacRumors would say 'meh, this is red. I wanted white.'"
QCassidy352 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:21 PM   #29
Korolen
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
It seems like the iPhone is as big of a device as anyone would want to carry in their pocket. A larger screen would cross the line into the world of carrying it in a bag (like a laptop bag). But the screen seems too small for that, and they do already have the MacBook Air for that market of ultra-portable laptops... I guess we'll see where Steve takes this one?
Korolen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:22 PM   #30
TexasAg
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeegler View Post
I don't think we're gonna see new product launches at WWDC, just based on precedence.
Except that I read earlier today (based on a wiki entry) that Apple has actually announced new hardware pretty consistently since around 2002. Here's the entry:

Before 2002, WWDC was not a place for hardware announcements, but Apple deviated from that principle in 2002 when it announced the rack mounted server Xserve, in 2003 with the introduction of the consumer-oriented iSight and the Power Mac G5, in 2004 with the introduction of redesigned Apple Cinema Displays, in 2005, when an announcement was made that Apple Computer would start the transition of their computers from IBM's PowerPC microprocessor line to Intel's line of x86 processors, and in 2006 with the release of the Xeon-based Mac Pro and Xserve.

2007 included an announcement of the launch date for the iPhone.
TexasAg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:23 PM   #31
job
macrumors 68040
 
job's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: in transit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeegler View Post
I don't think we're gonna see new product launches at WWDC, just based on precedence.
Wasn't the G5 Powermac introduced at WWDC way back when?

I'd say that counts as a new product launch...
job is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:23 PM   #32
tgildred
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by liketom View Post
if steve talks about it at wwdc you will , in fact you'll be begging for it
oh, so true....

Quote:
Originally Posted by tothecore View Post
if it also acts like a WACOM tablet... I'm sold!!!
I hadn't thought of that... I'm suddenly drooling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HiRez View Post
If I were Mr. Schwaderer, I'd be booking a late night flight to an undisclosed country. But then, he must know you can't hide from Steve's ninja stealth assassins. Hopefully he has updated his will and straighted out his affairs for his family's sake.
Steve may take care of this one himself.

Last edited by Mitthrawnuruodo : May 15, 2008 at 08:07 AM. Reason: Merging, please use MULTIQUOTE to answer more than one post...
tgildred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:25 PM   #33
cloudnine
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Send a message via Yahoo to cloudnine Send a message via Skype™ to cloudnine
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
English translation:
He goes on to say that an upgraded version of the current form factor of iPhone would also exist as a 3G-model.

While Schwaderer calls the larger device a "version of the iPhone", it seems clear that it refers to the rumored mini-tablet device. Some rumors have suggested that it would be introduced at WWDC.
[ sarcasm ]

Oh yay. A tablet. How exciting.

[ / sarcasm ]

Last edited by cloudnine : May 14, 2008 at 03:32 PM. Reason: invalid syntax
cloudnine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:26 PM   #34
andiwm2003
macrumors Demi-God
 
andiwm2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhySoSerious View Post
why the hell would anyone want a tablet? i mean, it's probably too big for pockets (or if you squeeze it in, it'll be uncomfortable) and it'll be just like all the other crappy mini-laptops out there.
.................
if it's only slightly larger than my iphone than it's too large for a phone and too small for a tablet. for decent internet browsing and pdf reading it would need a 800x480 screen. many websites are 800 pixel wide. i don't believe this is going to happen. at least not "slightly larger" than the current iphone.
andiwm2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:27 PM   #35
tgildred
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by cloudnine View Post
Oh yay. A tablet. How exciting.

[ / sarcasm ]

you forgot the open tag on your sarcasm...
tgildred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:27 PM   #36
NEENAHBOY
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
*sing-songy* Someone's gonna get fiiiiirrrreddddd...
NEENAHBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:29 PM   #37
Phil A.
macrumors Demi-God
 
Phil A.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Telford, UK
I think there's a typo in the original article. Surely it should say "Ex Intel Germany CEO Hannes Schwaderer"...
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.93Ghz, 4GB | 24" LED ACD | iPhone 3GS 32GB Black | ATV 160GB
Phil A. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:30 PM   #38
WhySoSerious
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Send a message via AIM to WhySoSerious Send a message via Yahoo to WhySoSerious
exactly...a tablet is pointless. just introduce the touch technology into a redesigned laptop and be done with it. don't waste time/energy/r&d into a stupid tablet.
__________________
It's all part of the plan...
MacBook Pro 17" HighRes Glossy | Snow Leopard
2.4 GHz Intel C2D | 4GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM
WhySoSerious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:30 PM   #39
Zeegler
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by andiwm2003 View Post
if it's only slightly larger than my iphone than it's too large for a phone and too small for a tablet. for decent internet browsing and pdf reading it would need a 800x480 screen. many websites are 800 pixel wide. i don't believe this is going to happen. at least not "slightly larger" than the current iphone.
iTablet is 13" and comes w/ iPhone headphones/mic for those time that you are using the iTablet and too lazy to pick up calls from iPhone in your pocket
__________________
128 GB 4G iPhone Black
13" iTablet, 3.2 GHz, 16 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, WiMax
Apple ][+, 1 MHz, 48K RAM, dual 5.25" floppy drives
Zeegler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:30 PM   #40
TexasAg
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhySoSerious View Post
why the hell would anyone want a tablet?
What if it's a tablet that is "tethered" to your iPhone? Not something that you hold up to your head and make calls on, but something with a larger screen that you can surf through your iPhone and do work on. Might not be bad.
TexasAg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:31 PM   #41
TMay
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Carson City, NV
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhySoSerious View Post
why the hell would anyone want a tablet? i mean, it's probably too big for pockets (or if you squeeze it in, it'll be uncomfortable) and it'll be just like all the other crappy mini-laptops out there.

think of it this way, it'll be about the size of a portable dvd player. what's the point in that? if you need a PC that bad when you're on the go......get a full blown laptop (MBA or MB or MBP). If you don't need a PC that bad, but just wanna surf the net, watch movies, play games.....an iphone should suffice and it fits in your pocket.

this is a bad idea and the only market that exist for a tablet is for HARDCORE fanboys, not 99% of the other population.

this will be a huge dud. the only purpose the tablet will serve is to TEST technology so they can use it in future MacBooks and iMacs.....nothing more, nothing less.
Bigger screen, same thickness, multi-touch, reader, more performance, more battery life, more memory, card reader...blah..blah..blah..blah..blah, and omg what about the games!

Nah, who would want one of those...(as he carefully maps his position for a 48 hour siege of Summit Sierra Apple store).
TMay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:32 PM   #42
Klaxons2012
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhySoSerious View Post
why the hell would anyone want a tablet? i mean, it's probably too big for pockets (or if you squeeze it in, it'll be uncomfortable) and it'll be just like all the other crappy mini-laptops out there.

think of it this way, it'll be about the size of a portable dvd player. what's the point in that? if you need a PC that bad when you're on the go......get a full blown laptop (MBA or MB or MBP). If you don't need a PC that bad, but just wanna surf the net, watch movies, play games.....an iphone should suffice and it fits in your pocket.

this is a bad idea and the only market that exist for a tablet is for HARDCORE fanboys, not 99% of the other population.

this will be a huge dud. the only purpose the tablet will serve is to TEST technology so they can use it in future MacBooks and iMacs.....nothing more, nothing less.

That's a bit of an overreaction, don't you think? How can you tell a product is going to be a dud by just hearing a vague description of specs from a chip manufacturer. I think this tablet has the potential of being the next big thing in mobile computing. Apple should get the benefit of rolling out a product before you place such a judgement upon it.
Klaxons2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:32 PM   #43
terrordemon
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
who says this has to be a tablet??? could larger mean screen resolution? like, maybe its a quarter of an inch bigger. its not 3 inches larger on each side.

i honestly see no reason why this couldnt make its way into the 3g iphone.
terrordemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:32 PM   #44
WhySoSerious
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Send a message via AIM to WhySoSerious Send a message via Yahoo to WhySoSerious
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeegler View Post
iTablet is 13" and comes w/ iPhone headphones/mic for those time that you are using the iTablet and too lazy to pick up calls from iPhone in your pocket
yeah...and geared toward the super-dooper-tech-geek. no ordianary consumer will want a tablet when they can get an iphone or MPA/MBP.

a tablet is one of those things that has no real place in the world. it serves no purpose other than to test new touch technology and maybe garnish some funds from the super geeks who want anything/everything new.
__________________
It's all part of the plan...
MacBook Pro 17" HighRes Glossy | Snow Leopard
2.4 GHz Intel C2D | 4GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM
WhySoSerious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:32 PM   #45
cloudnine
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Send a message via Yahoo to cloudnine Send a message via Skype™ to cloudnine
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgildred View Post
you forgot the open tag on your sarcasm...
heh. all fixed :P
cloudnine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:33 PM   #46
rockstarjoe
macrumors 6502a
 
rockstarjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: washington dc
What are the chances that this guy is just speculating based on rumors? Might be a bad game of telephone going on...
__________________
Macbook, iPod Classic, iPhone 3g, hackintosh
My band - [velvet] - Our music on iTunes
rockstarjoe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:33 PM   #47
Eduardo1971
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lost Angeles, Ca. usa
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlastmango View Post
iMiniPad and iMaxiPad?
Funny! On the flip side at least if they are named this iMiniPad and iMaxiPad will come with built in protection from spills.
__________________
13" white 2Ghz Macbook, 250GB Hard drive, 2GB RAM
Fight On!
Eduardo1971 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:33 PM   #48
bigmc6000
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2006
is it possible that the Intel guy may be right about the resolution but wrong about the size factor? I mean, wouldn't it be nice if Apple upped the resolution of the iPhone without actually changing the dimensions? Of course it would need a better processor to be able to handle the increase in data brought about by such increases in resolution. Of course I think it'd be great if they upped resolution to match 720p TV's and made all TV downloads 720p
bigmc6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:35 PM   #49
hypermark
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhySoSerious View Post
why the hell would anyone want a tablet? i mean, it's probably too big for pockets (or if you squeeze it in, it'll be uncomfortable) and it'll be just like all the other crappy mini-laptops out there.

this will be a huge dud. the only purpose the tablet will serve is to TEST technology so they can use it in future MacBooks and iMacs.....nothing more, nothing less.
I totally disagree (and I am crying because I am happy and want this device)!

Imagine a living room version of your iPod that doesn't need to fit in your pocket, is big enough to offer better video, web, gaming, etc., can integrate more services into the same screen (e.g., IM and gaming), generates no heat so it doesn't burn your lap, and can run native applications and sync back to and control your desktop Mac/Apple TV, etc.

I think that would be pretty cool.

Everyone focuses on this as a PHONE when I think the story that Apple seems to be pursuing is intersect of mobility (via cellular or Wi-Fi) and media (via iPhone, iPod, Mac, Apple TV) across different form factors.

Mark
hypermark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2008, 03:35 PM   #50
Diatribe
macrumors 68040
 
Diatribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Costa Rica (yes, I moved)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmc6000 View Post
is it possible that the Intel guy may be right about the resolution but wrong about the size factor? I mean, wouldn't it be nice if Apple upped the resolution of the iPhone without actually changing the dimensions? Of course it would need a better processor to be able to handle the increase in data brought about by such increases in resolution. Of course I think it'd be great if they upped resolution to match 720p TV's and made all TV downloads 720p
It would need to be bigger not to accomodate a bigger screen but a bigger battery as Atom feeds on battery like there is no tomorrow.
__________________
Knowledge - fueled by curiosity
Mac Beginner's Guide | My Adium Xtras
Diatribe is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2010, MacRumors.com, LLC