Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old May 26, 2008, 02:42 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Solar LCD Powered iPods, iPhones and Laptops?



A recently published patent application discovered by MacRumors reveals that Apple is investigating the use of solar power in versions of their mobile devices -- both handheld devices and portable computers. Integrating solar power into a mobile device holds the enormous potential of extending battery life significantly. However, successfully integrating solar panels into these small devices is not without its challenges.

The major issues described are the limited area available to solar panels, durability, and the "wasting" of space on a portable device. It is due to these problems that solar power has not found its way into mobile devices, not just from Apple, but from all manufacturers.





The most interesting technique described by Apple, however, is the integration of the solar panels behind the actual LCD screen of a portable device. The solar panel would absorb ambient light that passes through the LCD screen of the device. This could eliminate any additional footprint typically required by the solar panels. If successfully implemented, Apple's iPhone, iPod and laptops, could require no outward changes in design to add solar power.

Apple's not the only one exploring this technology as an old (2001) Motorola patent describes the same technique. While several limitations to the technique were described at that time, the issues may have been better addressed in recent years.

Article Link

Patent Application

Last edited by arn : May 26, 2008 at 03:23 AM.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 02:46 AM   #2
MacinDoc
macrumors 65816
 
MacinDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Great White North
Well, if you can put the solar panels under the display (I wonder if this may be possible with OLED, although I'm no expert in the area), the increased area available for solar panels may make up for the fact that the light reaching the panels will be partly filtered by the display itself. I wonder how this will work with touchscreen technology, however.
__________________
MB Alu 2GHz, iMac i7, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS
MacinDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 02:48 AM   #3
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacinDoc View Post
I wonder how this will work with touchscreen technology, however.
It apparently works with touchscreen and OLED technology. The motorola patent apparently said that only a small portion of light went through and it was only ideal for certain (black&white) screens. But that was 2001.

http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives...solar_lcd.html

Quote:
This [Motorola] patent also includes word on how solar cells can be added to OLED and touchscreen displays as well.
arn
arn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 02:48 AM   #4
D4F
macrumors 6502a
 
D4F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Sounds interesting.
If they manage to combine two power options this might give you some crazy use times.
__________________
13" Macbook Pro
D4F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 02:56 AM   #5
Flynntoo
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
talk about think different
__________________
AppleIIe/Performa6100//Powermac8100//eMac/MBP2.4/8giPhone
AppleTV/airportexpress&extreme/2gShuffle/iSight/mightymouse/macmini
Flynntoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 02:58 AM   #6
MacFly123
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Cool! So soon we may very well have OLED razor thin displays with solar power and iSight cameras built into the displays themselves Sounds good to me!

My only question is how much do your iPods, iPhones, Laptops etc. actually have their screen exposed to the sun??? Don't you usually have your portables in your pocket and your laptops avoiding sun glare when outside??? How much power would this really add then?
__________________
- Steve Jobs' best friend!

Last edited by MacFly123 : May 26, 2008 at 03:01 AM. Reason: addition
MacFly123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:02 AM   #7
Greenbird600
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
It would certainly be cool if they could do this. Another thing that I think would be awesome is if they found a way that you could attach an ipod or iphone with the solar tech in them to a laptop, and use the ipod/phone's solar panel to charge the laptop, for that extra boost.
Greenbird600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:04 AM   #8
cnote678
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
This will be awesome! Probably happen years from now, but still very cool. Efficiency=
cnote678 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:04 AM   #9
MOFS
macrumors 6502a
 
MOFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Liverpool, UK
Without wanting to put a downer on this but would this work indoors? Computers are energy intense as we know, and I wonder how much energy a solar panel would absorb indoors (where most of the machines created with this would be used), especially if they only absorb a small proportion of ambient light anyway.
__________________
It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing
Footie fan? Join the Macrumors Fantasy Premier League competition!

Last edited by Doctor Q : May 26, 2008 at 12:07 PM. Reason: no need to quote entire news story
MOFS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:10 AM   #10
Flynntoo
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
i think if you are indoors, you probably have access to power
__________________
AppleIIe/Performa6100//Powermac8100//eMac/MBP2.4/8giPhone
AppleTV/airportexpress&extreme/2gShuffle/iSight/mightymouse/macmini
Flynntoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:11 AM   #11
BlackSp1der
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFly123 View Post
My only question is how much do your iPods, iPhones, Laptops etc. actually have their screen exposed to the sun???
I think that the idea of this tecnology is absorb the light generated by the LCD Screen.
BlackSp1der is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:16 AM   #12
junkmailbonzai
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Bring it on! I am all for not having to charge my electronics as much. This would also be a godsend for hiking, camping, and car trips. Go apple!
junkmailbonzai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:18 AM   #13
arubinst
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lausanne - Switzerland
So what if...

So what if this is the reason why the back of the new iPhone is rumored to be "black"?

What if it's not black but instead it's a huge solar cell array (dark blue) protected by a thick transparent layer?

I know this sounds insane, but it would be so cool... Well... one can always dream.
arubinst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:18 AM   #14
David G.
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Great State of Alaska
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSp1der View Post
I think that the idea of this tecnology is absorb the light generated by the LCD Screen.
OR, they could have a highly reflective backing behind the screen so they could turn brightness while appearing just as bright. Much more efficient that way.
__________________
"People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people."
"Si vis pacem, para bellum." - "If you wish for peace, prepare for war"
David G. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:22 AM   #15
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSp1der View Post
I think that the idea of this tecnology is absorb the light generated by the LCD Screen.
Was that a joke? In case it wasn't, the idea is that sunlight would pass through the LCD onto the solar panels.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MOFS View Post
Without wanting to put a downer on this but would this work indoors? Computers are energy intense as we know, and I wonder how much energy a solar panel would absorb indoors (where most of the machines created with this would be used), especially if they only absorb a small proportion of ambient light anyway.
They wouldn't _only_ be solar powered. You'd still have the normal battery to use in non-lit situations. It would presuambly just extend your battery life with a constant trickle of power.

arn
arn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:23 AM   #16
anubis
macrumors 6502a
 
anubis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Under full bright sunlight illumination, with the solar panels pointed directly at the sun, you're only looking at an electricity generation rate of between 15 and 20 watts with the best polycrystalline solar cells available today, assuming the solar cells cover an entire 1 square foot area. If the solar energy strikes the screen at an oblique (indirect) angle, the energy collection rate begins to fall of dramatically. Indoors, you'd be lucky to generate 1-2 watts.

I'm not saying this is a terrible idea. I'm just saying that best care scenario, it extends your battery life by maybe a minute.

If the point is to collect the light "backscatter" from the screen backlight, it would be a much better use of resources to simply not generate as much backscatter, as the best solar cell efficiency you could hope for would be about 20%. I think LED backlighting mostly solves this problem, rendering the argument moot.
anubis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:24 AM   #17
g8bo
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Switzerland - Zug
Quote:
Originally Posted by arubinst View Post
So what if this is the reason why the back of the new iPhone is rumored to be "black"?

What if it's not black but instead it's a huge solar cell array (dark blue) protected by a thick transparent layer?

I know this sounds insane, but it would be so cool... Well... one can always dream.
I once made this joke some months ago on macrumors^^ but nobody spend attention to it...
g8bo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:28 AM   #18
j26
macrumors 65816
 
j26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paddyland
Something like that would be useful in gps style devices (iPhone?), since they're exposed to the sun a lot, but I can't see how useful it would be for a laptop. The amount of time you'd have a laptop open in a situation where it would receive enough light to be useful would be very limited.
__________________
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
j26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:29 AM   #19
kamiboy
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2007
If only portable devices didn't spend 99,9% of their time in our darkened pockets.
kamiboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:34 AM   #20
alphaod
Contributor
 
alphaod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LIE x37
Apple is getting busy with all these patents aren't they? I wouldn't be surprise one bit if Apple put a device out with all the patents in one creative mess and everyone would call it a technological phenomenon.
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
Mac Pro E09 (2x2.66/6x2GB/4x300GB10K/GTX285) | Dell 3007WFP-HC (30")
MacBook Air M09 (2.13/2GB/128GB) | iPhone 3GS (32GB/White/Unlocked)
alphaod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 03:44 AM   #21
lowbb
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Quote:
Originally Posted by arubinst View Post
So what if this is the reason why the back of the new iPhone is rumored to be "black"?

What if it's not black but instead it's a huge solar cell array (dark blue) protected by a thick transparent layer?

I know this sounds insane, but it would be so cool... Well... one can always dream.
but you hold your iPhone with your hand so that the back of the iPhone is covered
so no sunlight can pass through
__________________
lowbb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 04:05 AM   #22
craigverse
macrumors Demi-God
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Send a message via AIM to craigverse Send a message via Yahoo to craigverse
I love this sort of article. It's amazing what ideas are out there that may one day be put to use. Keep them coming!
__________________
24" iMac, 17" MBP, 15" MBP, Airport Extreme N, 140GB Apple TV, 80GB 5g iPod, 16GB 3G iPhone, BT Mighty Mouse, Wireless Keyboard
craigverse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 04:21 AM   #23
intel
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Back in the day when i was 12 i heard you can have semi transparent solar panels, we had those chunky monitors with these weird screen filters and i thought to myself, why not catch some of the light that the monitor puts out, seeing that the screen filters made the monitor dark as ****. (what can i say, i was only 12).

There are many ideas that help recharge the battery of a device being used, using the power that the device is already putting out and is going to waste.

This seems like a good idea if the solar cell catches the light emited from the backlight. I'm not exactly sure how that backlight thing works but this idea would be practical if it is more efficient than using a reflector.

There are also devices/materials that use waste heat to generate electricity. A thin layer over the top of the cpu and beside the battery would do the trick. These divices are like 25% efficient. (That's 25% of the 20% or so that is wasted as heat, whick makes it as useless as a fart in a jar giving you back only 5% of your total power, minus another 3% or so in the losses of recharging the battery leaving you with only 2%. Then if you take into account the energy(/cost) used to add that extra device, you are left with sweet nothingness but bitter remorse for buying a device that is full of ****. Something like the hybrid car phonomenon but only in its own parralel universe with a twist)

Who knows, if you combine all these techs in one neat package without blowing the budget and if it gives me that extra 5 mins on a conversation with a chick that will eventually get me layed, hell, bring it on.
intel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 04:24 AM   #24
Brianstorm91
macrumors 65816
 
Brianstorm91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hampshire, England.
Send a message via MSN to Brianstorm91
I new I should have bought those jeans with the transparent pockets !
__________________
12.1" PowerBook G4; 23" Apple Cinema Display; 40GB Playstation 3; 16GB iPod Touch
Brianstorm91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2008, 04:44 AM   #25
Analog Kid
macrumors 68000
 
Analog Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Interesting, but most solar cells I've seen are black, and LCDs need to reflect light back up through the panel. Guess I'll have to read the patent...

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacFly123 View Post
My only question is how much do your iPods, iPhones, Laptops etc. actually have their screen exposed to the sun??? Don't you usually have your portables in your pocket and your laptops avoiding sun glare when outside??? How much power would this really add then
If the could make this efficient enough, I think it would cause a change in how people use their devices. Place it on the dash of your car, leave it out on the table, put it in a windowed pocket of your purse...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSp1der View Post
I think that the idea of this tecnology is absorb the light generated by the LCD Screen.
Um... Study up on your thermodynamics. What you're suggesting wouldn't work for the same reason perpetual motion is impossible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by intel View Post
This seems like a good idea if the solar cell catches the light emited from the backlight. I'm not exactly sure how that backlight thing works but this idea would be practical if it is more efficient than using a reflector.
It won't be more efficient than using a reflector for the same reason as above. A mirror or white diffuser will always be more efficient than converting light to electricity and then back to light.
Quote:
Originally Posted by intel View Post
There are also devices/materials that use waste heat to generate electricity. A thin layer over the top of the cpu and beside the battery would do the trick. These divices are like 25% efficient. (That's 25% of the 20% or so that is wasted as heat, whick makes it as useless as a fart in a jar giving you back only 5% of your total power, minus another 3% or so in the losses of recharging the battery leaving you with only 2%.
All the power going into the CPU comes out as heat, not just 20%. A small fraction will travel down the bus and become heat in a different device, such as the memory, but heat is where it all ends somewhere. The problem with the thermal devices you're describing has been that they typically require much higher temperatures to reach that 25% efficiency than silicon can operate at.
__________________
"Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand...
Ignorance and Prejudice and Fear walk hand-in-hand."
--Peart
Analog Kid is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC