How can you say only 200MHz difference, when the top end G4 tower is a DUAL GHz system??? Dual means TWO 1GHz processors.
Don't just look at the speed numbers, also look at the L3 cache differences (1MB on the new TiBook and 2MB on the tower). I know, from past experience, that a cache increase like that makes a huge difference for system performance. Add up all the differences and you see that the tower does do much better over the laptops. Granted, I own a laptop now, with now plans in the seeable future to get a tower again. I am very happy with the 800MHz TiBook and all that it offers me. I value portability, right now, over raw power. I would estimate that I will have a new tower within a year or so, depending on what comes out and when.
FYI, I was informed that a 1.4GHz processor functions at the speed of light. With that being the case (not sure if it is true, so take it with a grain of salt, or two), I wonder how chips are exceeding that speed. That could be the reason why we are seeing larger and larger heat sinks, and better chip fans coming out. I can only imagine what will be used for cooling of 4GHz systems (AMD is working on a 4.4GHz chip and is projecting having it on the market in the next year or two).
Either way, there is a reason for towers, and a reason for laptops. Towers also have much better expansion, and upgrade potential then laptops do. With towers, you can install up to five hard drives (four on the base and one in the zip drive slot), plug in a slew of PCI cards, and keep it humming for a long time. Laptops, can ,typicallly, take one extra PCMCIA card, you can give it up to 1GB of RAM, and only swap out the single hard drive. There are more differences, but I am not going to list them all, since I have neither the time, nor the desire to.
It is time to get on my Harley and ride. 😀