I highly doubt that. Such flexible or adjustable wings have been banned in F1 for quite some time now. If they actually had tried racing with that, they would have DQ'd, possibly banned for a GP or two, or, if not failed by the stewards, at least had another team complain about it
Ferrari's did, along with many other teams, hence the the introduction of a mandatory spacer between the rear wing elements to prevent them closing at high speeds and causing an aerodynamic stall, though obviously these are entirely passive systems, and not active ones.
The FIA, just before the Canadian GP, also requested that those teams with a bridge wing (every team other than Ferrari and Honda I believe) were required to fit a stanchion to help prevent flex of the bridge wing, after it was becoming increasingly obvious from onboard camera's that the bridge wings were flexing substantially at high speeds.
Abstract said:
Surely on a road car, a retracting spoiler would do the trick if you wanted to drive at really high speeds on straight roads.
It would if all you want to do is create/reduce downforce, but you're still stuck with a somewhat compromised aerodynamic solution relative to the entire speed range of the vehicle.
If you have a car that can actively adjust its
entire aerodynamics, then it'd be able to continuously maximise not only it's aerodynamic efficiency, but also adapt to conditions where it may require more, or less downforce even though the speed is the same, for example, the aerodynamic demands are different between 80mph on a straight motorway, and 80mph on a twisty country road.
