Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:17 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple to Revamp Software Update?

ThinkSecret revives rumors that Apple will open up software update to certain developers to allow 3rd party software updates to be delivered through Apple's Mac OS X Software Update Control Panel.

The rumor first reported in Jan 2003, but has not made its way into Mac OS X yet.
MacRumors is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:20 AM   #2
hobbes3113
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
This would be a welcome upgrade to an otherwise perfect program...
__________________
"We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give." -Winston Churchill
hobbes3113 is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:24 AM   #3
mainstreetmark
macrumors 68000
 
mainstreetmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
I've been wanting this for a while now. I like running the latest stuff, but don't like constantly checking.
__________________
iTunesRegistry.com <-- v3.0 Now Playing
mainstreetmark is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:25 AM   #4
macnews
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Idaho
This would be a nice feature on the pro end. I hate having to go to adobe's site and be checking if they fixed the latest Illustrator or Photoshop bug.
macnews is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:26 AM   #5
ratspg
macrumors Demi-God
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Send a message via AIM to ratspg
nice

I guess we'll have to call it VersionTracker Plus Plus. heh
ratspg is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:27 AM   #6
ITR 81
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Send a message via AIM to ITR 81
Sounds good. Now lets see it happen.
ITR 81 is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:30 AM   #7
pgwalsh
macrumors 65816
 
pgwalsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Send a message via Yahoo to pgwalsh
about friggin time.
__________________
My Widget: F@H WUdget
My Business: KAHE Sparkling Nectars
pgwalsh is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:31 AM   #8
cgc
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Or they could call it Software Update Extreme.
cgc is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:37 AM   #9
AirUncleP
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
bout time

I think we have all been waiting for this.
__________________
plaid pants......and an argyal sweater......No he's not retarded!
McToast gets it.......do you?
AirUncleP is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:38 AM   #10
pgwalsh
macrumors 65816
 
pgwalsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Send a message via Yahoo to pgwalsh
Quote:
Originally posted by cgc
Or they could call it Software Update Extreme.
haha... right and it will be added to .mac - so you'll have to pay for it.
__________________
My Widget: F@H WUdget
My Business: KAHE Sparkling Nectars
pgwalsh is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:41 AM   #11
kuyu
macrumors 6502a
 
kuyu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Louisville
great idea. This further separates pc complexity and mac simplicity.
__________________
If it plugs in I have one. If it goes fast I want one.
kuyu is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:44 AM   #12
pgwalsh
macrumors 65816
 
pgwalsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Send a message via Yahoo to pgwalsh
Quote:
Originally posted by kuyu
great idea. This further separates pc complexity and mac simplicity.
Well sort of.. You can get some 3rd party driver updates through windows update.

The real gold would be patches, drivers and notification's of newer versions.
__________________
My Widget: F@H WUdget
My Business: KAHE Sparkling Nectars
pgwalsh is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:46 AM   #13
stoid
macrumors 68040
 
stoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: So long, and thanks for all the fish!
Send a message via AIM to stoid
Since Apple has apparently spent hundreds of man hours developing this, it will label every update as 'critical' just like every Windows patch to give the programmers a feeling of accomplishment.
__________________
Get Salted!
stoid is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:49 AM   #14
wdlove
macrumors 604
 
wdlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
I hope that this revamp will allow for greater access and improved software for all of us. They could call it iUpdate.
__________________
First MacRumors "Contributor"
wdlove is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 11:53 AM   #15
JohnGillilan
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles
It will be funny to see "Software Update" appear as an update in the current version of it.
__________________
"If you've got beef, eat a porkchop."
-- Coolio
JohnGillilan is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 12:02 PM   #16
supertex
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Louisiana State University
I don't know, call me ignorant (which as a criminology major, I could easily be concerning computing issues), but would releasing access to Software Update be an easy way for any kind of attack on a system, pretend you're an update to Chess or something and then all of a sudden WHAM! kernel panics galore? I imagine Software Update gets root level access to install stuff once you give it your password. Makes me feel warm and cozy knowing Apple is the only one I'm gonna hear from in there...

NO!! Even worse!! People spamming my Software Update offering cute little apps that put dancing girls on my desktop... <shudder>

Then again, maybe I don't know what the crap I'm talking about, it's been known to happen before...
__________________
Remember The Alamo!!!!
supertex is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 12:04 PM   #17
johnnyjibbs
macrumors 68030
 
johnnyjibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London, UK
Send a message via AIM to johnnyjibbs Send a message via MSN to johnnyjibbs
You could have a point. I suppose it would only be available to licensed developers, maybe even just Adobe to begin with.
__________________
johngriffithsapps.com - Get It Done! | Grocery Checkout
15" MBP, iPhone 3G, 12" PB, iPod 4G, iPod shuffle
johnnyjibbs is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 12:07 PM   #18
supertex
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Louisiana State University
Quote:
Originally posted by johnnyjibbs
You could have a point. I suppose it would only be available to licensed developers, maybe even just Adobe to begin with.
All the same, I don't know that I trust anybody but Apple with it, I'd have to watch my back... some crazy cracked-out windozehead decides he wants to drag OS X down into the pit along with them...
__________________
Remember The Alamo!!!!
supertex is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 12:09 PM   #19
hobbes3113
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally posted by supertex
would releasing access to Software Update be an easy way for any kind of attack on a system, pretend you're an update to Chess or something and then all of a sudden WHAM! kernel panics galore?
I imagine that this is something that will be carefully monitored by Apple. I'm sure they would never allow something like this to happen. I agree with johnnyjibbs in that only licensed developers would be allowed access, the rumor even hints at this.
__________________
"We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give." -Winston Churchill
hobbes3113 is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 12:15 PM   #20
Flowbee
macrumors 68030
 
Flowbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alameda, CA
And there would hopefully be a way that the user could choose which vendor they would like updates from. Plus, you would certainly still be able to choose which updates to download and which to ignore.
__________________
Podophile.com >> Home of Nike+iPod hacks and FAQs.
Flowbee is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 12:16 PM   #21
applekid
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: On this chair
Quote:
Originally posted by pgwalsh
Well sort of.. You can get some 3rd party driver updates through windows update.

The real gold would be patches, drivers and notification's of newer versions.
Allowing the next batch of Mac users to call "Software Update" spyware. That's what happened to the Windows updating program. Anything that phones home is considered spyware it seems, even if it is for a reasonable cause.

As long as the downloads and updating stay reliable, I'm not going to say anything.
applekid is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 12:17 PM   #22
supertex
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Louisiana State University
Oh I'm sure Apple will monitor it closely, don't get me wrong, but all the same it gives me the creeps...
__________________
Remember The Alamo!!!!
supertex is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 12:18 PM   #23
robotrenegade
macrumors 6502a
 
robotrenegade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Greenville,SC
Send a message via AIM to robotrenegade
That's sounds awesome!!! I hope Adobe and macromedia jump on the wagon.
__________________
60GB iPod | 17" Mac Book Pro | Mac OS 10.5.4 | 8GB iphone
robotrenegade is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 12:24 PM   #24
dguisinger
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Microsoft recently updated Windows Update and marged functionality with Windows Bug Reporter.

For example, when Developer Studio crashed while working on an HTML page last week, I submitted the bug like normal thru the popup dialog. Instead of just saying thank you for reporting the bug, it said Microsoft had released a fix to the problem, and let me click directly into Windows Update to download the Internet Explorer fix.

It would be awsome to see Apple utilize the same technique, allowing you to report bugs, and then be told that hey, the bug which caused this crash has been fixed, don't be lazy, go install the update.
dguisinger is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2003, 12:35 PM   #25
JoeRadar
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2003
Quote:
Originally posted by pgwalsh
The real gold would be patches, drivers and notification's of newer versions.
A roll-back option (which XP already supports) would be nice. If an update screws something up (like when people had problems with 10.2.8), being able to roll-back to a previous point is important.

Another configurable feature I would like to see is being able to specify how long an update has been out before my system downloads the update. For example, I would like to wait a week before upgrading, letting other people take the early risks.
JoeRadar is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC