|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Adobe Photoshop CS4 Interface and Screenshots
![]() ![]() Mac Photoshop CS4 screenshot, click for larger Adobe seems to be hard at work at Adobe Creative Suite 4*. In May, they released public betas of CS4 versions of Dreamweaver, Fireworks, and Soundbooth. Existing CS3 owners are able to continue to use these applications beyond the initial 48 hour window. One of the most obvious changes in the new CS4 applications is the user interface, and this change will also be carried over into the next version of Adobe's Photoshop. This decision is described in detail by Adobe's John Nack. Nack describes how Adobe has been trying to make the interfaces on their apps more consistent and shows off a screenshot of the new Mac Photoshop "application frame". This application frame contains both user interface elements as well as documents themselves. Despite expressing his own initial resistance, Nack explains the advantages to the consolidated window: Quote:
There's been no public timeframe for the release of this next version of Adobe's Photoshop, but there were some contested claims of an October release target. The next version of Photoshop has been announced to remain a 32-bit application. 64-bit support is expected on the subsequent version for the Mac. * Note that Adobe has objected to labeling this next version of Creative Suite as "Creative Suite 4" or "CS4", but for consistency's sake with the rest of the world, we are using that designation until Adobe officially announces otherwise. Article Link Last edited by arn : Jun 22, 2008 at 05:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors god
|
I realize that some of this is a few weeks old but it got lost in the shuffle pre-WWDC.
arn |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sacramento, California
|
i absolutely hate that interface. seriously
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Apr 2003
|
That is awful.
__________________
My cat's breath smells like catfood. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
|
![]() Can we have that as the default UI for Snow Leopard please (I was only looking at the top bar). Actually, can we have anything other than the current OS X UI for Snow Leopard please, it's droning, plain, and boring.
__________________
The Un-Funny Truth About Scientology (Warning: Graphic images) MacBook Pro 15.4"/2.5 GHz/250GB/4GB RAM iMac G4 17"/800 Mhz/80GB/512GB RAM |
|
|
|
| Stridder44 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Stridder44 |
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: May 2007
|
I like the new interface...
and moving the whole app from one monitor to another is great for multi-taskers with multiple monitors!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Apr 2003
|
I was thinking the opposite. Don't most users with multiple monitors work on one screen and keep their palettes on the other? There are a lot of things wrong with this.
__________________
My cat's breath smells like catfood. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Netherlands.
|
I still hate the fact that it isn't 64-bit....
|
|
|
|
| DanielJvdBerg |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by DanielJvdBerg |
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
|
Yeah, just read that as well. I understand re-writing all that code takes time, but why wouldn't they get a 64-bit version out for OS X? I mean isn't Photoshop used mostly on Macs anyway?
__________________
The Un-Funny Truth About Scientology (Warning: Graphic images) MacBook Pro 15.4"/2.5 GHz/250GB/4GB RAM iMac G4 17"/800 Mhz/80GB/512GB RAM |
|
|
|
| Stridder44 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Stridder44 |
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
I like the unified layout. I've always hated how on OS X every element seemed to be in it's own space in Photoshop. I'd hit the background too easily and switch apps by accident. I've always much preferred how the Windows version is.
|
|
|
|
| randomlinh |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by randomlinh |
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Netherlands.
|
Exactly, from my view I see Adobe CS mostly used on Macs, it's just wrong to put your biggest platform behind the other.
|
|
|
|
| DanielJvdBerg |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by DanielJvdBerg |
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sacramento, California
|
if you're clicking on the background then you're probably going to end up clicking on other images in the 'application frame' anyway, there is no difference. I think the windows version is the MAIN reason I left windows for mac. It's ugly, JUST like this
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
|
err... I think I'll stick with CS3 and skip this fourth generation.
__________________
iMac AL 24" | PS3 replaced aTV |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: May 2008
|
CS4 and Multi Touch
Hey, does anyone know if CS4, or whatever adobe is planning on calling the next photoshop, will have the ability to use the new multi touch track pad on the macbook pros?
|
|
|
|
| SugaredJuggler |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by SugaredJuggler |
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Netherlands.
|
|
|
|
|
| DanielJvdBerg |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by DanielJvdBerg |
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Ew, what is Adobe doing ?! That interface is awful. Why did they make changes to the traffic light icons ?!
I am hoping this is just a prototype interface. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
photoshop cs4 interface..
I think it's great. I'm not an expert in photoshop and i always felt their interface is a bit difficult to get use to. Looks like the new one will have a few things that allows simpler navigation between images. Also the graphics card accelleration will help a lot(if implemented in cs 4).
..and if this option makes it into photoshop than it's all complete adobe-hires-co-inventor-of-image-resizer-technology/ |
|
|
|
| fountaineer |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by fountaineer |
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Dec 2003
|
I LOVE that new interface. When I'm designing, my biggest complaint with working on a 30" monitor is the visual clutter. I have to sit there and search for controls while I'm trying to concentrate on design.
This is nice and clean and I don't have a million icon colors popping out at me. I don't think the grey window controls are something Adobe fully changed themselves. Apple has been moving in this direction of removing the Red, Yellow and Green color and this is possibly a Snow Leopard change. I can't wait for this to come out! |
|
|
|
| bdkennedy1 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by bdkennedy1 |
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada
|
If you read the article... the consolidated view is optional. I for one will opt out. This is just not the Mac way. I have two monitors... one 24" for my document... another 24" for palettes, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
Holding off to cs5
__________________
Power Mac G5 Dual 2.0Ghz (1 Gen), 6.5GB Ram, X800XT, Mac OS X (10.5.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sacramento, California
|
does any one else find it funny that the article states that adobe is so against calling it cs4, but the screen shot in the upper right corner reads "what's new in cs4"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Netherlands.
|
|
|
|
|
| DanielJvdBerg |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by DanielJvdBerg |
|
|
#23 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jakarta
|
That probably the ugliest interface I have ever seen. It even beats out Windows XP in WTF factor. I will never buy another Adobe product as long as I live unless they actually clean up their act. It's not MY job to get used to their terrible, ugly new interfaces just because they want them consistent on two platforms. It's THEIR job to make my graphic design work pleasant and -dare I say it- enjoyable. How about they focus on giving new, useful features instead of horrid, bizarre interfaces?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| maxrobertson |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by maxrobertson |
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
wow, this is as horrible as Leopards GUI... BRING BACK AQUA! Why are we going to back to the 90s w/ all these ass ugly flat grey... w/e the hell these all are
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
MichaelFlux.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
|
Oh my God please don't. Leopard is alright, just boring. Aqua looks as bad as XP. They need to do something new and different with the UI (talking about Apple).
__________________
The Un-Funny Truth About Scientology (Warning: Graphic images) MacBook Pro 15.4"/2.5 GHz/250GB/4GB RAM iMac G4 17"/800 Mhz/80GB/512GB RAM |
|
|
|
| Stridder44 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Stridder44 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|