|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
PowerMac and Xserve Revisions at MWSF 2004?
Appleinsider reports that they now have corroborating infomration that Apple will be updating their PowerMac line at MacWorld San Francisco 2004.
The best information available to the rumor site indicates that the new models will come in at 2.0Ghz, 2.2GHz and 2.4GHz configurations. Previous notes, however, had indicated that IBM was producing chips as fast as 2.6GHz at this time. Other expectations remain the same with the use of 90nm PowerPCs, 533MHz DDR II RAM, a faster system bus (up to 1.5GHz). Xserve updates are also expected, but few details are available. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 6502
|
I could definatly see this happening. It would be nice to see new Powermacs. They are running behind on speed now. And Xserves.. everyone knows how outdated they are.
__________________
Erik Myxter Erik.Myxter@sendit.nodak.edu aim: thinlayorofpole http://www.xanga.com/erikmyxter Looking for a powerbook. Last edited by Rower_CPU : Dec 12, 2003 at 04:20 PM. |
|
|
| TomSmithMacEd |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by TomSmithMacEd |
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jun 2003
|
Xserves should be up to about 2.6 Ghz
by the end of january, powermacs may not be that fast but hopefully will equal that at the high end--I'm still waiting to get one til it gets over 3Ghz |
|
|
| paulypants |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by paulypants |
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 6502
|
Lies, all lies!!! (*prays for 2.6*)
__________________
"how do you win $ 1.6 M at a quarter slot? that's 6.4 millions coins shooting out of the slot. they could have killed her!!!" -- Don't Panic |
|
|
| Phobophobia |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Phobophobia |
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central Florida
|
nice!
All I have to say is ...
WOOOOHOOO!!!! But I would still like to see some kind of powerbook update. Hickman
__________________
MP 2.8GHz Octo/10.6/10GB/X25-M G2 160GB + 2.25TB RAID 0/Drobo/GTX 285 32GB iPod Touch/80GB 5.5G iPod (Black) Nikon D80/105mm f2.8 Micro/50mm f1.4 AF-S/18-135mm/SB-600 |
|
|
| Brian Hickman |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Brian Hickman |
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Connecticut
|
AI has a good record of late, no?
Well these seem reasonable, though doubtless some will find reasons to complain: Th1S SuXX0Rs, wh3R3 is teh 3Ghz PowerMaxxx0rzz? and so on..... |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
|
Price Drops?
I wonder how far the current G5 models will drop in price?
__________________
plaid pants......and an argyal sweater......No he's not retarded! McToast gets it.......do you?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 65816
|
Maybe they are holding off on the 2.6 until they release the 2.8 and 3.0Ghz PM's?
All I know is the 3Ghz PM is mine or 3.2 if it's out by then as well. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
Cool...
But nothing really new here. I liked those 2.6 Ghz rumors better though.
|
|
|
| macMaestro |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by macMaestro |
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: l'Allemagne
|
and my processor running at 867 MHZ... I need that improvement for my next PB...
Great for the next owners of those babies...
__________________
No Mac no fun...
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
macrumors 65816
|
Re: nice!
Quote:
1.42 = 17inch 1.33 = 15inch 1.25 = 12inch This also reminds me I'll be buying a G5 PB as well whenever they come out this yr. and maybe new iPod if new ones are kick ass. Last edited by ITR 81 : Dec 12, 2003 at 01:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hawaii
|
Well, always nice to hear possible processor updates, tho I'm hoping Apple is prepared to deliver should there be an overwhelming demand for the high-end model.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors 65816
|
What I'm wondering is when we see the 3Ghz PM will it have a 2Ghz FSB? If so these suckers will kick some ass.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Near a Mac.
|
These nunbers seem reasonable. It would be nice if all three where duals. I'm waiting for this revision to go G5 since I got the budget approval from the finance department (a.k.a.:wife).
Even a single 2 would be a monster with 1Ghz bus!
__________________
MBP 2.4Ghz • 4GB • 250GB Panasonic L1 • Leica 25 ƒ1.4 • Leica 14-50 ƒ2.8-3.5 • Leica 14-150 ƒ3.5-5.6 • Zuiko 35 ƒ3.5 • Zuiko 70-300 ƒ4-5.6 • FL-36R |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: washington dc
|
Quote:
__________________
"if everyone is thinking alike, then someone isn't thinking"
|
|
|
|
| gwuMACaddict |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by gwuMACaddict |
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors regular
|
If Apple update the G5 towers and XServes, along with some i-applications.. I wonder if still hoping for PB updates will be too much? It's all I really want, come on guys!
__________________
Apple: Pure computing in an impure world |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
|
Quote:
Will they be duals all across? Will the low end model be single-CPU (seems likely)? Will the new lineup take the prices of the current lineup, from $1799 to $2999? Will the price drop on existing models be such that the current king of the hill (dual 2GB) matches (or approximates) the price of the new (single?) 2GHz? Seems unlikely because that could mean dropping from $3000 to $2000. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: France, Europe
|
problem with the mobo
Quote:
I have raed somewhere that for a 3GHz PM, this can not be installed on the existing mother board model. (probably due to FSB) I rather think ofthe info reported by appleinsider and macbidouille.com of a multiprocessor Xserve 3U for making big cluster. it has to be faster than the PPC970 1U blade server developped by IBM, so I guess Apple will go multiprocessors and higher end server... this could correspond to the yesterday news regarding entreprise/larger business unit that Apple would like to developp.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors member
|
this is going to sounds rediculous, but i think i'm going to wait til they release dual 5 ghz. Christmas of '05? Well, I do have to pay off my powerbook first!
|
|
|
| bishopduke |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by bishopduke |
|
|
#20 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: France, Europe
|
Quote:
now I would imagine than the nex mother board will be able to get 3GHz+ G5, so let say a FSB on a new mobo which will be able to accomodate FSB between 1.5GHz and 2GHz (the latest meaning a G5 at 4GHz...) without forgetting than in that case the RAM needs to run also to corresponding level. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Area 51
|
How about new powerbooks too?
|
|
|
| stockscalper |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by stockscalper |
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MA
|
I dont understand the need for DDR2 memory, in fact that may be a mistake as DDR2 is quite rare at the moment and most is being used only with High end graphics boards like 5700Ultra/5950Ultra. There is DDR1 memory currently at 533MHz sold by high end memory companies like OCZ and Mishkin, which could be used in these systems and would be much more resonably priced.
__________________
Awaiting PB update: my 1.25 is now with someone else ![]() Win-box 2400+ AMD Emac 800 |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Montreal, Canada
|
AppleInsider says...
that we'll get DUAL 2.0, DUAL 2.2 and DUAL 2.4 Ghz in January. This means that the price for the low-end PowerMac will go up again, to the level it was when they launched the G5
![]() Oh well, i'll have to pay 300$ more.
|
|
|
| From Win to Mac |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by From Win to Mac |
|
|
#24 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
Re: at least 1.5GHz
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| bathysphere |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by bathysphere |
|
|
#25 | ||
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Re: at least 1.5GHz
Quote:
Appleinsider: Quote:
Also in the article: with the cooler-running 970s, heatsinks and/or fans will get smaller allowing more room for HDs, possibly up to four HDs for a terabyte of storage. |
||
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|