|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Apple Sends Another MobileMe Apology E-mail and Extension
![]() Amidst the rocky .Mac to MobileMe transition last week, Apple made one other mistake that it is now apologizing for. Apple had been preauthorizing charges up to 121 GBP to European customers who signed up for a free MobileMe trial. For debit accounts, this preauthorization charge may actually remove that amount of money from the customer's available balance. Apple is working on reversing those preauthorizations and sent out new apology letters to those customers. Quote:
Article Link |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 604
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
That's a bit of a cockup!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MacWorld
|
I Will Never Use Mobile Me. Ever!!!!!!!
(they lost all of the 'Apple reliability' factor) Last edited by pismodude2 : Jul 19, 2008 at 03:57 AM. Reason: elaboration |
|
|
|
| pismodude2 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by pismodude2 |
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: /Aussieland/home
|
oh my
… talk about embarrassing! they better back this up with no down time for the next year when its finally up and running.
__________________
♫Gee Officer Krupke, krup you!♫ 15" MacBook Pro Core Duo 2 GHz, 2 GB, 250 GB 7200.4; 23" Cinema Display; Snow Leopard Core i5 2.66 GHz, 4GB, 1.5 TB, 4870 1GB Nokia E63 |
|
|
|
| richthomas |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by richthomas |
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 65816
|
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5A347 Safari/525.20)
What is it with their web services being so doomed?
__________________
-PPC_Michael 17" MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo + 23" Cinema Display // 16GB iPod Touch |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
I do not like apple apologizing every other day. It`s not going to help them increase their brand value. Once in a while is good but not every week. It was a small error. They rectified it, that should be it. No real need for another 30 day extension. I know those who get it will be happy but no one would have buzzed if no such freebie was awarded. They pleased the one percent of their potential customers but for the rest of the potential buyers mobileme is sounding more and more like a mess with troubles showing up everyday.
Last edited by ImNoSuperMan : Jul 19, 2008 at 04:05 AM. |
|
|
|
| ImNoSuperMan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by ImNoSuperMan |
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On The Interweb Thingy!
|
Wow...top time to be a trial user!
Great customer service from Apple. They could have ignored the trial users but chose to win them over with a huge freebie. Regrettably my trial period is long over.....but it's the thought that counts!
__________________
Mac Pro: 2.93GHz Quad-Core, MacBook: 2GHz, TV, iPod Touch
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London, UK
|
30 days extension for launch problems.
30 days extension for card authorisation problems. Erm, doesn't that make a total of 60 days, not 120? Applaud the sentiment, but the maths being out the window here suggests some significant panic and haste over at MobileMe. ETA: Scratch that - see what they mean now. Adding in the original 60-day trial too....
__________________
Still waiting for inspiration here.... Last edited by ClaphamChris : Jul 19, 2008 at 04:05 AM. Reason: My maths not so good either.... |
|
|
|
| ClaphamChris |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by ClaphamChris |
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
|
12 people have been fired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LIE x37
|
So is this 30-day extension for European customers only I assume?
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
Mac Pro E09 (2x2.66/6x2GB/4x300GB10K/GTX285) | Dell 3007WFP-HC (30") MacBook Air M09 (2.13/2GB/128GB) | iPhone 3GS (32GB/White/Unlocked) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The SimCity Deli
|
Apologies are meant to stave off the class-action lawsuits.
__________________
A pate is nothing more than a French meat loaf that's had a couple of cocktails....Carol Cutler |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
They needed to take this very seriously and they did. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: sweden
|
I'm just curious...
Is this the "new" Apple? How long before I have to update Mac OS X through iTunes? How long before Apple decides what apps I can run on my Mac? How long before I have to get a credit card and give away the info to Apple just to download the next version of Firefox to my Mac? People were raising this concern in the forums at Apple support pages, and the posts were removed. For example, one person asked how he could buy the update for his iPod Touch. He could buy the device in his country, but there was no iTunes Store for him to use so he couldn't update it. Could he buy the software in a normal store selling Apple stuff? No. Could he use gift cards to buy the stuff? No. I just beginning to have a bad feeling about this whole "you have to have a credit card and register in iTunes" situation... Last edited by saab : Jul 19, 2008 at 04:26 AM. Reason: wrong name |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Southern California
|
Quote:
You people are kidding, right? Giving away an additional 30 days is an acceptable response? Give me a break. Yes, the number of people who suddenly find their bank account in the red is going to be significant. We're talking almost $250 here. Plenty of people that keep less than that in their checking account for security reasons alone (much less those who can't afford to keep that extra money in there). Apple needs to pay for any and all bank fees promptly, and make sure that these people have access to their funds immediately. I don't know many people that feel like loaning an extremely wealthy corporation $250 for up to a month. And what are they getting instead? An extended free trial. Jesus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bournemouth, UK
|
Apple can 'apologize' all they like, but until they find the UK dictionary on their Mac's they may as well forget it.
I'm still struggling to see the benefits of the service for the price but some things never change... Last edited by dogtanian : Jul 19, 2008 at 05:27 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
|
"Isn't that great? We've been working on that for a while. I think we finally got it right."
Steve Jobs, 9 June 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
i think he said "down with the ship" or something like that
__________________
Power Mac G5 Dual 2.0Ghz (1 Gen), 6.5GB Ram, X800XT, Mac OS X (10.5.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Well, this is pretty bad, but not nearly as bad as you are explaining it. Apple didn't get loaned $250 and customers didn't get charged $250. You are misunderstanding what an authorization hold on a card is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London, UK
|
Quote:
So a free trial stops you accessing the full cost of the service for two years from your own bank account for up to a month. OK, the money never actually leaves, but you can't spend it as it's preauthorised. Truly dreadful for people who are on a tight budget.
__________________
Still waiting for inspiration here.... |
|
|
|
|
| ClaphamChris |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by ClaphamChris |
|
|
#20 | ||
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, a friend tried signing up several times to the MobileMe trial during the period of half-down-time (I guess it was all processed, bar being delivered the "done" page, but this wasn't obvious!) and ended up with several such charges applied to an account in which he kept few funds. I ended up finding a signup page which didn't require any payment details. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: May 2004
Location: England
|
MobileMe is getting quite the reputation for being a total shambles. I could accept server problems upon rollout. Redefining 'Push' was not good. Holding £121? Damaging at best.
Is it me, or did Apple's QA and Customer Service take a severe downturn these past few years?
__________________
MacBook Air (Rev.A) 1.6GHz 80GB HD: 20" ACD : iPhone 8GB (Rev.A) 3.0 JB/UL : 2G Shuffle |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
No I think you are. If I can't use £121 of the funds in my bank account, then that's as equivalent to apple taking £121 and paying it back when they cancel the hold. I can't use the money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: England
|
If I got the trial of Mobileme, today in the very near future ( 2 months ), i take it the payment subscription should be ok, and I will just get a 30 day trial. Does Apple notify you beofre they go on and take money out the bank, to subscribe to it after the trial period has ended. Is it easy to say ' No ' before any money it taken out?
NStocks |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Agree 100%. I was just trying to clear up the mischaracterization of the OP, who thought (or wanted people to think) that the money had actually been removed. I suspect this would have been an even bigger mess, because Apple would have to put the money back, and after they did that, it could take a few days more to clear.
Either way, a buggy launch is one thing, goofing with peoples credit cards is another. This is why I am ALWAYS SKEPTICAL of "free" trials that require a credit card!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Quote:
No one is "loaning" any money to anyone. Apple ran authorizations on the cards, NOT charges! I don't think you understand how this works. Although depending on the bank/provider, they may lower your *available* balance by the amount of the authorization, it is NOT a charge, and therefore should NOT create overage charges or cause anyone to go "in the red". If the prior account balance was lower than the authorized amount, then the authorization should just not go through. That's at least how I understand it. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
| winterspan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by winterspan |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|