Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Pro

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jul 24, 2008, 08:19 PM   #1
team 79 krunch
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
FireWire 400 or 800?

I am going to upgrade my 17" 2.5GHz 4GB RAM MBP's hard drive to a 500GB 5400-RPM drive. I want to use the 250GB 5400-RPM drive as an external. IS there a major difference between FireWire 400 & FireWire 800?
My main concerns are speed and power consumption.
__________________
17" MacBook Pro Hi-RES glossy screen 2.6GHz 2GB-RAM 250GB-HDD, 17" iMac G5, Mac Mini, 32GB iTouch, 160GB iPod Classic silver, iPod Mini-silver,
team 79 krunch is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2008, 08:35 PM   #2
bc008
macrumors 68000
 
bc008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan
FW800 is literally twice as fast as FW400.

i dont know about power consumption
__________________
| iMac 21.5" - For Sale | iPhone 4 | iPad |
bc008 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2008, 08:36 PM   #3
bigrell486
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Home
Send a message via AIM to bigrell486 Send a message via Skype™ to bigrell486
800 is faster than 400 and USB 2.0.
Power Consumption depends on the device.
bigrell486 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2008, 08:38 PM   #4
GGJstudios
macrumors Westmere
 
Join Date: May 2008
I use Firewire 800 for my external drive and the difference is noticeable! Screamin' fast!
GGJstudios is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2008, 09:24 PM   #5
Herrow
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
FW 800 is considered "pro" level for a reason...very fast, especially noticeable when moving very large files or folders.
Herrow is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2008, 02:07 AM   #6
jjahshik32
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
FW800 hands down!!
__________________
http://www.steve-yi.com
jjahshik32 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2008, 11:20 AM   #7
Bobioden
macrumors 65816
 
Bobioden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denver
If you are just going to be using the external as a Time Machine backup drive than it really wouldn't make a difference.
__________________
Macbook Pro 15.4", 2.4, 500 GB, 8 GB
Al iMac 24", 2.4, 320 GB, 4 GB
iPhone 5S 32 GB Gray
iPad Mini Retina 32GB Gray
Bobioden is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2008, 05:10 PM   #8
alphaod
macrumors Core
 
alphaod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 上海 (Shanghai)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobioden View Post
If you are just going to be using the external as a Time Machine backup drive than it really wouldn't make a difference.
It does if you have 300GB of backups to make!

And yes FW800 is a lot faster and the power consumption for all FW official spec devices should be the same.
__________________
Mac Pro | iMac | Mac mini | MacBook Pro | MacBook Air | iPad | iPhone | iPod
alphaod is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2008, 09:56 PM   #9
Bobioden
macrumors 65816
 
Bobioden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denver
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaod View Post
It does if you have 300GB of backups to make!

And yes FW800 is a lot faster and the power consumption for all FW official spec devices should be the same.
But if it is only going to be used for a TM backup, the first time it will be slow, after that it is not going to make a difference.
__________________
Macbook Pro 15.4", 2.4, 500 GB, 8 GB
Al iMac 24", 2.4, 320 GB, 4 GB
iPhone 5S 32 GB Gray
iPad Mini Retina 32GB Gray
Bobioden is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2008, 09:58 PM   #10
noodle654
macrumors 68000
 
noodle654's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Never Ender
I am about to change my external hard drive setup. I am currently using the WD Passport (USB) and that thing is slow, I hate it. I plan on getting the WD Studio Edition with the USB, eSata, and FireWire 800/400. I wish WD made a drive that has just USB and FireWire at a lower cost. I dont need eSATA at all.
__________________
MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.3GHz (June 2012) HR Antiglare | iPhone 5 64GB | MacBook Air i5 1.3GHz (2013) | Mac Pro 5,1 W3580 |
noodle654 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2008, 07:49 AM   #11
CaptainChunk
macrumors 68020
 
CaptainChunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
I am about to change my external hard drive setup. I am currently using the WD Passport (USB) and that thing is slow, I hate it. I plan on getting the WD Studio Edition with the USB, eSata, and FireWire 800/400. I wish WD made a drive that has just USB and FireWire at a lower cost. I dont need eSATA at all.
They do. It's called the MyBook Home Edition. It has USB 2.0 and FW400, but no FW800.
__________________
MP 8x2.8GHz, 16GB RAM, flashed 8800GT; Early '08
15" MBP 2.6GHz, 4GB RAM; Early '08 (RIP)
13" MBP 2.3GHz, 8GB RAM; Early '11
CaptainChunk is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2008, 08:01 AM   #12
DoFoT9
macrumors P6
 
DoFoT9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Singapore
Send a message via AIM to DoFoT9 Send a message via MSN to DoFoT9 Send a message via Skype™ to DoFoT9
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrell486 View Post
800 is faster than 400 and USB 2.0.
Power Consumption depends on the device.
it will most likely even be faster than USB3.0!!!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaod View Post
It does if you have 300GB of backups to make!

And yes FW800 is a lot faster and the power consumption for all FW official spec devices should be the same.
that backup will only be made once, so it wont really make that much of a difference the first time (backup will only go on average about 5-10mbps).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobioden View Post
But if it is only going to be used for a TM backup, the first time it will be slow, after that it is not going to make a difference.
the first time the database has to be made, so its extremely slow.. it runs in the background as low priority anyways, so thats why its so slow.. could probably change it but meh.
__________________
Official MacRumors IRC @ irc.krono.net #macrumors (Or http://kewlirc.net:9090/)
2012 2.5GHz Mac Mini Dual - 16GB RAM
Win8 PC - i5-3570k - 16GB RAM - SSD
DoFoT9 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2008, 10:05 AM   #13
noodle654
macrumors 68000
 
noodle654's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Never Ender
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainChunk View Post
They do. It's called the MyBook Home Edition. It has USB 2.0 and FW400, but no FW800.
Yeah but I am looking for the 800. Its fine though, I can get one on eBay for cheap and get the 25% off Live deal.
__________________
MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.3GHz (June 2012) HR Antiglare | iPhone 5 64GB | MacBook Air i5 1.3GHz (2013) | Mac Pro 5,1 W3580 |
noodle654 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Pro

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sony PD150 > FW 400 > 800 > TB ... Okay? smoking monkey Digital Video 4 Nov 10, 2013 11:10 PM
FireWire 800 or 400 and what to get DeafRaiders Buying Tips and Advice 5 Dec 24, 2012 09:49 AM
Mac Mini 2011 firewire 800 to 400 m1kygarcia Mac mini 13 Aug 19, 2012 07:01 AM
Firewire 800-400 Adapter or PICe Card? Garnick Mac Pro 3 Aug 4, 2012 06:35 PM
Firewire 400 to 800 converter iMovie issue JavaWizKid Digital Video 2 Jul 2, 2012 12:29 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC