Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:35 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple to Add Dedicated Video Hardware to Macs?



AlleyInsider publishes an unconfirmed rumor that Apple will be incorporating QuickTime encoding/decoding chips into their products in the coming months. AlleyInsider's Dan Frommer describes it as "pure speculation" but felt it plausible enough to publish for discussion.
Quote:
Our understanding is that a QuickTime encoding/decoding chip would handle the grunt work of processing video, presumably in the H.264 format, so that Mac computers' processors wouldn't have to do as much heavy lifting. That could be used in any number of cirumstances, such as a live, hi-def iChat AV video chat, watching HD video off the Web, or faster encoding HD video for distribution. (Perhaps the iSight cameras built into MacBooks and iMacs might get a HD upgrade, too.)
The rumor actually mirrors an old claim by Robert Cringely from 2007 that describes the same details:
Quote:
Now comes the rumor I have heard, that I believe to be a fact, that has simply yet to be confirmed. I have heard that Apple plans to add hardware video decoding to ALL of its new computers beginning fairly soon, certainly this year.
The significance of this rumor is somewhat unclear as many modern day graphics cards already contain dedicated H.264 decoding hardware. The addition of encoding hardware, however, may be of beneift for lower end and mobile configurations.

Incidentally, H.264 is one of the codecs used in Blu-Ray high definition video discs which Apple has yet to adopt.

Article Link
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:38 PM   #2
P-Worm
macrumors 68000
 
P-Worm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
I'm not really sure that I buy this.

P-Worm
__________________
Follow my show The Movie Audit as well as watch my other videos on my YouTube Channel!
P-Worm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:41 PM   #3
Apple Ink
macrumors 68000
 
Apple Ink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Obviously this would be great for low end MacBooks with IGPs but this coming at a time when Apple is promoting Parallel computing........
__________________
I know a lot about cars. I can look at a car's headlights and tell you exactly which way it's coming
- Mitch Hedberg
Apple Ink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:41 PM   #4
Bubba Satori
macrumors 68000
 
Bubba Satori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B'ham
Blu-ray Macbook Pro and Macbook Tuesday.
Bubba Satori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:42 PM   #5
bwshockley
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Duluth, MN
I would like to see this, especially if it can reduce iChat overhead and save some juice. I run iChat for hours on end, producing a fairly hot MacBook Pro in the process. I'd love to see a dedicated encoder that uses less power, or at least creates less heat.
bwshockley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:43 PM   #6
evilgEEk
macrumors 65816
 
evilgEEk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boise, Idaho
I don't see this happening.

Definitely worth speculating about, but I would be surprised if it came to fruition.
evilgEEk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:45 PM   #7
kornyboy
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN (USA)
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_0_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5B108 Safari/525.20)

So this means that we may see a Blu-Ray drive in an Apple computer soon. Glad to hear this but I think that we will have to wait and see what happens. It would be very nice to see Blu-Ray in all computers that have an optical drive.
__________________
Stuff
kornyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:45 PM   #8
solipsism
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-Worm View Post
I'm not really sure that I buy this.
It's true, because the Intel Montevina chipset comes with High Profile H.264 and VC-1 decoding.
solipsism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:47 PM   #9
christiemp
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wisconsin
I would LOVE if they did this on the new macbooks AND released them before September 15th !

I would LOVE for the new macbooks to be released with this the first tuesday in September...I'm crossing my fingers...but it probably won't happen
__________________
30GB iPod video
13" Aluminum Macbook 2.4 GHz, 2GB RAM, 250 GB HD
I'm a mac convert as of October 15th 2008
christiemp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:48 PM   #10
motulist
macrumors 68040
 
motulist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
It sounds like it would've been useful 3 years ago, but not today.

AFAIK, I assume that even the lowest end current macbook can encode and decode h.264 at a reasonable rate without a dedicated chip. Heck, my 5 year old 1 ghz G4 powerbook can encode h.264 off a DVD in very high quality at something like 8 times longer than real time. So I would presume (and hope) that even without a dedicated chip a brand new upcoming late 2008 / early 2009 macbook should be able to do stuff more than 8 times faster!

Last edited by motulist : Aug 11, 2008 at 12:57 PM.
motulist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:49 PM   #11
andiwm2003
macrumors Demi-God
 
andiwm2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston, MA
a german magazine (spiegel) had an article about blue ray in PC's and how they can't cope with the data amount. maybe one of the reasons that there is no blue ray in macbooks is simply because the processors aren't powerful enough or get too hot/use too much battery. and apple wants to make things go smooth. i wouldn't mind having a chip in a MB that solves that problem (although i don't need/want blue ray). a year ago they said it's about $50. maybe prices are down by now.
andiwm2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:51 PM   #12
plumbingandtech
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Unless they can parlay this into a grandcentral coprocessor, i really don't think this is the big sept. news.
plumbingandtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:56 PM   #13
milo
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
*Adding* video hardware?

Don't many macs already have video hardware that at least does hardware encoding, but it sits there unused because apple doesn't provide the software drivers for it?

Wouldn't adding the software support for stuff they're shipping already be the first step?
milo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:56 PM   #14
Small White Car
macrumors 68040
 
Small White Car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington DC
Gee, I was excited by this rumor back in 2007.

And 2006.

And, hmmm...I think there was something similar in 2004. (Different hardware, I'm sure, but the same idea.)

Let's just file this one away next to the 'mini tower' idea and get on with our lives.
Small White Car is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 12:58 PM   #15
Small White Car
macrumors 68040
 
Small White Car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by milo View Post
*Adding* video hardware?

Don't many macs already have video hardware that at least does hardware encoding, but it sits there unused because apple doesn't provide the software drivers for it?

Wouldn't adding the software support for stuff they're shipping already be the first step?
Video cards are not made to encode and de-code H.264. The processor still does that before passing it on to the video card.
Small White Car is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 01:00 PM   #16
iMacmatician
macrumors 68040
 
iMacmatician's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The world of Macmatics, flying with my calculator…
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
AlleyInsider publishes an unconfirmed rumor that Apple will be incorporating QuickTime encoding/decoding chips into their products in the coming months. AlleyInsider's Dan Frommer describes it as "pure speculation" but felt it plausible enough to publish for discussion.
Quote:
Our understanding is that a QuickTime encoding/decoding chip would handle the grunt work of processing video, presumably in the H.264 format, so that Mac computers' processors wouldn't have to do as much heavy lifting. That could be used in any number of cirumstances, such as a live, hi-def iChat AV video chat, watching HD video off the Web, or faster encoding HD video for distribution. (Perhaps the iSight cameras built into MacBooks and iMacs might get a HD upgrade, too.)
The rumor actually mirrors an old claim by Robert Cringely from 2007 that describes the same details:
...
The significance of this rumor is somewhat unclear as many modern day graphics cards already contain dedicated H.264 decoding hardware. The addition of encoding hardware, however, may be of beneift for lower end and mobile configurations.
Interesting. Another feature the next MacBooks and MacBook Pros could have. So I suppose upcoming Macs, Snow Leopard, iTunes X / Media Me, and iLife '09 could focus on these aspects: iChat, HD iTunes videos, HD in general, QuickTime X, etc.

An explosion of media? I'm liking that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andiwm2003 View Post
a german magazine (spiegel) had an article about blue ray in PC's and how they can't cope with the data amount. maybe one of the reasons that there is no blue ray in macbooks is simply because the processors aren't powerful enough or get too hot/use too much battery. and apple wants to make things go smooth. i wouldn't mind having a chip in a MB that solves that problem (although i don't need/want blue ray). a year ago they said it's about $50. maybe prices are down by now.
That's totally valid, but then why isn't there Blu-ray in the Mac Pros and/or iMacs? 4/8 cores should be enough.

So I'm thinking the absence of Blu-ray in Macs is mainly from another reason.
__________________
babyj: "One day, all Apple products will be running the iPhone OS …"
iMacmatician is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 01:01 PM   #17
commander.data
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
This is a waste of time. OpenCL will allow GPU to accelerate h.264 encoding. And even without OpenCL, ATI has already partnered with Cyberlink PowerProducer to allow GPU accelerated encoding and similarly nVidia is doing the same with the BadaBOOM software. Even if Intel IGPs lack GPU accelerated h.264 encoding, Grand Central should make better utilization of existing dual cores.

And of course, all discrete GPUs in the current Apple lineup already accelerate h.264 decode with Blu-ray support, although better drivers are probably needed. Intel's GMA X4500 also provides h.264 decoding acceleration so decoding h.264 is hardly a feature that needs a separate chip.
commander.data is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 01:02 PM   #18
motulist
macrumors 68040
 
motulist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Small White Car View Post
Video cards are not made to encode and de-code H.264. The processor still does that before passing it on to the video card.
Video cards do indeed participate in decoding h.264.

Quote:
Originally Posted by anandtech.com
ATI was first to offer H.264 decode acceleration on its GPUs at the end of 2005
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2977

http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/...007-page1.html

http://www.google.com/search?num=100...nvidia&spell=1

Last edited by motulist : Aug 11, 2008 at 01:15 PM.
motulist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 01:09 PM   #19
commander.data
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Small White Car View Post
Video cards are not made to encode and de-code H.264. The processor still does that before passing it on to the video card.
Yes the CPU is still involved in some parts of decoding and it does depend on the GPU implementation, but generally when they say they support GPU h.264 decoding, there is still a massive difference.

http://www.hkepc.com/?id=1510&page=5&fs=idn#view

Near the bottom is a comparison of h.264 and Blu-ray decode between the GMA X3500 in the G35 chipset which does not support h.264 decoding and the GMA X4500HD in the G45 chipset which does. CPU utilization dropped from 86% to 10% for h.264 file decode and 95% to 23% for Blu-ray decode. And this is on a 1.6GHz Celeron. Even the GMA X4500 IGP has no problems with h.264 decode. It's just not a worthwhile feature to buy a separate chip for now that even Intel IGPs support it just fine.

Incidentally, on these early drivers, the GMA X4500HD is actually within 10-30% of the performance of AMD's HD 3200 IGP which is on mature drivers. Which is fairly decent for an Intel IGP.
commander.data is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 01:10 PM   #20
darkelipse04
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Send a message via AIM to darkelipse04
This could be VERY handy for those with Macbooks/Macbook Airs/Mac Minis. The IGP they all have cannot use Open CL (at least right now).
The Capella platform is the only chipset with true optimized encoding/decoding of H.264 and HD playback.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrin...orm_.282009.29

Most if not all the work is being done by the CPU right now. The less heat the better. I say bring on this decoding/encoding chip. It will probably be something like Elgato Turbo264 dongle.
http://www.elgato.com/elgato/na/main...oduct1.en.html
__________________
"Tom: Up next, a pig that wont eat Jews."

Last edited by darkelipse04 : Aug 11, 2008 at 01:12 PM. Reason: More information added.
darkelipse04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 01:11 PM   #21
Small White Car
macrumors 68040
 
Small White Car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by motulist View Post
Video cards do indeed decode h.264.
I stand corrected on that fact. But that doesn't really change the issue I was responding to: The majority of Macs out there don't have hidden hardware that can just be 'turned on.'

I was incorrect in the way I responded to that, but the central point remains the same.
Small White Car is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 01:11 PM   #22
slu
macrumors 6502a
 
slu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Buffalo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Small White Car View Post
Gee, I was excited by this rumor back in 2007.

And 2006.

And, hmmm...I think there was something similar in 2004. (Different hardware, I'm sure, but the same idea.)

Let's just file this one away next to the 'mini tower' idea and get on with our lives.
And tablet....
__________________
Rev A. iMac G5 / iPod classic 160 GB / Macbook 2.4 C2D / 3G iPhone
slu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 01:15 PM   #23
rumf
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by commander.data View Post
This is a waste of time. OpenCL will allow GPU to accelerate h.264 encoding. And even without OpenCL, ATI has already partnered with Cyberlink PowerProducer to allow GPU accelerated encoding and similarly nVidia is doing the same with the BadaBOOM software. Even if Intel IGPs lack GPU accelerated h.264 encoding, Grand Central should make better utilization of existing dual cores.

And of course, all discrete GPUs in the current Apple lineup already accelerate h.264 decode with Blu-ray support, although better drivers are probably needed. Intel's GMA X4500 also provides h.264 decoding acceleration so decoding h.264 is hardly a feature that needs a separate chip.
The intersection of Grand Central and dedicated Quicktime encode/decode on the board as well as the "Platform Transition" talk leads me to believe we might see something akin to a "Mac Terminal" in the near future. Take a minimal CPU, add some dedicated codec hardware and interface it to a massively parallel "home server" running over Airport Extreme and you have a whole new home computing paradigm... A mac in every display in your home via an apple tv like device, your iPod touch representing the computing power of a mac pro, your macbook tripling its processing capacity when within network range.

Lots of threads that can be woven into an interesting story.

Last edited by rumf : Aug 11, 2008 at 01:25 PM.
rumf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 01:22 PM   #24
Hattig
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by milo View Post
*Adding* video hardware?

Don't many macs already have video hardware that at least does hardware encoding, but it sits there unused because apple doesn't provide the software drivers for it?

Wouldn't adding the software support for stuff they're shipping already be the first step?
I'm certain that if it is true (and I hope it is) then it is merely about including drivers for the video acceleration that is present in any recent ATI/AMD and NVIDIA graphics card or integrated graphics, and also present in Intel's latest integrated graphics.

And it will be about time too!
__________________
iBook — 12" 1.33GHz, 1.5GB RAM, 40GB, Combodrive, 200GB Firewire Hard Drive :: iPod — 8GB Black G3 iPod nano
Hattig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2008, 01:22 PM   #25
fastbite
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London
This is a big deal. To have the ability of standardizing video performance across the board will allow apple to open up to all HD video.
__________________
If the movie is a turkey, stuff it! http://www.turkeyornot.com/
fastbite is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC