Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Aug 28, 2008, 07:26 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Releases ProRes QuickTime Decoder 1.0



Apple today released ProRes QuickTime Decoder 1.0, which allows Mac and PC users to view Apple ProRes files through QuickTime. ProRes, released as part of Final Cut Pro 6 in April 2007, is a post-production format targeted at video editors and offering uncompressed high-definition quality at standard-definition file sizes.

Quote:
The Apple ProRes QuickTime Decoder software allows both Mac and Windows users to play Apple ProRes files through QuickTime. Apple ProRes is a visually lossless format that provides uncompressed HD quality at SD data rates.

It is an excellent choice for mastering and can easily be transcoded to distribution formats like H.264. With new support for playback on both Mac and Windows computers, Apple ProRes can also be used for review and approval of Final Cut Studio sequences.
Apple previously published a white paper (PDF) detailing the features and benefits of the format.

The update is available in a Mac version weighing in at 369 KB and requiring OS X 10.4 or 10.5 and a Windows version weighing in at 273 KB and requiring Windows XP (SP2) or later. Both versions also require QuickTime 7.5 or later.

Article Link
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 07:39 PM   #2
tingly
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
I like that "visually lossless".
tingly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 07:40 PM   #3
ZiggyPastorius
macrumors Demi-God
 
ZiggyPastorius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Berklee College of Music
Send a message via AIM to ZiggyPastorius Send a message via MSN to ZiggyPastorius Send a message via Skype™ to ZiggyPastorius
Small updates. I wish I could just create my own file formats.
__________________
The multiplying villainies of nature do swarm upon him, and fortune, on his damned quarrel, smiling, showed like a rebel's whore.
ZiggyPastorius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 07:47 PM   #4
Rocketman
macrumors 68020
 
Rocketman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Claremont, CA
I would like to see a player for each of several proprietary camera video formats, starting with Sony.

I already posted Apple should provide file format standardization guidelines and SDK and services for camera vendors so essentially every image ever captured can be ingested seamlessly into Apple.

Rocketman
__________________
Think Different-ly!
Looking for an iPhone dev with way too much
time on her hands for BASIC programs I have.
Rocketman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 08:04 PM   #5
Doodledoo
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
PREDICTION!

Apple ends up using this format to provide HD downloads through iTunes for Apple TV and eventually everything else, obviously with DRM. Very exciting if you ask me!
Doodledoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 08:07 PM   #6
DaftUnion
macrumors 6502a
 
DaftUnion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Send a message via AIM to DaftUnion
Yay. Seriously though, if they use this format for HD downloads in iTunes come September, that would be awesome.
__________________
iMac G5 Rev. B/20"/2Ghz/SuperDrive/1GB RAM/400GB HD/Mac OS X.4.11
Switched 8/25/05
Custom 2.4Ghz Core2Duo/1GB Ram/NVIDIA 7600
iPhone 8gb
DaftUnion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 08:11 PM   #7
macshill
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Send a message via MSN to macshill Send a message via Yahoo to macshill
Maybe that's the ace card up Steve's sleeve. That'd rock!
__________________
StopTheCut.org - "When you know more, you do better."
macshill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 08:20 PM   #8
sam10685
macrumors 68000
 
sam10685's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Well this obviously means Apple is going to refresh every hardware product they make.
__________________
I'm Sam.
sam10685 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 08:24 PM   #9
Lordillingworth
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Shropshire, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by sam10685 View Post
Well this obviously means Apple is going to refresh every hardware product they make.
Brilliant comment! I think it also explains those weird fingers we have seen coming out of apple recently.
Lordillingworth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 08:27 PM   #10
skellener
macrumors 6502a
 
skellener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: So. Cal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodledoo View Post
PREDICTION!Apple ends up using this format to provide HD downloads through iTunes for Apple TV and eventually everything else, obviously with DRM. Very exciting if you ask me!
Nope. This is first and foremost a production format. It is much larger than h.264 and not practical to deliver files with. It's is 6-10 times smaller than uncompressed (we use it at work) but h.264 is much smaller. I don't see Apple moving away from h.264 anytime soon. It is great news for mixed environment studios though. Now Pro-Res can be used on ALL machines even if they are Windows.
skellener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 08:34 PM   #11
macshill
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Send a message via MSN to macshill Send a message via Yahoo to macshill
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lordillingworth View Post
Brilliant comment! I think it also explains those weird fingers we have seen coming out of apple recently.
Aw, you're just jealous 'cause you can't do the Vulcan symbol as well as Steve can.

"Dup dor a'az Mubster."
__________________
StopTheCut.org - "When you know more, you do better."
macshill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 08:46 PM   #12
rhett7660
macrumors 68020
 
rhett7660's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sunny, Southern California
Send a message via Yahoo to rhett7660
Quote:
I would like to see a player for each of several proprietary camera video formats, starting with Sony.
And JVC.............
__________________
rhett7660 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 08:49 PM   #13
MaynardJames
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by skellener View Post
Nope. This is first and foremost a production format. It is much larger than h.264 and not practical to deliver files with. It's is 6-10 times smaller than uncompressed (we use it at work) but h.264 is much smaller. I don't see Apple moving away from h.264 anytime soon. It is great news for mixed environment studios though. Now Pro-Res can be used on ALL machines even if they are Windows.
Exactly. ProRes is an Intermediate Codec. For HD it uses bitrates in the 100's to 200's of Mbits/s. Using ProRes for downloadable HD content would be completely impractical.
MaynardJames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 08:52 PM   #14
LethalWolfe
macrumors Demi-God
 
LethalWolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Finally. Apple not making decoders of all it's codecs available as part of QT Player is just irritating.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodledoo View Post
PREDICTION!

Apple ends up using this format to provide HD downloads through iTunes for Apple TV and eventually everything else, obviously with DRM. Very exciting if you ask me!
Not likely. 40gig/hr for a 720p24 file. That would go over well.


Lethal
__________________
If it doesn't hurt you aren't having fun.
LethalWolfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 09:17 PM   #15
ChrisA
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodledoo View Post
PREDICTION!

Apple ends up using this format to provide HD downloads through iTunes for Apple TV and eventually everything else, obviously with DRM. Very exciting if you ask me!
I very seriously doubt this will happen. Prores is large. Do you want to wait 6 hours for a movie to down load. This is for mastering shows prior to transcoding to some distribution format.

OK it you like this, then you are likely already sending your video email attachments in DV format and your still photos as 16-bit per channel uncompressed TIFF.
ChrisA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 09:46 PM   #16
Analog Kid
macrumors 68000
 
Analog Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by tingly View Post
I like that "visually lossless".
I'm sure this was all gone over when ProRes was announced, but I'm glad I'm not the only one noticing the weasel words...

Lossless means I can decode an encoded stream and retrieve the original-- if that's not true here then the word lossless shouldn't be anywhere in the description unless preceded by a negative.
__________________
"Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand...
Ignorance and Prejudice and Fear walk hand-in-hand."
--Peart
Analog Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 10:03 PM   #17
137489
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocketman View Post
I would like to see a player for each of several proprietary camera video formats, starting with Sony.

I already posted Apple should provide file format standardization guidelines and SDK and services for camera vendors so essentially every image ever captured can be ingested seamlessly into Apple.

Rocketman

I have yet to hit a format that VLC player cannot handle.
137489 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 10:55 PM   #18
quadgirl
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by shervieux View Post
I have yet to hit a format that VLC player cannot handle.
You're completely missing the point. This is a production codec to natively plug in to OS X and for windows editing software that can use the quicktime handler. Where exactly does VLC come into this?
quadgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 28, 2008, 11:27 PM   #19
samh004
macrumors 68020
 
samh004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Send a message via AIM to samh004
Quote:
Originally Posted by quadgirl View Post
You're completely missing the point. This is a production codec to natively plug in to OS X and for windows editing software that can use the quicktime handler. Where exactly does VLC come into this?
I presume he meant that ProRes already works in VLC on windows, so the new codec wasn't needed. Of course I am just assuming, I don't actually know anything, it just seemed the likely point.
__________________
samh004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 12:41 AM   #20
alphaod
Contributor
 
alphaod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LIE x37
I found the Final Cut update in System Updater; is this included in said update?
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
Mac Pro E09 (2x2.66/6x2GB/4x300GB10K/GTX285) | Dell 3007WFP-HC (30")
MacBook Air M09 (2.13/2GB/128GB) | iPhone 3GS (32GB/White/Unlocked)
alphaod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 12:53 AM   #21
happydude
macrumors 6502a
 
happydude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: a country with a new sense of hope
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodledoo View Post
PREDICTION!

Apple ends up using this format to provide HD downloads through iTunes for Apple TV and eventually everything else, obviously with DRM. Very exciting if you ask me!
isn't this too large to send over the internets?
__________________
hi
happydude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 02:08 AM   #22
LethalWolfe
macrumors Demi-God
 
LethalWolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Analog Kid View Post
I'm sure this was all gone over when ProRes was announced, but I'm glad I'm not the only one noticing the weasel words...

Lossless means I can decode an encoded stream and retrieve the original-- if that's not true here then the word lossless shouldn't be anywhere in the description unless preceded by a negative.
Visually lossless isn't a weasel word. It's a term to describe a codec that, as the name implies, generates a visually indistinguishable copy of the original but at a relatively small file size because the codec is compressed. A mathematically lossless codec creates and exact, bit-for-bit copy of the original but the file sizes tend to be very large.


Lethal
__________________
If it doesn't hurt you aren't having fun.
LethalWolfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 02:19 AM   #23
maproduction
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
The reason for this, much needed, release is only for a production workflow. If you edit with ProRes and have windows AfterEffect workstations you could not just send over the footage nor could the AE render out to ProRes unless it was on a Mac system with FCP6 installed.

This has been asked for since ProRes came out.

Virtually Lossless is also a commonly used term and production people know how to take it. Anytime you compress you loss something but this codec gives a lot of space and bandwidth savings with very loss in quality it also holds up very well from one generation to another.
maproduction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 02:19 AM   #24
Tosser
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by LethalWolfe View Post
Visually lossless isn't a weasel word. It's a term to describe a codec that, as the name implies, generates a visually indistinguishable copy of the original but at a relatively small file size because the codec is compressed. A mathematically lossless codec creates and exact, bit-for-bit copy of the original but the file sizes tend to be very large.


Lethal
So, as the Analog Kid said, it is a weasel term, since in audio*, what you just described receives the monicker "lossy format" (i.e. "cd-quality" 128kbps MP3s and the sort where 10/11ths of the audio information is tossed away), as opposed to "lossless", which describes how a the file can be made into a bit-for-bit copy for the original (again).

Edit:

* and still photography (i.e. jpegs are lossy, raw is lossless).

Quote:
Originally Posted by maproduction View Post
.

Virtually Lossless is also a commonly used term and production people know how to take it.
So does everyone else. The problem is, of course, Apple doesn't use the term "virtually lossless", but rather "visually lossless"

Last edited by Tosser : Aug 29, 2008 at 02:48 AM.
Tosser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 06:16 AM   #25
gnasher729
macrumors 68040
 
gnasher729's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodledoo View Post
PREDICTION!

Apple ends up using this format to provide HD downloads through iTunes for Apple TV and eventually everything else, obviously with DRM. Very exciting if you ask me!
I think you don't quite understand what this is about. This is a file format that is used by professional film editors during the editing process. You can't edit a file in h.264 format, because the decoding/encoding is much too expensive and you cannot edit single frames in h.264 without having to re-encode all the surrounding frames. ProRes is about five times smaller than raw, uncompressed files. That makes it about 18 MByte per second or 144 MBit per second for 1080p at 30 fps. About 24 times bigger than current Apple TV HD movies.

The only people needing this are film editing professionals who want to see what their movie will look like when played by QuickTime without having to go through a long encoding process.
gnasher729 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC