Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 29, 2008, 09:04 AM   #1
rscott505
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
[Merged] Comcast Implements 250GB Cable Internet Bandwidth Limit

As an avid user and supporter of Apple TV, I am greatly concerned about Comcast's recently announced 250 GB/month bandwidth limit.

I've heard that 250 GB/month is quite large. However, with 4 macs, two iPhones and one Apple TV, we are on the internet quite a bit, and download the overwhelming percentage of our content. As more and more media is delivered over the internet, and as HD content becomes more available, isn't it possible to get to this limit much quicker than Comcast asserts.

Obviously, Comcast is concerned with Netflix, Apple, Amazon and other future on-line content providers impacting their on-demand service.

Also, I contacted Comcast to determine if they would provide information about bandwidth usage, and the response was to download software on each computer. (No one could tell me if such a program was available for an unhacked Apple TV) Quite frankly, that is not sufficient. All cell phone companies let you see your minutes used, and with them, the punishment is a per minute charge, while in this instance Comcast will suspend your internet for a year. As such, it does not seem right that Comcast cannot provide bandwidth usage so we know where we stand.

Curious as to others thoughts on this.
rscott505 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 09:16 AM   #2
CWallace
macrumors Demi-God
 
CWallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Well 250GB is a heck of a lot of bandwidth - especially compared to companies like Time Warner that are talking setting limits (some well) below 50GB. I mean unless you spend your entire time downloading TV series DVD sets via Bittorrent, you're unlikely to hit it. And since it is a hard cap, you don't need to worry about getting socked with huge overage fees if you do happen to spend your entire time downloading DVD sets from Bittorrent.

FIOS is starting to deploy here in Western Washington, so it might be an option in your area. Or AT&T's UVerse. But chances are they too will enforce bandwidth caps down the road.
CWallace is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 09:22 AM   #3
JML42691
macrumors 68020
 
JML42691's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Durham, NH
I wouldn't be all that worried about it, unless if you are downloading a few movies a day, then you should be all set. If you are truly worried about it, then are there any more options to service (an unlimited service, or one with 500 GB maybe)? And is this change to all Comcast customers, or just customers creating new services? As Comcast is a HUGE internet provider in my area, and this is the first that I have heard of it.

EDIT: Found this article written by the Associated Press that details what this cap suggests, it sounds like you have nothing to worry about from this article, as this was done more to set an exact amount for what Comcast thinks is excessive use, for which they have capped users before, but without a set amount. They are saying that the median usage amount for their customers is less than 5 GB/month, so you should be fine.

Article Link
__________________
Current: 13" MacBook Air (mid-2012) ; iPhone 4 32GB (Verizon) : Setup Pics
Soon: ?

Last edited by JML42691; Aug 29, 2008 at 09:29 AM. Reason: edit note
JML42691 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 09:45 AM   #4
MikieMikie
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Newton, MA
I appreciate the article link, btw. Interesting.

As a Comcast subscriber, I think the 250GB number is pretty fair, considering what others have implemented.

I just hope they don't creep that number down.
MikieMikie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 09:52 AM   #5
alphaod
macrumors P6
 
alphaod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NYC
As a FiOS customer, I pity y'all Comcast ppl.
__________________
Mac Pro | 27" iMac | 15" MacBook Pro with Retina display | iPhone 5 | iPad 3 | iPad mini
alphaod is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 09:58 AM   #6
JML42691
macrumors 68020
 
JML42691's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Durham, NH
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikieMikie View Post
I appreciate the article link, btw. Interesting.

As a Comcast subscriber, I think the 250GB number is pretty fair, considering what others have implemented.

I just hope they don't creep that number down.
After seeing what other providers are giving as limits, Comcast is very generous in this situation. I too hope that they do not bring this number down at all. It seems like they are only implementing this because they have suspended some subscribers in the past for using an excessive amount of bandwidth, but they haven't had an actual set amount listed, which is why they have stated 250 GB.

And that article states that you can download 4 standard definition movies a day for the whole month and still be in your allotted bandwidth.
__________________
Current: 13" MacBook Air (mid-2012) ; iPhone 4 32GB (Verizon) : Setup Pics
Soon: ?
JML42691 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 10:04 AM   #7
MyDesktopBroke
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Do You Use Comcast?

They are limiting internet service to 250gb for their customers.
MyDesktopBroke is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 10:07 AM   #8
ColinEC
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
I use Comcast, but I'm not worrying about the cap.

I don't think I ever have downloaded over 250GB in one month before, the most was probably 25GB.
ColinEC is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 10:10 AM   #9
Chip NoVaMac
macrumors G3
 
Chip NoVaMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern Virginia
Quote:
Originally Posted by JML42691 View Post
And that article states that you can download 4 standard definition movies a day for the whole month and still be in your allotted bandwidth.
Even doing 4gb movies/dvd's a 250gb limit is like 60+ movies. But in some ways I wonder if this is a solution looking for a problem.... Meaning that in my neighborhood there are few that I can sense that are heavy users... So far on my basic internet service I am getting on average 8kbps even during the heavy night time hours...
__________________
It is fast approaching the point where I don't want to elect anyone stupid enough to want the job. - Bombeck
Chip NoVaMac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 10:14 AM   #10
rscott505
Thread Starter
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Thanks so far the responses.

I also share the concern that the limit will creep downward.

I know I'm repeating myself, but Comcast is in the business of providing content. If you sign up for MLB's internet service, you can watch the games on your computer or iPhone. This is direct competition for Comcast's MLB package. If I rent an HD movie from ATV, it cuts directly into Comcast's profit since I didn't rent it from on-demand.

As such, while Comcast can say it's new policy is in compliance with Net Neutrality, in the end it is an end run around the concept. By limiting bandwidth, and not limiting its own services (albeit through cable TV), it is favoring its own content. Also, if the data for cable and internet share the same line coming into my house, why should cable tv (on-demand) be favored over internet. Is the reason because when I pay $3.99 for a movie using on-demand, Comcast gets the money? That ultimately seems to me to favor Comcast to the detriment of Apple (or Netflix or Amazon or whoever else is out there providing content).

It's inevitable as more-and-more content becomes available on-line, that Comcast will reduce the bandwidth limit. Thus ensuring that more consumers use its content than that of competitors.
rscott505 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 10:16 AM   #11
iGary
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Randy's House
There's no way I'd ever even come close ... and I live on the tubes.
iGary is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 10:26 AM   #12
CWallace
macrumors Demi-God
 
CWallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaod View Post
As a FiOS customer, I pity y'all Comcast ppl.
Chances are very good eventually FIOS will institute a limit, as well.




What is...amusing...is Comcast is rolling out their new 16mb/s download service. We just added it here in Seattle. So they have effectively doubled our speed and note that it will most benefit people who download large files or view online video content.
CWallace is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 10:34 AM   #13
GSMiller
macrumors 68000
 
GSMiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kentucky
Comcast doesn't offer their service in my area
__________________
2.16 GHz 20" iMac || 30GB 5G iPod || 1GB 3G Shuffle || 2.16 GHz Blackbook
GSMiller is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 10:38 AM   #14
trip1ex
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
iTunes standard movies are ~1.5gb. 166 iTunes sd movies/month = 250gb/month.
trip1ex is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 10:40 AM   #15
P-Worm
macrumors 68020
 
P-Worm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
I have Comcast and it sounds like they are going to handle the issue in a fair way. The article says that if one goes over the quota, they will receive a call from Comcast warning them of excessive use. Then if they do it another month in a 6 month period they could have their contract terminated.

I much prefer the warning over unexpectedly being billed an extra amount.

P-Worm
P-Worm is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 10:48 AM   #16
scorpio333
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
My thoughts and opinions, feel free to not agree. I'm no longer a Comcast customer for a few different reasons. If I would have tried to live out those reasons this would have definitely been a deal breaker. I doubt I consistently reach that amount per month, but there have been stretches where I went double that while doing projects. If it were full time work a dedicated business service would suit me better, but the work comes for a few months then dries up.

For me this a matter of principle. Why isn't Comcast being proactive and improving their service to handle all these new services? Why put the cap on paying customers? Let's keep older technology around, tell everyone it's the best, then slap people with limits and tell them it's for their own good.

Frankly it pisses me off everytime I see a comcastic commercial boasting superiority and then they pull a gimmick like this. It has been my experience that DSL and FIOS were far superior services than the comcast service I received in two separate locations.

If the cap doesn't make you happy, let Comcast know. Also let them know they're not the only game in town and the cap could cost them your business (assuming you're willing cut ties with them). Yeah they won't listen, but it's fun to rub it in once they come begging for your money again after you've left them.
scorpio333 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 11:10 AM   #17
soberbrain
macrumors 65816
 
soberbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
I don't think the cap will affect me personally, 250 GB is a lot of data. I hope it helps to keep costs down and better the service.
__________________
13" MacBook Pro 2.26 GHz --- iPhone 4
"To start press any key."
Where's the ANY key!? --- HJS
soberbrain is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 11:40 AM   #18
operator207
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
If this is something your worried about, I am sure there are some routers out there you could install that will tell you bandwidth usage. Like this one. Note: I am not recommending this device (I have never used it), just that a device like I am describing exists.

Then you could monitor who does what without having to find software for all your devices.
operator207 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 11:43 AM   #19
Eidorian
macrumors Penryn
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
250 GB/month is a ridiculous amount of bandwidth to use.

Well right now it is...
__________________
Core i5 750 / 16 GB RAM / SSD / HD 7950 / Windows 8
MRoogle it!
Eidorian is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 12:06 PM   #20
xlii
macrumors 68000
 
xlii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Millis, Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eidorian View Post
250 GB/month is a ridiculous amount of bandwidth to use.

Well right now it is...

No one will ever need more than 640k bytes of memory (wasn't that bill gates who said that)
xlii is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 12:09 PM   #21
CWallace
macrumors Demi-God
 
CWallace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by xlii View Post
No one will ever need more than 640k bytes of memory (wasn't that bill gates who said that)
For a character-based, command-line OS, it likely was.
CWallace is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 12:28 PM   #22
MikieMikie
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Newton, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by xlii View Post
No one will ever need more than 640k bytes of memory (wasn't that bill gates who said that)
Actually, Apple had a 64K limit, and came standard with 48K. Who would need more?
MikieMikie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 12:53 PM   #23
rick6502
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Comcast is punishing the wrong people.

In understand the IPs are worried about bandwidth issues, but punishing their customers is not the answer. 4% of all internet traffic is junk, but rather than figure reducing the amount of junk mail traffic they are limiting the amount of (in theory) legitimate traffic. So if the amount of junk increases and their bandwidth does not increase, is Comcast going to have to lower the cap? At what point does it stop? This is a case of ****** the users, they'll keep paying anyway. Would you let the highway department tell you the roads were too full of trucks so you can only drive so much?

http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/...ic-raw-sewage/
rick6502 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 01:39 PM   #24
dilailamams
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
i've been using comcast for a little over 2 yrs. i had not any connection or speed problem yet. also i got lots of rebates and free modem..when i applied.
dilailamams is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2008, 01:49 PM   #25
killr_b
macrumors 6502a
 
killr_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Suckerfornia
The wording in the op is great!

Once they get you used to the idea of "limiting internet service" that whole internet2 thing will sound less like a rumor…


__________________
Mac Pro 2,1 - 16GB RAM, ati 5770, 30" ACD x2; Whoa-terabytes everywhere…
killr_b is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Internet bandwidth limiter millar876 Mac OS X 9 Jan 13, 2013 03:59 PM
iChat Bandwidth Limited by Comcast - help Jopling Mac Applications and Mac App Store 25 Aug 18, 2010 09:20 AM
Is it Possible, limit internet bandwidth for a computer? starcrossed General Mac Discussion 6 Jan 27, 2005 10:24 AM
Comcast Cable Internet doubled its DL speed. coopdog Community 13 Feb 3, 2004 12:17 PM
Comcast Cable Internet & iBook rjett Mac Help/Tips 9 Dec 3, 2002 07:16 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC