Go Back   MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 3, 2008, 01:37 AM   #1
ivan98
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
New Nano - Capacity?

Since the new form factor is now as confirmed as rumors can be, and date officially set for 9th Sept (anyone notice this is 9/9, iPhone3G was 7/11 and 8/22), what capacities do you think the new Nano will have?

Current the flash lines are (1,2), (4,8) and (8,16,32) GB for Shuffle, Nano and Touch respectively.

Will we see (2,4), (8,16) and (16,32,64) [multiply by 2] or (4,8), (16,32) and (32,64) [multiply by 4]?

For laptop CPU, Apple seems to follow the practice of using the same price point; CPU of xMHz costing $z in laptop rev1 will get CPU of yMHz costing the same $z in rev2. If this COGS structure holds, we just need to know how much flash RAM price has dropped for the past year (Nano was last released in Sep 07).
ivan98 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 3, 2008, 01:43 AM   #2
EricNau
Moderator
 
EricNau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
I suspect we'll see the 1 GB shuffle dropped, with the 2 GB taking its place at the $50 price point. 4 GB just seems too large for a shuffle.

As for the Nano, I suspect we'll see 8 GB and 16 GB.

Finally, as for the touch, I'm not expecting any capacity changes (except possibly dropping the 8 GB), but I surmise we'll see lower prices. At this point, I just can't picture a cost-effective 64 GB touch.
EricNau is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 3, 2008, 02:06 AM   #3
ivan98
Thread Starter
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
This blog post says a 4x price drop for the past year....

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricNau View Post
4 GB just seems too large for a shuffle.
You don't mean physically right, cos there're 4GB M2/MicroSD so it's certainly possible. Size aside, it's a "why not?"...

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricNau View Post
I surmise we'll see lower prices.
With Apple, I'll never assume a price drop, but these days, it's certainly possible.

Which leaves us with the combos:
  • 2x capacity increase
  • 2x capacity increase + price drop
  • 4x capacity increase
ivan98 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 3, 2008, 03:50 AM   #4
Moriarty
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
A 4GB shuffle won't happen. Honestly... who wants about 100 CD's worth of music on an iPod Shuffle? It would be an absolute nightmare to navigate. Well, you can't. Even at 320kbps, you'd fit about 25 CDs. It's a lot of music for something without a screen. People might buy it mindlessly because it's got a bigger capacity, but that sort of size is just redundant.

It's just too big. Even 2GB is quite generous.

All I hope is that they drop the price of the iPod Classic. I've been looking at one for the past couple of months but have held out because of the impending update. If they do nothing to it I'll be really annoyed... but perhaps a reasonably priced 32GB Touch could tempt me. I'd only be able to fit half my music at 128kbps on a 32GB touch, but a lot of it I wouldn't want to listen to on the road anyway.... so the Touch is still tempting. But expensive.

So many choices and they all cost too much money
Moriarty is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 6, 2008, 06:31 AM   #5
thespyglass
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool UK
Thanks for this thread.

Need to replace my little 2G Mini asap and was planning to upgrade to a Classic because of the capacity but a Nano is more practical for someone like me who uses the thing at the gym/running outside, as well just in general while out and and about.

16GB+ could really tempt me.
__________________
16GB iPod Nano | Aluminium MacBook (2.4Ghz, 250GB HD, 2GB RAM)

Last edited by thespyglass; Sep 6, 2008 at 06:31 AM. Reason: Adding the "+" after "16GB"
thespyglass is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 6, 2008, 08:11 AM   #6
KJmoon117
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by thespyglass View Post
Thanks for this thread.

Need to replace my little 2G Mini asap and was planning to upgrade to a Classic because of the capacity but a Nano is more practical for someone like me who uses the thing at the gym/running outside, as well just in general while out and and about.

16GB+ could really tempt me.
I share the same view, I'm going to replace by dying iPod Nano 8GB (2nd Gen) and the current line of Nanos has been a little frustrating due to their capacity.

If they do come out with a 16GB Nano, I might be really tempted to buy as well; however, I still have my eye on the 80GB Classic. The only problem is that I'm a runner... Ehh, it's a little frustrating choice for me at the moment. Hopefully Sept. 9th will change that.
KJmoon117 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 6, 2008, 10:13 AM   #7
iMacmatician
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Most likely, 8 GB for $149 and 16 GB for $199.
__________________
"There is no 5.5" iPhone." - 1080p
"iPhone 6 Plus has a resolution of 1920 by 1080" - Apple
iMacmatician is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 6, 2008, 02:52 PM   #8
The Killer Fuzz
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by iMacmatician View Post
Most likely, 8 GB for $149 and 16 GB for $199.
Yeah, i would go with that but considering what apple has done with the last 2 generations, it would be 8gb silver then 16gb, in colors.
__________________
iPhone 8gb
iPod shuffle 1gb
MBP 15" 2.4ghz,2gb,250gb HD,glossy
The Killer Fuzz is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2008, 09:40 AM   #9
WordLife565
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
I'd expect no higher than 16 GB, but most likely, it will stay at a max of 8 GB, so that it won't permeate into iPod touch territory.
__________________
13" Macbook Pro 2011, 2.3 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD
iPhone 5 16 GB Black
2G iPod touch 8GB
Apple TV
WordLife565 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2008, 09:55 AM   #10
sushi
Moderator emeritus
 
sushi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: キャンプスワンピー [Japan]
I think that the Nano will be a new form factor and the memory will increase to 8GB and 16GB models.

Although, there has been talk about a price decrease. In that case, we may not see an increase in memory.

As for the Shuffle. If Apple creates a new version that can function as a Thumb Drive, then we'll see bigger capacities. Otherwise, if it is the same model, then only a price drop.
__________________
You only live twice, once when you are born, and when you look death in the face. *Basho style poem from 007 YOLT.
sushi is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2008, 05:20 PM   #11
SkyBell
macrumors 603
 
SkyBell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas, unfortunately.
Am I the only one who thinks 12 GB is going to be the top of the line nano?
__________________
MR's PowerPC Fangirl
eMac 1.42 GHz G4 - 10.5.8
12" PowerBook G4 1.5 GHz - 10.4.11
Blueberry iBook G3, Apple IIc
SkyBell is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2008, 05:27 PM   #12
iTeen
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Washington
Send a message via MSN to iTeen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassie View Post
Am I the only one who thinks 12 GB is going to be the top of the line nano?
They don't make 12gb chips.
iTeen is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2008, 07:19 PM   #13
11800506
macrumors 65816
 
11800506's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington D.C. Area
I'd say:
Shuffle - 1 GB, 2 GB with a slight price drop
Nano - 8 GB, 16 GB
Touch - Drop the 8 GB, 16, 32 GB fall down a price point with the possible introduction of a 64 GB Touch
Classic - 120 GB, 200 GB (?) - I know they have 120 GB 1.8" drives because of the Zune 120 but I don't know about drives above 160 GB in size

That seems pretty likely.
__________________
Retina Macbook Pro 15" - 2.7 / iPhone 5
11800506 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2008, 07:26 PM   #14
The Toon Master
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
We have 12 gazillion topics like this

but anyway, in previous topics it's been mentioned that 32GB Flash Drives and 360GB Hard Drives do not come small enough to fit in iPod or were too expensive to be put in an iPod. That's why it's been mentioned that the iPod Classic will come in 120GB and 240GB models respectivly, which is a decent sized increase and should be cost friendly enough.

I'm also in the camp of who the f would want a 4GB shuffle, but apparently the price drop of the shuffle resulted in really good sales numbers
The Toon Master is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2008, 07:28 PM   #15
BoyBach
macrumors 68040
 
BoyBach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
My prediction is that capacity of the nano range won't change, instead the prices will be heavily reduced.
__________________
"I'm sensing a change in management style here, from touchy-feely to smashy-testes."
BoyBach is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2008, 07:33 PM   #16
sushi
Moderator emeritus
 
sushi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: キャンプスワンピー [Japan]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassie View Post
Am I the only one who thinks 12 GB is going to be the top of the line nano?
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTeen View Post
They don't make 12gb chips.
To add, capacities are in powers of 2, so you'll see sizes like these:

1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, etc.

Usually multiple memory slots are filled with the same capacity memories. So you won't see mixed chip capacities such as 12 (8+4), 20 (16+4), etc.

In the case of the Touch and iPhone, the Touch has two memory slots whereas the iPhone only has one. So the Touch will be able to max out at twice the capacity of the iPhone.
__________________
You only live twice, once when you are born, and when you look death in the face. *Basho style poem from 007 YOLT.
sushi is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 8, 2008, 03:07 AM   #17
Moriarty
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
If they don't offer the new Nano's in 8GB and 16GB sizes, I'll eat my hat.*


*Actually, I won't eat my hat . But I will be very surprised if they don't, because an 8GB limit is just too small now to be competitive with other brands that go up to 32GB (which needs two chips, and is more expensive than the Nano should be). And I suspect the 8GB Touch will be dropped.
Moriarty is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 8, 2008, 03:31 AM   #18
iCantwait
macrumors 65816
 
iCantwait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
i should add to my sig somthing about if there is a 4gb shuffle and a 32gb nano i will also put $100 on red.

a 32gb nano would just be stupid, DONT DO IT APPLE. i want an 8gb nano as i already have a 16gb iPhone. But i do hope the lower end nano will come in multi colours as i really want that orange
__________________
There truly is something beautiful about seeing a 5gb iPod plugged into an iBook
iCantwait is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 8, 2008, 04:03 AM   #19
Dublo7
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Perth, Australia.
A 64gb Touch would be a must buy for me. I can't imagine how much it's going to cost though
Dublo7 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 8, 2008, 04:13 AM   #20
iCantwait
macrumors 65816
 
iCantwait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dublo7 View Post
A 64gb Touch would be a must buy for me. I can't imagine how much it's going to cost though
exactly, hence the lack of release-age
__________________
There truly is something beautiful about seeing a 5gb iPod plugged into an iBook
iCantwait is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Sep 8, 2008, 11:51 AM   #21
thespyglass
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJmoon117 View Post
If they do come out with a 16GB Nano, I might be really tempted to buy as well; however, I still have my eye on the 80GB Classic. The only problem is that I'm a runner... Ehh, it's a little frustrating choice for me at the moment. Hopefully Sept. 9th will change that.
Yeah, here's hoping. I'm sure there must be a few of us thinking the same things. If I was minted I'd love a Shuffle or similar just for running and the Classic for everything else, but I'm not, so... yeah.

Hurry up, tomorrow!
__________________
16GB iPod Nano | Aluminium MacBook (2.4Ghz, 250GB HD, 2GB RAM)
thespyglass is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ipod nano first gen recall (trade up for new nano)? RidgeRacerType4 iPod 4 Oct 7, 2012 12:09 AM
64GB I5 Capacity v. Actual Capacity jpbeck76 iPhone 3 Sep 21, 2012 06:08 PM
Where's the Capacity?? QuietKnight iPod touch 2 Sep 15, 2012 01:48 AM
Battery capacity iPod Nano 6G? cclloyd iPod 1 Jul 13, 2012 07:38 PM
iPad mini similar to the "fat" nano? (3rd gen iPod nano) leukotriene iPad 2 Jul 7, 2012 11:44 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC