Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Sep 10, 2008, 07:45 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
iPod Nano, Touch Disassembled. iPod Touch has a Bluetooth Chip.





iPod Nano disassembly




iPod Touch dissemmbly


iFixit has posted disassembly photographs of the iPod Nano and iPod Touch. These disassembly photos are common after new products are released and provide readers an interesting view of the internals of the latest Apple products.

Occasionally, however, there's also an interesting find. In this case, iFixit has found that the iPod Touch actually contains an unadvertised Broadcom BCM4325 Bluetooth chip. Apple has not made any mention of Bluetooth support in the new iPod Touch.

What Apple did announce was that it had added Nike+ wireless support in the iPod Touch. According to Apple's FAQ, the Nike+ system uses a "proprietary low-power 2.4 GHz radio protocol" which is specifically said not to be Bluetooth or Wi-Fi.

Bluetooth, however, appears to use the same frequency. We're uncertain if a Bluetooth chip can emulate the Nike+ protocol or if there is a separate unidentified Nike+ receiver in the iPod Touch. Regardless, this will certainly trigger speculation about adding Nike+ support in current iPhones and additional uses of the Bluetooth chip in the iPod Touch (such as Bluetooth headsets).


Article Link
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 07:46 PM   #2
fanbrain
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: So. UT
Bluetooth audio? File transfers? Sweet!
__________________
Keeping Apple debt-free since 1983.
fanbrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 07:50 PM   #3
iToaster
macrumors 68000
 
iToaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In front of my MacBook
Uh... isn't that bluetooth chip for the Nike shoe thingamabob?
__________________
Unibody MacBook | 2.4 | 2GB | 500GB | white iPhone 3G S⃣ | 32 GB
iToaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11, 2008, 12:43 PM   #4
Trip.Tucker
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by iToaster View Post
Uh... isn't that bluetooth chip for the Nike shoe thingamabob?
Yes sir, it is indeed.
Trip.Tucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 07:51 PM   #5
Hooka
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
now was the event worth it?!
__________________
iMac 24 inch 3.06 Core 2 Duo NVIDIA 8800; MBP 15 inch 2.16 CoreDuo
iMac 17 inch G5 2.0; iPhone 8gb 1st gen
2 Canon 5D w/50mm 1.2L, 24mm-105mm 4.0L
Hooka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 07:54 PM   #6
iPoodOverZune
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
now why would someone rate this as negative?!
__________________
I will consider (to) iPo(o)dOverZune anytime
Zune Zucks....flop show...then it may be too zoon to say yet
iPoodOverZune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 07:55 PM   #7
Beric
macrumors 68000
 
Beric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by iPoodOverZune View Post
now why would someone rate this as negative?!
There could have been a GPS chip in place of that bluetooth chip. That would be the negative way to look at it.
__________________
"If I wanted an Apple phone, would I be looking at an iPod touch?
If I didn't want to pay a $2000 contract, would I be looking at an iPhone?"
Beric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 07:56 PM   #8
jayhawk11
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lawrence, KS
Jesus. H. Good news. Can't wait to get mine tomorrow.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro Classic, 2.2 GHz; 32 GB iPhone 3G S⃣

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU.
jayhawk11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11, 2008, 05:22 AM   #9
ryanwarsaw
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by iPoodOverZune View Post
now why would someone rate this as negative?!
Because there is a chip that Apple will never allow to be used in any meaningful way?
ryanwarsaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11, 2008, 05:25 AM   #10
fishmoose
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sweden
So with this can we confirm if the new in-ear headphones work with the iphone 3G or not?
fishmoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11, 2008, 12:44 PM   #11
Trip.Tucker
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by iPoodOverZune View Post
now why would someone rate this as negative?!
Because they destroyed a perfectly working iPod?
Trip.Tucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11, 2008, 01:22 PM   #12
Apple Ink
macrumors 68000
 
Apple Ink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
So we finally conclude at least that a Bluetooth chip is the marketed 'inbuilt' Nike+ receiver!

Seems we're talking Entish.....
__________________
I know a lot about cars. I can look at a car's headlights and tell you exactly which way it's coming
- Mitch Hedberg
Apple Ink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 07:55 PM   #13
amac4me
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Here go the hackers. Someone will probably figure out how to get Nike+ on the iPhone.
__________________
Switch To A Mac
http://switchtoamac.com
amac4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 07:56 PM   #14
Mykbibby
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Send a message via AIM to Mykbibby
Could Apple possibly be prepping Stereo Bluetooth Support?
__________________
Mac Soda: Quenching Your Thirst for Everything Apple
Mykbibby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 11:51 PM   #15
aafuss1
macrumors 68000
 
aafuss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Send a message via AIM to aafuss1 Send a message via MSN to aafuss1 Send a message via Yahoo to aafuss1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mykbibby View Post
Could Apple possibly be prepping Stereo Bluetooth Support?
Could be-the hardware is present, all they need to do is enable it in software-but there's no BT antenna according to iFixit (only a Wi-fi one).
__________________
A.A.'s Mac mini-Core Solo 1.5 GHz,2GB, 60GB,Mac OS X 10.6
iPods:touch 32GB,5th gen 30GB, shuffle 2nd gen 1GB, shuffle 3rd gen 4GB, nano 1st gen 2GB, nano 3rd gen 4GB, nano 5th gen 8GB
aafuss1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 07:58 PM   #16
SkippyThorson
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Send a message via AIM to SkippyThorson
Theres the option of skype now with the headphones, and now you can pair it with a standard Bluetooth headset. We'll probably see that soon. That may be first legitimate alternative to AT&T.

Or.

I have an iPhone, does this mean I may begin to exercise?! Woohoo!
__________________
http://skippythorson.blogspot.com/
v1 iPhone ~ v5.5 iPod ~ v3 Nano ~ v1 Shuffle ~ 1.25ghz iMac G4 ~ 1.33ghz iBook G4 ~ Airport Extreme
SkippyThorson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 08:00 PM   #17
ltldrummerboy
macrumors 65816
 
ltldrummerboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kenai Peninsula
Cool. I hope this means I'll be able to use wireless headphones with my new Touch. Maybe after a $20 paid software update?
__________________
New to AT&T (30 days or less)? Want a $25 credit towards your next bill? PM me and we can both save!
ltldrummerboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 08:01 PM   #18
Hooka
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
I think this is the beginning stages of a nano type phone
__________________
iMac 24 inch 3.06 Core 2 Duo NVIDIA 8800; MBP 15 inch 2.16 CoreDuo
iMac 17 inch G5 2.0; iPhone 8gb 1st gen
2 Canon 5D w/50mm 1.2L, 24mm-105mm 4.0L
Hooka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 08:06 PM   #19
emt1
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wisconsin
I don't get why MacRumors thinks there is some big mystery surrounding iPod Touch compatibility with the new mic. It clearly says on the page "The remote and mic are supported only by iPod nano (4th generation), iPod classic (120GB), and iPod touch (2nd generation)."

How is that confusing?

Yes, the new iPod Touch supports the mic.
emt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 08:19 PM   #20
jbernie
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Assuming that the Broadcom BCM4325 Bluetooth chip is in no way modified then you would expect the touch to be a firmware update away from many BT options.

I hate to say it, but given the way Apple will charge for all iPod Touch updates except the 2.1, assuming you had paid to get to 2.0 I would not be surprised to see it be another $10 update to get it enabled.

Makes me wonder whether or not I might delay my iPod purchase a while longer, I haven't been in any rush and normally the stores sell the latest firmware rev. devices for the same price and cut the price of the old firmware models.
__________________
Talk is cheap, sometimes it is on sale!
ibernie.com
jbernie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 09:06 PM   #21
notjustjay
macrumors 68030
 
notjustjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hooka View Post
now was the event worth it?!
Naw, cue all the complainers who still think everything announced can magically appear on the older models via a free firmware upgrade...
__________________
MRoogle
notjustjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 09:07 PM   #22
havand
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
If the chip can do wifi, bluetooth and fm...Would the bluetooth and fm not need dedicated antennas as well?
havand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 09:14 PM   #23
ballyhoos
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
bluetooth chip + bluetooth GPS receiver dongle = GPS ... that's awesome, just need an app that allows downloading/storing of the maps to the file system and the app to read them from the blue dongle cords.

This is currently implemented on many phones this way...
ballyhoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 09:59 PM   #24
James-RSX
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Possible Antenna

Quote:
Originally Posted by havand View Post
If the chip can do wifi, bluetooth and fm...Would the bluetooth and fm not need dedicated antennas as well?
I had a Nokia phone with FM radio built in. It used the headphone cable as the antenna for the radio. It could be possible that Apple plan to do something similar when/if they activate the FM capabilities of this chip.

James
James-RSX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2008, 08:08 PM   #25
Rocketman
macrumors 68020
 
Rocketman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Claremont, CA
My first impression is that is an amazing device and an even more amazing engineering accomplishment. All those pieces and parts and still so small. More to the point, so many capabilities, and even more amazing, in such a small package. The holistic approach to engineering is an Apple asset.

Astounding.

Rocketman
__________________
Think Different-ly!
Looking for an iPhone dev with way too much
time on her hands for BASIC programs I have.
Rocketman is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC