|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Adobe Unveils Creative Suite CS4, GPU Accelerated Photoshop
![]() The embargo on Adobe's Creative Suite 4 lifted tonight at midnight and a number of news articles have revealed the details of the latest update to Adobe's flagship software package. Most interestingly, CNet reports that rumors that Adobe's Photoshop CS4 would employ the use of GPU-accelerated graphics were accurate. Quote:
A few of the other new Photoshop CS4 features are highlighted at Macworld including: - Content-Aware scaling - Nondestructive corrections in the Adjustment panel - Improved Lightroom integration - Advanced 3-D features in Photoshop Extended - New Tabbed interface Adobe Photoshop CS4 will cost $699 and ship in October. Existing Photoshop CS3, Photoshop CS2, or Photoshop CS owners can upgrade for $199. Adobe Photoshop Extended will cost $999 and existing Photoshop CS3 Extended, Photoshop CS2 or Photoshop CS owners can upgrade for $349. Of course, Adobe also introduced CS4 versions of their other applications including: Indesign CS4: Macworld Illustrator CS4: CNet, Macworld, DigitalArtsOnline After Effects CS4: DigitalArtsOnline Premiere Pro CS4: DigitalArtsOnline SoundBooth CS4: CNet Full details and pricing information can be obtained from Adobe.com. Article Link Last edited by WildCowboy : Sep 23, 2008 at 12:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
|
This sounds like a nice little upgrade, still wish it was 64bit on the Mac version though.
__________________
Canon 40D | Lenses | MacBook Pro/Air | iPhone | iPod Nano | Amazon Kindle |
|
|
|
| iBookG4user |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by iBookG4user |
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
nice update!
__________________
That thing is the most expensive phone out there! $599 for a phone? It won’t even sell enough to break even!-Steve Balmer “An A-Bomb, From A-Rod” |
|
|
|
| Yankees 4 Life |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Yankees 4 Life |
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Mar 2002
|
...and it comes on 17 installation DVDs for a hard drive footprint of 109.3 Gigs.
__________________
Have BlackBook and iPhone. Have operated almost every Mac model.Avoid fake Cuban cigars. — Get real cigar artwork.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
so, how does the upgrading stuff work? i have macromedia studio 8. i bought the upgrade to the design premium cs3. i see that for a limited time i can upgrade to cs4 with the studio 8 software, but does the upgrade i bought to cs3 count too?
or am i limited by the original software i bought? |
|
|
|
| gonnabuyamac |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by gonnabuyamac |
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Where is Ultra CS4?
The one thing I was hoping for was a Mac version of Ultra, the vector keying application that Adobe got when they acquired Serious Magic...
They did make a Mac version of DV Rack, now called Adobe OnLocation, which is great but it looks like Ultra just dropped off the map... ![]() Oh well, I guess I can wait to upgrade until CS5 now...
__________________
My signature line is more esoteric and obscure than yours. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I remember that image resizing tech from here. Amazing stuff.
|
|
|
|
| ElectricBrain |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by ElectricBrain |
|
|
#9 | |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
|
The embargo? I missed something big apparently?
![]() Quote:
I prefer 114 CD's instead (give or take 50).
__________________
The Un-Funny Truth About Scientology (Warning: Graphic images) MacBook Pro 15.4"/2.5 GHz/250GB/4GB RAM iMac G4 17"/800 Mhz/80GB/512GB RAM |
|
|
|
|
| Stridder44 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Stridder44 |
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors regular
|
So anyone have ant idea how well would this run on a Powerbook G4? Trying to decide if I should upgrade or not...
__________________
iMac G3, 233 Mhz, 96 MB RAM, 4 GB HD eMac G4, 700 Mhz, 768 MB RAM, 40 GB HD Powerbook G4, 1.67 Ghz, 2 GB RAM, 120 GB HD Mac Pro, 2.66 Octocore, 6 GB RAM, 4870, 1 TB HDD |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
I only hope fanboys now realise that it's not ok to release a new macbook with an integrated graphics chipset from the stone ages. It's clear that a proper video card is going to benefit the program now, which means cheaper PC's are going to have a huge edge over mac's unless apple step up.
|
|
|
|
| logicsuggests |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by logicsuggests |
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Wonder if Adobe got smart and brought back ImageReady ... Firework is an awful replacement for creating slices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
This should be great to go with the new macbooks tomorrow
|
|
|
|
| ll PiStoNs ll |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by ll PiStoNs ll |
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
hmm.. Better than nothing i guess, but It's only using the GPU for standard viewing tasks apparently? What exactly was shown in the Adobe labs preview from earlier? Weren't they showing off actual image manipulation and transformations that were accelerated?
|
|
|
|
| winterspan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by winterspan |
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: /Aussieland/home
|
i hate the UI http://images.macrumors.com/article/...acstonecs4.jpg why cant Adobe just follow Apple's interface guidlines and use a default Window with OS X's close, minimise, zoom buttons and a proper title bar.
im all for the single window and tabs but it seriously looks out of place. sad for such a well renowned Mac app
__________________
♫Gee Officer Krupke, krup you!♫ 15" MacBook Pro Core Duo 2 GHz, 2 GB, 250 GB 7200.4; 23" Cinema Display; Snow Leopard Core i5 2.66 GHz, 4GB, 1.5 TB, 4870 1GB Nokia E63 |
|
|
|
| richthomas |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by richthomas |
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: At home
|
Wow, sounds like a rather mediocre update, one that I will pass on. Unfortunately, there are so many outstanding bugs still evident in CS3 that will not get fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
No Cocoa Love
I seem to remember reading that CS4 is still written with Carbon API's. I'm sure it'd a pretty big undertaking to rewrite CS5 in Cocoa (they'll have to eventually) but it would boost performance and overall user experience if they did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
macrumors 68020
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 2 Much Infinite Loops
|
Quote:
__________________
"Real men FTP/SSH their files around anyway." -- generik |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
Although I have to agree, Photoshop's UI is a giant (10 year) step backwards. They need to start consulting us on these things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Did Adobe explain to anybody why they did a full version upgrade so quickly after releasing CS3? I just use the education version, but that's still a lot of change to ask for to get what doesn't seem like any big upgrade.
Someone who pays full price for the software will also have to answer this: Is all of this software overpriced? We're still using mostly Photoshop 5 (yes, 5) at work because we're cheap and it still kinda almost works. Part of me thinks it's $700 because it's the only image-editing software I have ever heard of that does anything more than MS Paint. It's just hard to believe that stuff like Photoshop takes more money to develop than an operating system.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.16GHz, 2GB RAM, 320GB HDD iPhone 3G S 32GB |
|
|
|
| Michael CM1 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Michael CM1 |
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
Gpu?
Does this mean that apple will finally be putting decent, modern graphics cards in imacs (8800 isn't exactly latest and greatest) and macbooks?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Dec 2003
|
iMac is not intended for professional computing audiences like graphics or video professionals. So anyone who needs the extra GPU processing for photoshop duties should be getting a Mac Pro anyway. I'm not saying the iMac doesn't deserve a true video card in it, I'm just saying that needing a GPU for photoshop acceleration is not a valid reason. The iMac should get a real video card, but not for that reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Will this release work in Leopard? Or we should expect random problems when using spaces?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
macrumors god
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: at the table with countless relatives
|
Quote:
__________________
"You've just been abducted, of course you need crepes!" -- Walter Bishop |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|