Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 24, 2008, 04:44 PM   #1
MacBytes
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Google vs. iPhone: Is Steve Jobs Reliving Past Mistakes?




Category: News and Press Releases
Link: Google vs. iPhone: Is Steve Jobs Reliving Past Mistakes?
Description:: none

Posted on MacBytes.com
Approved by Mudbug
MacBytes is offline   0
Old Sep 24, 2008, 04:53 PM   #2
Kilamite
macrumors G3
 
Kilamite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Nothing really new - just what we had been debating here for a while, since the first app got rejected.

I can't comment on my views on the G1 phone without having actually tried it - but it looks not very pleasing, and it doesn't run OS X (obviously) so I'm still full on in getting an iPhone once my T-Mobile contract runs out.

I think it will be very interesting to see how much of a boom there is with developing for the G1 and how having an open system will affect security and so on. And also, if the G1's App Store becomes successful, what Apple will do to keep ahead in the market.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro 2GHz i7 8GB 750GB Hybrid | Mac mini 2.3GHz i7 16GB 1TB Fusion | OS X 10.9.4
iPhone 5 64GB | Apple TV 3 1080p | iOS 7.1.2
Home Theatre Hackintosh i3 3.5GHz 4GB 3TB | OS X 10.9.2
Kilamite is offline   0
Old Sep 24, 2008, 05:18 PM   #3
ArtOfWarfare
macrumors 603
 
ArtOfWarfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Send a message via Skype™ to ArtOfWarfare
I think some people are blowing Apple's rejections a bit out of proportion.

... of course as a developer I also fear being rejected... it would be very nice if Apple clarified the rules.
__________________
Battery Status - On the Mac App Store
The only app that'll estimate when your wireless devices will need their batteries changed.
Including the ones paired with other Macs on your network.
ArtOfWarfare is offline   0
Old Sep 24, 2008, 05:20 PM   #4
IJ Reilly
macrumors P6
 
IJ Reilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Palookaville
Yeah, this guy is good at "pattern recognition" alright. He's good at recognizing the pattern of errors made by other journalists and repeating them uncritically. For one:

Quote:
The key to the PC's success and Apple's downfall was that the open-standards-based IBM-compatible PC created a platform for third-party hardware and softwaremakers to ply their stuff.
Oh really? In what way was the IBM-PC based on "open standards?" In what way did Apple discourage hardware or softwaremakers [sic] from creating "stuff" for the Mac platform? The other inconvenient historical fact this guy either forgot or doesn't know is that the IBM-PC followed the Apple II but preceded the Mac. So what is he actually talking about here? We don't know, because apparently he doesn't either.

For another:

Quote:
The iPhone is more open than Apple's computers.
What does this mean? Nothing, as far as I can determine.

And finally,

Quote:
And unlike Apple, which listens only to Jobs, these manufacturers will be listening to the market.
Right, Apple doesn't listen to market. Like, obviously.
__________________
*The season starts too early and finishes too late and there are too many games in between.
Bill Veeck
IJ Reilly is offline   0
Old Sep 24, 2008, 05:50 PM   #5
ArtursBoy
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AZ
Personally I see valid points to both sides of the argument ( Open source Android platform VS closed source Apple OS platform ). For developers is the limitations Apple imposes on them vs the freedom Android gives them. But for consumers, at least from my point of view, is the filtering by Apple of programs that are good enough to be approved vs those who are not. Now this may not always be the case, such as those example of someone developing an application that competes with something Apple is already offering.

As a consumer and not a developer, I feel as thought Apple is "trying" to act in my behalf by imposing some type of quality control in the applications it allows developers to offer for the iPhone. Has anyone noticed how much an application gets criticized for its lack of functionality or stability?? Imagine if nothing was controlled. Also, the fact that an application needs to be "approved" by Apple may push a developer to write something worthy of being approved, that plus the potential sales revenue from selling the application I think is a good incentive for developers to come out with good products.

If you think about it, the lack of control of the applications offered for the Android platform has a huge appeal to those wanting to write malicious codes for the phone. I mean what's gonna stop someone from writing spyware or viruses for the Android platform ? Are we going to start needing to use Antispyware and Antivirus programs on our Android phones? While Apple's restrictions in its approval process may not ultimately be able to guarantee 100 percent protection from malicious code, I believe it most certainly will reduce the chances of that happening dramatically.
ArtursBoy is offline   0
Old Sep 24, 2008, 05:51 PM   #6
SandynJosh
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Quote:
And unlike Apple, which listens only to Jobs, these (Android) manufacturers will be listening to the market.
-------------------------------------------------
I think Apple did an excellent job of listening to what the market wanted and the G3 is the result. Of course, there are things that can be improved and added, but the extent that they bumped up the feature set so much on the second pass is, in itself, remarkable.

Now, if AT&T can only bring their phone system up to par and get their pricing more in line, then the casual phone user would be more tempted to use the iPhone. As it stands now, Apple/AT&T is satisfying the enterprise market so well that the Blackberry is running to catch up and the Android is not even positioned to be in that race.

Furthermore, I see Apple as trying to lead the market, not follow it, so there may be some killer features to come that will keep Android and the others off balance for a while to come. These may well be features that the market doesn't yet know it wants.

Apple said they intend to have a slimmer profit margin this coming year. That sounds a lot like planning on buying some market share as well. Between aggressive prices and quickly moving the stakes, Apple will be making the competition move faster than they can just to stay slightly sub-par.
SandynJosh is offline   0
Old Sep 24, 2008, 06:29 PM   #7
severe
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacBytes View Post
Google vs. iPhone: Is Steve Jobs Reliving Past Mistakes?
No.
severe is offline   0
Old Sep 24, 2008, 06:31 PM   #8
ianogden
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Send a message via MSN to ianogden
I think this article explains the situation very well. Microsoft made shrewd business deals with IBM and managed to get its software on lots of computers, be they good or be they bad. There was no quality control.

It seems to me that Apple is so passionate about their products that they wouldn't want to see their stunning Mac OSX on a beige shoebox in a crummy house somewhere. I think that shows an integrity in their brand and in their products and it shows a lot of faith that they have in their designs and their implementation.

As far as the Android goes, I can't see the advantages in it. Maybe the physical keyboard will be better than the iPhone's touch keyboard, which I have been frustrated with at times, but none-the-less, I'd rather have Mac OSX on my phone, that a Google branded operating system. Maybe I'm biased.

In terms of Apple application handling, I agree with the quality control arguments. Apple is monitoring the software that is available because they want the best for their customers. This tells me a lot about them as a business. Android seems to be a device for developers rather than consumers, and that hints a trouble to me. I love the iPhone OS, its sleek and minimalist, maybe a bit slow at times, but it works! I wouldn't want to find a virus on my iPhone one day and end up with a pretty glass brick.

In any case, I don't see a major product release in the iPhone, I merely see an iPhone competitor that will soon be prone to bugs, overload, plus the G1 isn't a very nice device to looks at, or use. Multi-touch isn't there, and from the video I watched, the presenter couldn't really use it and the demo app was a blue dot!

I like google, but I think it should stick to Maps and internet search...
__________________
Disclaimer

**Please be aware, humour may be included in the above message. Please don't take it too seriously. It's not life or death.**
ianogden is offline   0
Old Sep 24, 2008, 06:43 PM   #9
donga
macrumors 6502a
 
donga's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: AZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacBytes View Post
Google vs. iPhone: Is Steve Jobs Reliving Past Mistakes?
i hope not. apple did mess up big time with its handling of developers and their apps though
donga is offline   0
Old Sep 24, 2008, 07:06 PM   #10
IJ Reilly
macrumors P6
 
IJ Reilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Palookaville
A problem (among many) with this article and some of the comments is that the word "open" is thrown around with any definition of its meaning, let alone its implications.

For instance, the fact that Android is "open source" means nothing in the context of whether Google licenses it to multiple hardware makers. The big difference isn't "openness" at all -- it's the variety of hardware configurations where we're likely to see it implemented. A good or bad thing? That's a matter of opinion, but "open" by any definition has nothing to do with it.
__________________
*The season starts too early and finishes too late and there are too many games in between.
Bill Veeck
IJ Reilly is offline   0
Old Sep 24, 2008, 07:22 PM   #11
MacNut
macrumors P6
 
MacNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
If the providers that will sell Android can keep the prices below AT&T I think they can make a dent. Don't forget that a lot of the networks will have Android based phones, not just T Mobile.
__________________
The thoughts in my head are rated TV-MA. Viewer discretion is advised.
Now batting, Number 2 Derek Jeter, Number 2
MacNut is offline   0
Old Sep 25, 2008, 12:16 AM   #12
LtRammstein
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Send a message via AIM to LtRammstein Send a message via MSN to LtRammstein
I've been an Apple fanboi all my life, and I see the Android as a Google failure, not a potential Apple failure.

For one, developers can make whatever they want on it! I bet you anything that Google has "protected" their code and the person's personal data, but that doesn't mean it's so well protected that no one's information is going to go on to the Internet. Besides, Slashdot reported a few months back that Google was basing their OS off some old APIs that has really major security flaws in it. I bet they patched it well, but see how Google employee trends (leaving the company for another) go, I don't think they got everything.

Two, from the videos I've seen, you can make an "addon" to any application on the phone. Cool idea... Not really. If I made an application for Android and I wanted to make money on it, I would lock it down hard! I would not allow any addons unless it was specifically, asked, then just charge a small fee for it when it's done. Apple has a done a great job to make sure the developer's code is theirs, and to make all updates free. On Android, I see it turning into "who can take T-Mobile customers to the cleaners first?" I'm a part-time developer, and I support Open Source, so my stuff would be open to that.

Finally, the functionality of the phone is far worse! No multi-touch screen, it's glitchy at best (usually because of hardware), PHYSICAL QWERTY KEYBOARD, no graphics capabilities of the iPhone! I like the touch screen of the iPhone and it's keyboard. I have a PC friend who can't get it through their mind that it's easier to type on there than any other damn phone. When I mean graphics of the phone, I mean the smooth motion of objects.

The only plus side I see to the phone is it's 3 megapixel camera.

I give T-Mobile and Google my best, but I think they are going to struggle with the phone until the get a lot of the hardware parts upgraded. Mainly, faster processor, more RAM, bigger HD capacity (expandable to 8GB... Say good bye to battery life), screen is not as nice as iPhone's.
__________________
17" White Intel iMac 1.83GHz, 250 GB HD, 2 GB RAM || iPod Touch 16GB w/ 3.0 || 15" Intel MBP 2.4GHz, 250 GB HD, 4 GB RAM
LtRammstein is offline   0
Old Sep 25, 2008, 06:44 AM   #13
LeviG
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Norfolk, UK
Personally I'm not a big fan of the iPhone, I think its underspecified for the money and missing a few features I would want etc but thats besides the point. The app store in some ways is better than the google approach in that its regulated and you shouldn't get any dodgy apps, the problem is with the current clarity of the regulations regarding apps which needs to be sorted out sharpish, once thats done it should be good, even itunes has improved on windows since v8 so its going in the right direction as an infrastructure

Now android in my view has more potential than the iPhone in that its open and can be used as we want to, it does have some issues in that you could get spyware etc but it also allows us to install anything we want to.
I think the app store is a less polished affair being that its only on the phone and theres also no desktop sync app, its all done online (not sure I want google having all my info like that).

As to the devices, the g1 is ugly as sin but I don't think much of the iPhone either. Neither have a stylus by the looks of it and this makes it pretty useless for drawing quick maps (something which is handy on symbian and wm5/6).

If google or another android manufacturer can make a phone which is pretty stylish and can work with both pen and finger (which it can be due to open nature), has a decent range of installed apps and theres a desktop app created then I think that the mobile market would be seriously shaken up but at present can't see either as being as big a seller as they could have been.
LeviG is offline   0
Old Sep 25, 2008, 06:50 AM   #14
rdowns
macrumors Penryn
 
rdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
These seem to be the same old tired arguments trotted out when the iPod was released. Seems Apple did OK there. We've had 39 iPod killers but none could even get arrested for a misdemeanor.
__________________
If your religion is worth killing for, please start with yourself.
rdowns is offline   0
Old Sep 25, 2008, 06:54 AM   #15
reverie
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, Germany
The PC didn't win over the Mac because it offered a huge selection of ugly boxes and lower quality. Why would that make any sense? Customers will alway prefer beautiful and functional products. It won for 2 main reasons:

1. IBM was the dominant brand in computing
2. It was significantly cheaper.

So how could this threat Apple today? There's no brand bigger than Apple's AND the iPhone is already cheap! People have to realize that Steve Jobs did not repeat John Scully's mistake from the 80s. The Mac was really, really expensive, but the iPod is not and neither is the iPhone.
reverie is offline   0
Old Sep 25, 2008, 07:57 AM   #16
mainstreetmark
macrumors 68020
 
mainstreetmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
"The iPhone is more open than Apple's computers"

Well, clearly this guy is mis-informed as to what open means. Macs have a closed hardware-operatingsystem model. The iphone also has this. Anyone can write and distribute anything they want for the Mac, to anyone they want to.

The iPhone? Not so much...

But, for the time being, I can understand why. If Apple lets people install whatever crap they want from whomever they want, the odds are high that some crappy, battery-hogging software will make it on there, and Apple gets to pay to support it. After all, the iPhone runs on batteries all day, whereas on a Mac, a bad app simply gets tossed and you're on your way.
__________________
iTunesRegistry.com <--don't bother, it's dead.
mainstreetmark is offline   0
Old Sep 25, 2008, 10:32 AM   #17
IJ Reilly
macrumors P6
 
IJ Reilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Palookaville
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdowns View Post
These seem to be the same old tired arguments trotted out when the iPod was released. Seems Apple did OK there. We've had 39 iPod killers but none could even get arrested for a misdemeanor.
Perfect!

Quote:
Originally Posted by reverie View Post
The PC didn't win over the Mac because it offered a huge selection of ugly boxes and lower quality. Why would that make any sense? Customers will alway prefer beautiful and functional products. It won for 2 main reasons:

1. IBM was the dominant brand in computing
2. It was significantly cheaper.
This was also a one-time event which will never be repeated. When IBM farmed out the OS for the IBM-PC to Microsoft, they had no thoughts about allowing the hardware to be cloned. This was something others figured out how to do without violating IBM's copyrights. The result was far from deliberate on IBM's part. Still all these years later, some clueless journalists write as though it was, and compound their error by calling the PC "open" -- something it was never intended to be, by any definition.
__________________
*The season starts too early and finishes too late and there are too many games in between.
Bill Veeck
IJ Reilly is offline   0
Old Sep 25, 2008, 02:20 PM   #18
swordfish5736
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belle View
Send a message via AIM to swordfish5736
The app store was also a result of apple listenin to what the consumer wanted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SandynJosh View Post
Quote:
And unlike Apple, which listens only to Jobs, these (Android) manufacturers will be listening to the market.
-------------------------------------------------
I think Apple did an excellent job of listening to what the market wanted and the G3 is the result. Of course, there are things that can be improved and added, but the extent that they bumped up the feature set so much on the second pass is, in itself, remarkable.

Now, if AT&T can only bring their phone system up to par and get their pricing more in line, then the casual phone user would be more tempted to use the iPhone. As it stands now, Apple/AT&T is satisfying the enterprise market so well that the Blackberry is running to catch up and the Android is not even positioned to be in that race.

Furthermore, I see Apple as trying to lead the market, not follow it, so there may be some killer features to come that will keep Android and the others off balance for a while to come. These may well be features that the market doesn't yet know it wants.

Apple said they intend to have a slimmer profit margin this coming year. That sounds a lot like planning on buying some market share as well. Between aggressive prices and quickly moving the stakes, Apple will be making the competition move faster than they can just to stay slightly sub-par.
__________________
swordfish5736 is offline   0
Old Sep 25, 2008, 04:55 PM   #19
markgamber
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Redneck, PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by mainstreetmark View Post
But, for the time being, I can understand why. If Apple lets people install whatever crap they want from whomever they want, the odds are high that some crappy, battery-hogging software will make it on there, and Apple gets to pay to support it. After all, the iPhone runs on batteries all day, whereas on a Mac, a bad app simply gets tossed and you're on your way.
Where does this paranoia originate? First of all, is the iPhone hardware really that weak? Seriously, people on this site love to rip Windows Mobile and Blackberry but both can chug along pretty well with piles apps all running at once. Second, Windows Mobile and Blackberry have both been around for years and so have 3rd party apps for both. Whatever serious garbage is out there gets ferretted out pretty quickly and marked for what it is. And not because HTC, Microsoft or RIM run every aspect of every phone with a heavy-handed, my-way-or-the-highway attitude. Are iPhone users too stupid to figure out what's bad on their own or is this supposed to explain why the iPhone system has all the appeal of 1989's "software carousel"?

Practically, the answer is no. Steve Jobs has never made a mistake. Just ask him, he'll tell you himself.
markgamber is offline   0
Old Sep 25, 2008, 04:57 PM   #20
chris200x9
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
I just thought of something. With everyone complaining apples store isn't open enough and others complaining that androids is going to be to open, why doesn't google or apple take a cue from linux and offer repositories. Google or Apples repository you know the app has been check and quality assured but you *can* install other apps if you want.
chris200x9 is offline   0
Old Sep 25, 2008, 05:12 PM   #21
LeviG
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Norfolk, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris200x9 View Post
I just thought of something. With everyone complaining apples store isn't open enough and others complaining that androids is going to be to open, why doesn't google or apple take a cue from linux and offer repositories. Google or Apples repository you know the app has been check and quality assured but you *can* install other apps if you want.
I would say this is likely what will happen with android in the end and perhaps also have the very rare chance of happening with apple too.
LeviG is offline   0
Old Sep 26, 2008, 12:51 AM   #22
wearwholesaler
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Send a message via AIM to wearwholesaler
I love my iPhone
wearwholesaler is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CNBC Recognizes Steve Jobs as Most Influential Business Leader in the Past 25 Years MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 130 May 5, 2014 08:23 AM
Did Steve Jobs Really Work on the iPhone 5? SomeDudeAsking iPhone 80 Aug 18, 2013 01:51 PM
Resolved: Reliving the past :) (tibook) Graeme43 PowerPC Macs 8 Aug 13, 2013 11:03 AM
Steve Jobs imaginary quotes on Google Glass needfx Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 16 Apr 22, 2013 05:48 PM
Insiders Detail Steve Jobs' Role in Apple's Mapping Effort, Desire to Replace Google as iOS Search Engine MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 204 Oct 5, 2012 02:03 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC