Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:29 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
NVIDIA Powered MacBooks on October 14th?



TUAW believes that the upcoming MacBooks will indeed be powered by NVIDIA chipsets and will be delivered on October 14th.
Quote:
A source tells us that Nvidia is showing off new MacBooks to their employees, and word is going around that the new versions will be released as soon as October 14th.
Apple was first rumored in July to be incorporating alternative chipsets in future laptops. While Apple would still be using Intel CPUs to power their laptops, the support chips (including graphics) were said to be supplied by a company other than Intel. NVIDIA topped some lists as the most likely supplier. A subsequent report pointed specifically to the use of the MCP7A-U chipset in future MacBooks. This NVIDIA chipset was briefly detailed by Expreview:
Quote:
“MCP7A-U is the top class chipset in the MCP7A family. Though it could be named as GeForce 9XXX, it will be come the first mainstream uATX mobo with DDR3-1333 support. Sources inform us the MCP7A-U will be the “fastest mGPU”, but who knows.”
Such a move would address user complaints about the use of Intel's slower integrated graphics chipsets in current MacBooks. The move would also prepare Apple's laptops for the release of Mac OS X Snow Leopard which will allow applications to utilize the more powerful graphics processing units.

MacRumors has also heard similar whispers which lead us to believe these reports could be true.




Article Link

Last edited by arn : Oct 13, 2008 at 09:58 PM.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:31 AM   #2
richthomas
macrumors 601
 
richthomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: /Aussieland/home
dedicated NVIDIA graphics chips would be the bomb on a Macbook. just leave integrated for the Air.
__________________
♫Gee Officer Krupke, krup you!♫
15" MacBook Pro Core Duo 2 GHz, 2 GB, 250 GB 7200.4; 23" Cinema Display; Snow Leopard
Core i5 2.66 GHz, 4GB, 1.5 TB, 4870 1GB
Nokia E63
richthomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:31 AM   #3
robpow
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5F136 Safari/525.20)

woohoo can't wait!
robpow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:32 AM   #4
SFStateStudent
macrumors Demi-God
 
SFStateStudent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Francisco California, USA
Send a message via AIM to SFStateStudent Send a message via Yahoo to SFStateStudent Send a message via Skype™ to SFStateStudent
I'm hoppin' on that bus...
__________________
MBP 2.5GHz 250GB Mac Pro 3G S⃣ iPhone 32GB Black
SFStateStudent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:35 AM   #5
PCMacUser
macrumors 68000
 
PCMacUser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
It's possible that the graphics would be the nVidia equivalent to Intel's integrated set, rather than a beasty dedicated solution.
__________________
13" MacBook Pro 2.53GHz, 4Gb RAM, 250Gb HDD
12" iBook G4 1.33GHz, 1.5Gb RAM, 60Gb HDD
80Gb iPod Classic, 1Gb Shuffle, AirPort Express
PCMacUser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:35 AM   #6
bittin
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Hope that Rumor is true
bittin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:36 AM   #7
zarusoba
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
That kicks arse! (US: ass)
__________________
iMac 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM; 20" Cinema Display; Wacom Intuos3; 7B pencil + kneadable eraser
zarusoba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:37 AM   #8
parkeyb
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Hmm, i just don't understand why there have been no more pictures leaked if these laptops are actually that close to release... I'm dying for more tidbits.
parkeyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:38 AM   #9
richthomas
macrumors 601
 
richthomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: /Aussieland/home
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5F136 Safari/525.20)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PCMacUser
It's possible that the graphics would be the nVidia equivalent to Intel's integrated set, rather than a beasty dedicated solution.
so no dedicated graphics chip? But the photo has a pic of seperate chip?
__________________
♫Gee Officer Krupke, krup you!♫
15" MacBook Pro Core Duo 2 GHz, 2 GB, 250 GB 7200.4; 23" Cinema Display; Snow Leopard
Core i5 2.66 GHz, 4GB, 1.5 TB, 4870 1GB
Nokia E63
richthomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:40 AM   #10
daneoni
macrumors 601
 
daneoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Yus! and the rumor actually makes sense since Snow Leopard will indeed tap into GPU power.
daneoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:41 AM   #11
osc4r
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Big chance that it will be the new chipset, complete with NVIDIA's 9300 GFX and boasting DDR3 memory.

Quite obvious as you start to see them already in other laptops!
osc4r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:43 AM   #12
PCMacUser
macrumors 68000
 
PCMacUser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by richthomas View Post
[size=1]
so no dedicated graphics chip? But the photo has a pic of seperate chip?
I'm not sure which photo you mean. There was a photo of an nVidia chipset with 'nVidia' written on it in one of the linked articles, but that was the chipset, not a dedicated graphics chip.
__________________
13" MacBook Pro 2.53GHz, 4Gb RAM, 250Gb HDD
12" iBook G4 1.33GHz, 1.5Gb RAM, 60Gb HDD
80Gb iPod Classic, 1Gb Shuffle, AirPort Express
PCMacUser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:47 AM   #13
Pixellated
Contributor
 
Pixellated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dartford, UK
*Gets bank card ready*
__________________
"Globetotter" 8GB iPhone 3G; "Bricky" 2.4GHz AluBook ; "Oldy" CD MacBook; "Biggy" Core2Quad Hackintosh; "Eyestrain" Hackintosh Netbook
Pixellated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:48 AM   #14
viccles
macrumors 68030
 
viccles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Send a message via AIM to viccles
*Gets cards ready as well* Oh, the 14th can't come soon enough!
__________________
iMac 3.06ghz 4GB ram|5th gen 8GB blue iPod nano|Alu Macbook 2.4 ghz 2GB ram|32GB white iPhone 3GS
Follow me on twitter
viccles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:48 AM   #15
iBunny
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
I could only see this as good. Especially with the MacBook Pro's. If The MBP includes a dedicated GPU, coupled with a Integrated GPU in the Chipset... it could mean Hybrid SLI.

This would be phenomenal gaming for the MBP compared to current and previous Mac Laptops.
__________________
Sergeant
United States Marine Corps
iBunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:50 AM   #16
emotion
macrumors 68030
 
emotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Bring on the OpenCL and CUDA support.

Hopefully battery life won't suffer too badly.
emotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:52 AM   #17
Marx55
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
What is needed is a smaller and lighter (400 - 500 g) subnotebook. With true Firewire and Ethernet ports. Even the MacBook Air is too large and heavy for us (besides lacking the essential Firewire connectivity).
Marx55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:54 AM   #18
MacinJosh
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by richthomas View Post
dedicated NVIDIA graphics chips would be the bomb on a Macbook. just leave integrated for the Air.
MCP7A-U *is* integrated from what I understand.

Joshua.
MacinJosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:55 AM   #19
OriginalMacRat
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marx55 View Post
With true Firewire
Which Firewire is the "true" one?
OriginalMacRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:58 AM   #20
macbooker15
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hello! I'm over here!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marx55 View Post
What is needed is a smaller and lighter (400 - 500 g) subnotebook. With true Firewire and Ethernet ports. Even the MacBook Air is too large and heavy for us (besides lacking the essential Firewire connectivity).
Do u say the exact same thing once a thread?

Ontopic: YAY!
__________________
*Proudly 14, with a business*

13.3" Macbook, 2.0 GHz, 2 GB RAM, NEW 320 GB HD ; Jailbroken 8GB iPod Touch 3.0
macbooker15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 03:58 AM   #21
peterdevries
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
I have a current MBP, and although I don't think all of NVidia's chipsets are faulty; the way they handled the faulty MBP chipsets is worrying me..

Am I the only one?
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
peterdevries is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 04:04 AM   #22
maxlew
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Send a message via MSN to maxlew
Quote:
What is needed is a smaller and lighter (400 - 500 g) subnotebook. With true Firewire and Ethernet ports. Even the MacBook Air is too large and heavy for us (besides lacking the essential Firewire connectivity).
I highly doubt anything like that will happen any time soon. The main uses for firewire these days are video cameras and a few hard drives. Although subnotebooks are always lacking on the hard drive space, USB is just as good, because your not supposed to be doing anything super hard drive intensive, or even anything intensive on a subnotebook.
__________________
Macbook 2.16ghz 2gb
Dead 30gb 5g iPod (Drowned in my friends pool)
maxlew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 04:09 AM   #23
DARKJ3DI
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Finally! The x3100 is too slow and makes too much heat to run anything. My MacBook gets hot (about 60ēC) while running the screensaver...
__________________
Macbook 2.4GHz, iPod Touch 1G, iPod Shuffle 2G, AirPort Express, Xbox 360 Elite
DARKJ3DI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 04:10 AM   #24
tominated
macrumors 68000
 
tominated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Queensland, Australia
this'd be soooo awesome. hopefully they'll still be cheaper than the iMac cos i need a new mac (faulty logic board) and I want gfx. I'll prolly get this and a nice shiny 22" lcd
__________________
20" iMac Core Duo
13" 2.26Ghz MBP
Upgraded to 4GB RAM & 500GB HDD
tominated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 5, 2008, 04:11 AM   #25
itickings
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacinJosh View Post
MCP7A-U *is* integrated from what I understand.

Joshua.
That's my understanding as well.

But integrated doesn't have to mean junk. While the dedicated solutions are beefier, I'd take the integrated one anyway if it is beefy enough and provides advantages over the dedicated one (like economy/power consumption).
itickings is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC