Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 27, 2004, 11:43 AM   #1
MacBytes
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Bill gates dares to speak about apples security


Category: Opinion/Interviews
Link: Bill gates dares to speak about apples security

Posted on MacBytes.com

Approved by Mudbug
MacBytes is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 11:49 AM   #2
Sun Baked
macrumors G5
 
Sun Baked's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Isn't this like saying a Ford Escort that's always in the repair shop for breakdowns is a more reliable car than a oil change only Lexus, because the Escort is better maintained than the Lexus?
__________________
MacRumors member fails resist iPhone glamour effect, suffers credit card damage 2d8.
Sun Baked is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 12:17 PM   #3
jnasato
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: paradise
Yah, Gates is assuming that the other OSs potentially have the same amount of security flaws as Windows.

But it's hard to say whether the security of Mac OS X is due to the lack of hacker interest or an actually secure OS, so Gates has a fair assumption.
Maybe the true safety of Mac OS X (and Linux) hasn't been put to the test (yet?).
__________________
- ILLUSTREET.jp - nothinggg.com -
jnasato is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 12:33 PM   #4
Lancetx
macrumors 68000
 
Lancetx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
To assume that OS X and Linux are more secure primarily due to "lack of hacker interest" is making quite an enormous assumption I'd say. It has been well documented many times that is not the main factor in why Windows has so many security issues that do not affect their competition.

This story is just more CYA on Gates' part, usually it's the Sweaty One that is out there rambling such nonsense. The point is that they have a huge security risk problem on their hands that is going to take years (if ever) to clean up. They fully realize this, but as long as people keep paying up for Windows, they really don't have a lot to have to worry about...yet.
Lancetx is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 12:46 PM   #5
druggedonions
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Send a message via AIM to druggedonions
The british government give bill gates a knighthood.
And the next day he's on his high horse!
__________________
What do you mean we have rats in the oven?

Last edited by druggedonions; Jan 27, 2004 at 12:50 PM.
druggedonions is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 12:52 PM   #6
mainstreetmark
macrumors 68020
 
mainstreetmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Does Windows have hackers because of more security holes or security holes because of more hackers? That's a brain noodle.
__________________
iTunesRegistry.com <--don't bother, it's dead.
mainstreetmark is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 01:09 PM   #7
Sayhey
macrumors 68000
 
Sayhey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Francisco
All I've to say is this sounds like just more Microsoft FUD.
Sayhey is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 01:12 PM   #8
Photorun
Banned
 
Photorun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC
I didn't realize Bill Gates does stand up comedy? Wow, he actually IS talented!
Photorun is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 01:34 PM   #9
Rower_CPU
Moderator emeritus
 
Rower_CPU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Quote:
Gates said "virtually all" Microsoft customers are now using automatic patching.
Really? Quick show of hands, who uses the automatic update feature?

I never do in our lab environment, or personally.
__________________
Join MacRumors.com - Team Folding!
Rower_CPU is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 02:17 PM   #10
billyboy
macrumors 65816
 
billyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In my head
Does everyone with a Mac online have warnings about security updates automatically appearing? Mine is set for once a week, which could be a long time in virus land. I know viruses arent a deal right now unless you run MS Office, but just for belt and braces, and also as a means for instilling good practice into us, perhaps Apple should have an over-rider for security updates. Not to force launch the update, but to display it perhaps in the menubar, until it is installed. Assuming security patches are issued because they are really important, I wouldn't take that small imposition as a Big Brother type move.
billyboy is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 02:24 PM   #11
Mr.Hey
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally posted by druggedonions
The british government give bill gates a knighthood.
And the next day he's on his high horse!

Mr.Hey is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 02:41 PM   #12
dombi
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Makes me wonder if he is getting afraid of Linux and the Mac. Why else would he try to create negative press for the other two operating systems?

He is right in a way, and in others he is completely wrong. To give Outlook the ability to communicate with the operating system the way it does was a serious flaw in their design. Can he just admit that?
dombi is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 02:49 PM   #13
CMYanko
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Spin Doctor

What a wonderfull job of spinning your softwares biggest weakness as possibly, ultimately, its biggest strength!

People don't load patches because they often lead to even worse problems making the cure worse than the disease.
CMYanko is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 03:01 PM   #14
Qunchuy
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally posted by Rower_CPU
Really? Quick show of hands, who uses the automatic update feature?

I never do in our lab environment, or personally.
The thousands of Windows systems where I work are behind a very effective firewall, and most are totally locked down so the users can't do administrative tasks. Nobody could use the automatic update even if he wanted to.
__________________
qo'mey poSmoH Hol :: language opens worlds
Qunchuy is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 03:06 PM   #15
Qunchuy
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Gates also said Microsoft is looking at ways of developing e-mail protocols so that a recipient can verify the sender of the e-mail. "This is critical for security," he said, "and for getting rid of spam."
As long as we don't end up with a Microsoft proprietary protocol to replace SMTP, or an IEEE standard with Microsoft "enhancements", I'll agree with the need to have authenticated sender identity. It's already possible using public key cryptographic systems.
__________________
qo'mey poSmoH Hol :: language opens worlds
Qunchuy is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 03:09 PM   #16
Rower_CPU
Moderator emeritus
 
Rower_CPU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Quote:
Originally posted by Qunchuy
The thousands of Windows systems where I work are behind a very effective firewall, and most are totally locked down so the users can't do administrative tasks. Nobody could use the automatic update even if he wanted to.
Exactly. I'm not sure where this "virtually all" claim is coming from, other than Bill's nether region.
__________________
Join MacRumors.com - Team Folding!
Rower_CPU is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 03:14 PM   #17
redAPPLE
macrumors 68030
 
redAPPLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 2 Much Infinite Loops
i always thought a man who is "wise" enough to earn that much money would be wise enough to measure his words...

actually is has been "proven" by experts and journalists that at least, the mac is a secure OS.

i would agree though that a windows user who has the a lot of time, effort and will, might also find a flaw in the os x system.
redAPPLE is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 04:24 PM   #18
mainstreetmark
macrumors 68020
 
mainstreetmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Quote:
Originally posted by Rower_CPU
Exactly. I'm not sure where this "virtually all" claim is coming from, other than Bill's nether region.
Probably from Paul Thurrott.
__________________
iTunesRegistry.com <--don't bother, it's dead.
mainstreetmark is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 05:11 PM   #19
zellin
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
LOL Mark!!!
Thurott and Gates are jokes.
Maybe Thurott will get knighted...
zellin is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 05:19 PM   #20
richters
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Gates shows to be very ignorant

"
As The New York Times reported back in September:

Mac OS X and Linux are much more secure than Windows XP. For example:

- Windows comes with five of its ports open; Mac OS X comes with all of them shut and locked... These ports are precisely what permitted viruses like Blaster to infiltrate millions of PCs. Microsoft says that it won't have an opportunity to close these ports until the next version of Windows, which is a couple of years away.

- When a program tries to install itself in Mac OS X... a dialog box interrupts your work and asks you permission for that installation -- in fact, requires your account password. Windows XP goes ahead and installs it, potentially without your awareness.

- Administrator accounts in Windows (and therefore viruses that exploit it) have access to all areas of the operating system. In Mac OS X, even an administrator can't touch the files that drive the operating system itself. A Mac OS X virus (if there were such a thing) could theoretically wipe out all of your files, but wouldn't be able to access anyone else's stuff -- and couldn't touch the operating system itself.

- No Macintosh e-mail program automatically runs scripts that come attached to incoming messages, as Microsoft Outlook does.

...the conclusion is clear: Linux and Mac OS X aren't just more secure because fewer people use them. They're also much harder to crack right out of the box.
"
richters is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 06:07 PM   #21
applemacdude
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Over The Rainbow
Send a message via ICQ to applemacdude Send a message via AIM to applemacdude Send a message via MSN to applemacdude Send a message via Yahoo to applemacdude Send a message via Skype™ to applemacdude
What Billy says is like Blah
applemacdude is offline   0
Old Jan 27, 2004, 10:29 PM   #22
From Win to Mac
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Montreal, Canada
Gob bless Canada...

you see guys i live in Canada...
i don't lock my doors at night

But you can bet that the guy that lives in Philadelphia is locking all his locks, and he's "patched up" his door over and over again so that there are no holes.
Now, who's safer ?
Me or the poor bastard that lives down the border ??

I would say me.

And remember, OS X's and Linux's doors ARE locked, so for sure they're pretty damn safe !
From Win to Mac is offline   0
Old Jan 28, 2004, 12:05 AM   #23
yamabushi
macrumors 65816
 
yamabushi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Not a bad analogy. Perhaps a future Apple ad campaign could tell people to "move to a better neigborhood". Of course the ads would have to be careful not to show an ethnic or cultural bias.
yamabushi is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacBytes.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iPhone Is Banned in Bill Gates, Refuses To Buy Kids Anything Apple OnlyOneThatEver Current Events 82 Mar 5, 2009 07:26 PM
Hilarious - BBC picks up cabbie to talk about Apple vs. Apple irmongoose Community Discussion 35 May 15, 2006 06:22 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC