|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: DC
|
Which would you buy? Imac 20" 1.25 ghz or powermac G5 1.6 ghz
I need your suggestions as what I should get. I have a budget of $2000-$2200 and I'm trying to update my mac. I have a 17" imac 800mhz right now and i do graphics / photoshop / and music pro tools. Would you go for the new 20" imac 1.25ghz or the new G5 powermac 1.6gz with no screen?
Which do you think is a better. What would you get with that budget? my target setup was the g5 with a 20" flat screen but that amounts to $3000 plus... what do you guys recommend? |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
macrumors 601
|
Re: Which would you buy? Imac 20" 1.25 ghz or powermac G5 1.6 ghz
Quote:
Of course for graphics you want to push the RAM up to at least a gig...and maybe bump the graphics card from the base model. A third party CRT monitor would save you some cash for decent screen real estate. I have heard that its also better for true colours... Don't forget G5 will support both screens fine, so you will have the area of dual display which might allow you the option of using some cheap new or second hand/refurb screens at 17" together. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Yahooville S.C.
|
G5 no question, you are comparing a almost obsolete cpu to a brand new one. Apple is working on 5 years of G4. you can still get deals on 1.8 G5s and then get another brand 17" for the same cost as 20 inch Imac. 20 Inch imac is apples worst value in my H.O. or get a refurb 1.6/1.8 and get someone elses 18,19,20" display.
Or do like me wait for a new G5 20' Imac
__________________
Those that give up Liberty to have temporary Security deserve Neither......Benjamin Franklin. |
|
|
| Dont Hurt Me |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Dont Hurt Me |
|
|
#4 |
|
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Great(?) Britain
|
G5 1.6, say no more.
</thread>
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
G5+ LCD or CRT 3rd party monitor.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Munich, Germany
|
G5, trust me I have one
__________________
MacBook 2Ghz Core2Duo, 320GB HD, 3.3GB RAM + 24" LG LCD |
|
|
| SpaceMagic |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by SpaceMagic |
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: in a one horse, two house, three pub town.
|
Speaking as a fully paid up member of the International iMac Love and Appreciation Society who believes in eating iMac, sleeping iMac and breathing iMac, I would have to sincerely recommend you purchase the G5.
Because I want one, and am struggling to justify the expense. Man alive, it's got to be 5!
__________________
Before a brilliant person begins something great, they must look foolish in the crowd. From the I Ching |
|
|
| Savage Henry |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Savage Henry |
|
|
#8 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hawaii
|
Re: Which would you buy? Imac 20" 1.25 ghz or powermac G5 1.6 ghz
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Dakota
|
My brother just got a refurb 1.8 G5 and I was totatly impressed. Even though it is only a single cpu machine it is quite responsive. I have been contemplating purchasing a refurb for myself
__________________
Want to earn frequent Folder miles? Join Team MacRumors. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 68000
|
As most posters said I would recommend the G5. But on the other hand - having no display is not really a choice. And it looks like you want to have a 20". Those are not cheap from any manufacturer.
Thought already about the 15" PB ?
__________________
Macbook Pro 17" 2.8 GHz ; Cinema Display 23"; iPhone 3G 16GB; TimeCapsule Final Cut Pro 2; Aperture 2 |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Near a Mac.
|
G5.
Even if you have to use a 13" black and white TV for a few months. ![]() The iMac is outdated technology that is mostly un-upgradeable, whereas the G5 can be upgaded via AGP, and PCI. And who knows if faster CPU's will be made available later third party. Apple has refurb 1.6 G5's for $1399- that's a 800 differece from the 20" iMac. If you serach good, you can get a 20" LCD for about $850. Then again, you can get a 19" for even less. iMac's are cool, beautiful computers, but they just aren't a good buy technologically. But that's only my opinion.
__________________
MBP 2.4Ghz • 4GB • 400GB Olympus E3 & Panasonic L1 • Leica 25 ƒ1.4 • Leica 14-50 ƒ2.8-3.5 • Leica 14-150 ƒ3.5-5.6 • Zuiko 50 ƒ2 • Zuiko 70-300 ƒ4-5.6 • FL-36R |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: DC
|
Quote:
any help i would appreciate... which would you get the 1.6 or the 1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Feb 2004
|
Quote:
In other words, this one's gonna last you. Hope that helps. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bliss....
|
G5 1.8
I am far from an expert, but based on what you say you want to do, I have to believe a G5 is the way to go. As was pointed out earlier, the monitor can always be upgraded later....
And based on this thread, I'd suggest you stretch to the 1.8 GHz G5. See this thread: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=61963 The differences between the 1.6 and the 1.8 are quite a bit larger than I would have expected.... Best, Bob |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
macrumors 68020
|
Quote:
__________________
come on
come on it's the end of the world |
|
|
|
| Capt Underpants |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Capt Underpants |
|
|
#16 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Near a Mac.
|
Quote:
__________________
MBP 2.4Ghz • 4GB • 400GB Olympus E3 & Panasonic L1 • Leica 25 ƒ1.4 • Leica 14-50 ƒ2.8-3.5 • Leica 14-150 ƒ3.5-5.6 • Zuiko 50 ƒ2 • Zuiko 70-300 ƒ4-5.6 • FL-36R |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Near a Mac.
|
Quote:
But if you can swing it, 1.8's are a great option. Here is a site that has fairly good reviews and offers a "cash discount". http://www.infinity-micro.com/prodLG...d=f6ad3d28b0.1 Also remember we are very close to a revision of the G5 line. It would suck to get your machine and in two weeks, for the same price new faster ones are released. I myself have been waiting since mid December for upgraded G5 towers. I want my G5 for gaming- so it's not a crucial issue to wait. If you NEED a computer right now- then buy. But if you WANT a new computer, waiting a little can't hurt. (Now I've messed you up too- hahahaha- You will become a G5 rumor dependant as well)
__________________
MBP 2.4Ghz • 4GB • 400GB Olympus E3 & Panasonic L1 • Leica 25 ƒ1.4 • Leica 14-50 ƒ2.8-3.5 • Leica 14-150 ƒ3.5-5.6 • Zuiko 50 ƒ2 • Zuiko 70-300 ƒ4-5.6 • FL-36R |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: DC
|
Quote:
thanks for the comments |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Feb 2004
|
Is it possible to add second G5 later?
Ideally I'd like a dual G5 but the current special for a *new* 1.8 G5 SP for $1899 is pretty tempting. Can an additional 1.8 G5 processor be installed later or are the Single and Dual motherboards totally different beasts?
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
|
I'd go for the G4 iMac. Think different! (he he)
I just got a 20" iMac 1.25 Ghz 1GB RAM and use it for photography with photoshop and it's alright. Not the fastest but it does the job. I mostly work with files around 6 MB. If you're scanning film or work with large RAW files, you'll want something faster. The screen is the same as the 20" cinema display. It is sharp and crisp (unlike the 17" iMac which takes it's screen from the 17" powerbook). Go see one at an Apple store. I was planning on getting a 20" display anyway, so the 20" iMac fit the bill perfectly. I might be the odd ball here, but I really fell in love with the iMac's simple design and small foot print. I like being able to adjust the height, tilt and swing of the screen (sounding like a 4x5 photographer here). I've really been happy with mine. Now I'm not saying don't get a G5. I'm just telling you my experiences with mine. The main selling point of the iMac is of course the price. The memory discounts that Apple offers right now make it even more appealing because one of the two memory slots in the iMac is NOT user changable, so you must get Apple RAM in this slot. Apple is selling RAM right now for dirt cheap (by Apple prices anyway). Check it out at www.apple.com If you know a student or faculty that can buy this for you, you can get a 20" iMac 1.25 Ghz, 1GB RAM for $2200 shipped (from www.apple.com). If you figure the monitor is the same as the 20" cinema display which cost ~$1200, the computer itself (with 1 GB RAM and superdrive) is only $1000. So the way I saw it, 1.25 Ghz G4, 1 GB RAM, SD for $1000? Who cares about a 1.6 Ghz G5! $1000 is a bargain! |
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
Pixel Check
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| MegaSignal |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MegaSignal |
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
|
No dead pixels (knock on wood). It's been flawless so far. Boots 10.3.2 in 10-15 seconds. I re-installed the system off the restore discs so I could get rid of the extra languages, Lexmark drivers, etc. Run macjanitor and repair permissions and the thing is snappy (at least it seems that way to me).
The fan is *slightly* louder than my wife's 17" iMac, which is practically silent. I attribute this to an increased power supply for the 20" screen (?). It's still relatively quiet though. |
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
Quote:
I appreciate the info on the fan (I owned a 15" two years ago), but it shouldn't be too bad as I've been using a Dual 1.25 for a while. I tend to agree, however, with the other posts with regard to the poster - he will probably benefit more from a G5 tower. For me, I know what I need! |
|
|
|
| MegaSignal |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MegaSignal |
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Connecticut (Ankara, Turkey for the next year)
|
since you actually would benefit from the g5, there really is not question about it. the imac would be better if you were a general user. for your purposes, however, the g5 is the only logical choice.
__________________
-15" MacBook Pro, 2.4 GHz, 200 GB HD, 4 GB RAM -Dell 20" 2005FPW -16 GB iPod Touch -Nikon D40 w/ Nikkor 18-200mm VR |
|
|
| Steven1621 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Steven1621 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|