Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Dec 2, 2008, 03:31 PM   #1
MacsRgr8
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
10.6 10A222 server and client seeded!

Apple is giving us the new Snow Leopard builds!!



EDIT: tried a find, but couldn't find a thread on this topic.
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 03:39 PM   #2
xUKHCx
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
xUKHCx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Kop
Any big changes noted in the seed notes
__________________
The red men: Paul William Carlile (19), Raymond Thomas Chapman (50), Gary Christopher Church (19), Joseph Clark (29), Paul Clark (18)
xUKHCx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 03:43 PM   #3
MacsRgr8
Thread Starter
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Forgive me for not violating my NDA..... but reading the seed notes there still are MANY known issues...
Oh, and the Server requires an Intel with 2.0 GB of RAM. I'll give you that
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 03:49 PM   #4
xUKHCx
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
xUKHCx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Kop
I figured as much but thanks for the info.

Have you followed previous development cycles? If so how does this compare to previous OS X releases?
__________________
The red men: Paul William Carlile (19), Raymond Thomas Chapman (50), Gary Christopher Church (19), Joseph Clark (29), Paul Clark (18)
xUKHCx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 03:52 PM   #5
MacsRgr8
Thread Starter
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by xUKHCx View Post
I figured as much but thanks for the info.

Have you followed previous development cycles? If so how does this compare to previous OS X releases?
I am still downloading this build. I have installed the previous version, so I'm dying to find out if it feels different, faster, etc.
I am on a 12 Mb connection, and downloading them both at the same time (2 x 6.2 GB...) takes a couple of hours, I'm afraid.

EDIT: pic of downloading
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Picture 1.png
Views:	112
Size:	20.6 KB
ID:	146783  
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 03:56 PM   #6
xUKHCx
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
xUKHCx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Kop
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacsRgr8 View Post
I am still downloading this build. I have installed the previous version, so I'm dying to find out if it feels different, faster, etc.
I am on a 12 Mb connection, and downloading them both at the same time (2 x 6.2 GB...) takes a couple of hours, I'm afraid.

EDIT: pic of downloading
Sorry I meant in terms of 10.5, 10.4 etc. when referring to releases and development cycles.
__________________
The red men: Paul William Carlile (19), Raymond Thomas Chapman (50), Gary Christopher Church (19), Joseph Clark (29), Paul Clark (18)
xUKHCx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 04:02 PM   #7
MacsRgr8
Thread Starter
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by xUKHCx View Post
Sorry I meant in terms of 10.5, 10.4 etc. when referring to releases and development cycles.
Ah, I see.

Yes, I have followed those betas too (actually, from Jaguar upwards), and TBO reading these seed notes it doesn't really look like the development is half way yet.
Don't want to sound pessimistic, but having 2 pages of "issues" (installation issues, Time Machine network backup issues, other issues, Developer issues, Third party issues) makes me think that Snow Leopard seems at least 6 months away from Release Candidate.

Also lots of ".... not fully functional"

But... Apple never ceases to amaze me...
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 04:04 PM   #8
Sky Blue
macrumors 68040
 
Sky Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Yes! nice nice nice. Any new notes on Exchange?
__________________
"The case is so square that it easily stands at attention as if begging for treats."
Sky Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 04:06 PM   #9
MacsRgr8
Thread Starter
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky Blue View Post
Yes! nice nice nice. Any new notes on Exchange?
Yep.
I'll say this: Apple is definitely working on it...
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 04:08 PM   #10
Sky Blue
macrumors 68040
 
Sky Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Cool beans. Thanks for the heads up.
__________________
"The case is so square that it easily stands at attention as if begging for treats."
Sky Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 12:06 AM   #11
Quillz
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Send a message via AIM to Quillz Send a message via MSN to Quillz
I wonder if Apple will finally completely unify the UI in Snow Leopard... Leopard still has lots of Aqua artifacts left over, most notably the scroll bars.
Quillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 07:03 AM   #12
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Latest Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Builds Still Have Work to be Done



AppleInsider reports that new seeds of Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard were recently distributed to developers.

The newest seed of Mac OS X 10.6 is said to offer new additions to Grand Central, which provides developers an easier way to harness the power of multiple processor cores. Apple's efforts to convert many of its existing apps to Cocoa are still underway but with much still left to be done on Font Book. Other areas that are undergoing ongoing revisions include power management for notebooks and 64-bit support.

While there had been some hints that Mac OS X 10.6 might arrive in the first quarter of 2009, Apple's official timeframe was "about a year" from this past June.

Article Link: Latest Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Builds Still Have Work to be Done
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 07:07 AM   #13
La Porta
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Send a message via AIM to La Porta
No need to rush - let's get it as stable as possible to make up for the 10.5 issues.
__________________
Proud owner of over 33 legacy Apple/Mac computers.
La Porta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 07:10 AM   #14
matthemercyless
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Do we have any more information on whether Snow Leopard will support PowerPc based Macs? I have Leopard on my PowerBook and was wondering if it would benefit from the likes of using the GPU for general computing as promised in Snow Leopard?!
__________________
PowerBook 1.67Ghz - 100GB HDD, 2GB RAM.
G4 Cube 450Mhz - 80GB HDD, 1.5GB RAM
8GB iPhone
matthemercyless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 07:12 AM   #15
Sky Blue
macrumors 68040
 
Sky Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthemercyless View Post
Do we have any more information on whether Snow Leopard will support PowerPc based Macs? I have Leopard on my PowerBook and was wondering if it would benefit from the likes of using the GPU for general computing as promised in Snow Leopard?!
I'd say 99% chance it won't run on PPC, but until they say it officially you ever know.

Looking forward to getting rid of Entourage.
__________________
"The case is so square that it easily stands at attention as if begging for treats."
Sky Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 07:19 AM   #16
doctoree
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Secret lair/ Earthmiddlepoint
Quote:
Originally Posted by La Porta View Post
No need to rush - let's get it as stable as possible to make up for the 10.5 issues.
You are right, especially the following is worth the wait:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthre...=1#post6541117

Doc
__________________
I just signed my Organ Donor Card because Steve J. asked for it. That's how you know Apples marketing works!
doctoree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 07:21 AM   #17
Tallest Skil
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: 1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
Quote:
Originally Posted by doctoree View Post
You are right, especially the following is worth the wait:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthre...=1#post6541117
I refuse to believe that we'll see the performance increase that he's claiming. It's just not possible with software.
Tallest Skil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 07:36 AM   #18
retroneo
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthemercyless View Post
Do we have any more information on whether Snow Leopard will support PowerPc based Macs? I have Leopard on my PowerBook and was wondering if it would benefit from the likes of using the GPU for general computing as promised in Snow Leopard?!
OpenCL will require a DirectX 10-Class GPU, which weren't in any PowerBook.
retroneo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 07:51 AM   #19
nado
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
What does the Cocoa Finder look like?
nado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 07:52 AM   #20
irishgrizzly
macrumors 65816
 
irishgrizzly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by retroneo View Post
OpenCL will require a DirectX 10-Class GPU, which weren't in any PowerBook.
Do all Intel macs have this requirement?
irishgrizzly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 07:53 AM   #21
motulist
macrumors 68040
 
motulist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
It sounds like a ton of the major os components are being largely or totally rewritten. While that's a great move for the future, I'm gonna steer WIDE clear of the 10.6.0 version and wait till a couple of last digit updates come out. A major under-the-hood rewrite of the OS code is sure to cause some serious problems at first.

I applaud Apple for doing this really worthwhile under-the-hood work that probably isn't gonna get as much attention or sales as some of the flashier OS cats that they've released in the past, but it's a very worthwhile investment in their long term sales. Still, I'm not gonna load Snow Leopard onto my Mac until the fallout from this major code rewrite has been smoothed over.
motulist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 07:54 AM   #22
MrCrowbar
macrumors 68000
 
MrCrowbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishgrizzly View Post
Do all Intel macs have this requirement?
GMA 950 (current Mac Minis, old Macbook) can't do DX10.
Guess I'll get some new hardware with Snow Leopard then.
__________________
MrCrowbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 08:00 AM   #23
themoonisdown09
macrumors Demi-God
 
themoonisdown09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Georgia, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by motulist View Post
It sounds like a ton of the major os components are being largely or totally rewritten. While that's a great move for the future, I'm gonna steer WIDE clear of the 10.6.0 version and wait till a couple of last digit updates come out. A major under-the-hood rewrite of the OS code is sure to cause some serious problems at first.
For the past 2 major OS releases, I've updated the day (or day after) it came out and haven't had any real problems. The main reason for this is probably because I don't use any of my Macs at my job, so I'm not on it all hours of the day.
themoonisdown09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 08:03 AM   #24
guzhogi
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCrowbar View Post
GMA 950 (current Mac Minis, old Macbook) can't do DX10.
Guess I'll get some new hardware with Snow Leopard then.
I wonder if Macs will have Nehalem by the release date? If so, and Nehalem & Snow Leopard are as fast as people say, yowza!
guzhogi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2008, 08:06 AM   #25
137489
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCrowbar View Post
GMA 950 (current Mac Minis, old Macbook) can't do DX10.
Guess I'll get some new hardware with Snow Leopard then.
So I can't upgrade my wife's mini - darn.

when you say old macbook, I hope your not referring to anything pre-aluminum.... I have an early 2008 whitebook.
137489 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC