Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,547
30,863


Apple must allow other mobile carriers to sell the iPhone 3G in France based on a ruling today.
The decision overturns an exclusive arrangement with Apple that has allowed Orange to be the iPhone's exclusive distributor in France since the phone was launched last year.
Orange does not believe the decision will affect agreements in other countries. Bouygues Telecom "welcomed" the ruling and plans to sell the iPhone shortly.


Article Link: Orange Loses iPhone Exclusivity in France
 

bizzaregood

macrumors regular
Aug 31, 2008
123
80
MA, US
No need for unlock?

It would be nice if this was worldwide and got rid of the need for yellowsn0w. but i doubt it will happen anywhere else.
 

beon

macrumors newbie
Sep 25, 2008
10
0
LA CA
We'll see how this goes... I wonder if other carriers will exnay the visual voicemail? I like to believe there's a reason :apple::apple::apple: is so tight about its partnerships. And I'm pretty damn sure the french gov't doesn't know more about telecom than Apple + Orange. We'll see!
 

roger6106

macrumors regular
Jun 19, 2007
123
30
Hopefully this will make officially unlocked iPhones available in the US without a contract.
 

bigjnyc

macrumors 604
Apr 10, 2008
7,856
6,764
why would a ruling in another country affect Apple's business practices in the US? the mind boggles.

I think he meant unlocked iphones from France making their way to the US, like being sold on ebay or something.
 

david803sc

macrumors member
Jul 11, 2008
56
0
Lake Wylie, SC
I think he meant unlocked iphones from France making their way to the US, like being sold on ebay or something.

Actually he said "official", a ruling in france has no bearing in the US or any other country, and besides the ruling only says other carriers have to be able to sell the Phone that DOES NOT mean they have to sell it unlocked or even without a contract, so it may not even help ebay sales, but I guess one could hope.
 

Harpo

macrumors member
Jun 23, 2006
63
0
Actually he said "official", a ruling in france has no bearing in the US or any other country, and besides the ruling only says other carriers have to be able to sell the Phone that DOES NOT mean they have to sell it unlocked or even without a contract, so it may not even help ebay sales, but I guess one could hope.

I think by "official" he meant officially in France. Doesn't seem too Apple-like to sell an unlocked one, though.
 

roger6106

macrumors regular
Jun 19, 2007
123
30
I think by "official" he meant officially in France. Doesn't seem too Apple-like to sell an unlocked one, though.

Exactly. I know that you can purchase ones that have been unlocked, but there is no guarantee that future software updates won't break that. If Apple is forced to sell the iPhone through other carriers in France they might end up selling officially unlocked iPhones, which would then make it to the US.
 

bytethese

macrumors 68030
Jun 20, 2007
2,707
120
What's to stop Apple from simply not selling the iPhone in France any longer?

Seems like a move Apple might make. "We can't have just one carrier in France? Ok, how about no carrier then, we'll take our business elsewhere..."
 

GfPQqmcRKUvP

macrumors 68040
Sep 29, 2005
3,272
514
Terminus
What socialists (the French). Apple can't even choose who they do and do not want to do business with in that effed up country.
 

fabian9

macrumors 65816
Nov 28, 2007
1,147
146
Bristol, UK
Hopefully this will make officially unlocked iPhones available in the US without a contract.

They already sell unlocked iphones in France, UK and some other countries. But they're still restricted to the country they are bought in, probably in order to avoid people distributing them in the US and other countries.

I don't see how this ruling would change this, they'll still be sold in France and only work with french SIMs.
 

foobarbaz

macrumors 6502a
Nov 29, 2007
876
1,969
Good for Apple. Lately they don't seem to be interested in exclusive deals anymore, so this probably just spares them from waiting till it expires. They'll probably sell more iPhones this way. Bad for Orange.

I don't see how this ruling would change this, they'll still be sold in France and only work with french SIMs.

Are you sure? Many Germans seem to be importing Belgian, Italian and Czech iPhones. I haven't heard about country locks.
The unlocked iPhones available in France, by the way, are not imported because they are more expensive.
 

anim8or

macrumors 65816
Aug 16, 2006
1,362
9
Scotland, UK
They already sell unlocked iphones in France, UK and some other countries. But they're still restricted to the country they are bought in, probably in order to avoid people distributing them in the US and other countries.

I don't see how this ruling would change this, they'll still be sold in France and only work with french SIMs.

They sell unlocked iphones in the uk.... hmm that sounds a little too good to be true my friend????
 

Tipsy

macrumors newbie
Jul 13, 2008
23
0
What's to stop Apple from simply not selling the iPhone in France any longer?

Seems like a move Apple might make. "We can't have just one carrier in France? Ok, how about no carrier then, we'll take our business elsewhere..."

Nothing to stop them doing that - apart from the millions upon millions of Euros of sales they'd miss out on and the damage it would do to Apple's brand in France. That'd be real smart.

Apple has formed agreements with only one provider in so many countries because it enhances the aura of exclusivity around the product, means they can get some guarantees about the user experience (why risk complaints about the product because of the crappy 3G network it's being used on?) and, most of all, because it makes them money. The carrier has to pay more than usual up front, subsidising the phone, but also gets a load of new customers who're all paying for data. The "Apple knows best" defence which seems to be emerging is cute, but perhaps some people here should consider if Apple is just trying to do what's best for Apple - whether that's good or bad for customers.
 

babyj

macrumors 6502a
Aug 29, 2006
586
8
I'd be surprised if that ruling is upheld as its just crazy and illogical. Though if you read the article its only an interim ruling pending a final decision, so the final decision itself could overturn the interim ruling.

I'm sure it will take Apple a while to sort out an agreement with other carriers, then they've got to be happy with their network being compatible with the phone, properly test the visual voice mail, then it will probably take them a while longer to allocate stock and so on.
 

Fotek2001

macrumors regular
Jun 16, 2005
106
0
London, England
I'd be surprised if that ruling is upheld as its just crazy and illogical.

Ummm... Why is it 'crazy and illogical'..? Just because the US government lets big business walk all over consumers, it doesn't mean the rest of the world has to follow... It's no wonder the phone business in the US is so far behind the rest of the world with that kind of attitude :rolleyes:
 

QuarterSwede

macrumors G3
Oct 1, 2005
9,785
2,033
Colorado Springs, CO
Yup, choice for the consumer is so 80's. Who would want that?
Are we that stupid? LOL. :p
Ummm... Why is it 'crazy and illogical'..? Just because the US government lets big business walk all over consumers, it doesn't mean the rest of the world has to follow... It's no wonder the phone business in the US is so far behind the rest of the world with that kind of attitude :rolleyes:
There's nothing wrong with consumer choice. The problem is when companies start having their rights trampled on*. If you have a problem with the way a company is doing business, speak with your wallet.

If this decision is made final then I wouldn't be surprised if Apple pulls out of France just to spite the government. I wouldn't blame them because that's what I would do if that happened to me.

*Yes I agree that consumer rights come before company rights.
 

JMP

macrumors member
Oct 27, 2007
96
5
There's nothing wrong with consumer choice. The problem is when companies start having their rights trampled on. If you have a problem with the way a company is doing business, speak with your wallet.

I personally have no Pb with the way company is doing business.
However, I do have a Pb when that company choses on my behalf what, or what no to do, or who I have to do business with (carrier), should I choose to buy their product.
The logical answer would be:"Don't buy an iPhone then".

But what if I want an iPhone, do I have to get an AT&T (or Orange) contract?
No. When I buy a set of pickups for a guitar, the maker does not tell me I HAVE TO put them on a specific guitar. When I buy a car, I don't have to buy gas from any specific distributor...

If this decision is made final then I wouldn't be surprised if Apple pulls out of France just to spite the government. I wouldn't blame them because that's what I would do if that happened to me.

They will not pull out of France. There are many other countries where the iPhone is available from more than one carrier.;)

*Yes I agree that consumer rights come before company rights.

Agreed
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.