Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Jan 1, 2009, 11:52 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
iMovie to Receive Update and Move Online?



In a Computerworld blog entry, Seth Weintraub of 9to5Mac follows up on yesterday's rumor of iWork becoming a suite of web-based applications with a new report regarding a similar update to iMovie due at Macworld next week.

Weintraub specifically points to several benefits of integrating iMovie into MobileMe's "cloud":

Quote:
iMovie in the Cloud would also offer users the ability to easily view their movies on iPod Touches or iPhones. If the application is entirely Web based, it means that potential customers include the "other 90%" of users who use Windows.
The release of iMovie '08 in August 2007 received a number of complaints that ultimately resulted in Apple offering purchasers of iLife '08 the ability to download the previous version, iMovie HD 6, free of charge.

Weintraub seems uncertain if this move means that iMovie (or iWork) will become a web application only or if the "cloud" component is simply an add-on to the native Mac versions. From a practical standpoint, it would seem that for high definition video, the Mac version would remain as it currently is.

Article Link: iMovie to Receive Update and Move Online?

Last edited by arn : Jan 1, 2009 at 04:37 PM.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 11:54 AM   #2
dalvin200
macrumors Demi-God
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nottingham, UK
whoa... that would require immense server processing and hdd storage if it were all in the cloud!
__________________
24" iMac "Penryn"; 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM, 500GB HDD, 8800GS
I luuurrvvveee my iPhone 3G 16GB
Search before you post: MRoogle
dalvin200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 11:56 AM   #3
talkingfuture
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The back of beyond.
If iWork is going into the cloud and now iMovie it would be safe to assume that the whole iLife suite will be in the cloud too. I wonder if this is a precursor to a stripped down new mini for accessing it.
talkingfuture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 11:59 AM   #4
yg17
macrumors Demi-God
 
yg17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
They can barely get web-based e-mail and calendars right....I can see a web based iMovie sucking really, really hard.
__________________
2.66 GHz quad core Mac Pro, 3 GB RAM, 2x500GB WD Black (RAID0),
2x1TB WD Black (RAID1), LG Blu-Ray Burner, GT120, Dell U2410
13" Unibody MacBook 2.4 GHz
120 GB iPod Classic; 16 GB iPhone 3G
yg17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:00 PM   #5
robinp
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
more likely the stripped down netbook/tablet. Surely this is what Snow Leopard is really about, getting os x onto light, low power devices that can access the web
robinp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:01 PM   #6
macbookairman
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Send a message via AIM to macbookairman Send a message via Yahoo to macbookairman
Interesting....I'm not sure I would use iMovie in "the cloud"...doesn't seem like it would be as fast as an actual desktop application. But if iPhoto was there, I would use that. Is it even possible to have a way to import photos from a camera to a webapp?
__________________
MacBook-Airman
Twitter: @woodjosiah
MacBook (Black) 2.2GHz, 30 GB iPod Video, iPod Touch 2G
Every time someone writes “I-POD” or “Ipod”, Jonny Ive kills a kitten.--bjango
macbookairman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:03 PM   #7
kastenbrust
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Korea
the problem is if theyre serious about online movie editing they'd basically have to give every editor theyre own dedicated quad core server, not to mention bandwith and so on, i think the idea of iwork in the cloud is great but imovie, hmmm
kastenbrust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:04 PM   #8
puffnstuff
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
How about they give me iMovie 06 back since 08 is complete garbage
__________________
iBook G4, Macbook, iPod touch 1g
SOON: MBA Tablet
puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:07 PM   #9
jaw04005
macrumors 68030
 
jaw04005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: AR
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalvin200 View Post
whoa... that would require immense server processing and hdd storage if it were all in the cloud!
Not to mention on our side, do we really want to upload GB's of video data?

By the way, if 9to5Mac is correct and this is where Apple is going with iLife in the future — what's the point of owning a Mac?

If I can get all of Apple's applications on Windows, I might pick up that $1000 Dell with Quad-core processors instead of an iMac.

The iLife suite has always been the biggest selling point for me. So much so, I returned to Mac in 2002 because of it (iDVD).

I understood iTunes for PC. However, this doesn't make much sense unless Apple is transitioning into a "services" company.
jaw04005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:08 PM   #10
kid rock
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southend-on-sea, Essex, England
Send a message via AIM to kid rock Send a message via MSN to kid rock Send a message via Skype™ to kid rock
all well and good until your net connection goes, not a good idea unless they still release a normal iLife09 you can install and use locally



I could see them having a web based "portion" of iLife/iWork but not all online, considering some people can only get 512-kb broadband in the UK
__________________
iPhone 3G 16GB
MacBook Pro
Time Capsule
AppleTV
iPod Shuffle (3RD Gen)
kid rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:08 PM   #11
aznelementmaste
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff View Post
How about they give me iMovie 06 back since 08 is complete garbage
They did...iMovie HD 6 is a free download for iMovie '08 users. Just search it up on google, and download it.
aznelementmaste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:08 PM   #12
lilstewart
macrumors 68040
 
lilstewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Illinois
Send a message via AIM to lilstewart
Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff View Post
How about they give me iMovie 06 back since 08 is complete garbage
They did...
__________________
macbookpro 17" unibody antiglare
Who except God can give you peace? Has the world ever been able to satisfy the heart? St. Gerard Majella
lilstewart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:09 PM   #13
metroid87706
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Baltimore, MI
Send a message via AIM to metroid87706 Send a message via Skype™ to metroid87706
No No No No No NO! When I upload videos, I don't want to wait for 2GB+ files to upload. Are they out of their mind to even think of making this? I know its a rumor, but still.... whoever made that one up has got to be really stupid, no offense.
__________________
Now DevinPitcher
metroid87706 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:12 PM   #14
Spades
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
This rumor is too ridiculous. I don't believe this or the iWork online rumor any more.

But if it was true...

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaw04005 View Post
By the way, if 9to5Mac is correct and this is where Apple is going with iLife in the future — what's the point of owning a Mac?
Maybe that's the point. What if they're planning on getting out of computer hardware? What if they dropped OS X as well?
Spades is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:12 PM   #15
The Samurai
macrumors Demi-God
 
The Samurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Glasgow
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaw04005 View Post
Not to mention on our side, do we really want to upload GB's of video data?

By the way, if 9to5Mac is correct and this is where Apple is going with iLife in the future — what's the point of owning a Mac?

If I can get all of Apple's applications on Windows, I might pick up that $1000 Dell with Quad-core processors instead of an iMac.

The iLife suite has always been the biggest selling point for me. So much so, I returned to Mac in 2002 because of it (iDVD).

I understood iTunes for PC. However, this doesn't make much sense unless Apple is transitioning into a "services" company.
I agree with what you say.

In addition, it would become incredibly hard for students like myself who carry out work in different locations and not necessarily having free wifi access. If Apple go down this route, I think theres going to be trouble - not for myself but their brand.
The Samurai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:13 PM   #16
FF_productions
macrumors 68030
 
FF_productions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Prospect, Illinois
Send a message via AIM to FF_productions Send a message via Skype™ to FF_productions
When our net speeds increase, then we can talk about editing movies in a web-based App.

I'm sorry but this is PRE-mature to do at this point in time, the ISP's need to seriously boost bandwidth for this to work.

And, Apple needs to learn how to release software without making people involuntary beta testers (MobileMe didn't start out so good).

Apple, get your heads out of your rich asses if this is true. Not everybody thinks every direction u take is the right one, everyones got a right to voice an opinion, and for once in a blue moon, I not only disagree with this, but I'm angered by all this web-based talk at THIS point in time.
__________________
Mac Pro, Quad 2.66, 11 GB ram, 4.5 TB's, 7300GT
PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0 1.5 GB 23" Cinema
Join The World Community Grid!
Also Visit My Site
FF_productions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:14 PM   #17
GSMiller
macrumors 68000
 
GSMiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kentucky
Oh fantastic, something else that requires MobileMe
__________________
2.16 GHz 20" iMac || 30GB 5G iPod || 1GB 3G Shuffle || 2.16 GHz Blackbook
GSMiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:15 PM   #18
puffnstuff
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by aznelementmaste View Post
They did...iMovie HD 6 is a free download for iMovie '08 users. Just search it up on google, and download it.
Oh ok then

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaw04005 View Post
Not to mention on our side, do we really want to upload GB's of video data?

By the way, if 9to5Mac is correct and this is where Apple is going with iLife in the future — what's the point of owning a Mac?

If I can get all of Apple's applications on Windows, I might pick up that $1000 Dell with Quad-core processors instead of an iMac.

The iLife suite has always been the biggest selling point for me. So much so, I returned to Mac in 2002 because of it (iDVD).

I understood iTunes for PC. However, this doesn't make much sense unless Apple is transitioning into a "services" company.
would you use photoshop.com over photoshop? iMovie cloud version will probably be very very scaled down.
__________________
iBook G4, Macbook, iPod touch 1g
SOON: MBA Tablet
puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:15 PM   #19
metroid87706
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Baltimore, MI
Send a message via AIM to metroid87706 Send a message via Skype™ to metroid87706
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSMiller View Post
Oh fantastic, something else that requires MobileMe
Can't agree more.
__________________
Now DevinPitcher
metroid87706 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:16 PM   #20
niji
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: tokyo
MobileMe

iWeb already effortlessly uploads to a folder in MobileMe's iDisk.
iPhoto already sends it's content to the special Gallery section on MobileMe's iDisk.
iTunes already syncs over the cloud.

iPhone data plan is unlimited (sorry I am not an ATT user so I dont know for sure).

sorry, but what's the big deal?

speed of network is the limiting factor and has been and will be the problem for the next 5 years for service providers. but WI-FI is there, so whats the problem?

the iPhone platform is the perfect device for cloud computing.

browser based platform.

iWork being integrated into the cloud doesnt prevent you from using it on a stationery mac.
niji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:17 PM   #21
igazza
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
man this is crazy

snow leopard will be a web app guys
__________________
Redmond has a cat too, A copycat.
igazza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:17 PM   #22
FF_productions
macrumors 68030
 
FF_productions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Prospect, Illinois
Send a message via AIM to FF_productions Send a message via Skype™ to FF_productions
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaw04005 View Post
By the way, if 9to5Mac is correct and this is where Apple is going with iLife in the future — what's the point of owning a Mac?
Good point. Apple tries to push certain services, and they use the popularity of the iPhone to nail it into the reality-distortion field and get people to follow their direction.

At one point u gotta stop for a second, and wonder, why am I following them?

If this is their direction like I said above, i'll be very disappointed.

EDIT-The poster above did mention cloud computing, BUT I'd like to have the option of a desktop editing system, I think cloud computing helps with iPhone big time though.
__________________
Mac Pro, Quad 2.66, 11 GB ram, 4.5 TB's, 7300GT
PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0 1.5 GB 23" Cinema
Join The World Community Grid!
Also Visit My Site
FF_productions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:18 PM   #23
ArtOfWarfare
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Because they didn't screw it up enough when they went from HD to '08?

No, this simply is not happening.

I don't want Apple screwing around with building iMovie from scratch again. I want them to build on what they've got in '08 and give me app of the quality that iMovie HD was (because I do think the stuff they've done in '08 is cool if you think of it as an all new product. Just... when you compare it to HD... HD offered so much finer controls and a lot more effects even if it was a lot slower.)
__________________
24" Aluminum iMac, 2.4 GHz, 3 GB RAM Mac OS X 10.6.1 (Snow Leopard) 32 GB iPhone 3G S (OS 3.1)
ArtOfWarfare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:21 PM   #24
twoodcc
macrumors 603
 
twoodcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Right side of wrong
Send a message via AIM to twoodcc Send a message via MSN to twoodcc
i really don't see how this would work and actually work correctly. imovie would be the most intensive ilife app, and the one that uses the most data storage. i just don't see myself putting my 1080P videos on my mobile me and actually editing them online.
__________________
tville pump
Smarter than the average bear
twoodcc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2009, 12:24 PM   #25
tobyx
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Have fun uploading 28 GB of home movie footage to MobileMe servers. See you in 2011 when the upload has finished.

Rumor is fake.

Unless we go back from HD to thumbnail-sized 5 fps movies. Yeah right
tobyx is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC