|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Core i7 (Nehalem) Based MacBook Pros Possible in Q4 2009?
![]() Tom's Hardware reports on Intel's plans to offer their first Core i7 (Nehalem) mobile processors by the fourth quarter of 2009. These 32 nm Arrandale processors will be suitable for notebook designs, and Tom's Hardware speculates that we'll see these in Apple's notebooks: Quote:
The 32 nm process also represents a die-shrink over existing 45 nm-based Intel chips. The new 32 nm process is said to offer an estimated 22 percent performance boost according to Mark Bohr, an Intel senior fellow. Intel is also expected to transition their desktop processors to the 32 nm design in the same timeframe, but Apple has yet to take advantage of Intel's "desktop"-class processors. Instead, Apple has used Intel's mobile (Mac Mini, MacBook, MacBook Pro, iMac) and server (Mac Pro, Xserve) processors exclusively. Article Link: Core i7 (Nehalem) Based MacBook Pros Possible in Q4 2009? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solon, OH
|
Yay, this is welcome news. I knew Intel was going to be slower at delivering notebook-ready Core i7 processors than they would at desktop- and server-class ones. That said, I'm sure the entire MacBook line will get a huge performance boost when these arrive, given what the Core i7 is capable of.
__________________
Proud iMac and iPod touch owner Successfully upgraded iMac to 1TB HDD |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
|
Yup... Once this happens, I'll run out and buy a new MBP. Simply. Cannot. Wait.
__________________
Penguin: Early 2008 MacBook Pro C2D @ 2.5GhZ, 2GB, 250GB / iPhone 3GS 32GB Monkey: Early 2006 MacBook Black CD @ 2GhZ, 2GB, 80GB / iPhone 3G 16GB |
|
|
|
| fleshman03 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by fleshman03 |
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors member
|
4 threads ... yet another excuse not to go to quad core.
__________________
MacBook Pro, 2.4Ghz (Penryn), 2GB RAM, 250GB/5400RPM HDD, Windows 7 (VM), and Vista x64 (BC) iPod Nano, 2G, 4GB
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 68040
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The world of Macmatics, flying with my calculator…
|
Yeah Apple will most likely use Arrandale instead of Clarksfield for the notebooks due to Clarksfield's power draw. That means an update in late spring 2009 and then the Nehalem update in late 2009 or early 2010.
We'll most likely see quad-cores in the MacBook Pro when Clarksfield goes to 32 nm in 2010. The combined new microarchitecture plus process shrink should give a pretty big performance increase.
__________________
babyj: "One day, all Apple products will be running the iPhone OS …" |
|
|
|
| iMacmatician |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by iMacmatician |
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN (USA)
|
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5H11 Safari/525.20)
I hope this pans out. I would also like to see a desktop processor in the iMac line as well.
__________________
Stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Peninsula (Northern Silicon Valley)
|
Huh?
Four threads are a lot weaker than four cores. I'd rephrase your statement: 8 threads ... yet another excuse to go to quad core. ![]() How about a desktop processor in an actual desktop, not an all-in-one!
__________________
-as Marriage Equality - Have you talked about it with your gay friends, your gay colleagues and your gay relatives? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The back of beyond.
|
Should be something to look out for but it seems so far away. I hope we aren't going to start seeing people waiting for this update for a while yet.
__________________
Futuristical bloggery with a twist. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London, UK
|
Yeesh. I just started looking at my MBP with contempt....
These kind of figures are quite astonishing, no? 20% increase year on year? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: May 2002
Location: middle earth
|
Yeah, still seems weird knowing what's coming this far in advance. Kinda takes the excitement out of it...
__________________
Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of an insane mind. --Terry Pratchett |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solon, OH
|
Quote:
That said, I think 4 cores in a notebook would represent a significant boost in capabilities.
__________________
Proud iMac and iPod touch owner Successfully upgraded iMac to 1TB HDD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
How could Intel releasing processors in Q4 2009 indicate that these processors will make it into Apple products in 2009? I simply do not see the connection. If anything, the Q4 2009 release of these processors points to a possible 2010 Apple product launch. Why pervert the post with such an baseless headline?
|
|
|
|
| SilverRubicon |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by SilverRubicon |
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denmark
|
I love this whole Apple+Intel thing. The news of faster'n'better processors keeps poppin' up at a steady pace.
For now I love my Unibody MBP. It's just so speeeeedy.
__________________
33.8688 MHz Playstation SCPH-7502 / 32bit-RISC / 2mb RAM / Dual Analog Controller Nintendo G&W / Dual Screen / Donkey Kong / Oil Panic / Safe Buster |
|
|
|
| flottenheimer |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by flottenheimer |
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
If anything, the iMacs could possibly have Nehalems by the end of this year, but they have yet to update their current processors to the predicted quad-core configuration.
I really don't understand a fling these days. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Quote:
Of those of us who would buy, say, a $1000 consumer desktop, many have opted for the lower-priced Mini in the meantime. Cannibalizing sales of lower priced units is not really a bad thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Blue Dot, Red State
|
these babies can't get here soon enough. I'm hammer down day one.
starting to get back problems from lugging the Mac Pro around.
__________________
Lab: 3.0 ghz octo MP Mobile: 1.33 ghz 12' PB twitter.com/Dr_H twitter.com/TapeSlave Last edited by FJ218700 : Feb 11, 2009 at 10:58 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: May 2007
|
So... when will I be able to buy a quad-core 32nm MacBook Pro with USB 3.0, Firewire S3200, souped up batteries, finalized Wireless N + integrated 3G, and Blu-ray?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
My plan is to replace my early 2008 MBP in 2010 with a Nehalem based model. Snow Leopard will rock!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
wow 22% performance boost! That is a lot only for a processor. I'm not too familiar with that stuff but will ram run at 1066MHZ just like late 2008 penryn MBP?
__________________
uMBP 2.53GHz/4GB ram
Rogers iPhone 3Gs White 32GB TC 1TB |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||||
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Peninsula (Northern Silicon Valley)
|
Quote:
A lot of people can't or won't pay for the expensive Mac Pro, the Mini is perceived as a toy, and many people don't like all-in-ones for valid reasons. Quote:
Look at this true professional portable, and as you read think about an Apple announcement of the "MacBook Workstation" with these features: Quote:
__________________
-as Marriage Equality - Have you talked about it with your gay friends, your gay colleagues and your gay relatives? |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Dec 2004
|
blah, blah, blah. Apple rarely updates their hardware.. Who cares, this won't happen anyway
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: AR
|
"It is highly probable that Apple will base new MacBook and MacBook Pro units on 32nm Arrandale Core i7's. With 2 cores and able to process 4 threads, the new MacBook models will be able to save even more power, thanks to the smaller fabrication process as well as optimized processor features."
So the mobile Core i7 Arrandale part is just dual-core with HTT enabled (2 real, 2 logical cores), correct? Compared to the current desktop Core i7 part which is quad-core with HTT enabled (4 real, 4 logical cores)? So, there's still a chance Apple could decide to use the true quad-core Clarksfield part instead, which has 4 real and 4 logical cores. Last edited by jaw04005 : Feb 11, 2009 at 11:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jul 2004
|
Quote:
Wake me when they update the Mac mini, come out with another headless Mac for under $1200, or stop making those super shiny screens on every GD product. Plus, rumors are like a-holes. Everyone has one.... |
|
|
|
|
| billystlyes |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by billystlyes |
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
What he said. I promise you, these processors will not be in the macbook or macbook pro. They are way to expensive for apple to make their profit margin. End of discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
|
I revise what I said. I saw i7 and got all excited. I want 4... count them... 4 cores in my laptop.
Maybe I'll get lucky and Apple will do some type of special run with Intel. That - or I'll wait till 2010
__________________
Penguin: Early 2008 MacBook Pro C2D @ 2.5GhZ, 2GB, 250GB / iPhone 3GS 32GB Monkey: Early 2006 MacBook Black CD @ 2GhZ, 2GB, 80GB / iPhone 3G 16GB |
|
|
|
| fleshman03 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by fleshman03 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|