Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:07 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Last Minute Specs: iMac, Mac Minis, Airport Extreme, Time Capsule and Mac Pros?



There's only a few hours left before Apple's rumored announcement of new iMacs and Mac minis but a list of parts/specs posted to our forum indicate that Apple may be pushing out a number of updates including iMacs, Mac minis, Mac Pros, Airport Extreme, and Time Capsule. The posting was made by someone who has had access to Apple part numbers in the past, and we've since been able to confirm that these part numbers and specs are valid and found in Apple's systems.

The list of parts and specs correspond to the previous iMac rumors with one 20" model and three 24" models. The speeds of the processors appear comparable to the previous iMacs. Hard drive capacities and RAM, however, have been bumped to twice their previous amounts. The iMac will almost certainly adopt the NVIDIA platform which brings with it accelerated video that should also support Apple's upcoming Snow Leopard.

The Mac minis are said to be 2.0 GHz each with improved hard drive space. We've heard whispers that the entry level price for the Mac mini may finally fall to $499, representing a $100 drop. The adoption of the NVIDIA platform in the Mac mini should also provide a significant performance boost over the existing models.

Meanwhile, new Time Capsule and Airport Extreme models are consistent with FCC filings that were just published this week. The timing of the release of these filings almost certainly means these releases are imminent.

Finally, the parts list surprisingly reveals that the Mac Pro will finally be updated alongside a new ATI RADEON HD 4870 graphics card. The Mac Pro specs reveal the following specs:

- MAC PRO 2.26_8CX/6X1G/640/GT120/SD-USA
- MAC PRO 2.66QCX/3X1GB/640/GT120/SD-USA

The 2.66GHz configuration is a familiar baseline configuration for the Mac Pros and it seems likely there would be build-to-order processor upgrades. The 2.26GHz configuration, however, seems more of a mystery. While a 2.26GHz Xeon processor seems to exist, it does not appear to come in 8-core configurations. Otherwise, the specs seem consistent with the adoption of Intel's Nehalem processors.


Article Link: Last Minute Specs: iMac, Mac Minis, Airport Extreme, Time Capsule and Mac Pros?

Last edited by arn : Mar 3, 2009 at 04:16 AM.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:09 AM   #2
wesleyh
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
The lamest update yet.. I'll probably get something else now.
wesleyh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:11 AM   #3
nerdish
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Manchester, UK
Send a message via AIM to nerdish
2.26GHz Mac Pro?

So a price drop then?
nerdish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:12 AM   #4
mrkgoo
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Oboyoboyoboy






I'm not even in the market for a new computer.... :/ Why am I excited?
mrkgoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:12 AM   #5
ltldrummerboy
macrumors 65816
 
ltldrummerboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kenai Peninsula
I for one am pretty excited about this update. Hopefully the midrange iMacs will now be fairly decent gaming machines. I'm looking at you COD4!
__________________
New to AT&T (30 days or less)? Want a $25 credit towards your next bill? PM me and we can both save!
ltldrummerboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:13 AM   #6
BenManchester
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
What graphics on the high-end iMac? I'm dying to know.
BenManchester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:13 AM   #7
talkingfuture
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The back of beyond.
Looks like they've been busy in Cupertino over the last few weeks.
talkingfuture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:14 AM   #8
troller
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
I hope there are some high end mini models...if not, they have learnd nothing !
troller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:14 AM   #9
Blue Sun
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne
Just give me a 9800m GT (or better) and I'll be happy.
Blue Sun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:15 AM   #10
hacksaw-C87
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Birmingham England
Quote:
Originally Posted by nerdish View Post
2.26GHz Mac Pro?

So a price drop then?
Surely both are unlikely. That would make the Mac Pro slower than the top-end Macbook!! I hope that's wrong for all you desktop users. IMO not an inspiring update based on the information we currently possess.
hacksaw-C87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:15 AM   #11
BenManchester
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Sun View Post
Just give me a 9800m GT (or better) and I'll be happy.
+1
BenManchester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:16 AM   #12
Kaptajn Haddock
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Denmark
The only reason for these updates (if true) is to have a somewhat up to date line of consumer Macs and lowered prices due to the financial crisis. Whenever Snow Leopard comes out we will see updates again with quad core, LED and you name it. Apple has done this before.
Kaptajn Haddock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:17 AM   #13
mj1903
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Looks like some solid updates!
mj1903 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:17 AM   #14
gianly1985
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2008
2,4ghz + 5ghz (double frequency at SAME TIME) Airport Extreme?
__________________
17" good old white iMac core 2 duo + 3gb RAM + Intel x25-M G2 160gb SSD ; iPhone 3g 16gb WHITE
ITALIAN
gianly1985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:17 AM   #15
nerdish
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Manchester, UK
Send a message via AIM to nerdish
Quote:
Originally Posted by hacksaw-C87 View Post
Surely both are unlikely. That would make the Mac Pro slower than the top-end Macbook!! I hope that's wrong for all you desktop users. IMO not an inspiring update based on the information we currently possess.
Well the 2.66 and a 2.26 are both slower than the baseline Mac Pro's now, so might be a xMac
nerdish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:18 AM   #16
hacksaw-C87
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Birmingham England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaptajn Haddock View Post
The only reason for these updates (if true) is to have a somewhat up to date line of consumer Macs and lowered prices due to the financial crisis. Whenever Snow Leopard comes out we will see updates again with quad core, LED and you name it. Apple has done this before.
It'd be a kick in the teeth though, don't you think. Imagine if you just spent £2, 000 updating your iMac, only for another one to come out 4 months later with substantially better specs. I wouldn't buy a desktop from Apple again after that! (Not that I'd buy a desktop full stop, but that's besides the point).
hacksaw-C87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:19 AM   #17
nicolapo
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by hacksaw-C87 View Post
Surely both are unlikely. That would make the Mac Pro slower than the top-end Macbook!! I hope that's wrong for all you desktop users. IMO not an inspiring update based on the information we currently possess.
How is a 8-core tower running Leopard or SnowLeo slower than a two-core MacBook?

Last edited by nicolapo : Mar 3, 2009 at 04:24 AM.
nicolapo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:20 AM   #18
hacksaw-C87
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Birmingham England
Lol, good point. Hadn't considered the cores, just saw the 2.26 and jumped to conclusions!
hacksaw-C87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:21 AM   #19
herriiee
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Gt120

Looks like the stock videocard of the Mac Pros wil bee an GT 120. A rebranded Gef9500.
herriiee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:23 AM   #20
InkMaster
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nagoya, Japan
Send a message via AIM to InkMaster Send a message via MSN to InkMaster Send a message via Yahoo to InkMaster
I for one am definitely excited about the new Airport Extreme/Time Capsule.

Finally will be able to use N at full speed w/o having the rest of the devices on the network slowing everything down.
__________________
InkMaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:24 AM   #21
spcdust
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London, UK
Is it me or are the rumoured update specs for the iMac pretty un-inspiring?

A genuine question here, are the Core 2 Duo processors installed in the iMacs really coming to the end of their life cycle or have I got this completely wrong?

If the spec rumours pan out to be true I think I'll skip this one and wait for something more impressive, hopefully we won't have to wait twelve months for the next one?
spcdust is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:24 AM   #22
Ironduke
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
what do you guys expect?

After bring us the very sexual and very toight! unibody macbooks, its lame updates as per usual.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:25 AM   #23
Kaptajn Haddock
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Denmark
This has to be a completely ninja like silent update from Apple, or else they will make a fool out of themselves. I can't wait to see if these updates will just show up in the store silently with a New sign on, or if Apple will clear the starting page at apple.com with tags like:

The New iMac - sort of.

or

Mac Mini - still Mini.

If these specs are true, this has got to be the sloppiest updates from Apple ever, and only a dramatic price cut will justify them.
Kaptajn Haddock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:25 AM   #24
Ironduke
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by spcdust View Post
Is it me or are the rumoured update specs for the iMac pretty un-inspiring?

A genuine question here, are the Core 2 Duo processors installed in the iMacs really coming to the end of their life cycle or have I got this completely wrong?

If the spec rumours pan out to be true I think I'll skip this one and wait for something more impressive, hopefully we won't have to wait twelve months for the next one?
They are uninspiring unless apple drop prices then they could be quite good.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 04:28 AM   #25
Blue Sun
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaptajn Haddock View Post
If these specs are true, this has got to be the sloppiest updates from Apple ever, and only a dramatic price cut will justify them.
Bigger HDD, better video card, more RAM. Better than a poke in the eye with a rusty stick.
Blue Sun is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC