Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:43 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Introduces New Mac Pro with Nehalem Xeon Processors



Apple(R) today introduced the new Mac(R) Pro using Intel "Nehalem" Xeon processors and a next-generation system architecture to deliver up to twice the performance of the previous generation system.* The new Mac Pro starts at $2,499 and features the latest graphics technology and an updated interior that makes expansion even easier than before.
Quote:
"The new Mac Pro is a significant upgrade and starts at $300 less than before," said Philip Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing. "The Mac Pro features an advanced system architecture, new faster processors and our best-ever graphics options to deliver a faster, more powerful system that our professional customers are going to love."
The new Mac Pro includes Intel Xeon processors running at speeds up to 2.93 GHz, each with an integrated memory controller with three channels of 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC memory that delivers up to 2.4 times the memory bandwidth while cutting memory latency up to 40 percent.** Every Mac Pro comes standard with the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 512MB of GDDR3 memory, a high-performance graphics card with nearly three times greater performance when compared to the previous generation system.*** An optional ATI Radeon HD 4870 is available for even more performance. With both a Mini DisplayPort and DVI port, the new Mac Pro provides out-of-the-box support for the 24-inch Apple LED Cinema Display, the 30-inch Apple Cinema HD Display, or other DVI based displays.

- $2499. One 2.66GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 3500 Processor. 3GB of RAM. NVIDIA GeForce GT 120. 640GB HD.
- $3299. Two 2.26GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 5500 Processor. 6GB of RAM. NVIDIA GeForce GT 120. 640GB HD.



Article Link: Apple Introduces New Mac Pro with Nehalem Xeon Processors

Last edited by arn : Mar 3, 2009 at 08:59 AM.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:45 AM   #2
galstaph
macrumors 6502a
 
galstaph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Great White North Eh
not too bad a deal for canada edu store 3399 for the top base
2699 for single proc (edu)
2899/3799 in regular store
__________________
iBook 12" 1.33ghz; 8gb ipt; early '09 17" 2.66Ghz umbp; '09 Mac Pro 2.26 octad
"..unlike some other Robin Hoods, I can speak with an English accent"
galstaph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:45 AM   #3
FF_productions
macrumors 68030
 
FF_productions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Prospect, Illinois
Send a message via AIM to FF_productions Send a message via Skype™ to FF_productions
Wait a minute, you have to spent at least $3300 to to get the option to go OVER 8 gigs...I don't like this split between Quad and Octo.

$225 upgrade for 8 gigs of ram? wow, not bad Apple not bad. (For EDU sorry.)
__________________
Mac Pro, Quad 2.66, 11 GB ram, 4.5 TB's, 7300GT
PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0 1.5 GB 23" Cinema
Join The World Community Grid!
Also Visit My Site
FF_productions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:46 AM   #4
valdore
macrumors 65816
 
valdore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kansas City, Missouri. USA
Way to go Arn staying on top of these updates so fast!
__________________
www.ericbowersphoto.com
valdore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:46 AM   #5
Hamish
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Send a message via MSN to Hamish
Holy Wow... but apple australia store is not up yet, so I dont know the price.
Hamish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:46 AM   #6
iPastor
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Need more info..

The brain doesn't compute that a lower clock speed is in fact an improvement. I would like to see more info on the Nehalem chipset, as this seems to make the difference, as well as three channels for the memory set.

In all, it seems to be a nice improvement for what I am getting.
iPastor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:47 AM   #7
BornAgainMac
macrumors 68030
 
BornAgainMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida Resident
I am disappointed. I would have expected a better price at those configurations.
BornAgainMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:48 AM   #8
SydneyDev
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Oh boy. The difference between the Mac Pro and iMac is going to be a lot more pronounced than it was in the last generation.
SydneyDev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:49 AM   #9
Jimmetry
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Wait, 3GB RAM? As in... less than the new 'midrange' iMac? Weird.

I'm sure there's a legitimate reason, but it sounds odd from a marketing perspective.
__________________
24" Alu iMac ; Core 2 (GMA950) MacBook ; 8GB iPhone 3G ; 500GB Time Capsule
Formerly known as 'oticon6'
Jimmetry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:50 AM   #10
UMHurricanes34
macrumors 65816
 
UMHurricanes34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by FF_productions View Post
Wait a minute, you have to spent at least $3300 to to get the option to go OVER 8 gigs...I don't like this split between Quad and Octo.

$225 upgrade for 8 gigs of ram? wow, not bad Apple not bad.
But consider how they're giving you those 8 gigs. 4x2GB, so you're losing space that could be more efficiently, but of course more expensively, be filled by two 4GB chips. I upgrade my MP in 4GB chips, but DDR3 is massively more expensive than DDR2 now. Hopefully this new release will let the high end Mac Pro memory drop in price a little more.

Also, Apple hasn't updated the Mac Pro page under the Mac tab...I'm interested in the new interior. It's unlike Apple to not have that ready along with the launch.

Well they've updated it now, but it's all messed up.
__________________
Think Different.
Mac Pro l MacBook Pro l iMac l TiBook
iPhone 3G S⃣ l tv l iPod
Follow me on twitter.

Last edited by UMHurricanes34 : Mar 3, 2009 at 08:55 AM.
UMHurricanes34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:50 AM   #11
Umbongo
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: England
2006 Mac Pro - $2,499 Two 2.66GHz dual core ($690 per processor) $1,119 + processors
2008 Mac Pro - $2,799 Two 2.80GHz quad core ($797 per processor) $1,205 + processors

2009 Mac Pro - $2,499 One 2.66GHz quad core ($284 per processor) $2,215 + processor
2009 Mac Pro - $3,299 Two 2.26GHz quad core ($373 per processor) $2,553 + processors

Please explain Apple.
Umbongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:50 AM   #12
Palliser
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Very nice, I want!
__________________
Aluminum Macbook 2.0ghz, 4GB, 500GB
Palliser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:50 AM   #13
Spanky Deluxe
macrumors Demi-God
 
Spanky Deluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London, UK
Hold on, these prices can't be right.... £2499 for a 2.26GHz Eight Core?? I'm shocked that 2.66GHz isn't the baseline. £2499 for a 2.66GHz Eight Core would have made a bit more sense although still more expensive than the previous model. As for the price bump of the Mac Mini up from £391 to £499. Ludicrous. I was planning on buying a new Mac Pro but I think I'll wait a while now.
__________________
"No, I'm from Iowa, I only work in outer space."
Spanky Deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:50 AM   #14
Kilamite
macrumors Demi-God
 
Kilamite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Scotland
Engadget says the Apple Store says the wrong info for the Mac Pro's for CPU's..
__________________
- MacBook Pro Unibody 15" 2.8GHz 'anti-glare'
- Apple TV 1TB (work in progress)
- iPhone 3G 8GB
- MobileMe // OS X 10.6.2
Kilamite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:51 AM   #15
FF_productions
macrumors 68030
 
FF_productions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Prospect, Illinois
Send a message via AIM to FF_productions Send a message via Skype™ to FF_productions
Interesting things to note...The super high end Quattro graphics card no longer is an option.


Clock speed has dropped below 3 ghz, so we must assume Nehalem delivers a hell of a boost at a lower clock speed.

Ram prices are not as bad as they used to be for the Mac Pro's.
__________________
Mac Pro, Quad 2.66, 11 GB ram, 4.5 TB's, 7300GT
PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0 1.5 GB 23" Cinema
Join The World Community Grid!
Also Visit My Site
FF_productions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:51 AM   #16
galstaph
macrumors 6502a
 
galstaph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Great White North Eh
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmetry View Post
Wait, 3GB RAM? As in... less than the new 'midrange' iMac? Weird.

I'm sure there's a legitimate reason, but it sounds odd from a marketing perspective.
I don't know either, kinda weird pairing, maybe apple got a fire sale on some dimms
__________________
iBook 12" 1.33ghz; 8gb ipt; early '09 17" 2.66Ghz umbp; '09 Mac Pro 2.26 octad
"..unlike some other Robin Hoods, I can speak with an English accent"
galstaph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:51 AM   #17
LeviG
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Norfolk, UK
Got to love the graphics - not
no workstation card full stop, got to have 2 cards to use 2 led displays.
Apple seriously lost the plot on this one, the mac pro is a workstation machine and they give us gaming graphics cards, the ati one is likely to be out of date in the next few months too (coming upto update cycle)

Price not too sure its good value but nehalem is still pricey, I suspect a fair few people may now hold off on it atleast in the UK
LeviG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:52 AM   #18
SydneyDev
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmetry View Post
Wait, 3GB RAM? As in... less than the new 'midrange' iMac? Weird.

I'm sure there's a legitimate reason, but it sounds odd from a marketing perspective.
It has to be a multiple of 3 with that CPU. I have an i7 in my PC and it has 6GB (i.e. not 2, 4 or 8)
SydneyDev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:52 AM   #19
tMac85
macrumors 65816
 
tMac85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: in a great place
WTF. they are throwing everything out into the ring today!

keep it up arn!
__________________
lotzofapples//
my spare time
tMac85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:52 AM   #20
iBug2
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
They can't sell them at previous prices. The processors are a lot more expensive.
iBug2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:53 AM   #21
azentropy
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
It has gotta be a misprint... Quad core is supposed to start at $1499 not $2499... right???

This is just plain sad...
azentropy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:53 AM   #22
jeremybuff
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Asheville, NC
Send a message via AIM to jeremybuff Send a message via MSN to jeremybuff
ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB 4-6 weeks

If you configure the 24" 'ultimate' 3.06 ghz with the ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB your shipping goes from 4-5 days to 4-6 weeks..........

Last edited by jeremybuff : Mar 3, 2009 at 08:53 AM. Reason: screen size correction.
jeremybuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:53 AM   #23
longofest
Demi-God (Editor)
 
longofest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Falls Church, VA
Send a message via AIM to longofest
Firewire is far from dead. 4 Firewire 800 ports on these babys.
longofest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:54 AM   #24
richthomas
macrumors 601
 
richthomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: /Aussieland/home
one Mini Display port on the graphics card along with DVI which looks hella weird. also means that you cant use two LED Displays with a Mac Pro .

Thumb resize.
__________________
Core i5 3.0GHz, 4GB, 1.5TB, 4870 1GB; 23" ACD; Snow Leopard
15" MacBook Pro Core Duo 2GHz, 2GB, 250GB; Snow Leopard
richthomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:54 AM   #25
Palliser
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by SydneyDev View Post
It has to be a multiple of 3 with that CPU. I have an i7 in my PC and it has 6GB (i.e. not 2, 4 or 8)
Correct. Although u can have it as 2 / 4 / 8 but it runs quicker when you have 6 / 12 config as it runs in Tri-Channel model (instead of Dual).
__________________
Aluminum Macbook 2.0ghz, 4GB, 500GB
Palliser is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2010, MacRumors.com, LLC