Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:21 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Unboxing and Disassembly Photos of the New Mac Mini






MacMiniColo.net has posted a series of unboxing and disassembly photos of the new Mac Mini just released today. The above photo, of course, is the same shot that was leaked just yesterday. The retail box image of the Mini curiously only has 9 vents while the actual product has 10. Still, all the pre-release product shots and video turned out to be quite accurate. Aside from the different ports in the back, the new Mac Mini's casing seems nearly identical to the previous model:
Quote:
The outside of the Mac mini looks nearly identical. It has the same aluminum siding and the white plastic top. I guess I can't prove it, but having handled several hundred of the last generation Mac minis, the aluminum feels different. Perhaps it was manufactured differently.

Article Link: Unboxing and Disassembly Photos of the New Mac Mini
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:23 PM   #2
theBigD23
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
I wish it was cheaper. 120GB HD and 1G of RAM, I don't think I can justify purchasing it.
theBigD23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:25 PM   #3
Mr. Giver '94
macrumors 68000
 
Mr. Giver '94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Giver '94
I'll say what I said in the other thread about these pics......


Reminds me of when I bought mine back in 2005.....oh wait....
THEY LOOK EXACTLY THE FREAKIN SAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
3.06 GHz 500GB 24" Alu. iMac iPod Nano Red 16GB iPod 5.5G 30GB iPT 1G 8GB Beats by Dr Dre B&O Earset 3 iPhone 3G 16GB Black
Mr. Giver '94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:26 PM   #4
Eidorian
macrumors G3
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
Rather annoying antennas there.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8
chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7
Eidorian is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:27 PM   #5
Jayomat
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rainy-Town
fake!!!!
Jayomat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:29 PM   #6
plumbingandtech
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayomat View Post
fake!!!!
Photoshop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
The Palm Pre is the new Sarah Palin.
plumbingandtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:29 PM   #7
Darkroom
macrumors 68000
 
Darkroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montréal, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayomat View Post
fake!!!!
LOL!
__________________
iPhone OS Apps: Film Light, SizeMe.
Darkroom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:31 PM   #8
minik
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bellevue, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayomat View Post
fake!!!!
That's gotta be. There is no Tuesday.
__________________
Flickr, facebook. twitter.
minik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:40 PM   #9
chenazhi
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
to expensive

599 is too high.
499 would be nice.
chenazhi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:27 PM   #10
O and A
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York City
Send a message via AIM to O and A
I agree these should cost 499 especially in this economy. Also it would be nice for a 999 iMac again.
__________________
MacPro 3GHZ x4, 4GB RAM, 750GBx4, ATI 1900, 23"; Hackintosh 3GHZ x4, 4GB RAM, 1TBx2, 512 8800GT; 20"; PowerBook 17" 1.6ghz, 2GB RAM. iPhone3G 16GB Blk
O and A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 07:31 PM   #11
Mr Maui
macrumors 65816
 
Mr Maui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by theBigD23 View Post
I wish it was cheaper. 120GB HD and 1G of RAM, I don't think I can justify purchasing it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by amac4me View Post
Would have been nice to see the Mac mini entry price fall back below $500 - back to $499 given the economic backdrop.
Quote:
Originally Posted by O and A View Post
I agree these should cost 499 especially in this economy. Also it would be nice for a 999 iMac again.
You'd think people would be happy that the thing was updated (after all the complaining about that) but then there is always a complaint about price.

I've heard complaints about the price being lowered because of the tough times ... would people seriously say it was OK to raise the price when the times got better? Not a chance. Once a price is lowered, it would pretty much be stuck.

Remember, the mini is designed to be a low-end "intro" computer to get people familiar with the ease and functionality of Apple computers. It is NOT designed to be a computer to compete with low-end PCs.
__________________
UPCOMING APPLE PRODUCTS - The NEW "iWantItAll" and "iWantItNow"
Big brother Gates is watchin' ... an' he ain't likin' ... 8.5% market share!
Mr Maui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:10 PM   #12
Slurpy2k8
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Maui View Post
You'd think people would be happy that the thing was updated (after all the complaining about that) but then there is always a complaint about price.

I've heard complaints about the price being lowered because of the tough times ... would people seriously say it was OK to raise the price when the times got better? Not a chance. Once a price is lowered, it would pretty much be stuck.

Remember, the mini is designed to be a low-end "intro" computer to get people familiar with the ease and functionality of Apple computers. It is NOT designed to be a computer to compete with low-end PCs.

Yeah.. your apologizing for Apple is pretty sad. You want us to profusely thank apple simply because this thing was 'updated' after 1.5 years? Really? 'Complaining' when its warranted is exactly what forums are for. As most people here are fans of apple (myself included) you'd think critical analysis wouldn't be looked on so spitefully from people such as yourself. And it's to Apple's benefit to upgrade their products- you know, so they can sell them? It's not some gesture they do out of the goodness of their hearts. Stop acting as if its some favor they're doing for us, and we need to thank them for it then shutup.

The truth of the matter is that as most rational people here have realized that Apple have managed to make the mini an even worse value than before- an impressive feat. One could argue the same about the iMac and the MacPro updates.
Slurpy2k8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:18 PM   #13
ChrisH3677
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Victoria, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slurpy2k8 View Post
Yeah.. your apologizing for Apple is pretty sad. You want us to profusely thank apple simply because this thing was 'updated' after 1.5 years? Really? 'Complaining' when its warranted is exactly what forums are for. As most people here are fans of apple (myself included) you'd think critical analysis wouldn't be looked on so spitefully from people such as yourself. And it's to Apple's benefit to upgrade their products- you know, so they can sell them? It's not some gesture they do out of the goodness of their hearts. Stop acting as if its some favor they're doing for us, and we need to thank them for it then shutup.

The truth of the matter is that as most rational people here have realized that Apple have managed to make the mini an even worse value than before- an impressive feat. One could argue the same about the iMac and the MacPro updates.
Hear, hear! Well said.

And in Australia the bottom Mac mini has gone up AU$200!! That's just a smidge under 25%. Yes the dollar's worse, but it's been a lot worse and the Mac mini has never cost as much. I hate to say it, but I'm looking at hackintoshes now.
__________________
Computer:iMac Core Duo 2GHz
Windoze switcher: August 2003
Other Macs: Wife's: iBook 366Mhz clamshell; Kid's: eMac 800Mhz
ChrisH3677 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 4, 2009, 11:34 AM   #14
Yvan256
macrumors 68040
 
Yvan256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Anyone know if this works or has already been used this to make an external SATA mod?
Xecuter HDXT PS3 Hard Drive Xtender
__________________
Mac mini Core 2 Duo 1.83 GHz/2.5 GiB, Mac mini G4 1.42 GHz/1 GiB, 12" PowerBook G4 1.5 GHz/512 MiB, iPod touch 16 GiB, silver iPod shuffle 1 GiB.
Yvan256 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:18 PM   #15
macUser2007
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2007
The Mini could make a very nice, cool-running, quiet HTPC.

Unfortunately, even with the new NVDIA chipset, I am wondering if the 2.0 CPU can run comfortably a BluRay movie. Running Vista, of course, since OS X still doesn't support BluRay playback.

I think Apple kind of missed the boat on this one, both in terms of software and hardware. Too bad, really, since the first Intel Mac Minis (back when) were really a good buy, IMO. But times have changed.
macUser2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:20 PM   #16
Eidorian
macrumors G3
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
Quote:
Originally Posted by macUser2007 View Post
The Mini could make a very nice, cool-running, quiet HTPC.

Unfortunately, even with the new NVDIA chipset, I am wondering if the 2.0 CPU can run comfortably a BluRay movie. Running Vista, of course, since OS X still doesn't support BluRay playback.

I think Apple kind of missed the boat on this one, both in terms of software and hardware. Too bad, really, since the first Intel Mac Minis (back when) were really a good buy, IMO. But times have changed.
I think you'd be more interested in looking at the 9400M's decoding performance on the Windows side anyways.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8
chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7
Eidorian is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 4, 2009, 12:59 AM   #17
dagamer34
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by macUser2007 View Post
The Mini could make a very nice, cool-running, quiet HTPC.

Unfortunately, even with the new NVDIA chipset, I am wondering if the 2.0 CPU can run comfortably a BluRay movie. Running Vista, of course, since OS X still doesn't support BluRay playback.

I think Apple kind of missed the boat on this one, both in terms of software and hardware. Too bad, really, since the first Intel Mac Minis (back when) were really a good buy, IMO. But times have changed.
The GeForce 9400M can decode 1080p on chip. I think you just need drivers and software that is hardware-accelerated. No need to worry about CPU speed, as even the Atom + 9400M was able to keep up with decoding 1080P video.
dagamer34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 4, 2009, 02:16 AM   #18
Lershac
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA USA
Send a message via AIM to Lershac Send a message via Yahoo to Lershac
Quote:
Originally Posted by macUser2007 View Post
The Mini could make a very nice, cool-running, quiet HTPC.
It does make a great little quiet sbs 2003 server for small office use. External HD to hold the Exch DBs and another for backup... its very quiet and quite usable in performance load with 10 people on it.

I just wish I could locate a bluetooth driver for it that worked with SBS 2003.
Lershac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 09:12 PM   #19
Mr Maui
macrumors 65816
 
Mr Maui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Maui View Post
You'd think people would be happy that the thing was updated (after all the complaining about that) but then there is always a complaint about price.

I've heard complaints about the price being lowered because of the tough times ... would people seriously say it was OK to raise the price when the times got better? Not a chance. Once a price is lowered, it would pretty much be stuck.

Remember, the mini is designed to be a low-end "intro" computer to get people familiar with the ease and functionality of Apple computers. It is NOT designed to be a computer to compete with low-end PCs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slurpy2k8 View Post
Yeah.. your apologizing for Apple is pretty sad. You want us to profusely thank apple simply because this thing was 'updated' after 1.5 years? Really? 'Complaining' when its warranted is exactly what forums are for. As most people here are fans of apple (myself included) you'd think critical analysis wouldn't be looked on so spitefully from people such as yourself. And it's to Apple's benefit to upgrade their products- you know, so they can sell them? It's not some gesture they do out of the goodness of their hearts. Stop acting as if its some favor they're doing for us, and we need to thank them for it then shutup.

The truth of the matter is that as most rational people here have realized that Apple have managed to make the mini an even worse value than before- an impressive feat. One could argue the same about the iMac and the MacPro updates.
First ... I'm not "apologizing" for Apple, nor am I "defending" them. I will however defend their right to run their business as they see fit, whether you agree with the business model or not.

Second ... I don't "want" you to do anything. The point of my reply was simple. People scream and whine that the thing has not been updated in however long. Then, once it is updated, they complain about the price, or the specs, or something else. I don't think I've ever heard a majority say that Apple actually produced a good product. All they focus on is the "shortcomings" compared to what is available for PCs. Here's my advice to those people. BUY A DAMN PC!!

Third ... I don't look at you "spitefully" or any other way. I merely voiced my opinion .. which may or may not differ from yours. My guess is I have been using Apple products much longer than you. I work in the graphics industry and work on them daily ... and I have for over 20 years. So don't talk about how you are more "anything" relative to Apple than I am. You know nothing about me. I recognize the majority of people here are Apple fans I've been posting on this site nearly 6 years longer than you have been.

Fourth ... you say it is to Apple's benefit to update their products. Of course it is ... an d they do ... on their schedule and with their business plan. It is also to Apple's benefit to maintain their profit margins ... which they do BETTER than any other computer manufacturer out there. Here's another little tidbit you may have overlooked. Apple is GAINING marketshare. Even Microsoft is OPENLY acknowledging this FACT. I guess that means people (unhappy or not about specs, price, etc.) continue to buy Apple products at whatever price Apple chooses to charge.

Fifth ... The Mac mini was designed to be an "affordable APPLE computer" ... NOT AN AFFORDABLE COMPUTER. It was not designed to compete with every low-priced piece of junk PC out there. It is the least expensive computer in the Apple lineup ... therefore IT IS an "affordable Mac" compared to other Macs. Don't spend your time comparing it to "cheaper PCs". Those computers are cheaper for a reason ... they ARE NOT a Mac.

Finally ... As for your "most rational people" comment ... I'm willing to bet that these new Apple computers of "worse value than before" will outsell the previous (implied) "better value" computers by a long shot, that they will continue to convert PC users to the Mac, will continue to improve Apple sales and bottom lines, and will continue to inspire ridiculous responses like yours in the future.

That is my simple opinion. Time will tell if I am right. Go Apple.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisH3677 View Post
Hear, hear! Well said.

And in Australia the bottom Mac mini has gone up AU$200!! That's just a smidge under 25%. Yes the dollar's worse, but it's been a lot worse and the Mac mini has never cost as much. I hate to say it, but I'm looking at hackintoshes now.
I repeat the above. Please just buy a PC for $299. While I understand the desire of people to have Mac that are comparably priced to low-end PCs, Apple will never do that. If you really want your voice to be heard concerning the issue, convince 2m people per year to stop buying Macs. Then, and ONLY then will Apple hear.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ddTaylor View Post
Then why price it like one - actually why price it OVER one? You can get a kick-ass PC (yes, I know - with Windows) and run Linux on it for WELL UNDER the cost of the Mini. I love my Apple products but with the recent rash of 'updates' and 'refreshes' I may go with X86. Works fine on my Acer netbook - yet another market Apple will not enter because they will not be able to keep the margins high enough - even though I think they would sell twice as many as the entry level MacBook.
Again ... buy the cheaper PC and run Linux on it. Apple succeed in keeping the prices high and the margins large because no matter how many people complain about the hardware, Apple knows they will continue to pay (and even overpay) for the incredible operating system. Should Apple have maintained/raised their prices? You'd think not. But people will buy ANYWAY ... and therefore justify the higher prices.
__________________
UPCOMING APPLE PRODUCTS - The NEW "iWantItAll" and "iWantItNow"
Big brother Gates is watchin' ... an' he ain't likin' ... 8.5% market share!

Last edited by Mr Maui : Mar 3, 2009 at 09:38 PM.
Mr Maui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 4, 2009, 09:12 AM   #20
ddTaylor
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Again ... buy the cheaper PC and run Linux on it. Apple succeed in keeping the prices high and the margins large because no matter how many people complain about the hardware, Apple knows they will continue to pay (and even overpay) for the incredible operating system. Should Apple have maintained/raised their prices? You'd think not. But people will buy ANYWAY ... and therefore justify the higher prices.[/quote]

But if you checked the latest sales numbers - that is not exactly the case and with pricing like this - it will continue the downward slide. Keep apologizing for Apple and maybe they will send you a free Mini!

D
ddTaylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 4, 2009, 06:34 PM   #21
bluefido
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slurpy2k8 View Post
Yeah.. your apologizing for Apple is pretty sad. You want us to profusely thank apple simply because this thing was 'updated' after 1.5 years? Really? 'Complaining' when its warranted is exactly what forums are for. As most people here are fans of apple (myself included) you'd think critical analysis wouldn't be looked on so spitefully from people such as yourself. And it's to Apple's benefit to upgrade their products- you know, so they can sell them? It's not some gesture they do out of the goodness of their hearts. Stop acting as if its some favor they're doing for us, and we need to thank them for it then shutup.

The truth of the matter is that as most rational people here have realized that Apple have managed to make the mini an even worse value than before- an impressive feat. One could argue the same about the iMac and the MacPro updates.

You hit the nail on its head. -- from another disgruntled Mac user
bluefido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:45 PM   #22
ddTaylor
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Maui View Post
You'd think people would be happy that the thing was updated (after all the complaining about that) but then there is always a complaint about price.

I've heard complaints about the price being lowered because of the tough times ... would people seriously say it was OK to raise the price when the times got better? Not a chance. Once a price is lowered, it would pretty much be stuck.

Remember, the mini is designed to be a low-end "intro" computer to get people familiar with the ease and functionality of Apple computers. It is NOT designed to be a computer to compete with low-end PCs.
Then why price it like one - actually why price it OVER one? You can get a kick-ass PC (yes, I know - with Windows) and run Linux on it for WELL UNDER the cost of the Mini. I love my Apple products but with the recent rash of 'updates' and 'refreshes' I may go with X86. Works fine on my Acer netbook - yet another market Apple will not enter because they will not be able to keep the margins high enough - even though I think they would sell twice as many as the entry level MacBook.

D
ddTaylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 08:53 PM   #23
KnightWRX
macrumors 65816
 
KnightWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddTaylor View Post
Then why price it like one - actually why price it OVER one? You can get a kick-ass PC (yes, I know - with Windows) and run Linux on it for WELL UNDER the cost of the Mini. I love my Apple products but with the recent rash of 'updates' and 'refreshes' I may go with X86. Works fine on my Acer netbook - yet another market Apple will not enter because they will not be able to keep the margins high enough - even though I think they would sell twice as many as the entry level MacBook.

D
Size, power consumption. Even the budget Inspiron 530 is a beast compared to a mini.
__________________
Aluminium Macbook 2.0 GHZ
KnightWRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 09:03 PM   #24
ddTaylor
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnightWRX View Post
Size, power consumption. Even the budget Inspiron 530 is a beast compared to a mini.
But is that what you want? An ultra-small 'desktop' with a silly large external power supply, no keyboard, no mouse and no display at MORE than the going rate for a much higher-end PC? I, as well as many, will pass. Bad move Apple.

D
ddTaylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2009, 09:59 PM   #25
Kar98
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Maui View Post
You'd think people would be happy that the thing was updated (after all the complaining about that) but then there is always a complaint about price.
For almost a thousand bucks I'd get a mild speed bump, a different graphics chip and one more USB port, compared to what I've got now (and counting only the features I can make use of). And the remote is now extra.
Kar98 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC