Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Mar 6, 2009, 05:19 AM   #1
MacsRgr8
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Mac OS X 10.6 10a286 seeded to developers

Nice.... right before the weekend!
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 05:22 AM   #2
xUKHCx
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
xUKHCx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Kop
I was just reading on AppleInsider that 10A286 was the target build for the next release.


The last build was 10A261(?)

Wonders if any new tweaks are added to this build.
__________________
The red men: Paul William Carlile (19), Raymond Thomas Chapman (50), Gary Christopher Church (19), Joseph Clark (29), Paul Clark (18)
xUKHCx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 05:29 AM   #3
MacsRgr8
Thread Starter
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Yep.
10a261 was the previous build.

I'm just reading the seed notes, and forgive me for not compromising the NDA... but there are still quite a lot of "known issues"...

But, there are some new stuff.... not least in the Finder!
When I get home this evening, I will try it out
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 08:45 AM   #4
xUKHCx
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
xUKHCx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Kop
World Of Apple have put up what appears to be the seed notes.

Quote:
Less than a month after the last seed of Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard (Seed notes) Apple has released another major build. Build 10A286 packs three main important changes. Build 10A286 of Snow Leopard is said to contain a new QuickTime with a “minimal UI”, in addition the Finder has now been replaced with a Cocoa version and finally Safari 4 Beta is now included in the build.

The accompanying notes also pointed towards a major shift to 64-bit, with all developers being encouraged to run Mac OS X Snow Leopard in 64-bit mode.

The unusually short seed notes can be seen below.


New Content

This seed contains some major new changes in the following areas:

QuickTime Player
The new QuickTime Player has a new minimal UI and is focused on playback.

Finder
Finder includes a new Cocoa Desktop, Info Window and Contextual Menu

Safari
Safari 4 beta is included in the seed as the default browser.

Known Issues
Remote Installs over Airport may cause panics (A workaround is to install via Ethernet or DVD.)
Booting from the install DVD can take a long time
Some settings are not migrated from the previous system when upgrading, including file sharing, sharing name and energy saver settings.
Finder issues: Icon previews will not appear on the Desktop, selecting Clean Up does not change icon placement on the Desktop. Sometimes the Finder and Desktop will stop responding to input. A workaround is to restart Finder.
iTunes will sometimes lock up when an iPhone is connected. A workaround is to rename or delete ~/Library/Lockdown)
Microsoft Office 2004 applications can hang when using the File->Open menu. A workaround is to open the file by opening it in Finder.)
On newer MacBook Pros, the screen’s backlight will not come on when booting into the installer if the brightness is set below 6.
Hibernation is not working on machines with Nvidia graphics cards and will result in a frozen machine.
The Time Machine UI cannot be activated in Finder and Mail in some cases.
The linker creates a bad image when the minimum OS target is set to Mac OS X 10.5 and weak external symbols are used. (A workaround is to set Mac OS X 10.4 or 10.6 as the minimum OS target.)
Xcode often crashes when navigating in documentation using the navigation buttons.
We do not recommended installing this seed on the Nehalem Mac Pros.
__________________
The red men: Paul William Carlile (19), Raymond Thomas Chapman (50), Gary Christopher Church (19), Joseph Clark (29), Paul Clark (18)
xUKHCx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 08:51 AM   #5
MacsRgr8
Thread Starter
macrumors 601
 
MacsRgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Cheers... saves a lot of questions I could have gotten...
__________________
Drag and Drop for Windows users:
DRAG your peecee off your desk, and DROP it in the trash.
MacsRgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:29 AM   #6
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Snow Leopard Build 10A286 Seeded to Developers



Apple has seeded a new version of Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, termed Build 10A286, to developers. World of Apple republishes the seed notes, which highlight three significant changes in the new build: a new QuickTime user interface, Cocoa-based Finder features, and Safari 4 beta as the default browser.
Quote:
QuickTime Player
The new QuickTime Player has a new minimal UI and is focused on playback.

Finder
Finder includes a new Cocoa Desktop, Info Window and Contextual Menu

Safari
Safari 4 beta is included in the seed as the default browser.
World of Apple also notes that developers are being encouraged to run the new build in 64-bit mode, signaling a "major shift" in that direction.

Snow Leopard is due for release sometime in 2009, and Apple has been making steady progress on the new operating system, as demonstrated by consistent releases of new builds to developers. Apple has said that they are focusing on quality and performance in Snow Leopard rather than introducing significant numbers of new features.

Article Link: Snow Leopard Build 10A286 Seeded to Developers
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:32 AM   #7
ortuno2k
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Can't wait!
Screenshots please?
__________________
15" C2D MacBook Pro 2.33 GHz with 3GB of RAM, 320GB HDD on 10.6.1
ortuno2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:32 AM   #8
madrag
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
it's closer and closer, I can't wait!!!
madrag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:33 AM   #9
ant043
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ireland
yes give me snow leopard now or maybe the 24th march ?
__________________
macbook pro 13 2.26ghz, apple led cinema display, Iphone 32gb 3GS
ant043 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:34 AM   #10
MalibuMatt98
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Can't wait to take full advantage of my Core2 Duo
MalibuMatt98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:35 AM   #11
MrCrowbar
macrumors 68000
 
MrCrowbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
So... the Desktop is now Cocoa? What was it before, Carbon?
Anyway, replacing Carbon stuff by Cocoa is good, especially on things that are as essential as the Finder. <Shouts at Adobe>

Anyone think that March 24 Event might have to do with Snow Leopard?
__________________
MrCrowbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:36 AM   #12
bigtriece
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Lack Of i7 Processors Makes Snow Leopard Useless

Apple really messed up with Snow Leopard - it is so obvious that it was designed for the Core i7 processors in mind, but since they decided not to include the Core i7s in their new imac, mac mini and macbook range, the Snow Leopard upgrade is totally unnecessary.
bigtriece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:37 AM   #13
iMacmatician
macrumors 68040
 
iMacmatician's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The world of Macmatics, flying with my calculator…
Screenshots would be nice.
__________________
babyj: "One day, all Apple products will be running the iPhone OS …"
iMacmatician is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:38 AM   #14
RichardI
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Cocoa?

Some one refresh my memory please. What exactly is cocoa?

Rich
__________________
iMac 24", 2.8 Ghz., 4 Gb. ram, HD2600 Pro, 750Gb. Hard Drive, OSX 10.6.X (latest)
MagicMouse, CH Fighterstick. iPod Shuffle (2nd G) 1 Gb.
RichardI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:39 AM   #15
justflie
macrumors 6502a
 
justflie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Red Sox Nation
Interesting that Apple does NOT recommend one install this build on the new Nehalem Mac Pros. Any thoughts why?
__________________
2 x 2.66 GHz 2009 Mac Pro, 6 GB RAM, GTX 285 ; 32GB iPhone 3GS
justflie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:40 AM   #16
ortuno2k
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardI View Post
Some one refresh my memory please. What exactly is cocoa?

Rich
Here:

http://developer.apple.com/DOCUMENTA...section_1.html
__________________
15" C2D MacBook Pro 2.33 GHz with 3GB of RAM, 320GB HDD on 10.6.1
ortuno2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:42 AM   #17
iMacmatician
macrumors 68040
 
iMacmatician's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The world of Macmatics, flying with my calculator…
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtriece View Post
Apple really messed up with Snow Leopard - it is so obvious that it was designed for the Core i7 processors in mind, but since they decided not to include the Core i7s in their new imac, mac mini and macbook range, the Snow Leopard upgrade is totally unnecessary.
They couldn't put Nehalem in any other Mac even if they wanted to (without major redesign). And I'm sure Snow Leopard will help with non-Nehalems.

Quote:
Originally Posted by justflie View Post
Interesting that Apple does NOT recommend one install this build on the new Nehalem Mac Pros. Any thoughts why?
No Nehalem support yet?
__________________
babyj: "One day, all Apple products will be running the iPhone OS …"
iMacmatician is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:44 AM   #18
Small White Car
macrumors 68040
 
Small White Car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardI View Post
Some one refresh my memory please. What exactly is cocoa?

Rich
Cocoa and Carbon are 2 different programing languages for Mac software.

To the end user you wouldn't know the difference. Arguments over which was "better" focused on the way programmers work.

This argument is over now since Apple decide to stop support for 64-bit code with Carbon. It's clear now that everything will eventually be written in Cocoa. (Although Carbon programs that don't need 64-bit are obviously fine for quite some time, the trend towards Cocoa is clear.)
Small White Car is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:47 AM   #19
tbealmear
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Morgantown, WV
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtriece View Post
Apple really messed up with Snow Leopard - it is so obvious that it was designed for the Core i7 processors in mind, but since they decided not to include the Core i7s in their new imac, mac mini and macbook range, the Snow Leopard upgrade is totally unnecessary.
What is so obvious about it? I am pretty sure that Core2Duo's will take full advantage of Snow Leopard. If you have some facts, feel free to share it.
__________________
20" Alum iMac @ 2Ghz - 6G 80Gb iPod Classic (#2...stolen) - 16GB White iPhone 3GS - G4 Mac Mini
tbealmear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:50 AM   #20
numbersyx
macrumors 6502a
 
numbersyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCrowbar View Post
So... the Desktop is now Cocoa? What was it before, Carbon?
Anyway, replacing Carbon stuff by Cocoa is good, especially on things that are as essential as the Finder. <Shouts at Adobe>

Anyone think that March 24 Event might have to do with Snow Leopard?
Seems like it would be a good time to preview SL. Still think the release is for the summer:July is my guess....
numbersyx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:51 AM   #21
DavidLeblond
macrumors 68000
 
DavidLeblond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Small White Car View Post
Cocoa and Carbon are 2 different programing languages for Mac software.
Technically they're frameworks, not languages. Just nitpicking.
__________________
www.davidleblond.com
Try my new iPhone game, Claustrophobia!
DavidLeblond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:54 AM   #22
Sky Blue
macrumors 68040
 
Sky Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by justflie View Post
Interesting that Apple does NOT recommend one install this build on the new Nehalem Mac Pros. Any thoughts why?
Yeah, it's weird a beta wouldn't work with all available hardware.
__________________
"The case is so square that it easily stands at attention as if begging for treats."
Sky Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 10:55 AM   #23
Oh-es-Ten
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbealmear View Post
What is so obvious about it? I am pretty sure that Core2Duo's will take full advantage of Snow Leopard. If you have some facts, feel free to share it.
Yes, I agree - pretty much any machines from Santa Rosa onwards are going to benefit greatly from both Open CL and Grand Central supported apps. There is no reason at all you require i7 to take advantage of the extra power provided by those services.

Sounds like someone has some left over grumbles about lack of i7 in this refresh...
Oh-es-Ten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 11:00 AM   #24
Riemann Zeta
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Quote:
Still think the release is for the summer:July is my guess....
No way. Look at the massive number of severe "showstopper" bugs in these developers release builds: the installer is screwy, the Finder is riddled with bugs, sleep doesn't work, machine support is highly limited. Development seems to be progressing at a snail's pace.

I'm sticking with October as the release timeframe.
Riemann Zeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 11:01 AM   #25
Littleodie914
macrumors 65816
 
Littleodie914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houghton, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidLeblond View Post
Technically they're frameworks, not languages. Just nitpicking.
Very true. Where applications of the Cocoa framework are generally written in Objective-C, applications using the Carbon libraries are normally written in C.
__________________
Littleodie914 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC