Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jjahshik32

macrumors 603
Original poster
Sep 4, 2006
5,366
52
Curious, anyone have any istat temperature readings to do some comparisons to the last generation 8 core models?

I remember the 2.8GHz 8 core model I had with 16GB of RAM used to heat up my 12x14 room (pretty good sized room).
 

Infrared

macrumors 68000
Mar 28, 2007
1,714
64
For comparison, here are some Early 2008 Mac Pro stats:

temps.png
 

wayne226

macrumors member
Mar 7, 2008
71
8
cpu has come down to 30 now,just done encoding borat with handbrake.
was idle for 3 mins.
man this thing is quick.
 

Salavat23

macrumors 6502
Feb 7, 2008
333
4
The Nehalems run much hotter than the Penryns because they have an integrated memory controller, among other things.

The Nehalems will all idle at about 35-50 Celsius, and load at over 70.

Don't let the temperatures scare you, the Nehalems are built to run at those temperatures.
 

osin

macrumors 6502
Jun 8, 2008
309
10
New Jersey
Curious, anyone have any istat temperature readings to do some comparisons to the last generation 8 core models?

I remember the 2.8GHz 8 core model I had with 16GB of RAM used to heat up my 12x14 room (pretty good sized room).


I bet that your monitor and the light you are using will heat up your room much faster than computer...
 

rylin

macrumors 6502
Aug 18, 2006
351
0
I bet that your monitor and the light you are using will heat up your room much faster than computer...

Hardly.

24" Cinema Display does at most 212W when charging a macbook (60W).
Add in 2 40W lights and you're at 232W.

The MP probably idles around that, and goes a lot higher during load.
 

wayne226

macrumors member
Mar 7, 2008
71
8
i put 8gb in, i will wait until the prices come down on the 4gb sticks.
at the moment its quick enough with the 8gb,for the kind of tasks that i am doing
cheers
 

nanofrog

macrumors G4
May 6, 2008
11,719
3
Hardly.

24" Cinema Display does at most 212W when charging a macbook (60W).
Add in 2 40W lights and you're at 232W.

The MP probably idles around that, and goes a lot higher during load.
Exactly. :)

Don't for get those who order the HD 4870 will see an even higher bump as well, as it seems to idle ~150W. :eek: ;)
 

jjahshik32

macrumors 603
Original poster
Sep 4, 2006
5,366
52
Here is a comparison between the 08 model vs. the 09 model.

Power usage is amazingly good for this class machine. Past Mac Pros would hit the 550 watt range under full load; the MP09 maxes out at about 350 watts under the most severe load.

http://macperformanceguide.com/Reviews-MacProNehalem.html


Wow thats a HUGE difference, I bet it wont get my room as hot anymore!
 

Dragonforce

macrumors 6502a
Apr 9, 2008
587
5
Germany
I got my 2.66 quad-core Mac Pro in stock configuration today and also noticed that it runs quite a lot hotter than my old '06 Mac Pro. It usually idled at about 25°C on both CPUs while the '09 idles at mid-40's. Well, I guess thats normal :p
 

Fomaphone

macrumors regular
Jan 11, 2009
226
0
my 2.66 (eight) consistently runs between 120 degrees and 159. after about an hour of rendering and transcoding last night CPU A was higher... i want to say in the neighborhood of 170.

it sits between my desk and dresser with four inches of space on both sides, nothing in front of it and 8 inches space from the wall behind it.
 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.jpg
    Picture 1.jpg
    36.2 KB · Views: 84

nanofrog

macrumors G4
May 6, 2008
11,719
3
I got my 2.66 quad-core Mac Pro in stock configuration today and also noticed that it runs quite a lot hotter than my old '06 Mac Pro. It usually idled at about 25°C on both CPUs while the '09 idles at mid-40's. Well, I guess thats normal :p
For Nehalem, it's normal. ;) :D

Hot little devils. :eek: :p
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.