Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > PowerPC Macs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 17, 2009, 10:38 AM   #1
katewes
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
MacBook Air 1.6GHz vs Powerbook 12 1.5 GHz

A question for those who have used both the MacBook Air 1.6 GHz and the Powerbook 12" 1.5GHz maxed out 1.5GBRAM - I wonder how the Powerbook compares in terms of speed and zippliness relative to the early 1.6 GHz MacBook Air's.

Not for high level software like Photoshop, but just word processing and surfing the web?
katewes is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2009, 10:48 AM   #2
darngooddesign
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
The Air smokes it.
__________________
64 giggity... giggity... gigg-i-ty
Lego Apple Store
darngooddesign is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2009, 10:55 AM   #3
coupdetat
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
The PB is actually snappier in GUI operations due to the dedicated video on my 1.33ghz/1.25gb 12" PB. Minimizing windows using the genie effect is noticeably faster. However, once you start piling on heavy apps like Pages or Flash, the PB gets killed.

Strangely, Office 2004 on a PB runs much faster than either Office 2004 or 2008 on the MacBook Air. I actually just sold my MBA and switched to a Vaio TZ, largely because of poor battery life on the MBA and awful Office performance.
coupdetat is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2009, 03:32 PM   #4
catdog02481
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by coupdetat View Post
The PB is actually snappier in GUI operations due to the dedicated video on my 1.33ghz/1.25gb 12" PB. Minimizing windows using the genie effect is noticeably faster. However, once you start piling on heavy apps like Pages or Flash, the PB gets killed.

Strangely, Office 2004 on a PB runs much faster than either Office 2004 or 2008 on the MacBook Air. I actually just sold my MBA and switched to a Vaio TZ, largely because of poor battery life on the MBA and awful Office performance.

Hi, I have a Sony TZ and an MBA rev.1 1.8/SSD and just sold the latest maxed out PB12G4 1.5/1.25gb and i can tell you, the MBA is much much faster in pretty much anything you throw at it, including Office. Office 2008 runs very well on the MBA, no complaints. The PB was cute and had a sharp screen and brought back fond memories but it was obviously from another era, it had occasional troubles with youtube videos and some complex websites.
__________________
uMBP 15" quad Intel 160 Gen1; uMBP 17" Glossy-quad OCZ Vertex3; MBA13" "ultimate"; Thinkpad T60p 15" QXGA IPS; Thinkpad x220 i7 IPS; Ipad2 Sitting unused...
catdog02481 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2009, 04:43 PM   #5
Mactagonist
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NYC - Manhattan
Quote:
Originally Posted by catdog02481 View Post
Hi, I have a Sony TZ and an MBA rev.1 1.8/SSD and just sold the latest maxed out PB12G4 1.5/1.25gb and i can tell you, the MBA is much much faster in pretty much anything you throw at it, including Office. Office 2008 runs very well on the MBA, no complaints. The PB was cute and had a sharp screen and brought back fond memories but it was obviously from another era, it had occasional troubles with youtube videos and some complex websites.
The Air crushes almost any Power PC Mac. My Rev B gets a geekbench score higher then a Powermac G5 (dual 2.7).
Mactagonist is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > PowerPC Macs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should I get i7 MacBook Air or i5 2.6GHz MacBook Pro? Pitusky MacBook Pro 9 Mar 6, 2014 05:01 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC