Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 8, 2004, 03:14 PM   #1
wdlove
macrumors 604
 
wdlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
British judge wants Apple trademark row heard in London

*A British High Court judge ruled yesterday that a trademark battle between Steve Jobs's Apple Computer Inc. and The Beatles record company Apple Corps Ltd. should be heard in the United Kingdom.

It was a victory for Apple Corps, which is owned by Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, and the estates of deceased Beatles John Lennon and George Harrison. But a federal judge in California has also agreed to hear the case, holding that American law should apply. So the two companies will have to square off in court twice, with the possibility of different verdicts in each trial.

It's the latest in two decades of legal skirmishes of Apple vs. Apple. Five years after Jobs and partner Steve Wozniak launched the computer company in 1976, Apple Corps sued, claiming that Apple Computer's name and logo violate the record company's trademark. Settlements in 1991 and 1998 seemed to resolve the matter.

But the Beatles' record company now says that Apple Computer's popular iTunes Internet music retail business has gone too far. Apple Corps insists that the 1991 settlement included a pledge by Apple Computer to use the logo only for computer products and not for products related to music. Indeed, in 1998, Apple Computer, based in Cupertino, Calif., paid an out-of-court settlement to Apple Corps after the record company complained about an Apple music synthesizer product.

Still, Apple Corps says Apple Computer didn't learn its lesson. The recording company says that placing the Apple logo on the iTunes Music Store, an Internet-based music retailer, is another violation of the 1991 agreement.

http://www.boston.com/business/techn..._a_resolution/
__________________
First MacRumors "Contributor"
wdlove is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2004, 03:34 PM   #2
Sparky's
macrumors 6502a
 
Sparky's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Apple vs. Apple

You get the feeling this is not going away in our lifetime? I can see the headlines now "the Estate of Paul, John, Ringo, and George is sueing the estate of Steve" over the........
I think it would be cool if the 2 sat down and worked out a merger, think of the possibilities. Apple corp using Apple equipment in their studios, and Apple having license access to Apple music. It's a match made in the orchard.
__________________
God had a brain fart…and we are it! - me

24"iMac, Adobe CS4, 1T LaCie backup drive
Sparky's is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2004, 03:38 PM   #3
Frohickey
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PRK
I think its time for a name change.

TCCFKAA... The Computer Company Formerly Known As Apple



Lets see...

TCCFKAA iTunes Music Store
TCCFKAA iPod
TCCFKAA PowerMac
TCCFKAA PowerBook
TCCFKAA iMac
TCCFKAA iBook
TCCFKAA iLife/iPhoto/iDVD/iChat

Last edited by Frohickey; Apr 8, 2004 at 03:40 PM.
Frohickey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2004, 03:43 PM   #4
Sparky's
macrumors 6502a
 
Sparky's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
This was posted in the current events forum by Wdlove

It says in the second paragraph the case will be heard on both continents by 2 different Judges and will probably have 2 different outcomes.

My suggestion was, why don't the 2 just merge and get on with making money
__________________
God had a brain fart…and we are it! - me

24"iMac, Adobe CS4, 1T LaCie backup drive
Sparky's is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2004, 04:07 PM   #5
Frohickey
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PRK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky's
This was posted in the current events forum by Wdlove

It says in the second paragraph the case will be heard on both continents by 2 different Judges and will probably have 2 different outcomes.

My suggestion was, why don't the 2 just merge and get on with making money
I think that I can speak for Apple and el Stevo... we would not want to have Yucky Oh-No hawking Macs. The only reason she was in the Think Different posters is because she sewed John Lennon's and her clothes together. I don't think you want to see her naked. There are already enough insane people in the world, no need to make more.
Frohickey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2004, 04:35 PM   #6
wdlove
Thread Starter
macrumors 604
 
wdlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
In the Boston Globe Business section, IMHO I don't think that the 2 logo's look anything alike. Apple Corps is a pale green with a stem out the top, they have a lot of printing in side and of of the apple. The only real similarity is the word "Apple." I think that this is just another case of greed. They should just concentrate on making music. Apple doesn't create any music, just computers and software. They should try to work together on the ITMS in Europe.
__________________
First MacRumors "Contributor"
wdlove is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2004, 06:40 PM   #7
Sabbath
macrumors 6502a
 
Sabbath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
I guess if Apple (computer ) do lose this case by the time it reaches a verdict apple will already have such a presence in peoples minds, to simply drop any use of apple and call it iTunes, iTunes music store and iPod. People will just automatically link these as Apple, without the use of the word.
Sabbath is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2004, 03:26 AM   #8
MacNut
macrumors P6
 
MacNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
So when I go to the produce dept. who should I send my money too, Steve or Ringo, afterall the fruit came before both companys. So I say the family of the first seed of apple trees should sue both companys for improper use of a food product. On a related topic, my kitchen window is now property of Bill Gates
__________________
The thoughts in my head are rated TV-MA. Viewer discretion is advised.
Now batting, Number 2 Derek Jeter, Number 2
MacNut is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2004, 04:04 AM   #9
TimDaddy
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Versailles, KY (and that's pronounced Vurr-sales)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacNut
So when I go to the produce dept. who should I send my money too, Steve or Ringo, afterall the fruit came before both companys. So I say the family of the first seed of apple trees should sue both companys for improper use of a food product. On a related topic, my kitchen window is now property of Bill Gates
That's what I'm thinking! But, this seems more relevant than the earlier lawsuits over naming a computer company after a fruit. Now, it is a music-related company using the name Apple, when someone has already done that. Maybe they should drop Apple from the name of the music store and give applemusic.com, which currently redirects you to apple.com/itunes, to Apple Corps Ltd. Of course, they'll have to fight and say they won't budge, and then they can eventually settle for that to make Apple Corps feel like they won!
__________________
Help this young lady continue her education! Pleeeeease! Whether or not you choose to give, please spread the link around!
http://www.gofundme.com/36lr1o
TimDaddy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2004, 05:15 AM   #10
Abstract
macrumors Penryn
 
Abstract's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Location Location
Did the former Beatles really surprised that a computer company called Apple would use an apple in its logo? How can Apple Computers really make an apple look different if they want to use a simplistic, proper apple logo?

Does Apple Corp even produce music anymore?
__________________
"Hard? It's supposed to be hard. Hard is what makes it great!" - Tom Hanks.
Abstract is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2004, 01:23 PM   #11
MacNut
macrumors P6
 
MacNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
How many other companies have an Apple in their name and could they sell music if they wanted too or is this just a witch hunt against Apple Computer.
__________________
The thoughts in my head are rated TV-MA. Viewer discretion is advised.
Now batting, Number 2 Derek Jeter, Number 2
MacNut is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2004, 12:28 AM   #12
MrMacMan
macrumors 601
 
MrMacMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 1 Block away from NYC.
Send a message via AIM to MrMacMan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abstract
Did the former Beatles really surprised that a computer company called Apple would use an apple in its logo? How can Apple Computers really make an apple look different if they want to use a simplistic, proper apple logo?

Does Apple Corp even produce music anymore?
No Apple Corp is a dead company.

site 1
and the dead apache site I just hacked


The ''Corporation'' I say that in quotes because it self-manages itself, is dead.

All they do it recycle 'found' beatles music.

A new song here, and unreleased track there.


Why was 'The Beatles #1' Album put out? It sold a bull-load of copys... but why I have every song on that album...



Apple Corp LTD. is basically a lawsuit machine
a threatened lawsuit here...

Other stuff there...


Apple Corp. Now feeds off "new" albums and "lost and forgotten" tracks.

I love the beatles and hate this "corporation".
__________________
There is a little Steve in all of us!
-->Folding is Fighting Against Disease and help MacRumors. Join Today!<--
Props to --> Shadowfax For Making My Avatar!
IM Me On AIM Already!
MrMacMan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 25, 2004, 07:25 PM   #13
wdlove
Thread Starter
macrumors 604
 
wdlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
How about this for a very similar Apple logo? It's the same except that theirs is green. Maybe someone should notify Apple legal.

http://www.beersofeurope.co.uk/acata...lands_197.html
Attached Images
 
__________________
First MacRumors "Contributor"
wdlove is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2004, 02:23 AM   #14
virividox
macrumors 68040
 
virividox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manila - Nottingham - Philadelphia - Santa Barbara - Boston (ugh hate not knowing where to call home)
this is really retarded, i didnt even know about apple corp till this i wonder how many ppl know of them compared to the ppl who know about apple computer
__________________
17" MBP , 2 gig ram, 200 gig fw800 + 120 gig fw400 + 250 gig usb2 ext, 5g 80gig Ipod, Tiger
d200 & d70
virividox is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2004, 02:47 AM   #15
MacNut
macrumors P6
 
MacNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
I thought Michael Jackson owned all of the Beatles recordings so shouldn't this really be Michael Jackson suing or are they separate entities.
__________________
The thoughts in my head are rated TV-MA. Viewer discretion is advised.
Now batting, Number 2 Derek Jeter, Number 2
MacNut is offline   0 Reply With Quote


Reply
MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Current Events

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judge in Brazilian 'iPhone' Trademark Lawsuit Rules in Apple's Favor MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 61 Sep 27, 2013 10:53 AM
Apple tries to trademark the word 'startup' TheMacPotato Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 2 Aug 30, 2013 08:44 PM
Judge Dismisses Apple Trademark Claims Against Amazon's Appstore MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 324 Jan 22, 2013 11:16 AM
Uh oh, the Judge is not happy with Apple CASLondon Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 0 Nov 2, 2012 04:54 AM
UK Judge Is Forcing Apple To Publish On Its Website That Samsung Didn't Copy Apple Phokus iPad 1 Jul 18, 2012 04:05 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC