|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Next-Generation iPhone to Have "Faster Internet Speeds"?
![]() Silicon Alley Insider reports on rumors from a mobile industry source saying that the next-generation iPhone will have "a significantly faster Internet connection." While no further information is given as to whether this is referring to cellular or Wi-Fi connectivity, Silicon Alley Insider lays out some possibilities based on what is known about the state of the technology. Quote:
Quote:
Article Link: Next-Generation iPhone to Have "Faster Internet Speeds"? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jul 2004
|
Its got a gigabit ethernet socket on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Double 3G speed and whatever else apple adds in the iPhone 3G 2.0 this June?
Yah... I'll update.
__________________
The Palm Pre is the new Sarah Palin. |
|
|
|
| plumbingandtech |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by plumbingandtech |
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: United States of America
|
Now maybe we can watch live tv or stream on apps without wifi???? Browsing speed is fast enough for me now though!
|
|
|
|
| Airforcekid |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Airforcekid |
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
7.2mbps*
*Exclusive to San Francisco |
|
|
|
| stainlessliquid |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by stainlessliquid |
|
|
#6 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Quote:
nice.......... ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
The Palm Pre is the new Sarah Palin. |
|
|
|
|
| plumbingandtech |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by plumbingandtech |
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Well, if the new 3G and Broadcom chipsets make it in, along with the OLED screen from that (rather unlikely) rumor, we'd be looking at better battery life already.
I'm betting it's quite likely we'd see both draft-N and doublespeed 3G in the next hardware revision of the iPhone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New York City & South Florida
|
While this is great news, it still won't fix the problem of too many people using AT&T's 3G network at once in metropolitan areas.
__________________
MacBook 2.2 GHz Intel, 2 GB RAM iMac G5 20" 1.8 GHz PPC, 1.25 GB RAM iPhone 3GS 32GB |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Double what?
Well, I'll probably upgrade because I am one of those gadget types that likes to have the latest and greatest. It'll be interesting to see how much of a speed increase the average Joe will get from this updated hardware. 3G may be limited to 3+Mbps but I have never seen my speeds that high. It is a rarity for me to see over 1Mbps and my speed is usually around 500-600kbps.
|
|
|
|
| rlmccormick |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by rlmccormick |
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
I hope there wil be a faster 3G or its replacement with the new iphone. I have messed around a couple of storms and Verizons 3G just seems faster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
|
|
|
|
| rlmccormick |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by rlmccormick |
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Not where I live or work on 1st and Howard. I can generally only get Edge and I know many people who have the same experience. I also think there are so many iPhones owners in what is a small city (7 miles sq) it is killing the network.
I would like up wi-fi upgrade from g to n. I have the previous version of the Apple Extreme so would like to turn it to N 5GHz only.
__________________
3G 16GB iPhone, 15" Mac Book Pro 2.5GhHz, Mac Pro 2.8GhHz 8 Core 8GB, Mac Mini 2GB RAM, Apple TV 160GB, Many, many Ipods |
|
|
|
| davidbrummy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by davidbrummy |
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: May 2008
Location: God's Own County, UK
|
Faster page rendering please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
That's going to be faster than the average home broadband connection ... more expensive though. Probably worse contention than your typical DSL, but far more intermittent use that might make evening usage performance better than home usage performance.
And 802.11n seems very likely in this iteration. Also it might not be necessarily referring to the US, but other 3G networks around the world which may be faster still.
__________________
iBook — 12" 1.33GHz, 1.5GB RAM, 40GB, Combodrive, 200GB Firewire Hard Drive :: iPod — 8GB Black G3 iPod nano |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Denver, CO
|
Thoughts/opinions on whether original iPhone users who upgraded to 3G will be allowed to upgrade (again) to the newer iPhone in June?
And by "allowed" I mean for the price of the new phone + restarting your 2-year contract. |
|
|
|
| lazyrighteye |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by lazyrighteye |
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
|
sounds like new iPhone will be capable of HSDPA.
For those in US, this is something networks in Europe have rolled out over the last 12-18months. A number of devices over here are already capable of using this. Be good seeing this in next iPhone for sure
__________________
MBP Unibody 2.53GHz 4GB RAM; iPhone 3G; PS3; Wii |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
who cares? 32Gb please.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkeley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Mass.
|
I would be psyched it it incorporated N for the wifi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ATL
|
But "N" wifi isn't any faster for the internet than "G".
Isn't the internet slower than "G"?
__________________
iMac i7 Quad, MacPro, Black Macbook: soon to be sold, tv ipod 4g 30g, shuffle, shuffle orange, iphone 3gs. Faithful rumors reader since 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: May 2008
Location: God's Own County, UK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Denver, CO
|
|
|
|
|
| lazyrighteye |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by lazyrighteye |
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
I might actually buy one if it has wireless n.
|
|
|
|
| dextermorgan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by dextermorgan |
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, TX
|
ATT will get much faster... both phones will get faster.. the iPhone 3G will go to 3.6Mbps and the next iPhone will go faster. 3.6Mbps is several times faster than now.. that would be GREAT! 802.11n is not only faster (file transfers in home network)... it supports much longer distances... longer distances are needed so you can connect from the street... higher speeds from Wifi is not needed for internet as the internet connection is slower than 802.11b/g or n anyway. The recent Apple Extreme Base Stations will run on 802.11g if the current iPhones are also connected and n will not be used for you Macs. If you're not using wifi on your phone at the moment at home, turn that off so your AEBS can revert to n for your Macs.
__________________
MBP 2.16 / AEBS / iPhone 3GS / 3rd Gen Shuffle
Last edited by 8CoreWhore : Mar 20, 2009 at 01:46 PM. |
|
|
|
| 8CoreWhore |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by 8CoreWhore |
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Wireless N doesn't do downloads any faster than Wireless G. It's the device-to-device traffic that's faster. The only thing Wireless N would do is make it so the iPhone could work on N-only networks, which would be a bonus.
__________________
"If I wanted an Apple phone, would I be looking at an iPod touch? If I didn't want to pay a $2000 contract, would I be looking at an iPhone?" |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|