Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:39 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Updates Xserve to Nehalem Processors






As rumored, Apple has updated its Xserve line of servers to the latest Intel Nehalem processors. Apple claims the new Xserves deliver up to twice the performance of the previous system.
Quote:
Using Intel "Nehalem" Xeon processors and a next generation system architecture, the 1U rack-optimized Xserve delivers up to an 89 percent improvement in performance per watt. Xserve is available with up to two 2.93 GHz Intel Xeon processors and industry-leading storage options that include a low-power solid state drive (SSD) and up to 3TB of internal storage. Starting at $2,999, Xserve includes an unlimited client license for Mac OS X Server version 10.5 Leopard.
The new Xserve is available immediately from the Apple Store. The standard $2,999 configuration includes a 2.26GHZ Quad-Core Xeon 5500 processor and build to order options include dual 2.26 GHz, 2.66 GHz or 2.93 GHz Intel Xeon processors.

Article Link: Apple Updates Xserve to Nehalem Processors
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:40 AM   #2
Grimace
Contributor
 
Grimace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: with Hamburglar.
Just placed my order for an Octo-Serve!

Thanks Apple!
__________________
Canon 1Ds Mk III • Canon 5D MkII
16-35mm f/2.8L II • 24-70mm f/2.8L • 70-200mm f/2.8L IS
50mm f/1.2L • 85mm f/1.2L • 135mm f/2L • 300mm f/2.8L IS
Grimace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:41 AM   #3
justflie
macrumors 6502a
 
justflie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Red Sox Nation
D'oh. I just submitted this to you. Haha. Oh boy, there's that "performance per watt" metric again. As engineer, that melts my brain on many levels.
__________________
2 x 2.66 GHz 2009 Mac Pro, 6 GB RAM, GTX 285 ; 32GB iPhone 3GS
justflie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:41 AM   #4
vendettabass
macrumors 6502a
 
vendettabass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Send a message via Skype™ to vendettabass
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimace View Post
Just placed my order for an Octo-Serve!

Thanks Apple!
what you using it for?
vendettabass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:42 AM   #5
edesignuk
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
 
edesignuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Great(?) Britain
It boggles the mind that on a rather expensive server the RAID card is a $700 option, and that other than the SSD (who uses SSD's in servers?) the only other disk option is SATA. Where is SAS?
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
edesignuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:42 AM   #6
Awesome-o/
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
about time
Awesome-o/ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:42 AM   #7
darrenscerri
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Malta
Haha new Nehalem Xserves! The GPU is a GT 120.

No more SAS option? There are only the S-ATA drives as options. Btw for those who are wondering a quick search in google, "ADM" means Apple Drive Modules.
__________________
MacBook Pro 15" 2.53Ghz (Late 2008 - Unibody)
16GB 1st Gen iPod Touch
darrenscerri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:45 AM   #8
Evangelion
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by edesignuk View Post
It boggles the mind that on a rather expensive server the RAID card is a $700 option, and that other than the SSD (who uses SSD's in servers?) the only other disk option is SATA. Where is SAS?
I think the SSD makes quite a bit of sense. It doesn't eat a drive-bay and it has ultra-fast seek-times. There are quite a bit of uses for SSD in server-use IMO.
__________________
Anyone who thinks that Obama is a "Marxist" is so clueless that it's scary. Consider getting some education.
Evangelion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:47 AM   #9
amac4me
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evangelion View Post
I think the SSD makes quite a bit of sense. It doesn't eat a drive-bay and it has ultra-fast seek-times. There are quite a bit of uses for SSD in server-use IMO.
I think you're right and we'll see the adoption of SSD across more servers (and vendors) moving forward.
__________________
Switch To A Mac
http://switchtoamac.com
amac4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:47 AM   #10
edesignuk
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
 
edesignuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Great(?) Britain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evangelion View Post
I think the SSD makes quite a bit of sense. It doesn't eat a drive-bay and it has ultra-fast seek-times. There are quite a bit of uses for SSD in server-use IMO.
Perhaps in certain cases it might, though I'd still say that would be rather specialised. I stand by the rest of my statement though!
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
edesignuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:49 AM   #11
Airforcekid
macrumors 6502a
 
Airforcekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: United States of America
I noticed if you went under mac it was updated mins before the store opened!
__________________
I have no sympathy for people with a shoot from the hip approach to technology, learn how to use it right and don't wine when it doesn't work exactly how you want it to.
Airforcekid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:52 AM   #12
Babybandit
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Ordered 2 at 2.93 Octa Core. Going to swap the Ram and Harddrives later on.

Might pinch down for 2 more to swap out more of the school's old server.

But definitely going to see how well they run first.
__________________
Twit me! Here
15" Macbook Pro, White iPhone 3G, iPod Shuffle, iPod Nano, iPod Touch!
Babybandit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:52 AM   #13
themoonisdown09
macrumors Demi-God
 
themoonisdown09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Georgia, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by edesignuk View Post
It boggles the mind that on a rather expensive server the RAID card is a $700 option, and that other than the SSD (who uses SSD's in servers?) the only other disk option is SATA. Where is SAS?
I believe the SSD is meant for the operating system.

Quote:
Solid-state drive option.
Xserve supports a 128GB Solid State Drive (SSD) that doesn’t take up a valuable drive bay. When added, it comes configured as your boot drive.
__________________
People who talk in metaphors oughta shampoo my crotch.
themoonisdown09 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:54 AM   #14
edesignuk
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
 
edesignuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Great(?) Britain
Quote:
Originally Posted by themoonisdown09 View Post
I believe the SSD is meant for the operating system.
Yeah I know. Still seems like an odd choice when the drive bays are all stuck with plain old SATA.
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
edesignuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:56 AM   #15
Shivetya
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
is the zero percent financing new?
Shivetya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:57 AM   #16
babyjenniferLB
macrumors 68000
 
babyjenniferLB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Scotlands
"Three independent hot-plug drive bays with support for SATA or SAS Apple Drive Modules."

Note the Xserve raid card is a SAS Raid card just not clearly advertised.
__________________
Kittenbunny CMS developer Temp Project link
babyjenniferLB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 08:58 AM   #17
Sehnsucht
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Now if my school would just order a rack of these bitches, I'd have no problem with it at all!


Quote:
Originally Posted by darrenscerri View Post
Haha new Nehalem Xserves! The GPU is a GT 120.
Better than the previous Xserve's integrated 64MB ATI chip.

But I always figured that you could throw a Mac Pro-compatible graphics card in one of these things, since the Xserve is basically a "squished" Mac Pro, right? Or is there even any physical room for a full-sized graphics card?
__________________
Farewell...
Sehnsucht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 09:01 AM   #18
Schizoid
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by edesignuk View Post
Yeah I know. Still seems like an odd choice when the drive bays are all stuck with plain old SATA.
Much better than the old standard 80Gb boot drive, although I would want an SSD boot drive, and 3 x 1TB RAID 5.... oh dear £4000..... ungh
Schizoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 09:01 AM   #19
Joe The Dragon
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by babyjenniferLB View Post
"Three independent hot-plug drive bays with support for SATA or SAS Apple Drive Modules."

Note the Xserve raid card is a SAS Raid card just not clearly advertised.
3gb of ram in a $3000 system?

for $500 more then the mac pro they can at least put 6gb in there.
Joe The Dragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 09:01 AM   #20
edesignuk
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
 
edesignuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Great(?) Britain
Quote:
Originally Posted by babyjenniferLB View Post
"Three independent hot-plug drive bays with support for SATA or SAS Apple Drive Modules."

Note the Xserve raid card is a SAS Raid card just not clearly advertised.
ah huh! OK. Still crappy that in a server they charge you $700 to have RAID capability (hello! it's a server!). At least it brings SAS with it though.

Can't help but think if you pick up an HP Proliant DL you'll get all this and more as standard.
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
edesignuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 09:02 AM   #21
fleshman03
macrumors 68000
 
fleshman03's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sehnsucht View Post

But I always figured that you could throw a Mac Pro-compatible graphics card in one of these things, since the Xserve is basically a "squished" Mac Pro, right? Or is there even any physical room for a full-sized graphics card?
You know, I've always had this weird dream of having one of those screwed into the bottom of a desk and used as a "workstation" computer.

Weird thought, huh?

I'd venture that it could offer better power consumption and heat distribution than a MacPro, but I'd be talking right out of my ass w/o actually knowing if that's the case.
__________________
Penguin: Early 2008 MacBook Pro C2D @ 2.5GhZ, 2GB, 250GB / iPhone 3GS 32GB
Monkey: Early 2006 MacBook Black CD @ 2GhZ, 2GB, 80GB / iPhone 3G 16GB
fleshman03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 09:03 AM   #22
Cromulent
macrumors 601
 
Cromulent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Land of Hope and Glory
Quote:
Originally Posted by edesignuk View Post
Yeah I know. Still seems like an odd choice when the drive bays are all stuck with plain old SATA.
Nah, you can stick SAS drives in them. Apple just does not offer them as a BTO option.

Edit: Darn just checked out the config I would buy if I had the cash and it came to £19k roughly. Little bit more saving left to do me thinks .
__________________
Neural Advance - Mac OS X, UNIX and Windows Development
Extreme Metal Reviews
MP 4x 2.66Ghz Xeons / 2GB RAM / 250GB + 500GB + 750GB + 1TB HDDs / ATI Radeon 4870 512MB
Cromulent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 09:03 AM   #23
brisbaneguy29
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brisbane
Send a message via AIM to brisbaneguy29 Send a message via MSN to brisbaneguy29 Send a message via Skype™ to brisbaneguy29
I believe if you read the specs SAS is indeed an option,

"Flexible drive options.
Xserve 1TB Serial ATA (SATA) Apple Drive Modules pack up to 3TB in a 1U form factor. Rated 24/7 for server-class reliability and performance, these drives are an outstanding dollar-per-gigabyte value. Or add 15,000-rpm Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) drive modules and enjoy the highest disk performance available today. SAS drives deliver higher sequential performance (up to 163MB/s2), outstanding random-access performance, and best-in-class mean time between failure (MTBF) ratings for the most demanding applications."
__________________
WEBCROWD : Hosting and Domains
P: 07 3348 8156
E: simon@webcrowd.com.au
W: http://www.webcrowd.com.au
brisbaneguy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 09:04 AM   #24
edesignuk
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
 
edesignuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Great(?) Britain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cromulent View Post
Nah, you can stick SAS drives in them. Apple just does not offer them as BTO option.
Intelligent, that
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
edesignuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2009, 09:05 AM   #25
Don.Key
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleshman03 View Post
You know, I've always had this weird dream of having one of those screwed into the bottom of a desk and used as a "workstation" computer.
It's a great idea... If you are deaf.
Don.Key is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2010, MacRumors.com, LLC