Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

NAS drive configuration

wesg

wesg

macrumors regular
Original poster
I'm building an NAS computer powered by Ubuntu, but I'm trying to determine the best drive setup for value and reliability.

I have a 750GB drive, and intend on purchasing one more drive when I build the computer (probably 1.5TB) but I can't decide whether to use RAID 5 and maybe buy 2 750GB instead of a 1.5TB, or just buy the 1.5TB and use a script to copy important files. ANy suggestions? I want to limit spending, but still have substantial storage space.
 
FYI: You need a minimum of three drives to run RAID5 - and in any RAID configuration the drives need to be the same size. The 650Gb drives should be at the cheapest buck-per-gigabyte level right now.
 
Sesshi said:
FYI: You need a minimum of three drives to run RAID5 - and in any RAID configuration the drives need to be the same size. The 650Gb drives should be at the cheapest buck-per-gigabyte level right now.
Click to expand...
But better with 4, as in a 3 drive RAID 5, there's no redundancy. 😱 🙁 Loose a drive, and you skip degraded and go straight to dead array. 😉 😛
 
nanofrog said:
But better with 4, as in a 3 drive RAID 5, there's no redundancy. 😱 🙁 Loose a drive, and you skip degraded and go straight to dead array. 😉 😛
Click to expand...

I'm no expert but I don't think that is correct unless I'm misunderstanding your comment. The minimum number of disks for a redundant RAID5 array is three. If a single disk fails the array will continue to operate with only two disks and no data loss. You will take a read speed hit when the array needs to rebuild data from the failed disk using the parity information though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID_5#RAID_5
http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2007/07/10/effect-of-drive-count-on-raid-5/
 
Flash SWT said:
I'm no expert but I don't think that is correct unless I'm misunderstanding your comment. The minimum number of disks for a redundant RAID5 array is three. If a single disk fails the array will continue to operate with only two disks and no data loss. You will take a read speed hit when the array needs to rebuild data from the failed disk using the parity information though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID_5#RAID_5
http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2007/07/10/effect-of-drive-count-on-raid-5/
Click to expand...
Oops, 😱 Right thought, but botched the numbers. 😛
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back