|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Version Due in June
![]() Engadget reports that a version of NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 285 graphics card for the Mac Pro will be released in June. ![]() Image from Engadget The GTX 285 is currently NVIDIA's fastest single-processor GPU, offering 240 processing cores and 1 GB of video memory. AnandTech recently reviewed the PC version of the GTX 285 and found that it consistently outperformed the ATI Radeon HD 4870, whose Mac counterpart is currently available as an upgrade for the Mac Pro. NVIDIA just last week announced the upcoming Quadro FX 4800, offering a professional-level graphics card option for Mac Pro users at a price point of $1799. The GTX 285, however, should provide a significant performance boost over the current standard-level offerings for the Mac Pro at a price point closer to $400. Article Link: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Version Due in June |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
I'd be quite happy to see this happen.
__________________
2.4Ghz 15" MBP Unibody | 2.53Ghz 13" MBP Athlon X2 Ubuntu 9.04 | HP XW4600, C2D Win7 x64 VMWare ESXi 4.0, running several OSes |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Cards are appearing a bit quicker for the Mac Pro now.
__________________
iThink therefore iAm. |
|
|
|
| flopticalcube |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by flopticalcube |
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Yea, as the % of macs around you will start to see both Nvidia and AMD release graphics cards faster for the mac side.
__________________
iPhone Apps: Speedtest X |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B'ham
|
Great news ! Hopefully some more Quadros are on the way, too.
|
|
|
|
| Bubba Satori |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Bubba Satori |
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
This should have been an option from the beginning for the current MP.
__________________
2.4Ghz 15" MBP Unibody | 2.53Ghz 13" MBP Athlon X2 Ubuntu 9.04 | HP XW4600, C2D Win7 x64 VMWare ESXi 4.0, running several OSes |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minnesota
|
c'mon, please work with the mac pro classic!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Utah
|
Wow that is one expensive card!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: First loop of the Bible Belt D:
|
Dare I get excited that third party video card makers are FINALLY making cards for mac of their own initiative? Or that Apple might finally... encourage it?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Well, now we know when 10.5.7 will be released.
|
|
|
|
| Riemann Zeta |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Riemann Zeta |
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
|
Hopefully this can work with Early 2008 Mac Pros.
__________________
MacPro: 2 x 2.8GHz, 10GB RAM, 2 x 750GB HD in RAID0, 8800GT 30" ACD Uni MacBook Pro, 2.53GHz, 4GB RAM, 250GB 7200RPM |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Japan
|
No Apple mini-display port again
![]() ![]()
__________________
2009 Apple Workstation |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors G3
|
If there were only more Macs that could use this.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8 chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
|
I imagine that image is simply a GTX 285 that Engadget found around on the web. The final release may not be a "partner" card (much like the 8800GT is nVidia branded), and may have different ports.
__________________
iMac 27"(2009), i7, 2TB, 8GB, 4850 - On Order! MacBook Pro(2008) 2.53 | 9600 512 | 4GB | 320GB 7,200rpm |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Georgia
|
Good to hear. I am surprised that the graphics card makers have not been quicker about this.
Especially since I think it is likely that a vastly higher percentage of people spending $2000 to $4000+ on a workstation are much more likely to buy a high end graphics card than say people buying $500 computers. It's not like they have to specifically design a card for the Mac. They just need to make drivers and custom firmware for pre-existing cards. It is really strange to me that the third party vendors have not practiced this long ago. As someone like Sapphire or eVGA would have greatly expanded their market as the sole seller on the Mac side. As opposed to the myriad of companies competing for the gaming market on the Windows side. This will make the Hackintosh community happy as these drivers are futzed with to get the high end PC counterparts working in OS X. With high end nVidia and ATI cards available I suppose it will be a matter of weeks until nVidia unleashes the GTX300 series and ATI the HD5000 series. To be available for Mac the following year.
__________________
Quadra 650 040 33MHz 72MB RAM, 2GB HD, 2x CD PMac G5 Rev B 2x2.0; 2.5GB RAM 600GB RAID 0 Acer Laptop AMD 2800 Home Made PentiumDC 2.5GHz, ATI 4850 |
|
|
|
| velocityg4 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by velocityg4 |
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
|
What we need is a mini tower, MacPro mini, into which we could put these things, instead of having to shell out serious dough for a full MacPro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Redmond, WA
|
I really, really want to see this be supported by the 2006 Mac Pros!
__________________
Mac Pro, Two 3GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon, NVIDIA 8800 GT, 7 GB RAM. 15" Macbook Pro, 2.8Ghz Core 2 Duo, NVIDIA 9600 M, 4 GB RAM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: 1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
|
|
|
|
|
| Tallest Skil |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Tallest Skil |
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
$400 is not unreasonable. Many will pay that, especially if they currently have a low-end card and want high-end performance or if these will be able to run on the older Pros.
__________________
iThink therefore iAm. |
|
|
|
| flopticalcube |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by flopticalcube |
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Sh.. i just today got the ATI RADEON HD 4870 512MB-ZML delivered!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
I have my fingers crossed that this card only requires 1 of the internal molex connectors for power, unlike the 4870. Otherwise we are limited to one card per machine which for us is a massive problem!!
Also i would love to see this card have 2 x DVI connectors and not the stupid and most importantly non-latching mini displayport connector. I can see the need for it on laptops and imacs, but i really need my connector to not be so easy to accidentally pulled out!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
|
The GTX 285 requires a 6 and an 8 pin power feed. In other words, one card.
__________________
iMac 27"(2009), i7, 2TB, 8GB, 4850 - On Order! MacBook Pro(2008) 2.53 | 9600 512 | 4GB | 320GB 7,200rpm |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
$50 more then a 4870 for a GTX285?
Or when they say "closer" they mean more like $499? Can't picture this card costing less then $500 considering that the PC version is already priced at around $310 (
__________________
MacPro 2008, Octo 2.8 Ghz, 32GB, XFX 4870-XXX 1GB
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
Well that's about all we need from you to realize you have no idea what you're talking about.
__________________
Mac Pro Nehalem Quad + GTX285, MBA 2.13Ghz SSD, iPhone 3G 8GB, Shuffle |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|