Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

dbomb7

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Apr 26, 2004
3
0
Alright all you Mac fiends...Let's here your decision on the new powerbooks if they were all fully decked out.
 

josepho

macrumors regular
Mar 12, 2004
240
0
Surrey, England
dbomb7 said:
Alright all you Mac fiends...Let's here your decision on the new powerbooks if they were all fully decked out.

If I didn't have to pay, and if I could keep my 12" PB (on its way right now) for taking to uni then I'd definitely go for the 15". For some reason, I just think that the 17" is too big to be a notebook, whilst the 15" lends itself to real power and at the same time, the ability to be picked up and carried about.

I did consider the 15" combo, but decided that I didn't fancy the extra size and weight, as I'll be carrying about a lot, especially when I spend 1 1/2 months in Salamanca, Spain during the summer... And since the 15" combo only has the same CPU as the 12" I thought it wasn't worth it just for the bigger screen... though admittedly it has its advantages.

Cheers!
 

xeriminox

macrumors newbie
Mar 11, 2004
9
0
Colorado
I am quite fond of my 12" PB and if given the chance, would certainly choose it again. Its portability is outstanding -- and as a student, portability is my main concern. If you are on the go and a smaller screen dosen't bother you, then this certainly would be a viable option for you, as well.
 

nospleen

macrumors 68030
Dec 8, 2002
2,719
1,560
Texas
If portability is an issue, I would definitely go for the 15". The increased spead and graphics card is worth it. I have a 17" and love it, but, I do not need portability. Plus, if you need more screen real estate, you can get an external monitor. I would say go with the 12, but the graphics card is not that good. (my wife loves hers though!)
 

thirteen1031

macrumors 6502a
Mar 23, 2004
580
212
12"!

Give up my sweet little 12"? Never. I don't need a big screen nor the max amount of processing power. Just a really good keyboard and a really portable laptop. I walk a lot, and that 12" in its small little backpack goes with me everywhere. The minimum amount of pounds is what I want/need--and minimum amount of size so that it fits on small tables with room to spare.

With a beautiful little screen and a keyboard that's a dream, what more do I need? (Well, better battery life and an illuminated keyboard would be nice, but I make do....)

If you were to ask me to choose all over again, I'd choose the same. Even decked out to the max, the other two just don't tempt me. I love my 12".
 

wPod

macrumors 68000
Aug 19, 2003
1,654
0
Denver, CO
Size DOES matter!! go 12"

come on. what is a laptop for? portability!! if you want power, get a desktop! to me there is little power difference b/w 1.3 and 1.5 ghz. but the diff b/w a 1.5G4 and a 1.6 G5 is a LOT bigger. whats the diff b/w some monsterous wintel laptop and the 17" pb (ok the PB looks a lot better) but still, i wouldnt consider that protable. there might be cases id justify the 15" .. . such as if my parents wanted portability, both of them use reading glasses and would have too much trouble on the 12" screen, so maybe a 15 would be ok. but i honestly have never understood the 17" PB. except to say 'heh. . . mines bigger' but bigger is not better in portability.
 

aricher

macrumors 68020
Feb 20, 2004
2,211
1
Chi-il
It all comes down to what you're going to do with your PB. For my line of work I need the 17". Being a Creative Director I work in the Adobe CS, Painter, Final Cut Pro, etc. every day. All these programs have a TON of palettes that take up valuable screen space. Sure, you can use an external monitor - and I do - when I'm at my desk. Usually though I'm at meetings, on the road, at photo shoots, etc. and I find that the extra screen size really helps in my production flow not to mention that the 17" has a WOW factor when showing work-in-progress to clients. Yes the PB 17 is a bit heavy but I find it to be entirely portable - I have it in my backpack every day and have had no problems on airplanes or coffee shops. I've used my business partner's 15" and believe me, after working on my 17" I just can't go back to anything smaller - best purchase I've ever made. For me it's not "mine's bigger," it's about productivity in what I do for a living.
 

mms

macrumors 6502a
Oct 8, 2003
784
0
CA
aricher said:
I've used my business partner's 15" and believe me, after working on my 17" I just can't go back to anything smaller - best purchase I've ever made.
The exact opposite for me. I can't go back to anything bigger than a 12". I used to use a 17" Studio Display, which seems monsterish now.
 

dragula53

macrumors regular
Jun 23, 2003
209
0
12"

12" I could have bought any one of the three powerbooks a few days ago.

but 14" was already too big.

got a 12" and not looking back! it is awesome.

no more problems on airlines with insufficient space.

I dig it.
 

Apple of my eye

macrumors regular
Apr 21, 2004
119
83
Fresno, Ca
Choose 12 if you have good desktop otherwise 15 or 17 only.

If you have a desktop system, the choice is one of preference, portability vs screen size. But if you are going to use the PB as your sole computer you should consider the 15 or 17 only. The 12 is a great computer and I would choose to choose it over the 15 or 17 if I had a decent desktop system. Otherwise the 1024x768 resolution is a deal breaker. If you want to use and multi-windowed or multi tool bar program you will be frustrated with the lower resolution machine. The 15 PB with it's increased resolution and 16:10 ratio create the perfect solution for a portable computer. If you feel you need a larger screen but want to sacrifice portablilty go for the 17. But remember with the current lineup the high end 15 and 17 are nearly identical spec wise, the only thing you gain with the 17 is screen size. Good luck.
 

Diatribe

macrumors 601
Jan 8, 2004
4,256
44
Back in the motherland
Apple of my eye said:
If you have a desktop system, the choice is one of preference, portability vs screen size. But if you are going to use the PB as your sole computer you should consider the 15 or 17 only. The 12 is a great computer and I would choose to choose it over the 15 or 17 if I had a decent desktop system. Otherwise the 1024x768 resolution is a deal breaker. If you want to use and multi-windowed or multi tool bar program you will be frustrated with the lower resolution machine. The 15 PB with it's increased resolution and 16:10 ratio create the perfect solution for a portable computer. If you feel you need a larger screen but want to sacrifice portablilty go for the 17. But remember with the current lineup the high end 15 and 17 are nearly identical spec wise, the only thing you gain with the 17 is screen size. Good luck.

If I go with your logic I'd just buy the 12" and an external monitor. You'd get the best from both worlds. I could only understand the 15" if you'd need the power or the screen estate on the go.
For me it's going to be the 12" after some thinking. Portability is key here.
And I'll just keep my 22" CRT :D
 

mpopkin

macrumors 6502
Nov 14, 2003
298
3
Chapel Hill, NC
What are you talking about
The 1.6 g5 sucks, i know because my school has three of them, i have a DP G5 2.0 Ghz and a New Powerbook 1.5 and my New powerbook processes Final Cut as fast or faster than the 1.6 Ghz G5, Get both a Desktop and a laptop. A laptop is for portability. the 15 is the best of both worlds. Fast and Portable. Light and nice



wPod said:
come on. what is a laptop for? portability!! if you want power, get a desktop! to me there is little power difference b/w 1.3 and 1.5 ghz. but the diff b/w a 1.5G4 and a 1.6 G5 is a LOT bigger. whats the diff b/w some monsterous wintel laptop and the 17" pb (ok the PB looks a lot better) but still, i wouldnt consider that protable. there might be cases id justify the 15" .. . such as if my parents wanted portability, both of them use reading glasses and would have too much trouble on the 12" screen, so maybe a 15 would be ok. but i honestly have never understood the 17" PB. except to say 'heh. . . mines bigger' but bigger is not better in portability.
 

Brettla

macrumors regular
Apr 28, 2004
136
0
Monona,WI
The 17 inch is nice, but i wanted a laptop, not something that is boardering on being a portable desktop, that's why i went with the 15, it's actually not much larger than my clamshell iBook.
 

Spyharpy

macrumors member
Apr 12, 2003
72
0
Bay Area, CA
I've been jumping along all three Powerbooks unable to decide which one to get. I have a G4 tower and a 21" CRT at present. I want to go the Powerbook route to make deskspace and have some portability. I also like the 20" Cinema Display. At first I liked the 17" but found it to be just too big, the 15" just about right but difficult to justify the 20" CD with either. My friend has a 12" and after using it, I found it to be the perfect laptop for me. I like the extreme portability of the 12" and I can certainly justify the 20" CD since I'd definitely need it. So, the 12" is what sets the perfect balance for me.
 

cyks

macrumors 68020
Jul 24, 2002
2,090
8
Westchester County, NY
...I don't see the 17" as a laptop... it's a portable computer.
For me, anything bigger then the 15" starts to lose it "portablility factor"... not that the 17" isn't portable... but I wouldn't want to have to carry one all the time. (pretty to look at though!)

...the 15" for me would be completely ideal in size and power- but (for me) a tad pricey and since I already have a desktop- the portability of the 12" is perfect.

My .02
 

Krizoitz

macrumors 68000
Apr 26, 2003
1,734
2,088
Tokyo, Japan
dbomb7 said:
Alright all you Mac fiends...Let's here your decision on the new powerbooks if they were all fully decked out.

15" is perfect. Screen isn't too small, laptop isn't too big, I plan on buying one as soon as I graduate and land a full time job.
 

Mac

macrumors member
Jan 8, 2004
46
0
17'' = Battle ship (reliable, big, does the job noone else can do, awesome firepower).
15'' = Destroyer (fast, smart, firepower, agile, noone in the air or below the water can feel secure)
12'' = MTB (handy, fast, lessened firepower, sting-operations)

The 15'' combines all the good charachteristics of them all. 15'' all the way.

No - I am not enlisted....
 

Diatribe

macrumors 601
Jan 8, 2004
4,256
44
Back in the motherland
Mac said:
17'' = Battle ship (reliable, big, does the job noone else can do, awesome firepower).
15'' = Destroyer (fast, smart, firepower, agile, noone in the air or below the water can feel secure)
12'' = MTB (handy, fast, lessened firepower, sting-operations)

The 15'' combines all the good charachteristics of them all. 15'' all the way.

No - I am not enlisted....

Yeah we saw what little life rafts can do to a destroyer didn't we... ;)
Sorry couldn't resist seeing your analogy.

Anyway I think it comes down do one thing, besides the two things I have pointed in my previous post, how often do you move it.
If you move it every day from place to place and really have to carry it (meaning not putting it in your car, carrying it 5 feet and putting it down again :D ) the only choice is the 12". If you don't then I'd get the 15".
 

hvfsl

macrumors 68000
Jul 9, 2001
1,867
185
London, UK
I have to decide between getting a maxed out 15inch or 17inch. I really like the screen size on the 17inch, but since I like to use my Powerbook when travelling, I have decided to go for the 15inch.

This will be my third powerbook and I have not paid for any of them. The first one I got from the government (PowerBook G3 233), the second one I got from my University (PowerBook G4 550) and this one I am getting from insurance because I lent my PowerBook G3 to someone and they broke it. :D
 

aricher

macrumors 68020
Feb 20, 2004
2,211
1
Chi-il
hvfsl - I'd rethink the 15" purchase. I thought the 17" would be too big to travel with as well but after using mine for 5 months I can attest otherwise. I tote mine with me every day - I use it on planes, trains and yes - automobiles. I have had no problems whatsoever setting the thing on any tables or my lap. As stated before - it's what you're using it for. Doing design work clutters up the screen with tons of palettes and the extra screen real estate of the 17" makes the extra size worthwhile.

If you're using design programs with any regularity you get so used to the extra space that anything smaller becomes frustrating. Your call, for me the 17" is the only choice.
 

Naimfan

Suspended
Jan 15, 2003
4,669
2,017
15" Absolutely. It is, IMO, perfect.

And now that the 15 and 17 have the same processor and video card (yes, I know the 17 uses a different version of the CPU chip), I think the overall case for the 15 is even stronger.

That said, it really does depend on what you use it for. I just think the 17" is a real niche product for those--like Aricher--who really need the screen size. And I just think the 12" looks like a toy--for me, it is just TOO small.

Best,

Bob
 

Steven1621

macrumors 6502a
Apr 10, 2003
796
0
Connecticut
my 15 in PB came in yesterday and it is perfect in every way. i think it is a good mix of size, power, and portability. the only difference between the 15 and the 17 is a bigger screen.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.