Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 10, 2004, 12:32 PM   #1
MacNut
macrumors P6
 
MacNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Nancy Reagan Endorses Human Embryo Research

Nancy Reagan Endorses Human Embryo Research

BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. (May 10) - As President Bush resists mounting pressure to loosen the restrictions he placed on human embryonic stem-cell research, Hollywood's supporting role in the debate this election year is growing.

Celebrities including Nancy Reagan, Dustin Hoffman, Michael J. Fox and Larry King raised $2 million for stem-cell research Saturday night at a gala for the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. The money is part of nearly $20 million that the foundation is donating to advance stem-cell research.

A Parkinson's disease foundation run by Fox, who suffers from the degenerative nerve condition, has contributed another $10 million.

''Science has presented us with a hope called stem cell research," Reagan said at Saturday's benefit.

The star power is providing frustrated scientists and patients with additional muscle in a lobbying campaign against Bush's policy, which limits federal funding for research on human embryonic stem cells to colonies created before August 2001.

Stem cells are the body's building blocks and have the potential to become many different types of cells. Scientists believe the cells can be coaxed into specific cells to repair organs or treat diseases such as diabetes, Parkinson's and Alzheimer's.

Stem cells are typically taken from days-old human embryos. Because the human embryos are destroyed when the stem cells are extracted, the process is highly controversial.

Saturday's dinner featured a rare public appearance by former first lady Reagan, who renewed her call for an expansion of the research. Former President Ronald Reagan suffers from Alzheimer's disease and his wife believes stem cells might someday provide a cure.

"Ronnie's long journey has finally taken him to a distant place where I can no longer reach him,'' she said. "Because of this I'm determined to do whatever I can to save other families from this pain.''

A growing number of federal lawmakers - including several staunch anti-abortion Republicans and party stalwarts like Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, who is also a heart surgeon - also are lobbying Bush to reconsider his policy.

Last month, 206 members of Congress, including several conservative Republicans, sent Bush a letter calling on him to reconsider his stem-cell policy.

The Bush administration said it has no plans to change its policy.

Still, Hollywood money is pouring in. Moviemakers Jerry and Janet Zucker have contributed more than $50,000 to a campaign to get a bond measure on California's ballot that would provide $3 billion in stem-cell research funds to the state's biotechnology industry.

"People from Hollywood have always supported this,'' said Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation chief executive Peter Van Etten. The foundation has contributed $500,000 to the California campaign.

The Zuckers said they donated money because their 16-year-old daughter has diabetes.

"When Katie was diagnosed five years ago we promised we would do everything in our power to find a cure,'' said Jerry Zucker, who directed the 1990 film "Ghost.''
__________________
The thoughts in my head are rated TV-MA. Viewer discretion is advised.
Now batting, Number 2 Derek Jeter, Number 2
MacNut is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2004, 01:33 PM   #2
MongoTheGeek
macrumors 68040
 
MongoTheGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Its not so much where you are as when you are.
Send a message via MSN to MongoTheGeek Send a message via Yahoo to MongoTheGeek
What would Reagan say though if restored to his faculties by a process that he found morally abhorrent?

They have been doing some studies though that show better results using somatic(adult) stem cells rather than embryonic. There is also research that demonstrated the ability to create adult stem cells from liposomes (fat cells!)

Hopefully in a couple of decades embryonic cell research will be seen as an archaic travesty like trepanning and blood-letting.
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be.
MongoTheGeek is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2004, 03:48 PM   #3
mactastic
macrumors 68040
 
mactastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colly-fornia
Funny that scientists can hoot and holler all they want and nothing gets done. Yet a few celebs can get the ball rolling. What does it say about a society when we are more willing to listen to our celebrities about scientific matters than scientists?
__________________
I salute you Sean [Hannity]. I salute you for bravely standing by a man whose only crime, was breaking federal law.
- Stephen Colbert
mactastic is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2004, 06:25 PM   #4
rainman::|:|
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: iowa
Send a message via Yahoo to rainman::|:|
i'll admit, i'm surprised she did this. i agree that Ronald would probably be at odds with this concept, which makes me think she's a bit selfish to ignore his wishes (but i don't know that for a fact). Tho if my husband was in such a state, i'd do just about anything to cure it.

My primary objection to stem cell research is that it would build an industry on human tissue, in a way that's never been done before. Moreover, tissue from female bodies. The potential exploitation needs to be dealt with carefully, to ensure that eggs are ethically harvested. Feminists seem blind to this because of the obvious abortion link.

Of course, with the advent of cloning, stem cell research won't always be dependent on tissue harvested from humans...

paul
rainman::|:| is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2004, 09:57 PM   #5
MongoTheGeek
macrumors 68040
 
MongoTheGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Its not so much where you are as when you are.
Send a message via MSN to MongoTheGeek Send a message via Yahoo to MongoTheGeek
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulwhannel
Of course, with the advent of cloning, stem cell research won't always be dependent on tissue harvested from humans...
All current methods of cloning require eggs from the same or a closely related species. The who-ha over cross species cloning is insane even when dealing with sheep and goats.
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be.
MongoTheGeek is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2004, 10:37 PM   #6
MacNut
Thread Starter
macrumors P6
 
MacNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulwhannel
i'll admit, i'm surprised she did this. i agree that Ronald would probably be at odds with this concept, which makes me think she's a bit selfish to ignore his wishes (but i don't know that for a fact). Tho if my husband was in such a state, i'd do just about anything to cure it.
But would Ronald want to cure the disease before it starts, its to late for him now but if he knew of what would of happened to him years ago before the effects started he might want the research now.
__________________
The thoughts in my head are rated TV-MA. Viewer discretion is advised.
Now batting, Number 2 Derek Jeter, Number 2
MacNut is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2004, 07:42 AM   #7
Aeolius
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Another method of harvesting stem cells involves using umbilical cord blood. When my daughter was born last December, I had her cord sent to a facility that stores cord blood. I am hoping that stem cell research advances quickly so that my son, who has cerebral palsy, may benefit from it.
Aeolius is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2004, 11:23 AM   #8
Krizoitz
macrumors 6502a
 
Krizoitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulwhannel
\My primary objection to stem cell research is that it would build an industry on human tissue, in a way that's never been done before. Moreover, tissue from female bodies. The potential exploitation needs to be dealt with carefully, to ensure that eggs are ethically harvested. Feminists seem blind to this because of the obvious abortion link.
A very good point. I sympathise with all those afflicted by diseases like this, believe me I have a couple friends/family members who this could really benefit BUT its really a matter of the ends justifying the means. Good intentions but I don't think the cost is worth it.
Krizoitz is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2004, 04:33 PM   #9
wdlove
macrumors 604
 
wdlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Senators call to ease stem cell restrictions

By Gareth Cook, Globe Staff *|* June 2, 2004

A majority of the US Senate has signed a letter asking President Bush to lift the government's funding restrictions on embryonic stem cells, increasing the pressure to change a policy critics say is holding back potentially lifesaving medical research.

The letter, which is still being circulated for signatures and has not yet been released, says the United States is falling behind in research into diseases "that affect more than 100 million Americans" and calls on the president to "expand" the current policy. It has been signed by 56 senators, including conservatives Trent Lott of Mississippi, Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas, Orrin G. Hatch of Utah, and 10 other Republicans.

Human embryonic stem cells are potent cells that can create any type of tissue in the human body and are thought to have great promise for fighting diseases that afflict millions of Americans. Because they can be created only by destroying a human embryo, the use of the cells for research is highly controversial, and three years ago President Bush declared the government would no longer pay for any research on new lines of stem cells.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/ar..._restrictions/
__________________
First MacRumors "Contributor"
wdlove is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2004, 04:50 PM   #10
Frohickey
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PRK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krizoitz
A very good point. I sympathise with all those afflicted by diseases like this, believe me I have a couple friends/family members who this could really benefit BUT its really a matter of the ends justifying the means. Good intentions but I don't think the cost is worth it.
Couldn't they just use the tissues from aborted fetuses? Maybe just wait until the end of the 3rd trimester and then use the aborted fetus for stem cell research.

I don't see why government has a role in the funding anyway? Couldn't stem cell research be funded via the private sector? If the government isn't funding it, then that is taxes that is not taken from the private sector that could be used to fund stem cell research, or anything else, for that matter.
Frohickey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2004, 06:51 PM   #11
Bedawyn
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Asheville, NC
Send a message via AIM to Bedawyn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frohickey
don't see why government has a role in the funding anyway? Couldn't stem cell research be funded via the private sector? If the government isn't funding it, then that is taxes that is not taken from the private sector that could be used to fund stem cell research, or anything else, for that matter.
There are a few sources of private funding, and a few American scientists taking advantage of them. But the vast majority of the scientific enterprise in the United States is supported, at least in some small way, by government funding. (As a taxpayer, I'm quite happy with this. Better my taxes than a private corporation that will have its own reasons for biasing the research.) For instance -- every academic scientist who works for a public university. I don't know the rules on this for certain, but the administration has a habit of making sweeping bans (instead of refusing to fund "bad" activity A but allowing "good" activities B and C, for instance, they refuse to give any money at all to an organization that spends a small amount of their time on A and most on B and C). I worked on a cloning paper several months ago, from an institution in another country, and one of the minor authors was from a U.S. university. There were some counsel-advised contortions to make sure it was clear to all that he hadn't touched the actual experimental cells with a ten-foot pole. I wouldn't be surprised if similar concerns kept many American scientists away from the field, for fear of losing their positions or the rest of their funding.

I also wouldn't be surprised if, 10 years from now, people wondered what all this fuss was about. Embryonic stem cells are already beginning to lose their glamour among scientists, and I truly believe the people clinging to the hope of ESCs are clinging to just that -- a hope, and no more. The scientific promise isn't all it was made out to be several years ago, and in this case I _don't_ believe the (scientifically) questionable ends justify the means.
Bedawyn is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2004, 06:59 PM   #12
mactastic
macrumors 68040
 
mactastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colly-fornia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frohickey
I don't see why government has a role in the funding anyway? Couldn't stem cell research be funded via the private sector? If the government isn't funding it, then that is taxes that is not taken from the private sector that could be used to fund stem cell research, or anything else, for that matter.
Then pray tell why you so strongly support government funding of NMD research...
__________________
I salute you Sean [Hannity]. I salute you for bravely standing by a man whose only crime, was breaking federal law.
- Stephen Colbert
mactastic is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2004, 07:56 PM   #13
Frohickey
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PRK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bedawyn
There are a few sources of private funding, and a few American scientists taking advantage of them. But the vast majority of the scientific enterprise in the United States is supported, at least in some small way, by government funding. (As a taxpayer, I'm quite happy with this. Better my taxes than a private corporation that will have its own reasons for biasing the research.)
You make it sound like only private corporations can bias their research and that all government funded research are unbiased. You have heard of the cost overruns in the various government funded project out there, especially with the military. But just forget about that for a moment.

The advantage of private funding is that we, as taxpayers, do not lose anything if the private endeavor were to fall flat on its scientific face. Sure, the private investors would soak up all of the losses, but they did so willingly.

Now, back to biased research. Nature does not tolerate hoaxes at all. If the research is flawed, there is nothing that will turn it from a failure into a success. You can't fool cells into believing that it is regenerating with flawed research. Either the research is sound, or its not, and the private funding mechanism enforces that the research is sound, or the funding goes away. Not so with government funded projects where the funding is determined by political goals.
Frohickey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2004, 07:57 PM   #14
Frohickey
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PRK
Quote:
Originally Posted by mactastic
Then pray tell why you so strongly support government funding of NMD research...
Isn't it the proper role of government to provide for the common defense?
Frohickey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2004, 08:20 PM   #15
krimson
macrumors 65816
 
krimson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Kalifornia
Send a message via AIM to krimson
I can't wait to see how Medi-care will fare once the average age of death his 90 because of all our medical advances.
__________________
"Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind".
Basically, it's made up of two separate words - "mank" and "ind". What do these words mean ? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind."
-Jack Handy

Join MacRumors.com - Team Folding, and be a part of the Mac Folding team!
krimson is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2004, 08:28 PM   #16
topicolo
macrumors 68000
 
topicolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ottawa, ON
Quote:
Originally Posted by MongoTheGeek
They have been doing some studies though that show better results using somatic(adult) stem cells rather than embryonic. There is also research that demonstrated the ability to create adult stem cells from liposomes (fat cells!)

Hopefully in a couple of decades embryonic cell research will be seen as an archaic travesty like trepanning and blood-letting.
Liposomes are tiny spheres which have the same membrane as cells (phospholipid bilayer). They can be used to deliver DNA and drugs into cells and are frequently used in gene therapy. Adipocytes are fat cells.

Which article did you read that stated that liposomes can induce cells to dedifferentiate? I'd be interested in taking a look at this article.
__________________
Do not disturb. Blood alcohol experiment in progress...
topicolo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2004, 08:38 PM   #17
Abstract
macrumors Penryn
 
Abstract's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Location Location
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulwhannel
i'll admit, i'm surprised she did this. i agree that Ronald would probably be at odds with this concept, which makes me think she's a bit selfish to ignore his wishes (but i don't know that for a fact). Tho if my husband was in such a state, i'd do just about anything to cure it.
So you'd only be for it if your husband was in a state that could possibly be cured from stem cell research? Isn't that a bit self-serving?

And Nancy supports this because she can think on her own. I don't think it has anything to do with her being selfish. They can have differing opinions and still be loyal to each other.

And like someone already mentioned, couldn't they just use dead foetuses?
__________________
"Hard? It's supposed to be hard. Hard is what makes it great!" - Tom Hanks.
Abstract is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2004, 07:07 AM   #18
MongoTheGeek
macrumors 68040
 
MongoTheGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Its not so much where you are as when you are.
Send a message via MSN to MongoTheGeek Send a message via Yahoo to MongoTheGeek
Quote:
Originally Posted by topicolo
Liposomes are tiny spheres which have the same membrane as cells (phospholipid bilayer). They can be used to deliver DNA and drugs into cells and are frequently used in gene therapy. Adipocytes are fat cells.

Which article did you read that stated that liposomes can induce cells to dedifferentiate? I'd be interested in taking a look at this article.
I misspoke then. my brain pulled the wrong word. It was fat cells de-differentiating and I thought I had the right word for a fat cell.

I can't find the one on fat here are two though one on skin and one on blood.

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991147
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994418
__________________
The future ain't what it used to be.
MongoTheGeek is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2004, 01:23 PM   #19
mactastic
macrumors 68040
 
mactastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colly-fornia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frohickey
Isn't it the proper role of government to provide for the common defense?
By your reasoning, shouldn't the government 'provide for the common defense' by purchasing a working system from a private company? Oh wait, in Frohickey world boondogles are allowed as long as the product is military related.
__________________
I salute you Sean [Hannity]. I salute you for bravely standing by a man whose only crime, was breaking federal law.
- Stephen Colbert
mactastic is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2004, 02:09 PM   #20
Frohickey
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PRK
Quote:
Originally Posted by mactastic
By your reasoning, shouldn't the government 'provide for the common defense' by purchasing a working system from a private company? Oh wait, in Frohickey world boondogles are allowed as long as the product is military related.
Thats your reading of it.

It would be nice if 'providing for the common defense' is via purchasing a working system from private companies. That way, us mere citizens have access to these working systems as well, if we have enough cash to pay for it.

Besides, have you heard of economies of scale? Imagine how much a lot of what the government buys for defense would drop in price if it were also available for the civilian market. Military GPS units come to mind.
Frohickey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2004, 10:03 PM   #21
mactastic
macrumors 68040
 
mactastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colly-fornia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frohickey
Thats your reading of it.
No, that's what you've argued many times. Private industry is to be used to solve all market issues.

Quote:
It would be nice if 'providing for the common defense' is via purchasing a working system from private companies. That way, us mere citizens have access to these working systems as well, if we have enough cash to pay for it.
Ah yes, citizens indeed should be able to purchase anything the military can. I wonder why it is that they can't?

Quote:
Besides, have you heard of economies of scale? Imagine how much a lot of what the government buys for defense would drop in price if it were also available for the civilian market. Military GPS units come to mind.
Most of what the government buys for defense IS available in the civilian market. Unless you are only talking about weapons. The military buys food and gas and tents and water purification and all manner of goods that you or I can buy. I can't believe you've never been to an Army Surplus store!
__________________
I salute you Sean [Hannity]. I salute you for bravely standing by a man whose only crime, was breaking federal law.
- Stephen Colbert
mactastic is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 14, 2004, 08:29 PM   #22
wdlove
macrumors 604
 
wdlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Other Approaches May Trump Stem Cells In Alzheimer's Research

Researcher: Stem-Cell Studies Should Still Begin Now

POSTED: 12:12 pm EDT June 11, 2004
NEW YORK -- Despite the high profile that Nancy Reagan and others have given the idea of using embryonic stem cells to treat Alzheimer's disease, advances are likely to come faster from other approaches.

Experts cite other more promising efforts that in five to 10 years may be used to fight the disease that led to former President Ronald Reagan's death.

"I just think everybody feels there are higher priorities for seeking effective treatments for Alzheimer's disease and for identifying preventive strategies," said Marilyn Albert, a Johns Hopkins University researcher who chairs the Medical and Scientific Advisory Council of the Alzheimer's Association.

http://www.thebostonchannel.com/heal...12150106142004
__________________
First MacRumors "Contributor"
wdlove is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2004, 10:15 AM   #23
KingSleaze
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: So. Cal
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulwhannel
Of course, with the advent of cloning, stem cell research won't always be dependent on tissue harvested from humans...

paul
Is this to say that a clone of a human (research path currently outlawed in US), wouldn't also be a human?
KingSleaze is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2004, 03:54 PM   #24
rueyeet
macrumors 65816
 
rueyeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingSleaze
Is this to say that a clone of a human (research path currently outlawed in US), wouldn't also be a human?
Not if the technology could eventually be used to clone specific body parts, tissues, or what have you, which is part of the possibilities expounded upon by stem-cell research advocates. The general idea is that if we could unlock what makes a cell do one thing or another, we could control that process in ourselves as well. How practical all that really is remains to be seen or studied.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frohickey
Couldn't they just use the tissues from aborted fetuses? Maybe just wait until the end of the 3rd trimester and then use the aborted fetus for stem cell research.
Given the fuss being made about the destruction of embryos for research purposes being equivalent to an abortion, do you really think this is going to mollify anyone? The whole point of those opposed to embryonic stem-cell research is that they're trying to prevent abortions, not think of uses for aborted fetuses.
__________________

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/O d+(---) s+:+>+: !a C+$ U P L+(-) E--
W++ N- o? K- w(---) O? M+ V PS++ PE Y+ PGP-
t(--) 5++ X- R+ tv- b+ DI++ D G e++ h-- r x+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
rueyeet is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 15, 2004, 07:43 PM   #25
FelixDerKater
macrumors 68000
 
FelixDerKater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
She could always take some of the money she was left and buy a small G5 cluster and run Folding@Home. That could be more promising for Alzheimer's than stem cells...

Seriously though, I think she is probably letting emotion get in the way of this decision to endorse the stem cell research and not thinking through the facts.

Last edited by FelixDerKater; Jun 15, 2004 at 07:47 PM.
FelixDerKater is offline   0 Reply With Quote


Reply
MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Current Events

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bill Clinton Endorses Samsung Devices SomeDudeAsking Wasteland 23 Jan 11, 2013 06:34 AM
Colin Powell endorses Obama for second term leekohler Politics, Religion, Social Issues 31 Oct 27, 2012 11:46 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC