Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 11, 2004, 07:27 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
90nm G5 Supplies Improving?

Appleinsider reports that Apple has received new 90nm PowerPC shipments and seeded several test PowerMac units to partners.

The test models are reported to range from 2.2GHz to 2.6GHz.

Meanwhile, Appleinsider notes that Apple Display upgrades could be delayed by oversupply of current units.

Rumors of PowerMac revisions have come and gone over the past few months. Earlier reports have indicated that Apple has already outsourced work for promotional materials for the new machines... but due to the unsteady supply of 90nm chips has been unable to commit to a ship date.
MacRumors is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:29 PM   #2
MrSugar
macrumors 6502a
 
MrSugar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Send a message via ICQ to MrSugar Send a message via AIM to MrSugar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
Appleinsider reports that Apple has received new 90nm PowerPC shipments and seeded several test PowerMac units to partners.

The test models are reported to range from 2.2GHz to 2.6GHz.

Meanwhile, Appleinsider notes that Apple Display upgrades could be delayed by oversupply of current units.

Rumors of PowerMac revisions have come and gone over the past few months. Earlier reports have indicated that Apple has already outsourced work for promotional materials for the new machines... but due to the unsteady supply of 90nm chips has been unable to commit to a ship date.
weee first post

This is good news to see that Apple is starting to get some constant chip supplies in, hopefully we will see them soon!
__________________
Laptop: Macbook (Black) 2ghz 1gig
Desktop: dual 2ghz G5 - dual 23" acd's
Toys: 40gig iPod - iSight - airport express

-- Fluidvision Design
MrSugar is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:29 PM   #3
Grimace
Contributor
 
Grimace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: with Hamburglar.
Here come the "No 3GHz???" complaints.....
Grimace is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:31 PM   #4
Grimace
Contributor
 
Grimace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: with Hamburglar.
No new Display for a while either...

Quote:
"On a side note, sources speculate that the likelihood of new Apple Cinema displays seeing an introduced alongside the new Power Macs could be fading fast. Despite promotional efforts intended to help deplete the stock of current displays, inventory is still said to be heavy."
Grimace is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:33 PM   #5
yoman
macrumors 6502a
 
yoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In the Bowels of the Cosmos
600 mhz increase! At least its not only 60mhz.
__________________
My first computer was an Apple IIGS at the meager age of 6 1/2 years.
I was raised with an APPLE and I will die with an APPLE.
yoman is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:35 PM   #6
J-Squire
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by carletonmusic
Here come the "No 3GHz???" complaints.....
Was just about to post mine.......

I was REALLY hoping for 3GHz come WWDC. I am suprised that they have spent 12 months preparing for this Rev B and it will only be a 2.6GHz. I will just cling to the faint hope that they have only seeded these speeds in order to keep the cat in the bag
J-Squire is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:36 PM   #7
BrianKonarsMac
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoman
600 mhz increase! At least its not only 60mhz.
dont you mean 67 . here's hoping apple eventually get's their supplies together, overstocked items are no fun for anyone.
BrianKonarsMac is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:37 PM   #8
mikeyredk
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
couldn't they just OC'em to 3 ghz?
mikeyredk is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:38 PM   #9
iriejedi
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nor Cal
Send a message via AIM to iriejedi Send a message via Yahoo to iriejedi
Smile NO complaints here

Quote:
Originally Posted by carletonmusic
Here come the "No 3GHz???" complaints.....
Trust me I want to believe in Steve... after all he did promise 3 gig by June (or next WWDC) - but all I want is a rev B G5! I'll even take a 2.1 I accept that the new G5s are amazing... but the whole "I'm not buying a first gen thing for me is personal".



Irie
__________________
Retired G5 2 X 2.5 - She lost her mind (could not find her DIMM slots anymore)
New MacPro 2.8 (early 2008) + 8800GT
iriejedi is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:39 PM   #10
Ambrose Chapel
macrumors 6502a
 
Ambrose Chapel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cambridge, MA
if the slowest Power Mac is at 2.2 GHz, then a G5 iMac could replicate the initial Power Mac line - 1.6 through 2.0

Ambrose Chapel is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:40 PM   #11
dontmatter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE, BABY! (or a nice little liberal arts college campus in the middle of nowhere...)
As with all news of this sort, yay for the good news, but it doesn't make you quite as happy as it would-reminds you that the news isn't good, except that it's the improvment of bad news previously. And, of course there will be complaints about 2.2-2.6 ghz, but I'm not too woried. About that- if those are the ones apple's been testing with, will they be putting slower ones in actual machines, or are they testing the technology and once they get to the machines, the chips will be faster, and we might have something more like 2.8 or *gasp* 3?
__________________
Insert witticism here. Or spelling correction.
dontmatter is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:40 PM   #12
cjc343
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the apple store, in front of a G5.
Send a message via AIM to cjc343
OverClocking decreases stability.... I like stable macs...
cjc343 is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:40 PM   #13
dizastor
macrumors 6502a
 
dizastor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyredk
couldn't they just OC'em to 3 ghz?
The 2.6's are just OC's 2ghz models... lol
dizastor is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:41 PM   #14
ZildjianKX
Guest
 
ZildjianKX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by carletonmusic
Here come the "No 3GHz???" complaints.....
I don't think wanting a 3 GHz G5 is asking too much... I personally think they should be aiming for higher than 3 GHz for one year... just my $0.02.
ZildjianKX is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:43 PM   #15
strangelogic
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: DC
easier to believe...

If the wait for the G5 xServe was less than 5-7 weeks - if they can't make them at 2 Gig in volume...
__________________
G5 Quad
MBA
strangelogic is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:44 PM   #16
windowsblowsass
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: pa
Send a message via AIM to windowsblowsass
sweet steve will probably announce theese at wwdc shipping soon but hell announce 3s but their not gonna ship till august
__________________
This pretentious ponderous collection of religious rock psalms is enough to prompt the question, 'What day did the Lord create Spinal Tap, and couldn't he have rested on that day too?- this is Spinal Tap
windowsblowsass is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:46 PM   #17
Vlade
macrumors 6502a
 
Vlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rochester NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenmonsterman
The 2.6's are just OC's 2ghz models... lol
No their not, the 2.0GHZ machines are over-clocked 1.8 machines (thats what IBM has specified them to work at), but the new chips are going to be rated at 2.6 from IBM.
Vlade is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:46 PM   #18
iriejedi
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nor Cal
Send a message via AIM to iriejedi Send a message via Yahoo to iriejedi
Lightbulb Solution to display problem!

Quote:
Originally Posted by carletonmusic
No new Display for a while either...
Only 2/3rds way through my MBA but I can solve the display problem!

CUT THE DANG PRICE!!!!!!!!!!!!

My 55inch HDTV from Mitshubushi was less then a 23inch HD monitor.

No one doubts how amazing those Apple displays are but given the other flat panal options out there I have seen - for half the price you can get 90% as good a display. or multiple displays and look super geeky and still have cash for a new XBOX game. If they cut 50% off the price tag they would still be expensive but I bet they'd move from inventory!

Irie

PS - mentioning a microsoft product was my way of swearing in a public forum! But I did not want to offend!
__________________
Retired G5 2 X 2.5 - She lost her mind (could not find her DIMM slots anymore)
New MacPro 2.8 (early 2008) + 8800GT
iriejedi is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:51 PM   #19
musicpyrite
macrumors 68000
 
musicpyrite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cape Cod
Quote:
Originally Posted by carletonmusic
Here come the "No 3GHz???" complaints.....
There will most deffinately will be.

At least they updated the procssors... what will steve-o say at WWDC?
__________________
For SCIENCE!!
musicpyrite is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:54 PM   #20
keysersoze
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
The entire AppleInsider Quote is:

"According to the source, all of the test models were equipped with dual processors ranging in speeds from 2.2GHz to 2.6GHz. The source, however, notes that there is no indication that configurations of the test units represent final specs for Power Macs that would be sent to production."

So 2.6 is not the definite "top"

So possible 3GHZ still on the horizon.
Also possible nothing on the horizon.
I'd place my bet on the former rather than the later.
__________________
i love brits

keysersoze is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:58 PM   #21
iLilana
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Do you know what a 'Ponoka' is?
Send a message via ICQ to iLilana Send a message via AIM to iLilana Send a message via Yahoo to iLilana
here's hoping

I smell cheap clear out monitor sale...



yeah right.
iLilana is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 07:59 PM   #22
numediaman
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago (by way of SF)
Send a message via AIM to numediaman
Quote:
Originally Posted by iriejedi
Only 2/3rds way through my MBA but I can solve the display problem!

CUT THE DANG PRICE!!!!!!!!!!!!

My 55inch HDTV from Mitshubushi was less then a 23inch HD monitor.
Unfortunately, what you are advocating is a "sales" strategy -- and Steve Jobs isn't one for sales strategies. Which is too bad really.

You won't sell displays if you aren't selling PowerMacs. The only other way is to get people to upgrade their current displays -- but you get into using price cuts as an incentive again (which exactly what should be done, of course).

I just wish Jobs were more aggressive. I understand their reluctance to cut margins -- but we are talking about products that are gathering dust on the shelves, right?
__________________
Apple 2e, Mac Classic, Performa 630, PM8600, Titanium PB, Mac mini, MacBook Pro, iPod, iPhone.
numediaman is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 08:00 PM   #23
ThomasJefferson
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Virginia
Best part, my next mac is pr'olly an ibook for my presentations. About next year, when I think about a new desktop, that much anticipated monster on the mac-horizon will be mine.
__________________
Currently in a committed relationship with my Gitzo 3540LS
ThomasJefferson is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 08:05 PM   #24
mgargan1
macrumors 65816
 
mgargan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Reston, VA
Send a message via AIM to mgargan1
remember last june when we all thought that the fastest g5 we would get was 1.6GHz? Well, Jobs suprised us and then gave us 2.0's... we did not expect that at all, we most of us didn't. So maybe Steve will suprise us, and give us 3.0's... and yes, the 2.0's are OC'd 1.8's. But just because it's OC'd does not mean that it's not stable. If IBM send apple unlocked mutipliers, then apple could OC the processors to their highest extent.
mgargan1 is offline  
Old May 11, 2004, 08:12 PM   #25
e-coli
macrumors 65816
 
e-coli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
The test models are reported to range from 2.2GHz to 2.6GHz.
I smell a PR disaster in the making.
e-coli is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC