Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 17, 2004, 03:27 AM   #1
slipper
macrumors 65832
 
slipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
ibook/powerbook videocard

which video card is better, the 32mb ATI mobility raedon found on the iBook or the 64mb nvidia gforce fx go5200 found on the powerbook? when will i notice a difference between the video cards?
slipper is offline   0
Old May 17, 2004, 03:43 AM   #2
Doraemon
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe (EU)
Performance-wise, the cards are both (more-or-less) equal.

However, the PowerBook has twice the amount of VRAM, hence it will perform much better.

As for the difference, you'll only notice it when playing games. For the standard day work, it won't make a different (i.e. the iBook's card is good enough).
Doraemon is offline   0
Old May 17, 2004, 03:46 AM   #3
Ozi
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia.
*agrees with above*

However, The 64MB fx go5200 is absolutely OWNED by a 64MB 9700 ATI Radeon Mobility, and even more so by the 128MB 9700 ATI Radeon mobility (both cards come in the new pBooks)
__________________
My Love: 15" pBook, 1.5GHz, 1GB RAM (1 SODIMM) 128MB Radeon 9700 mobility,80GB 5400RPM HD,backlit keyboard!mmmmm
Ozi is offline   0
Old May 17, 2004, 06:10 AM   #4
oingoboingo
macrumors 6502a
 
oingoboingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by slipper
which video card is better, the 32mb ATI mobility raedon found on the iBook or the 64mb nvidia gforce fx go5200 found on the powerbook? when will i notice a difference between the video cards?
Some very early reviews I found comparing the Radeon 9200 Mobility and the GeForce GX 5200 Go made it look like the GeForce was getting absolutely thrashed by the Radeon in most benchmarks. However, looking at the actual gaming performance when these chips are installed in Mac hardware, they are very close to each other. This page of benchmarks:

http://www.barefeats.com/ibG4b.html

which compares the 14" 1GHz G4 iBook (with 32MB Radeon 9200) to the 12" 1GHz G4 PowerBook (with 32MB GeForce FX5200) basically shows that there is no clear winner on UT2003, Quake III or Cinebench 2003. The scores are very close to each other in all benchmarks.

Now that the new revision 12" PowerBooks have the extra 32MB of VRAM, you might expect that this would have some type of beneficial effect, especially when playing games which use a large number of details textures, or when working with dual monitors and high resolution desktops, then then using things like Expose. However, looking at the big picture, both the Radeon 9200 Mobility and the GeForce FX 5200 GO are low-end entry-level mobile GPUs. You aren't going to be getting spectacular performance out of either of them with modern games, especially when coupled to a G4. UT2004 is essentially unplayable at 1024x768 on my 12" 1GHz PowerBook (15fps and below frame rates), so you need to start lowering resolution and dropping details settings. If you want to even have half a chance of a decent gaming experience on a Macintosh portable in the future, stretch to the 15" PowerBook with the Radeon 9700 Mobility. Much better for gaming.

That said, if you're a serious portable gamer, don't buy a Mac at all. It's not the iBook/PowerBook lineups greatest strength.
__________________
- 24" 2.8GHz iMac / 512MB nVidia 8800GS
- 15" 2.4GHz MacBook Pro
- 20GB 4G iPod
oingoboingo is offline   0
Old May 17, 2004, 06:12 AM   #5
oingoboingo
macrumors 6502a
 
oingoboingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by slipper
which video card is better, the 32mb ATI mobility raedon found on the iBook or the 64mb nvidia gforce fx go5200 found on the powerbook? when will i notice a difference between the video cards?
Sorry, should have reinforced Doraemon's comment in my post. He's right...for 'normal' tasks, both the Radeon and the GeForce will do a good job. You are going to notice the biggest difference when gaming or using 3D/OpenGL apps, and even then, the two GPUs are close.
__________________
- 24" 2.8GHz iMac / 512MB nVidia 8800GS
- 15" 2.4GHz MacBook Pro
- 20GB 4G iPod
oingoboingo is offline   0
Old May 17, 2004, 06:20 AM   #6
Abstract
macrumors Penryn
 
Abstract's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Location Location
I really don't even know why Apple used a 32MB Nvidia go 5200 in the 12" PB, and not the same card in the iBooks. Its not like there's much difference anyway. Its not like the 12" PB got the better deal going with the Nvidia. Actually, I really have no idea why they don't just stick with ATI in the long run and buy more cards strictly from them, hopefully getting them cheap ass.
__________________
"Hard? It's supposed to be hard. Hard is what makes it great!" - Tom Hanks.
Abstract is offline   0
Old May 17, 2004, 08:21 AM   #7
blue&whiteman
Banned
 
blue&whiteman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
of course a 64mb card is going to be better than a 32mb card

abstract: if ibooks had the same video card as powerbooks then there may as well be no ibook. the more the ibook gets inside it the more it will cost and that totally takes away from the purpose of the ibooks existence.
blue&whiteman is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Videocard shopping, Cuda spoonie1972 Mac Pro 1 Sep 20, 2013 04:40 PM
Fastest Videocard to go into a 2009 27? RedReplicant iMac 3 Sep 1, 2013 03:31 AM
iBook G3 clamshell, iBook G4 or PowerBook G4? garirry PowerPC Macs 32 May 26, 2013 02:11 PM
Return policy and videocard WorkaholicNL iMac 2 Jan 22, 2013 07:06 PM
Videocard Upgrade MP 5.1 digitalmatt Mac Pro 0 Nov 15, 2012 11:09 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC