|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Mac OS X Security Issue: Local Scripts
Infoworld reports on a new security vulnerability that affects Mac OS X/Safari.
The vulnerability involves the ability for Safari to run arbitrary local scripts on an end-user's computer. In order to accomplish this, a Disk Images must first be downloaded from the "attacking" website but can be tied to a single click. A demonstration can be found at insecure.ws. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
I altered some of my settings for safari as was suggested but I cannot find where to alter this setting: - change the help helper in InternetConfig (better protection) If anyone could point in me in the right direction, that'd be much appreciated! Cheers, PolarbearTed |
|
|
|
| PolarbearTed |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by PolarbearTed |
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Montréal, Canada
|
anyways, most people tend to not exploit os x security holes, do to the little amount of people it would harm, we are deemed as a group not worth the effort of a virus...
aethier
__________________
My mobile workstation: 15' 1.25GHz AL Powerbook; Ati Radeon 9600 64mb; 80Gb 5400rpm HDD; Superdrive; 1024Mb of ram Mobile Gaming: PSP Mobile Music: 3g 15bg iPod, 1g ipod shuffle, white 4g nano Last edited by Rower_CPU : May 17, 2004 at 05:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle, WA USA
|
Is it just me or do these sites seem hell bent on finding ANYthing wrong with OS X. Has anyone actually run across this as being a problem? Any of these supposed CRITICAL security flaws? Nope, didn't think so.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blinking blue dot
|
Testing it out now
No. But at least Apple's issues are fewer, and patched quicker, than in Windows.
Besides, this issue may not even be real. I'm just now trying the demonstration and it doesn |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern Virginia
|
Oh great why not tell them all how to do it!
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
I can imagine it now - FREE XXX PR0N CLICK HERE!! *clickety* |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: West Valley City, Utah
|
Does anybody feel that this, in part, is the Mac community's fault? We go on blabbing how we have no viruses/trojan horses/etc and low and behold, we get two issues in a week. It is almost as we dared them to come up with these and now that they have arisen, we are pissed b/c it seems the world is picking apart the Mac OS. Perhaps had we not had this "holier than thou" attitude, we wouldn't be worrying about this.
__________________
"I'm apathetic and I don't care." |
|
|
| leftbanke7 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by leftbanke7 |
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: May 2004
|
I think you shouldn't look at it as such a bad thing, no operating system is going to be completely secure. So what, a couple of vulnerabilities come out every so often, but they are fewer and less dramatic then the worms and security issues some windows users need to deal with.
For those of you interested, I ran the script and it needs to be addressed, since dodgy stuff could be done. But follow the suggestions on the site. PolarbearTed Last edited by Mudbug : May 17, 2004 at 05:46 PM. Reason: image attachment goodness |
|
|
| PolarbearTed |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by PolarbearTed |
|
|
#11 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Texas
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors god
|
while this is unsettling at best, at lest the folks who took the time to make the test file had a sense of humor and named their .txt file "owned"
The only good thing about this is that it's REALLY easy to keep from happening.
__________________
happy thankschrismahanakwaanzicasmasgiving.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: West Valley City, Utah
|
Quote:
__________________
"I'm apathetic and I don't care." |
|
|
|
| leftbanke7 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by leftbanke7 |
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
|
Evil Ideas
I don't know what would be worse - deleting data or emailing random iPhoto pics to random people on your address list...
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
This is rediculous. Comeon .. you can disable the feature in Safari to auto open the .dmg files. This is just like posting an .EXE file that is a virus or trojan or something on a website and clicking on it and telling it to open.
This comes down to "THE WEB", not Safari, not OSX, not Apple. If you are clicking on things, you should know what you're clicking on. You could sign your life away or do extreamly illegal things in a few mouse clicks if you are just happily clicking away. Do we need to start advertising in schools like they did in the 80s with "Don't take candy from strangers."? Now we'll have it say, "Don't click on links on stranger's websites." |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: May 2004
|
This is a good thing.
I have used Apple's since the Apple II and have always felt safer than using a PC. However, just because we have a small user base does not mean we are not vulenerable. There are many people who despise the Mac OS and would love to exploit its security flaws. We are lucky that we have these people exposing these flaws prior to any harm being done. The whole Intego thing claiming to have found the first trojan was sketchy and ridiculus, but, it is a good thing that people are willing to write proof of concepts to better secure our beloved OS. It is the publicity of these holes that will only make the Mac OS more secure. And to end, a quote from the website which posted this poc.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
This is the first one that I would call a vulnerability. It's pretty convoluted too. It looks like you have to download and automount the dmg before help runs and executes the script contained within. This is pretty hit and miss. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. The reason this is a vulnerability though is that a webpage can open an application external to the browser and tell it to perform an arbitrary command on the user's system. That part I do not like. Even if this particular attack has a decent chance of failing (but also a chance of succeeding), the arbitrary execution is a weak link just waiting to be exploited.
But, if you just disable the opening of "safe" files automatically, that will protect you for now. I just think it's only a matter of time before somebody exploits Help to do something really dangerous. |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
It would not be as horrible as you think... Most people do not run Safari as root. Running that command would only delete things that you had write permission in. Now, doing: rm -rf ~/ would surely piss a few people off.
__________________
Apple, release a new MacBook Pro! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Spain
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by elmimmo : May 17, 2004 at 06:33 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors 68000
|
ummm
Isn't this just running a program that will kill everything in the user folder. Still takes the user to click on it, it only affects the user and not the whole system, doesn't replicate to other computers.
But I like to know about these things, even though its manual download and start of the program. So its a like guessing if someones freeware open source stuff is not going to bight you.
__________________
Powerbook 1.67Ghz G4 - 1 Gig RAM Mac Mini 1.83Ghz Core 2 Duo - 2 Gigs RAM 60 Gig iPod - 4th generation http://ducktapeandglue.com |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors 6502
|
I would like to point out that this will happen with *ANY* browser or download manager on OS X and not just Safari.
It's rather clever actually
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
gullible, non-thinking sheepeople spread viruses
Quote:
most viruses, etc, spread through the principles of social engineering. gullible, non-thinking sheepeople spread viruses. anyone with a brain will never be caught by anything like this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Old Palace Yard
|
Quote:
Apple's response to these challenges, especially if quick and accurate will do more for my confidence than the supposed lack of flaws. Every OS has flaws, but it is the vendor's reponse to the flaws that is important. Think of it this way, an OS is a cruiseship continually fired upon by an enemy of pirates and miscreants. Sometimes the OS will take a hit, but it is the response to that hit: defend the damaged section, seal the hull, put out the fire or ignore it, dog the hatches and hope it will go away, that decides the ultimate vulverability of the OS. So far Microsoft has been telling passengers that the ship is fine, to ignore the smoke and the guy with the parrot who keeps drinking all the martinis.
__________________
It means that I, like God, do not play with dice and I don't believe in coincidences. Last edited by hulugu : May 17, 2004 at 06:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jul 2002
|
Quote:
Oh please... there are lots of companies that make their money by finding only vulnerabilities in Linux or Windows.... All of these flaws need to be addressed, no matter how seemingly trivial. Take a look outside the mac realm, and you'll see security is a _huge_ issue. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|