Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 17, 2009, 12:59 PM   #1
MichaelBarry
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Leeds
How does stacks work in Aperture 2?

I'm getting Aperture 2 soon but I'm slightly confused about how stacks work.

When I import a RAW image into the Aperture library, that is the master - am I correct?

but when I duplicate it, does it make another stack or is the duplicated RAW image stacked under the master. Or do they both become masters (like two completely different images?)

Also when I adjust a RAW image (brightness, highlights, etc.) and save the file, is it saved as a version under the master of the stack? this is all very confusing!!

basically what is saved as a version and what is saved as a completely different master?
__________________
Flickr
MichaelBarry is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2009, 01:38 PM   #2
cosmokanga2
macrumors 6502a
 
cosmokanga2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada, where we live in igloos.
Quote:
When I import a RAW image into the Aperture library, that is the master - am I correct?
?
Correct. The imported image files become the master images.

Quote:
but when I duplicate it, does it make another stack or is the duplicated RAW image stacked under the master. Or do they both become masters (like two completely different images?)
Stacks first: Stacks are a way of simplifying the viewing experience in Aperture. Stacks are similar to the "stacks" in the dock. When you click on it, it expands to show many more files contain in that "stack". I use stacks to hold the many master images and versions of a particular photographed subject. For example, if I have 30 shots of the same tulip, I make all of those images a "stack" so that when I'm viewing my images in the browser, I can choose to see the 30 images, or only the best one. Hope this isn't too confusing.

Adjustments in Aperture are just a set of instructions that are applied to the master image. When new adjustments are made, the master or a version is duplicated, Aperture makes a new set of instructions for that version.

The Aperture Manual has more information on this. http://www.apple.com/support/aperture/
__________________
Mid-2013 13" MacBook Air, iPhone 5, Nikon D800
Website
cosmokanga2 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 20, 2009, 09:10 AM   #3
pprior
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Any new version you make from a RAW file within aperture is a version, not a new master. That is because the picture you see is really just a "recipe" of adjustments applied to the original RAW file and a new photograph is not actually created on your hard disk. thus the file space taken up is minimal.

AFAIK there is no way to actually duplicate the master file, and there is no reason to do so because it would just duplicate file space. That's the beauty of RAW and nondestructive editing.

If OTOH you create a tiff or jpg in photoshop and edit and re-save it, now you have a new master because that image cannot be recreated by aperture. So in that case you have a whole new file, and it's a master. These files unfortunately can get quite large - with saved layers I routinely have images that are 300-500mb a piece

You can stack masters, versions, or any combination you wish.
__________________
2013 nMP 6core 16GB RAM, Promise Pegaus2 R6 12TB RAID; uMBP 17/Matte
pprior is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Aperture: Phil Shiller leaks Aperture 4 on stage! ipedro Digital Photography 41 Jul 23, 2014 02:41 PM
Need advice on Aperture, versions and stacks kirsch92 Digital Photography 3 Dec 20, 2013 01:38 PM
What is going on: why do so many reviews of Aperture say "it does not work"? xxmarkc Digital Photography 54 Nov 19, 2013 06:18 AM
Downgrade Aperture 3 Library to work with Aperture 2.0? macnerd93 PowerPC Macs 2 Feb 4, 2013 02:44 PM
Aperture library to iPhoto, No longer own Aperture. utahusker Mac Applications and Mac App Store 2 Oct 2, 2012 06:22 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC