Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 28, 2004, 09:35 PM   #1
Nermal
Moderator
 
Nermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Whakatane, New Zealand
Mini FireWire?

A friend of mine showed me his Windows PC the other day. It had a port on the front with the FireWire logo, but it was a lot smaller than the one on my Mac. Is this a mini-FireWire or something?
Nermal is offline   0
Old May 28, 2004, 09:37 PM   #2
wide
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nermal
A friend of mine showed me his Windows PC the other day. It had a port on the front with the FireWire logo, but it was a lot smaller than the one on my Mac. Is this a mini-FireWire or something?
No, it's just a different form of a firewire port. Same transfer speed, but a less efficient design--hardly anyone uses the smaller version.
__________________
1.33 GHz iBook 12.1"
-iskin protouch pb (artic)
-microsoft intellimouse explorer bluetooth
a dell laptop and a few ipods
wide is offline   0
Old May 28, 2004, 10:23 PM   #3
kewpid
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
It is a 4-pin firewire port which works in the same way as the 6-pin firewire ports found on Macs, except that it doesn't provide power to the external device.
kewpid is offline   0
Old May 29, 2004, 06:43 AM   #4
brap
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nottingham
Quote:
Originally Posted by wide
No, it's just a different form of a firewire port. Same transfer speed, but a less efficient design--hardly anyone uses the smaller version.
Actually, I find that 90% of PC cases, and PC laptops ship with 4-pin FW. It's damn annoying, I can't upgrade my shuttle without losing the 6-pin connection, and both my partner's, and parent's laptops ship solely with the 4-pin derivative.

It just ain't cricket, seriously.
__________________
( just visiting )
brap is offline   0
Old May 29, 2004, 07:02 AM   #5
CTerry
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Indeed

Yes my PC has mini-Firewire. Id really like to use my iPod on Firewire, but I have to use USB 2.0 because it wont charge from mini-Firewire.
CTerry is offline   0
Old May 29, 2004, 09:19 AM   #6
grapes911
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
 
grapes911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Citizens Bank Park
Its not really "mini-firewire." As kewpid said, it is a 4-pin 1394 rather than the 6-pin 1394 you are used to. Most of the time 6-pin is called firewire and 4-pin is called iLink. iLink is used by sony a lot (check the ps2 and sony labtops). It transfers with the same speed but it doesn't have the same voltage/current (I don't know which on) output. There are adapters that can go from on to the other.
grapes911 is offline   0
Old Jun 2, 2004, 01:51 AM   #7
Nermal
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Nermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Whakatane, New Zealand
Ah, OK, it's a dumb version of FireWire then
Nermal is offline   0
Old Jun 2, 2004, 01:56 AM   #8
LethalWolfe
macrumors Demi-God
 
LethalWolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nermal
Ah, OK, it's a dumb version of FireWire then
It's not dumb because not all devices can be powered by FW. So why make everything use the much larger 6-pin plug if two of the 6 pins are not needed?

Example, FW cannot power a MiniDV camera so why waste precious space (both internally and externally) w/the big 6-pin plug when the much smaller 4-pin plug will perform the same task?

Lethal
LethalWolfe is offline   0
Old Jun 2, 2004, 02:37 AM   #9
JFreak
macrumors 68040
 
JFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
i would be happy to have even that 4pin firewire in this work pc i have - even though that is not as user friendly as the 6-pin version, it's still fw400. generally pc manufacturers don't have any idea about how useful the firewire actually is, and they cut costs by not including it. and if they decide to be "pro", they usually put in the 4pin version.

maybe it's all changing when pc manufacturers begin to adopt the fw800. hopefully they will. they should think about "options" that seems to be the key word of the pc industry: using 4pin connector instead of 6pin forces user to use external power supplies for firewire devices. the 6pin connector leaves the option open to provide the poewr via the firewire cable.

(i know that dv cams have the 4pin connectors, but that doesn't mean that computers should have it also. it'd be better to have a 6pin connector in the computer side and use a 6pin-4pin cable to connect the cam.)
JFreak is offline   0
Old Jun 2, 2004, 07:40 PM   #10
grapes911
Demi-God (Moderator emeritus)
 
grapes911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Citizens Bank Park
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFreak
it'd be better to have a 6pin connector in the computer side and use a 6pin-4pin cable to connect the cam.
I don't know if it would be "better," just different. Its a preference.
grapes911 is offline   0
Old Jun 2, 2004, 08:49 PM   #11
janey
macrumors 603
 
janey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: sunny los angeles
the 4-pin version of fw400 isnt called iLink...iLink is Sony's name for Firewire in general, but FireWire caught on more than iLink did, which is why everyone says FireWire instead.
4-pin/6-pin firewire ports are pain in the asses...i wish theyd make like firewire ports to be all 6-pin so I won't have to deal with adapters and ****e like that. Many a time have I discovered that my friends cant connect their iPods to my 'Book because neither of us had adapters. But I'm glad Apple at least tries to be somewhat nice, and include 4 to 6 pin firewire adapters for their iPods.
__________________
iPad | 15" MacBook Pro | black (iPhone 3GS|MacBook) | Mac mini server
moof!

janey is offline   0
Old Jun 2, 2004, 09:11 PM   #12
wide
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by brap
Actually, I find that 90% of PC cases, and PC laptops ship with 4-pin FW. It's damn annoying, I can't upgrade my shuttle without losing the 6-pin connection, and both my partner's, and parent's laptops ship solely with the 4-pin derivative.

It just ain't cricket, seriously.
I know! I've noticed the same thing with PCs. I used to think it was a different kind of port, but I think PC companies use that port most of the time because it's smaller and they are too evil to use the kind of firewire the iPod uses.
__________________
1.33 GHz iBook 12.1"
-iskin protouch pb (artic)
-microsoft intellimouse explorer bluetooth
a dell laptop and a few ipods
wide is offline   0
Old Jun 2, 2004, 09:44 PM   #13
stoid
macrumors 68040
 
stoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: So long, and thanks for all the fish!
So the difference between 6-pin and 4-pin ports is the ability to supply power. What's the difference between the 6-pin and 9-pin ports (9-pin being the FW800 standard)? I know that you can get a 9-pin to 6-pin cable so the standards are at least compatible...
stoid is offline   0
Old Jun 2, 2004, 10:06 PM   #14
Blackheart
macrumors 6502a
 
Blackheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Send a message via AIM to Blackheart
Quote:
Originally Posted by LethalWolfe
It's not dumb because not all devices can be powered by FW. So why make everything use the much larger 6-pin plug if two of the 6 pins are not needed?

Example, FW cannot power a MiniDV camera so why waste precious space (both internally and externally) w/the big 6-pin plug when the much smaller 4-pin plug will perform the same task?

Lethal
Having a 6-pin allows you to use things that are BOTH powered and unpowered. It's more convenient than having only a 4-pin and not having any choice in the topic. I don't quite understand why PC laptop makers choose to have the 4-pin (maybe something with licensing Apple's 1394 ? I have no idea), it isn't that much smaller, and has less ability. As to it being smaller...why is it that Apple laptops are able to fit the large one easily, yet the PC laptops (which are generally larger) can't seem to "fit" it in?
__________________
"Not everyone can be the first with a new idea, but there is no excuse for not copying a good idea quickly" - Stephen Friedman

Great Stickies:
GUIDE: Zap PRAM, Repair Permissions, & run FSCK
GUIDE: Networking Windows with OS X
Guidelines for Getting Help
Blackheart is offline   0
Old Jun 3, 2004, 12:44 AM   #15
janey
macrumors 603
 
janey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: sunny los angeles
apple doesnt have ANYTHING to do with the IEEE 1394 standard, except maybe the name "FireWire".

And yes ive wondered the 4pin/6pin laptop thing too, guess its just more convenient for PC manufacturers to do what everyone else is doing
__________________
iPad | 15" MacBook Pro | black (iPhone 3GS|MacBook) | Mac mini server
moof!

janey is offline   0
Old Jun 3, 2004, 01:56 AM   #16
ibookin'
macrumors 65816
 
ibookin''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by übergeek
apple doesnt have ANYTHING to do with the IEEE 1394 standard, except maybe the name "FireWire".
Since when? Apple engineers developed the standard in the mid-80s and submitted it to the IEEE in 1995. Its original name was actually FireWire.
__________________
13" MacBook Air 1.7GHz i5
17" MacBook Pro 2.6GHz Hi-Res
iPhone 5 32GB Black
ibookin' is offline   0
Old Jun 3, 2004, 02:06 AM   #17
Blackheart
macrumors 6502a
 
Blackheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Send a message via AIM to Blackheart
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibookin'
Since when? Apple engineers developed the standard in the mid-80s and submitted it to the IEEE in 1995. Its original name was actually FireWire.
You got to it before I did. lol. Well anywho, here's an article about their licensing on it too.

http://news.com.com/2100-1040-220209.html?legacy=cnet
__________________
"Not everyone can be the first with a new idea, but there is no excuse for not copying a good idea quickly" - Stephen Friedman

Great Stickies:
GUIDE: Zap PRAM, Repair Permissions, & run FSCK
GUIDE: Networking Windows with OS X
Guidelines for Getting Help
Blackheart is offline   0
Old Jun 3, 2004, 03:18 AM   #18
LethalWolfe
macrumors Demi-God
 
LethalWolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackheart
Having a 6-pin allows you to use things that are BOTH powered and unpowered. It's more convenient than having only a 4-pin and not having any choice in the topic. I don't quite understand why PC laptop makers choose to have the 4-pin (maybe something with licensing Apple's 1394 ? I have no idea), it isn't that much smaller, and has less ability. As to it being smaller...why is it that Apple laptops are able to fit the large one easily, yet the PC laptops (which are generally larger) can't seem to "fit" it in?

Having 4-pin on the computer is crappy, IMO. But there are plenty of reasons to have 4-pin on devices that cannot be powered by FW.


Lethal
LethalWolfe is offline   0
Old Jun 3, 2004, 10:57 AM   #19
Blackheart
macrumors 6502a
 
Blackheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Send a message via AIM to Blackheart
Quote:
Originally Posted by LethalWolfe
Having 4-pin on the computer is crappy, IMO. But there are plenty of reasons to have 4-pin on devices that cannot be powered by FW.


Lethal
Right, I can understand why they would have 4-pin on the device (because of the size constraints) but why not make the connection to the computer, universally 6-pin. It would make the laptops, sporting the 6-pin, more versatile by being able to use the 4-pin and take advantage of the power-fed 6-pin.
__________________
"Not everyone can be the first with a new idea, but there is no excuse for not copying a good idea quickly" - Stephen Friedman

Great Stickies:
GUIDE: Zap PRAM, Repair Permissions, & run FSCK
GUIDE: Networking Windows with OS X
Guidelines for Getting Help
Blackheart is offline   0
Old Jun 3, 2004, 11:47 AM   #20
Grimace
macrumors 68040
 
Grimace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: with Hamburglar.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackheart
Right, I can understand why they would have 4-pin on the device (because of the size constraints) but why not make the connection to the computer, universally 6-pin. It would make the laptops, sporting the 6-pin, more versatile by being able to use the 4-pin and take advantage of the power-fed 6-pin.
Probably because PC companies are still way behind the game. PC desktops sometimes have the "normal" 6-pin firewire, but laptops still lag behind.
Grimace is offline   0
Old Jun 3, 2004, 11:51 AM   #21
janey
macrumors 603
 
janey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: sunny los angeles
aw crap.
/me sighs
does apple still charge the $1 per port thing?
__________________
iPad | 15" MacBook Pro | black (iPhone 3GS|MacBook) | Mac mini server
moof!

janey is offline   0
Old Jun 4, 2004, 01:02 AM   #22
Blackheart
macrumors 6502a
 
Blackheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Send a message via AIM to Blackheart
Quote:
Originally Posted by übergeek
aw crap.
/me sighs
does apple still charge the $1 per port thing?
I'm not sure, but I wouldn't think that it would be what's holding companies back if Apple IS still charging. I mean, the PC company's $800 laptop now costs $801...ooooo, big money. That's gotta be hurtin' the profit margin i'm sure...
__________________
"Not everyone can be the first with a new idea, but there is no excuse for not copying a good idea quickly" - Stephen Friedman

Great Stickies:
GUIDE: Zap PRAM, Repair Permissions, & run FSCK
GUIDE: Networking Windows with OS X
Guidelines for Getting Help
Blackheart is offline   0
Old Jun 4, 2004, 03:24 AM   #23
F/reW/re
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by übergeek
aw crap.
/me sighs
does apple still charge the $1 per port thing?
Apple did charge companies to use the name FireWire. Thats why everyone came up with their own name (sony=iLink, Dell=FireWave), but Apple managed to get it into their thick brain that charging companies to use the name is a bad idea!

Charging per port, never heard of it..

FYI, you do get firewire cables that has 4 pins in one end and 6 in the other.
F/reW/re is offline   0
Old Jun 4, 2004, 04:58 PM   #24
blue&whiteman
Banned
 
blue&whiteman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
just wanted to post this in a thread about fw as its not worth starting a thread over. I just came across an owc pci 2 port fw 400 card for only 10$!!!

owc only puts their name on good stuff.

http://eshop.macsales.com/Catalog_It...m=OWCFWLUCPCI2
blue&whiteman is offline   0
Old Jun 4, 2004, 05:27 PM   #25
mactastic
macrumors 68040
 
mactastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Colly-fornia
Yeah I have a full size (not sure if it actually provides power) firewire port on the back of my PC tower at work, but the front of it has the smaller firewire port. I guess the thinking is that the front port will mostly be used for DV video transfer, but seriously just put the full size ports on both ends. It's not like there's a lack of space in this giant tower or anything.
__________________
I salute you Sean [Hannity]. I salute you for bravely standing by a man whose only crime, was breaking federal law.
- Stephen Colbert
mactastic is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How can I transfer video from Mini DV camcorder to mac using firewire without imovie? hagop Mac Applications and Mac App Store 7 Jun 3, 2013 07:08 PM
iPad Mini: Logitech Ultrathin Mini Bluetooth Keyboard + iPad Mini seems pretty amazing!!! waa1futs iPad Accessories 30 Feb 16, 2013 11:34 PM
Mac mini Firewire went bad? Microstudio Mac mini 9 Jan 11, 2013 11:15 PM
Mac Mini 2011 firewire 800 to 400 m1kygarcia Mac mini 13 Aug 19, 2012 07:01 AM
Cloning MBA to a new Mac Mini? How without firewire? Bonnie MacBook Air 7 Jul 23, 2012 12:22 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC