Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Jul 6, 2009, 06:05 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Cameras Ordered for iPod Touch? Another Case Design



TechCrunch now claims that they too have heard evidence that the next generation iPod Touch will have a built in video camera.
Quote:
One of our sources in Asia say that Apple has placed an order for a massive number of camera modules of the type that they include in the iPhone. These are inexpensive cameras, in the $10 range. And the size of the order, our source says, means they can only be used for one thing - the iPods.
The rumor that the iPod Touch would get a camera first appeared in May from HardMac. The rumor, however, now makes more sense since the introduction of the iPhone 3GS which features video as a major new feature. When Apple does update the new iPod Touch, it seems likely that they will also upgrade the device to the more powerful processor and graphics chips that were introduced in the iPhone 3GS.

Meanwhile, TheAppleLounge points to another 3rd generation iPod Touch case design at DealExtreme which again shows off a centrally mounted camera hole:




The next generation iPod Touch is expected to be released in September.

Article Link: Cameras Ordered for iPod Touch? Another Case Design
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 06:14 AM   #2
buckyballs
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
I'm going to don my skeptic hat.

I don't think Apple would have sent the designs to the case manufacturers early enough for cases to be finished already ( > 2 months before expected announcement)
buckyballs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 06:19 AM   #3
retroneo
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
What are the two other small holes?
retroneo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 06:19 AM   #4
talkingfuture
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The back of beyond.
I'd like to see the new iPod nano and Touch have GPS. Not for navigating or mapping applications, but as a replacement for Nike+. I could go biking, hiking or running and download what I've done at the end of the day. That would be cool. Nike+ is great if you're running in Nike shoes but not so great if you do other sports or wear other trainers.
talkingfuture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 06:28 AM   #5
Chundles
macrumors Demi-God
 
Chundles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Gong, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by retroneo View Post
What are the two other small holes?
Lanyard loops.

A lot of silicon cases have them though I don't know why, nobody uses lanyard anymore.
__________________
This is going straight to the Pool Room
Chundles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 06:29 AM   #6
designgeek
macrumors 6502a
 
designgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: "Town"
I'm really doubting these. Something just isn't right.
__________________
So many stupid questions, so little time.
15.uMBP

Last edited by designgeek : Jul 6, 2009 at 06:30 AM. Reason: stupidity.
designgeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 06:33 AM   #7
Chundles
macrumors Demi-God
 
Chundles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Gong, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by designgeek View Post
I'm really doubting these. Something just isn't right.
They do look off-centre but it's because the earphone jack is on the bottom next to the connector. It's wider on one side so that it doesn't cover the headphone jack.
__________________
This is going straight to the Pool Room
Chundles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 06:37 AM   #8
Warbrain
macrumors 68040
 
Warbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
We've seen external re-designs before because of new cases being sold...

and it wouldn't surprise me if the iPod touch got a camera.
__________________
WARBRAIN
Twitter | Blog
MacBook, 2.1 GHz C2D, 4 GB RAM, 500 GB HDD
iPhone 3G 8 GB
Warbrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 06:51 AM   #9
zedsdead
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
These case are consistant with the rumors. I have no doubts that the iPod Touch will get the same camera and features that is in the iPhone 3GS. I also feel the iPod Nano is getting a camera, however it may only be for stills.
__________________
iMac 27: 2.8 Core i7 Quad, 2TB, 8 gigs of RAM, ATI 4850
Macbook Pro: 2.4 Core2Duo, 128 SSD, 4 gigs of RAM, NVIDIA 9400/9600
iPhone 3G S⃣ ; Apple TV; Final Cut Studio 2.5, Logic, Drobo, EyeTV
zedsdead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 07:19 AM   #10
DELLsFan
macrumors 6502a
 
DELLsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New England, USA
Meh ... unless Kevin Rose leaks it, it isn't happening.
__________________
Dell Vostro A90 Aluminum iMac 7,1 iPhone 3G AEBS TV
DELLsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 07:25 AM   #11
McShizzel
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canada
I'm going to wait till they have multi-core processors.
__________________
If you can't find it, it ain't there: mroogle
McShizzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 07:47 AM   #12
twoodcc
macrumors 603
 
twoodcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Right side of wrong
Send a message via AIM to twoodcc Send a message via MSN to twoodcc
i hope that the touch does get a video camera, and updated hardware. makes sense to me
__________________
tville pump
Smarter than the average bear
twoodcc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 07:52 AM   #13
Padraig
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Great; not alone can't i bring my phone into my gym, I won't be able to bring in any future iPods* also.


*Refusing to buy the new style shuffle.
Padraig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:00 AM   #14
A.Fairhead
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England
I say fake.

In addition, I can't help but feel it's a bad design idea to hang such an expensive piece of hardware around your neck without anything preventing the device from falling out of the front. I have a similar case for my first generation iPhone, and while it holds the phone, the edges do get quite weak if you continually remove / apply it.

Unless that's just what these cases look like in photographs, nothing really seems to be lined up right (all of the holes seem slanted …) and the inconsistent colour of the inside-back of the device doesn't do much in the way of convincing me of it being authentic

Then again, this could all simply be due to the flexible nature of the case and it's all perfectly legitimate.
__________________
Fairhead Creative. Solutions that Grow.
Graphic, Web and Written Solutions.
A.Fairhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:11 AM   #15
dasikes
macrumors 6502a
 
dasikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Alabama
Send a message via AIM to dasikes
I'm not going to state my thoughts on whether or not they'll get a camera, but I will say that IF they do, it won't be like this case. It'll be just like the iPhone's camera location. I doubt anyone would dispute that...
__________________
20" Aluminum iMac, 2.4GHz - 2GB - OSX 10.5.X
iPhone 3G - White 16GB
FCS2 AECS3
dasikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:13 AM   #16
Pugpuppydude
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Utah
Awesome! Thank you for the Chinese and their inability to understand apples reps telling them they can't leak!!
Pugpuppydude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:32 AM   #17
peterdevries
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by retroneo View Post
What are the two other small holes?
The holes are also inside a shallow indentation. It could be that a metal or hard plastic manufacturer logo will be clipped in here and fixated through the holes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dasikes View Post
I'm not going to state my thoughts on whether or not they'll get a camera, but I will say that IF they do, it won't be like this case. It'll be just like the iPhone's camera location. I doubt anyone would dispute that...
I'm disputing that. There are several other differences in design between the Touch and the iPhone (most notably the back material). In addition, the Touch is extremely tapered and thin. It's quite possble that there is not enough room to put the camera in the same position as it is in the iPhone.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
peterdevries is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:32 AM   #18
Shookster
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Quote:
And the size of the order, our source says, means they can only be used for one thing - the iPods.
Why?
Shookster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:35 AM   #19
dambrosir
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Camera placement

The camera on the iphone is in the corner. It appears on the iPod touch to be in the center. Why?
I tend not to believe these images they tend to be fake or mock ups.
I will just wait until apple makes an announcement.
dambrosir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:46 AM   #20
gGGg
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasikes View Post
I'm not going to state my thoughts on whether or not they'll get a camera, but I will say that IF they do, it won't be like this case. It'll be just like the iPhone's camera location. I doubt anyone would dispute that...
Quote:
Originally Posted by dambrosir View Post
The camera on the iphone is in the corner. It appears on the iPod touch to be in the center. Why?
Probably beacuse in the corner of the iPod touch there is the Wi-Fi antenna
gGGg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 08:48 AM   #21
Warbrain
macrumors 68040
 
Warbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.Fairhead View Post
I say fake.

In addition, I can't help but feel it's a bad design idea to hang such an expensive piece of hardware around your neck without anything preventing the device from falling out of the front. I have a similar case for my first generation iPhone, and while it holds the phone, the edges do get quite weak if you continually remove / apply it.

Unless that's just what these cases look like in photographs, nothing really seems to be lined up right (all of the holes seem slanted …) and the inconsistent colour of the inside-back of the device doesn't do much in the way of convincing me of it being authentic

Then again, this could all simply be due to the flexible nature of the case and it's all perfectly legitimate.
It's some POS Chinese silicone case - nothing ever lines up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dambrosir View Post
The camera on the iphone is in the corner. It appears on the iPod touch to be in the center. Why?
I tend not to believe these images they tend to be fake or mock ups.
I will just wait until apple makes an announcement.
Have you considered how thin the iPod touch is? It's amazingly thin. And, if I recall, the wireless antenna is on the upper right side, thus blocking the spot where the camera would be unless they move the antenna. They easily could but a center-placed camera would be best.
__________________
WARBRAIN
Twitter | Blog
MacBook, 2.1 GHz C2D, 4 GB RAM, 500 GB HDD
iPhone 3G 8 GB
Warbrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 09:07 AM   #22
Wilkinsons
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
If the new version get a GPS, how would i work without the assistance of a telephone network, i.e. A-GPS version?
Wilkinsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 09:27 AM   #23
Warbrain
macrumors 68040
 
Warbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilkinsons View Post
If the new version get a GPS, how would i work without the assistance of a telephone network, i.e. A-GPS version?
They would have to purchase the rights to maintain offline maps from Google.
__________________
WARBRAIN
Twitter | Blog
MacBook, 2.1 GHz C2D, 4 GB RAM, 500 GB HDD
iPhone 3G 8 GB
Warbrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 09:39 AM   #24
Wilkinsons
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warbrain View Post
They would have to purchase the rights to maintain offline maps from Google.

True, but I was actually thinking about the fact that A-GPS isn't the same as a "normal" Tom-Tom GPS since they need (according to wiki):

"An A-GPS receiver can address these problems in several ways, using network elements such as either an assistance server or other data from a network. That assistance generally falls into two categories: a) information used to more quickly acquire satellites, or b) calculations done remotely:"

So, if the incorporate a GPS, will it be a A-GPS or something more fancy? OR will they need, at least some contact with a working wlan network to work fluently... which of course will not happen in a moving car for example.
Wilkinsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2009, 09:58 AM   #25
Small White Car
macrumors 68040
 
Small White Car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington DC
I've always said that the iPod Touch really should be an "iPhone without a phone."

Yes, a lot of people call it that, but I mean it literally. GPS, camera...everything.

Apple hasn't agreed with me so far, so I'm not saying this case is real. But it would be nice.
Small White Car is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:52 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC